Variation in abundance of nectarivorous birds: does a competitive despot interfere with flower tracking?

Adaptive resource tracking in space and time may be disrupted by the modification of resources and competitors. Major global change drivers (e.g. land‐use change) have induced declines in many native species, while facilitating only a few. Given that many resources are predicted to become increasing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of animal ecology 2014-11, Vol.83 (6), p.1531-1541
Hauptverfasser: Bennett, Joanne M, Clarke, Rohan H, Thomson, James R, Mac Nally, Ralph, Tylianakis, Jason
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1541
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1531
container_title The Journal of animal ecology
container_volume 83
creator Bennett, Joanne M
Clarke, Rohan H
Thomson, James R
Mac Nally, Ralph
Tylianakis, Jason
description Adaptive resource tracking in space and time may be disrupted by the modification of resources and competitors. Major global change drivers (e.g. land‐use change) have induced declines in many native species, while facilitating only a few. Given that many resources are predicted to become increasingly scarce under the joint effects of climate and land‐use change, disturbance‐tolerant species that are able to defend high‐value resources may further limit the persistence of disturbance‐sensitive species. We sought to determine which nectarivorous birds track variation in flowering and if relationships between nectarivores and flowering are affected by on‐transect vegetation structure or the occurrence of a native, hyper‐aggressive species, the noisy miner Manorina melanocephala, which has become more prevalent. We measured eucalypt flowering and abundances of nectarivorous birds over the course of a year; we measured vegetation structure on the same forest transects. Nectarivores tracked spatial and some temporal variation in flowering, but this relationship was disrupted by noisy miners. Where present in sufficient numbers, the noisy miner excluded small‐bodied nectarivores (
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2656.12245
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1686995150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24034817</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24034817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5925-60657ef2a5a31e0e444d39860ed97d43549fbb52005a6440e6f857d1924267893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEokvhzAmwhCpxSTt2bMfmgqqqfKmCA5Sr5U0mrZdsvLWdrvrv65BtQVzAF0ueZ-admddF8ZzCIc3niFZSlEwKeUgZ4-JBsbh_eVgsABgtVa1hr3gS4woAagbV42KPcUWhrtiiuPxhg7PJ-YG4gdjlOLR2aJD4jgzYpBy89sGPkSxdaONb0nqMxJLGrzeYXHLXSFqMG59yesLQYUCydemSdL3fYiAp2OanGy7ePS0edbaP-Gx37xfn70-_n3wsz75--HRyfFY2QjNRSpCixo5ZYSuKgJzzttJKAra6bnkluO6WS8EAhJWcA8pOibqlmnEma6Wr_eLNXHcT_NWIMZm1iw32vR0wz2GoVFJrQQX8B1plKovXGX39F7ryYxjyIJmiQvNawlTwaKaa4GMM2JlNcGsbbgwFM_llJnfM5I755VfOeLmrOy7X2N7zdwZl4GAH2NjYvgvZHRd_c0pJKUBlTs7c1vV48y9d8_n4y-ldBy_mxFVMPvzRAFS5h2nyV3O8s97Yi5DFz78xyPvLv0lpxapbOsS9LA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1615947600</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in abundance of nectarivorous birds: does a competitive despot interfere with flower tracking?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Bennett, Joanne M ; Clarke, Rohan H ; Thomson, James R ; Mac Nally, Ralph ; Tylianakis, Jason</creator><contributor>Tylianakis, Jason</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Joanne M ; Clarke, Rohan H ; Thomson, James R ; Mac Nally, Ralph ; Tylianakis, Jason ; Tylianakis, Jason</creatorcontrib><description>Adaptive resource tracking in space and time may be disrupted by the modification of resources and competitors. Major global change drivers (e.g. land‐use change) have induced declines in many native species, while facilitating only a few. Given that many resources are predicted to become increasingly scarce under the joint effects of climate and land‐use change, disturbance‐tolerant species that are able to defend high‐value resources may further limit the persistence of disturbance‐sensitive species. We sought to determine which nectarivorous birds track variation in flowering and if relationships between nectarivores and flowering are affected by on‐transect vegetation structure or the occurrence of a native, hyper‐aggressive species, the noisy miner Manorina melanocephala, which has become more prevalent. We measured eucalypt flowering and abundances of nectarivorous birds over the course of a year; we measured vegetation structure on the same forest transects. Nectarivores tracked spatial and some temporal variation in flowering, but this relationship was disrupted by noisy miners. Where present in sufficient numbers, the noisy miner excluded small‐bodied nectarivores (&lt;63 g) from fragments, limiting the ability of this numerically dominant component of the avifauna to gain access to flowering resources. Altered patterns of interspecific competition due to vegetation fragmentation and climate‐induced degradation may have led to changes in the distribution of small nectarivore