Variation in abundance of nectarivorous birds: does a competitive despot interfere with flower tracking?
Adaptive resource tracking in space and time may be disrupted by the modification of resources and competitors. Major global change drivers (e.g. land‐use change) have induced declines in many native species, while facilitating only a few. Given that many resources are predicted to become increasing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of animal ecology 2014-11, Vol.83 (6), p.1531-1541 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1541 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1531 |
container_title | The Journal of animal ecology |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Bennett, Joanne M Clarke, Rohan H Thomson, James R Mac Nally, Ralph Tylianakis, Jason |
description | Adaptive resource tracking in space and time may be disrupted by the modification of resources and competitors. Major global change drivers (e.g. land‐use change) have induced declines in many native species, while facilitating only a few. Given that many resources are predicted to become increasingly scarce under the joint effects of climate and land‐use change, disturbance‐tolerant species that are able to defend high‐value resources may further limit the persistence of disturbance‐sensitive species. We sought to determine which nectarivorous birds track variation in flowering and if relationships between nectarivores and flowering are affected by on‐transect vegetation structure or the occurrence of a native, hyper‐aggressive species, the noisy miner Manorina melanocephala, which has become more prevalent. We measured eucalypt flowering and abundances of nectarivorous birds over the course of a year; we measured vegetation structure on the same forest transects. Nectarivores tracked spatial and some temporal variation in flowering, but this relationship was disrupted by noisy miners. Where present in sufficient numbers, the noisy miner excluded small‐bodied nectarivores ( |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2656.12245 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1686995150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24034817</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24034817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5925-60657ef2a5a31e0e444d39860ed97d43549fbb52005a6440e6f857d1924267893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEokvhzAmwhCpxSTt2bMfmgqqqfKmCA5Sr5U0mrZdsvLWdrvrv65BtQVzAF0ueZ-admddF8ZzCIc3niFZSlEwKeUgZ4-JBsbh_eVgsABgtVa1hr3gS4woAagbV42KPcUWhrtiiuPxhg7PJ-YG4gdjlOLR2aJD4jgzYpBy89sGPkSxdaONb0nqMxJLGrzeYXHLXSFqMG59yesLQYUCydemSdL3fYiAp2OanGy7ePS0edbaP-Gx37xfn70-_n3wsz75--HRyfFY2QjNRSpCixo5ZYSuKgJzzttJKAra6bnkluO6WS8EAhJWcA8pOibqlmnEma6Wr_eLNXHcT_NWIMZm1iw32vR0wz2GoVFJrQQX8B1plKovXGX39F7ryYxjyIJmiQvNawlTwaKaa4GMM2JlNcGsbbgwFM_llJnfM5I755VfOeLmrOy7X2N7zdwZl4GAH2NjYvgvZHRd_c0pJKUBlTs7c1vV48y9d8_n4y-ldBy_mxFVMPvzRAFS5h2nyV3O8s97Yi5DFz78xyPvLv0lpxapbOsS9LA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1615947600</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in abundance of nectarivorous birds: does a competitive despot interfere with flower tracking?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Bennett, Joanne M ; Clarke, Rohan H ; Thomson, James R ; Mac Nally, Ralph ; Tylianakis, Jason</creator><contributor>Tylianakis, Jason</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Joanne M ; Clarke, Rohan H ; Thomson, James R ; Mac Nally, Ralph ; Tylianakis, Jason ; Tylianakis, Jason</creatorcontrib><description>Adaptive resource tracking in space and time may be disrupted by the modification of resources and competitors. Major global change drivers (e.g. land‐use change) have induced declines in many native species, while facilitating only a few. Given that many resources are predicted to become increasingly scarce under the joint effects of climate and land‐use change, disturbance‐tolerant species that are able to defend high‐value resources may further limit the persistence of disturbance‐sensitive species. We sought to determine which nectarivorous birds track variation in flowering and if relationships between nectarivores and flowering are affected by on‐transect vegetation structure or the occurrence of a native, hyper‐aggressive species, the noisy miner Manorina melanocephala, which has become more prevalent. We measured eucalypt flowering and abundances of nectarivorous birds over the course of a year; we measured vegetation structure on the same forest transects. Nectarivores tracked spatial and some temporal variation in flowering, but this relationship was disrupted by noisy miners. Where present in sufficient numbers, the noisy miner excluded small‐bodied nectarivores (<63 g) from fragments, limiting the ability of this numerically dominant component of the avifauna to gain access to flowering resources. Altered patterns of interspecific competition due to vegetation fragmentation and climate‐induced degradation may have led to changes in the distribution of small nectarivore species that is a departure from the ‘ideal free distribution’ model. Interactions between noisy miners and small‐bodied nectarivores appear to be best described by the ‘ideal despotic distribution’ model in which noisy miners exclude smaller competitors and monopolize local resources. Increases in the severity and frequency of extreme climatic events (e.g. long droughts) predicted under climate change may create a boom‐bust pattern of availabilities of resources. The apparent insensitivity of noisy miners to such variation in flowering resource availability and the miners' influence on the ability of small nectarivores to access resources may lead to disproportionate declines in smaller‐bodied nectarivorous species. Reduced tracking of flowering by nectarivores has the potential to disrupt ecosystem services (e.g. pollination, seed dispersal) and may have long‐term consequences for the persistence of fragmented vegetation, adding further pressure on forest‐dependent biota.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12245</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24810732</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAECAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publ</publisher><subject>Aggression ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal behavior ; Animal ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Birds ; Body Size ; climate ; Climate Change ; drought ; Ecology ; ecosystem services ; Eucalyptus ; Feeding Behavior ; flowering ; flowers ; Flowers & plants ; Flowers - physiology ; Forest ecology ; forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Habitat selection ; indigenous species ; interspecific competition ; interspecific interactions ; Landscape ecology ; Manorina melanocephala ; Mining ; Nectar ; noisy miner ; Parrots - physiology ; Plant Nectar ; pollination ; Population Density ; resource tracking ; seasonal movements ; seed dispersal ; Songbirds - physiology ; Spatial ecology ; temporal variation ; Vegetation ; vegetation structure ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; Victoria</subject><ispartof>The Journal of animal ecology, 2014-11, Vol.83 (6), p.1531-1541</ispartof><rights>2014 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2014 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2014 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2014 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2014 British Ecological Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5925-60657ef2a5a31e0e444d39860ed97d43549fbb52005a6440e6f857d1924267893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5925-60657ef2a5a31e0e444d39860ed97d43549fbb52005a6440e6f857d1924267893</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7883-3577</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24034817$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24034817$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28866508$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24810732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Tylianakis, Jason</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Joanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Rohan H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mac Nally, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tylianakis, Jason</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in abundance of nectarivorous birds: does a competitive despot interfere with flower tracking?</title><title>The Journal of animal ecology</title><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><description>Adaptive resource tracking in space and time may be disrupted by the modification of resources and competitors. Major global change drivers (e.g. land‐use change) have induced declines in many native species, while facilitating only a few. Given that many resources are predicted to become increasingly scarce under the joint effects of climate and land‐use change, disturbance‐tolerant species that are able to defend high‐value resources may further limit the persistence of disturbance‐sensitive species. We sought to determine which nectarivorous birds track variation in flowering and if relationships between nectarivores and flowering are affected by on‐transect vegetation structure or the occurrence of a native, hyper‐aggressive species, the noisy miner Manorina melanocephala, which has become more prevalent. We measured eucalypt flowering and abundances of nectarivorous birds over the course of a year; we measured vegetation structure on the same forest transects. Nectarivores tracked spatial and some temporal variation in flowering, but this relationship was disrupted by noisy miners. Where present in sufficient numbers, the noisy miner excluded small‐bodied nectarivores (<63 g) from fragments, limiting the ability of this numerically dominant component of the avifauna to gain access to flowering resources. Altered patterns of interspecific competition due to vegetation fragmentation and climate‐induced degradation may have led to changes in the distribution of small nectarivore species that is a departure from the ‘ideal free distribution’ model. Interactions between