Explaining fraud deviancy attenuation in the United Kingdom

Fraud is one of the most costly crimes to society. There have been a number of studies documenting the low priority and resources allocated to fraud, but there has been little attempt to conceptualise the processes which lead to this. This paper develops a concept that is the antithesis to deviancy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Crime, law, and social change law, and social change, 2015-03, Vol.63 (1-2), p.49-64
Hauptverfasser: Button, Mark, Tunley, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 64
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 49
container_title Crime, law, and social change
container_volume 63
creator Button, Mark
Tunley, Martin
description Fraud is one of the most costly crimes to society. There have been a number of studies documenting the low priority and resources allocated to fraud, but there has been little attempt to conceptualise the processes which lead to this. This paper develops a concept that is the antithesis to deviancy amplification, deviancy attenuation, to examine why the level of resources and interest in fraud are not commensurate with the size of the problem. The paper also develops two further reverse concepts to further explain attenuation: de-labelling and immoral phlegmatism. Empirical evidence is offered in the form of case studies, statistical and survey data to support the arguments presented. The paper also illustrates these arguments through the comparison of the response to benefits fraud in the United Kingdom, which can be considered the one exception amongst frauds where labelling, moral panics and deviancy amplification occurs; explained by some Marxist commentators as a consequence of it being a lower class crime actively pursued by the powerful.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10611-015-9551-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1686417412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3657508441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-6fe63f5bdd4846469c2ba6208c1245f0f7634ce2ed3ee8104fcaab372792f5573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9gisbAE7hzbScSEqvIhKrHQ2XIdu7hKnWIniP57XIUBITHdDc_76u4h5BLhBgHK24ggEHNAntecp-WITJCXRQ4lx2MygZrynNU1OyVnMW4AAFkhJuRu_rVrlfPOrzMb1NBkjfl0yut9pvre-EH1rvOZ81n_brKld71pspdEN932nJxY1UZz8TOnZPkwf5s95YvXx-fZ_SLXjEOfC2tEYfmqaVjFBBO1pislKFQaKeMWbCkKpg01TWFMhcCsVmpVlLSsqeXphym5Hnt3ofsYTOzl1kVt2lZ50w1RoqgEw5IhTejVH3TTDcGn6xJVFpUQnPJE4Ujp0MUYjJW74LYq7CWCPOiUo06ZdMqDTgkpQ8dMTKxfm_Cr-d_QN41bdjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1673866525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Explaining fraud deviancy attenuation in the United Kingdom</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Button, Mark ; Tunley, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Button, Mark ; Tunley, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>Fraud is one of the most costly crimes to society. There have been a number of studies documenting the low priority and resources allocated to fraud, but there has been little attempt to conceptualise the processes which lead to this. This paper develops a concept that is the antithesis to deviancy amplification, deviancy attenuation, to examine why the level of resources and interest in fraud are not commensurate with the size of the problem. The paper also develops two further reverse concepts to further explain attenuation: de-labelling and immoral phlegmatism. Empirical evidence is offered in the form of case studies, statistical and survey data to support the arguments presented. The paper also illustrates these arguments through the comparison of the response to benefits fraud in the United Kingdom, which can be considered the one exception amongst frauds where labelling, moral panics and deviancy amplification occurs; explained by some Marxist commentators as a consequence of it being a lower class crime actively pursued by the powerful.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-4994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0751</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10611-015-9551-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Costs ; Crime ; Criminal law ; Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law ; Criminology and Criminal Justice ; Empirical research ; Fraud ; Labeling ; Labelling ; Law and Criminology ; Murders &amp; murder attempts ; Political Science ; Sanctions ; Social Sciences ; Society ; Socioeconomic factors ; Studies ; United Kingdom ; White collar crime</subject><ispartof>Crime, law, and social change, 2015-03, Vol.63 (1-2), p.49-64</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-6fe63f5bdd4846469c2ba6208c1245f0f7634ce2ed3ee8104fcaab372792f5573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-6fe63f5bdd4846469c2ba6208c1245f0f7634ce2ed3ee8104fcaab372792f5573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10611-015-9551-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10611-015-9551-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,27344,27866,27924,27925,33774,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Button, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunley, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Explaining fraud deviancy attenuation in the United Kingdom</title><title>Crime, law, and social change</title><addtitle>Crime Law Soc Change</addtitle><description>Fraud is one of the most costly crimes to society. There have been a number of studies documenting the low priority and resources allocated to fraud, but there has been