species that is a departure from the ‘ideal free distribution’ model. Interactions between noisy miners and small‐bodied nectarivores appear to be best described by the ‘ideal despotic distribution’ model in which noisy miners exclude smaller competitors and monopolize local resources. Increases in the severity and frequency of extreme climatic events (e.g. long droughts) predicted under climate change may create a boom‐bust pattern of availabilities of resources. The apparent insensitivity of noisy miners to such variation in flowering resource availability and the miners' influence on the ability of small nectarivores to access resources may lead to disproportionate declines in smaller‐bodied nectarivorous species. Reduced tracking of flowering by nectarivores has the potential to disrupt ecosystem services (e.g. pollination, seed dispersal) and may have long‐term consequences for the persistence of fragmented vegetation, adding further pressure on forest‐dependent biota.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12245</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24810732</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAECAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publ</publisher><subject>Aggression ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal behavior ; Animal ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Birds ; Body Size ; climate ; Climate Change ; drought ; Ecology ; ecosystem services ; Eucalyptus ; Feeding Behavior ; flowering ; flowers ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Flowers - physiology ; Forest ecology ; forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Habitat selection ; indigenous species ; interspecific competition ; interspecific interactions ; Landscape ecology ; Manorina melanocephala ; Mining ; Nectar ; noisy miner ; Parrots - physiology ; Plant Nectar ; pollination ; Population Density ; resource tracking ; seasonal movements ; seed dispersal ; Songbirds - physiology ; Spatial ecology ; temporal variation ; Vegetation ; vegetation structure ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; Victoria</subject><ispartof>The Journal of animal ecology, 2014-11, Vol.83 (6), p.1531-1541</ispartof><rights>2014 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2014 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2014 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2014 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2014 British Ecological Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5925-60657ef2a5a31e0e444d39860ed97d43549fbb52005a6440e6f857d1924267893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5925-60657ef2a5a31e0e444d39860ed97d43549fbb52005a6440e6f857d1924267893</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7883-3577</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24034817$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24034817$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28866508$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24810732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Tylianakis, Jason</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Joanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Rohan H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mac Nally, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tylianakis, Jason</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in abundance of nectarivorous birds: does a competitive despot interfere with flower tracking?</title><title>The Journal of animal ecology</title><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><description>Adaptive resource tracking in space and time may be disrupted by the modification of resources and competitors. Major global change drivers (e.g. land‐use change) have induced declines in many native species, while facilitating only a few. Given that many resources are predicted to become increasingly scarce under the joint effects of climate and land‐use change, disturbance‐tolerant species that are able to defend high‐value resources may further limit the persistence of disturbance‐sensitive species. We sought to determine which nectarivorous birds track variation in flowering and if relationships between nectarivores and flowering are affected by on‐transect vegetation structure or the occurrence of a native, hyper‐aggressive species, the noisy miner Manorina melanocephala, which has become more prevalent. We measured eucalypt flowering and abundances of nectarivorous birds over the course of a year; we measured vegetation structure on the same forest transects. Nectarivores tracked spatial and some temporal variation in flowering, but this relationship was disrupted by noisy miners. Where present in sufficient numbers, the noisy miner excluded small‐bodied nectarivores (&lt;63 g) from fragments, limiting the ability of this numerically dominant component of the avifauna to gain access to flowering resources. Altered patterns of interspecific competition due to vegetation fragmentation and climate‐induced degradation may have led to changes in the distribution of small nectarivore species