noisy miners and small‐bodied nectarivores appear to be best described by the ‘ideal despotic distribution’ model in which noisy miners exclude smaller competitors and monopolize local resources. Increases in the severity and frequency of extreme climatic events (e.g. long droughts) predicted under climate change may create a boom‐bust pattern of availabilities of resources. The apparent insensitivity of noisy miners to such variation in flowering resource availability and the miners' influence on the ability of small nectarivores to access resources may lead to disproportionate declines in smaller‐bodied nectarivorous species. Reduced tracking of flowering by nectarivores has the potential to disrupt ecosystem services (e.g. pollination, seed dispersal) and may have long‐term consequences for the persistence of fragmented vegetation, adding further pressure on forest‐dependent biota.</description><subject>Aggression</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>climate</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>drought</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>ecosystem services</subject><subject>Eucalyptus</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>flowering</subject><subject>flowers</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Flowers - physiology</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>indigenous species</subject><subject>interspecific competition</subject><subject>interspecific interactions</subject><subject>Landscape ecology</subject><subject>Manorina melanocephala</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>Nectar</subject><subject>noisy miner</subject><subject>Parrots - physiology</subject><subject>Plant Nectar</subject><subject>pollination</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>resource tracking</subject><subject>seasonal movements</subject><subject>seed dispersal</subject><subject>Songbirds - physiology</subject><subject>Spatial ecology</subject><subject>temporal variation</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>vegetation structure</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>Victoria</subject><issn>0021-8790</issn><issn>1365-2656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEokvhzAmwhCpxSTt2bMfmgqqqfKmCA5Sr5U0mrZdsvLWdrvrv65BtQVzAF0ueZ-admddF8ZzCIc3niFZSlEwKeUgZ4-JBsbh_eVgsABgtVa1hr3gS4woAagbV42KPcUWhrtiiuPxhg7PJ-YG4gdjlOLR2aJD4jgzYpBy89sGPkSxdaONb0nqMxJLGrzeYXHLXSFqMG59yesLQYUCydemSdL3fYiAp2OanGy7ePS0edbaP-Gx37xfn70-_n3wsz75--HRyfFY2QjNRSpCixo5ZYSuKgJzzttJKAra6bnkluO6WS8EAhJWcA8pOibqlmnEma6Wr_eLNXHcT_NWIMZm1iw32vR0wz2GoVFJrQQX8B1plKovXGX39F7ryYxjyIJmiQvNawlTwaKaa4GMM2JlNcGsbbgwFM_llJnfM5I755VfOeLmrOy7X2N7zdwZl4GAH2NjYvgvZHRd_c0pJKUBlTs7c1vV48y9d8_n4y-ldBy_mxFVMPvzRAFS5h2nyV3O8s97Yi5DFz78xyPvLv0lpxapbOsS9LA</recordid><startdate>201411</startdate><enddate>201411</enddate><creator>Bennett, Joanne M</creator><creator>Clarke, Rohan H</creator><creator>Thomson, James R</creator><creator>Mac Nally, Ralph</creator><creator>Tylianakis, Jason</creator><general>Blackwell Scientific Publ</general><general>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7883-3577</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201411</creationdate><title>Variation in abundance of nectarivorous birds: does a competitive despot interfere with flower tracking?</title><author>Bennett, Joanne M ; Clarke, Rohan H ; Thomson, James R ; Mac Nally, Ralph ; Tylianakis, Jason</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5925-60657ef2a5a31e0e444d39860ed97d43549fbb52005a6440e6f857d1924267893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aggression</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>climate</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>drought</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>ecosystem services</topic><topic>Eucalyptus</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>flowering</topic><topic>flowers</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Flowers - physiology</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>indigenous species</topic><topic>interspecific competition</topic><topic>interspecific interactions</topic><topic>Landscape ecology</topic><topic>Manorina melanocephala</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>Nectar</topic><topic>noisy miner</topic><topic>Parrots - physiology</topic><topic>Plant Nectar</topic><topic>pollination</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>resource tracking</topic><topic>seasonal movements</topic><topic>seed dispersal</topic><topic>Songbirds - physiology</topic><topic>Spatial ecology</topic><topic>temporal variation</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>vegetation structure</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>Victoria</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Joanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Rohan H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mac Nally, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tylianakis, Jason</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bennett, Joanne M</au><au>Clarke, Rohan H</au><au>Thomson, James R</au><au>Mac Nally, Ralph</au><au>Tylianakis, Jason</au><au>Tylianakis, Jason</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in abundance of nectarivorous birds: does a competitive despot interfere with flower tracking?