little attempt to conceptualise the processes which lead to this. This paper develops a concept that is the antithesis to deviancy amplification, deviancy attenuation, to examine why the level of resources and interest in fraud are not commensurate with the size of the problem. The paper also develops two further reverse concepts to further explain attenuation: de-labelling and immoral phlegmatism. Empirical evidence is offered in the form of case studies, statistical and survey data to support the arguments presented. The paper also illustrates these arguments through the comparison of the response to benefits fraud in the United Kingdom, which can be considered the one exception amongst frauds where labelling, moral panics and deviancy amplification occurs; explained by some Marxist commentators as a consequence of it being a lower class crime actively pursued by the powerful.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Criminal law</subject><subject>Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law</subject><subject>Criminology and Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Fraud</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Labelling</subject><subject>Law and Criminology</subject><subject>Murders &amp; murder attempts</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>White collar crime</subject><issn>0925-4994</issn><issn>1573-0751</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9gisbAE7hzbScSEqvIhKrHQ2XIdu7hKnWIniP57XIUBITHdDc_76u4h5BLhBgHK24ggEHNAntecp-WITJCXRQ4lx2MygZrynNU1OyVnMW4AAFkhJuRu_rVrlfPOrzMb1NBkjfl0yut9pvre-EH1rvOZ81n_brKld71pspdEN932nJxY1UZz8TOnZPkwf5s95YvXx-fZ_SLXjEOfC2tEYfmqaVjFBBO1pislKFQaKeMWbCkKpg01TWFMhcCsVmpVlLSsqeXphym5Hnt3ofsYTOzl1kVt2lZ50w1RoqgEw5IhTejVH3TTDcGn6xJVFpUQnPJE4Ujp0MUYjJW74LYq7CWCPOiUo06ZdMqDTgkpQ8dMTKxfm_Cr-d_QN41bdjw</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Button, Mark</creator><creator>Tunley, Martin</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Explaining fraud deviancy attenuation in the United Kingdom</title><author>Button, Mark ; Tunley, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-6fe63f5bdd4846469c2ba6208c1245f0f7634ce2ed3ee8104fcaab372792f5573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Criminal law</topic><topic>Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law</topic><topic>Criminology and Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Fraud</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Labelling</topic><topic>Law and Criminology</topic><topic>Murders &amp; murder attempts</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>White collar crime</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Button, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunley, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Crime, law, and social change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Button, Mark</au><au>Tunley, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Explaining fraud deviancy attenuation in the United Kingdom</atitle><jtitle>Crime, law, and social change</jtitle><stitle>Crime Law Soc Change</stitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>49-64</pages><issn>0925-4994</issn><eissn>1573-0751</eissn><abstract>Fraud is one of the most costly crimes to society. There have been a number of studies documenting the low priority and resources allocated to fraud, but there has been little attempt to conceptualise the processes which lead to this. This paper develops a concept that is the antithesis to deviancy amplification, deviancy attenuation, to examine why the level of resources and interest in fraud are not commensurate with the size of the problem. The paper also develops two further reverse concepts to further explain attenuation: de-labelling and immoral phlegmatism. Empirical evidence is offered in the form of case studies, statistical and survey data to support the arguments presented. The paper also illustrates these arguments through the comparison of the response to benefits fraud in the United Kingdom, which can be considered the one exception amongst frauds where labelling, moral panics and deviancy amplification occurs; explained by some Marxist commentators as a consequence of it being a lower class crime actively pursued by the powerful.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10611-015-9551-0</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-4994
ispartof Crime, law, and social change, 2015-03, Vol.63 (1-2), p.49-64
issn 0925-4994
1573-0751
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1686417412
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Case studies
Costs
Crime
Criminal law
Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law
Criminology and Criminal Justice
Empirical research
Fraud
Labeling
Labelling
Law and Criminology
Murders & murder attempts
Political Science
Sanctions
Social Sciences
Society
Socioeconomic factors
Studies
United Kingdom
White collar crime
title Explaining fraud deviancy attenuation in the United Kingdom
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A40%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Explaining%20fraud%20deviancy%20attenuation%20in%20the%20United%20Kingdom&rft.jtitle=Crime,%20law,%20and%20social%20change&rft.au=Button,%20Mark&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=49-64&rft.issn=0925-4994&rft.eissn=1573-0751&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10611-015-9551-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3657508441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1673866525&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true