that is a departure from the ‘ideal free distribution’ model. Interactions between noisy miners and small‐bodied nectarivores appear to be best described by the ‘ideal despotic distribution’ model in which noisy miners exclude smaller competitors and monopolize local resources. Increases in the severity and frequency of extreme climatic events (e.g. long droughts) predicted under climate change may create a boom‐bust pattern of availabilities of resources. The apparent insensitivity of noisy miners to such variation in flowering resource availability and the miners' influence on the ability of small nectarivores to access resources may lead to disproportionate declines in smaller‐bodied nectarivorous species. Reduced tracking of flowering by nectarivores has the potential to disrupt ecosystem services (e.g. pollination, seed dispersal) and may have long‐term consequences for the persistence of fragmented vegetation, adding further pressure on forest‐dependent biota.</description><subject>Aggression</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>climate</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>drought</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>ecosystem services</subject><subject>Eucalyptus</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>flowering</subject><subject>flowers</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Flowers - physiology</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>indigenous species</subject><subject>interspecific competition</subject><subject>interspecific interactions</subject><subject>Landscape ecology</subject><subject>Manorina melanocephala</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>Nectar</subject><subject>noisy miner</subject><subject>Parrots - physiology</subject><subject>Plant Nectar</subject><subject>pollination</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>resource tracking</subject><subject>seasonal movements</subject><subject>seed dispersal</subject><subject>Songbirds - physiology</subject><subject>Spatial ecology</subject><subject>temporal variation</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>vegetation structure</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>Victoria</subject><issn>0021-8790</issn><issn>1365-2656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEokvhzAmwhCpxSTt2bMfmgqqqfKmCA5Sr5U0mrZdsvLWdrvrv65BtQVzAF0ueZ-admddF8ZzCIc3niFZSlEwKeUgZ4-JBsbh_eVgsABgtVa1hr3gS4woAagbV42KPcUWhrtiiuPxhg7PJ-YG4gdjlOLR2aJD4jgzYpBy89sGPkSxdaONb0nqMxJLGrzeYXHLXSFqMG59yesLQYUCydemSdL3fYiAp2OanGy7ePS0edbaP-Gx37xfn70-_n3wsz75--HRyfFY2QjNRSpCixo5ZYSuKgJzzttJKAra6bnkluO6WS8EAhJWcA8pOibqlmnEma6Wr_eLNXHcT_NWIMZm1iw32vR0wz2GoVFJrQQX8B1plKovXGX39F7ryYxjyIJmiQvNawlTwaKaa4GMM2JlNcGsbbgwFM_llJnfM5I755VfOeLmrOy7X2N7zdwZl4GAH2NjYvgvZHRd_c0pJKUBlTs7c1vV48y9d8_n4y-ldBy_mxFVMPvzRAFS5h2nyV3O8s97Yi5DFz78xyPvLv0lpxapbOsS9LA</recordid><startdate>201411</startdate><enddate>201411</enddate><creator>Bennett, Joanne M</creator><creator>Clarke, Rohan H</creator><creator>Thomson, James R</creator><creator>Mac Nally, Ralph</creator><creator>Tylianakis, Jason</creator><general>Blackwell Scientific Publ</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7883-3577</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201411</creationdate><title>Variation in abundance of nectarivorous birds: does a competitive despot interfere with flower tracking?</title><author>Bennett, Joanne M ; Clarke, Rohan H ; Thomson, James R ; Mac Nally, Ralph ; Tylianakis, Jason</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5925-60657ef2a5a31e0e444d39860ed97d43549fbb52005a6440e6f857d1924267893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aggression</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>climate</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>drought</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>ecosystem services</topic><topic>Eucalyptus</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>flowering</topic><topic>flowers</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Flowers - physiology</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>indigenous species</topic><topic>interspecific competition</topic><topic>interspecific interactions</topic><topic>Landscape ecology</topic><topic>Manorina melanocephala</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>Nectar</topic><topic>noisy miner</topic><topic>Parrots - physiology</topic><topic>Plant Nectar</topic><topic>pollination</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>resource tracking</topic><topic>seasonal movements</topic><topic>seed dispersal</topic><topic>Songbirds - physiology</topic><topic>Spatial ecology</topic><topic>temporal variation</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>vegetation structure</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>Victoria</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Joanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Rohan H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mac Nally, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tylianakis, Jason</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bennett, Joanne M</au><au>Clarke, Rohan H</au><au>Thomson, James R</au><au>Mac Nally, Ralph</au><au>Tylianakis, Jason</au><au>Tylianakis, Jason</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in abundance of nectarivorous birds: does a competitive despot interfere with flower tracking?