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><date>2014-11</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1531</spage><epage>1541</epage><pages>1531-1541</pages><issn>0021-8790</issn><eissn>1365-2656</eissn><coden>JAECAP</coden><abstract>Adaptive resource tracking in space and time may be disrupted by the modification of resources and competitors. Major global change drivers (e.g. land‐use change) have induced declines in many native species, while facilitating only a few. Given that many resources are predicted to become increasingly scarce under the joint effects of climate and land‐use change, disturbance‐tolerant species that are able to defend high‐value resources may further limit the persistence of disturbance‐sensitive species. We sought to determine which nectarivorous birds track variation in flowering and if relationships between nectarivores and flowering are affected by on‐transect vegetation structure or the occurrence of a native, hyper‐aggressive species, the noisy miner Manorina melanocephala, which has become more prevalent. We measured eucalypt flowering and abundances of nectarivorous birds over the course of a year; we measured vegetation structure on the same forest transects. Nectarivores tracked spatial and some temporal variation in flowering, but this relationship was disrupted by noisy miners. Where present in sufficient numbers, the noisy miner excluded small‐bodied nectarivores (<63 g) from fragments, limiting the ability of this numerically dominant component of the avifauna to gain access to flowering resources. Altered patterns of interspecific competition due to vegetation fragmentation and climate‐induced degradation may have led to changes in the distribution of small nectarivore species that is a departure from the ‘ideal free distribution’ model. Interactions between noisy miners and small‐bodied nectarivores appear to be best described by the ‘ideal despotic distribution’ model in which noisy miners exclude smaller competitors and monopolize local resources. Increases in the severity and frequency of extreme climatic events (e.g. long droughts) predicted under climate change may create a boom‐bust pattern of availabilities of resources. The apparent insensitivity of noisy miners to such variation in flowering resource availability and the miners' influence on the ability of small nectarivores to access resources may lead to disproportionate declines in smaller‐bodied nectarivorous species. Reduced tracking of flowering by nectarivores has the potential to disrupt ecosystem services (e.g. pollination, seed dispersal) and may have long‐term consequences for the persistence of fragmented vegetation, adding further pressure on forest‐dependent biota.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Scientific Publ</pub><pmid>24810732</pmid><doi>10.1111/1365-2656.12245</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7883-3577</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8790 |
ispartof | The Journal of animal ecology, 2014-11, Vol.83 (6), p.1531-1541 |
issn | 0021-8790 1365-2656 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1686995150 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Aggression Animal and plant ecology Animal behavior Animal ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Aves Biological and medical sciences Biomass Birds Body Size climate Climate Change drought Ecology ecosystem services Eucalyptus Feeding Behavior flowering flowers Flowers & plants Flowers - physiology Forest ecology forests Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Habitat selection indigenous species interspecific competition interspecific interactions Landscape ecology Manorina melanocephala Mining Nectar noisy miner Parrots - physiology Plant Nectar pollination Population Density resource tracking seasonal movements seed dispersal Songbirds - physiology Spatial ecology temporal variation Vegetation vegetation structure Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution Victoria |
title | Variation in abundance of nectarivorous birds: does a competitive despot interfere with flower tracking? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A34%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20abundance%20of%20nectarivorous%20birds:%20does%20a%20competitive%20despot%20interfere%20with%20flower%20tracking?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20animal%20ecology&rft.au=Bennett,%20Joanne%20M&rft.date=2014-11&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1531&rft.epage=1541&rft.pages=1531-1541&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft.coden=JAECAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2656.12245&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24034817%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1615947600&rft_id=info:pmid/24810732&rft_jstor_id=24034817&rfr_iscdi=true |