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><date>2014-11</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1531</spage><epage>1541</epage><pages>1531-1541</pages><issn>0021-8790</issn><eissn>1365-2656</eissn><coden>JAECAP</coden><abstract>Adaptive resource tracking in space and time may be disrupted by the modification of resources and competitors. Major global change drivers (e.g. land‐use change) have induced declines in many native species, while facilitating only a few. Given that many resources are predicted to become increasingly scarce under the joint effects of climate and land‐use change, disturbance‐tolerant species that are able to defend high‐value resources may further limit the persistence of disturbance‐sensitive species. We sought to determine which nectarivorous birds track variation in flowering and if relationships between nectarivores and flowering are affected by on‐transect vegetation structure or the occurrence of a native, hyper‐aggressive species, the noisy miner Manorina melanocephala, which has become more prevalent. We measured eucalypt flowering and abundances of nectarivorous birds over the course of a year; we measured vegetation structure on the same forest transects. Nectarivores tracked spatial and some temporal variation in flowering, but this relationship was disrupted by noisy miners. Where present in sufficient numbers, the noisy miner excluded small‐bodied nectarivores (&lt;63 g) from fragments, limiting the ability of this numerically dominant component of the avifauna to gain access to flowering resources. Altered patterns of interspecific competition due to vegetation fragmentation and climate‐induced degradation may have led to changes in the distribution of small nectarivore species that is a departure from the ‘ideal free distribution’ model. Interactions between noisy miners and small‐bodied nectarivores appear to be best described by the ‘ideal despotic distribution’ model in which noisy miners exclude smaller competitors and monopolize local resources. Increases in the severity and frequency of extreme climatic events (e.g. long droughts) predicted under climate change may create a boom‐bust pattern of availabilities of resources. The apparent insensitivity of noisy miners to such variation in flowering resource availability and the miners' influence on the ability of small nectarivores to access resources may lead to disproportionate declines in smaller‐bodied nectarivorous species. Reduced tracking of flowering by nectarivores has the potential to disrupt ecosystem services (e.g. pollination, seed dispersal) and may have long‐term consequences for the persistence of fragmented vegetation, adding further pressure on forest‐dependent biota.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Scientific Publ</pub><pmid>24810732</pmid><doi>10.1111/1365-2656.12245</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7883-3577</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8790
ispartof The Journal of animal ecology, 2014-11, Vol.83 (6), p.1531-1541
issn 0021-8790
1365-2656
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1686995150
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Aggression
Animal and plant ecology
Animal behavior
Animal ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Biomass
Birds
Body Size
climate
Climate Change
drought
Ecology
ecosystem services
Eucalyptus
Feeding Behavior
flowering
flowers
Flowers & plants
Flowers - physiology
Forest ecology
forests
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Habitat selection
indigenous species
interspecific competition
interspecific interactions
Landscape ecology
Manorina melanocephala
Mining
Nectar
noisy miner
Parrots - physiology
Plant Nectar
pollination
Population Density
resource tracking
seasonal movements
seed dispersal
Songbirds - physiology
Spatial ecology
temporal variation
Vegetation
vegetation structure
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
Victoria
title Variation in abundance of nectarivorous birds: does a competitive despot interfere with flower tracking?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A34%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20abundance%20of%20nectarivorous%20birds:%20does%20a%20competitive%20despot%20interfere%20with%20flower%20tracking?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20animal%20ecology&rft.au=Bennett,%20Joanne%20M&rft.date=2014-11&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1531&rft.epage=1541&rft.pages=1531-1541&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft.coden=JAECAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2656.12245&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24034817%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1615947600&rft_id=info:pmid/24810732&rft_jstor_id=24034817&rfr_iscdi=true