Student perceptions of effective instruction and the development of critical thinking: A replication and extension

This study utilized data from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education to test the robustness of research conducted by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) that explored the relationship between student perceptions of exposure to organized and clear instruction and growth in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Higher education 2015-05, Vol.69 (5), p.823-838
Hauptverfasser: Loes, Chad N, Salisbury, Mark H, Pascarella, Ernest T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 838
container_issue 5
container_start_page 823
container_title Higher education
container_volume 69
creator Loes, Chad N
Salisbury, Mark H
Pascarella, Ernest T
description This study utilized data from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education to test the robustness of research conducted by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) that explored the relationship between student perceptions of exposure to organized and clear instruction and growth in critical thinking skills among college freshmen. To accomplish this, we created fully-specified models that included statistical controls for an array of potential confounding influences such as, student race, sex, pre-college critical thinking ability, pre-college tested academic ability, parental educational degree attainment, pre-college academic motivation, and a measure of interaction with high school teachers. Net of these influences, our findings generally replicate those uncovered by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) which suggest that student perceptions of organized instruction are positively associated with gains in critical thinking. Perceptions of instructional clarity, however, failed to exert a statistically significant influence on the dependent variable. Lastly, the results of our analyses suggest the effect of student perceptions of organized instruction on critical thinking affects students similarly, regardless of tested academic preparation (ACT or equivalent score), sex, or pre-college critical thinking levels. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10734-014-9807-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1686417197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A434846488</galeid><ericid>EJ1061026</ericid><jstor_id>43648827</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A434846488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-dda5fc16dff4eba05635882d6de0c10956f19c9b7f3fc57356d35a39967d0f173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9rFTEUxQdR8Fn9ACLCgBs3U--d_JmZZSnVVgoutOAupMnNM895mTHJK_jtzTBSqzyQLAI5v3O4uaeqXiKcIkD3LiF0jDeAvBl66Bp4VG1QdKzBjn99XG0AsG9QSHhaPUtpBwAtCrapbj7ng6WQ65mioTn7KaR6cjU5Ryb7O6p9SDkezKLUOtg6f6Pa0h2N07xfjAU20Wdv9Fg0H777sH1ePXF6TPTi931S3by_-HJ-2Vx_-nB1fnbdGIF9bqzVwhmU1jlOtxqEZKLvWystgUEYhHQ4mOG2c8yZ8hkhLROaDYPsLDjs2En1ds2d4_TjQCmrvU-GxlEHmg5Joewlxw6HBX3zD7qbDjGU6RYKEFFy8Yfa6pGUD27KUZslVJ1xxnsued8XqjlCbSlQ1OMUyPny_Bd_eoQvx9Lem6MGXA0mTilFcmqOfq_jT4Wglr7V2rcqfaulbwXF83r1UPTmnr_4iCARWln0dtVT0cKW4oMF_D90l_IU71M5W8Zsl62-WnXr54dDSt5hy34B2bHHkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1680111645</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Student perceptions of effective instruction and the development of critical thinking: A replication and extension</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Loes, Chad N ; Salisbury, Mark H ; Pascarella, Ernest T</creator><creatorcontrib>Loes, Chad N ; Salisbury, Mark H ; Pascarella, Ernest T</creatorcontrib><description>This study utilized data from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education to test the robustness of research conducted by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) that explored the relationship between student perceptions of exposure to organized and clear instruction and growth in critical thinking skills among college freshmen. To accomplish this, we created fully-specified models that included statistical controls for an array of potential confounding influences such as, student race, sex, pre-college critical thinking ability, pre-college tested academic ability, parental educational degree attainment, pre-college academic motivation, and a measure of interaction with high school teachers. Net of these influences, our findings generally replicate those uncovered by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) which suggest that student perceptions of organized instruction are positively associated with gains in critical thinking. Perceptions of instructional clarity, however, failed to exert a statistically significant influence on the dependent variable. Lastly, the results of our analyses suggest the effect of student perceptions of organized instruction on critical thinking affects students similarly, regardless of tested academic preparation (ACT or equivalent score), sex, or pre-college critical thinking levels. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-1560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10734-014-9807-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HREDAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B. V</publisher><subject>Ausland ; Classroom communication ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; College Freshmen ; College students ; Critical theory ; Critical Thinking ; Education ; Educational Attainment ; Gender Differences ; Higher Education ; Hochschule ; Humanities ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Knowledge acquisition ; Lehre ; Liberal Arts ; Motivation ; Parent Background ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Predictor Variables ; Racial Differences ; Research methods ; Secondary School Teachers ; Secondary schools ; Self report ; Skills ; Statistical Significance ; Student ; Student Attitudes ; Student evaluation of teachers ; Student Motivation ; Student Participation ; Student teacher relationship ; Students ; Studium ; Study and teaching ; Teacher Student Relationship ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching methods ; Thinking Skills ; USA</subject><ispartof>Higher education, 2015-05, Vol.69 (5), p.823-838</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-dda5fc16dff4eba05635882d6de0c10956f19c9b7f3fc57356d35a39967d0f173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-dda5fc16dff4eba05635882d6de0c10956f19c9b7f3fc57356d35a39967d0f173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43648827$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43648827$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27865,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=1064712$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1061026$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loes, Chad N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salisbury, Mark H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascarella, Ernest T</creatorcontrib><title>Student perceptions of effective instruction and the development of critical thinking: A replication and extension</title><title>Higher education</title><addtitle>High Educ</addtitle><description>This study utilized data from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education to test the robustness of research conducted by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) that explored the relationship between student perceptions of exposure to organized and clear instruction and growth in critical thinking skills among college freshmen. To accomplish this, we created fully-specified models that included statistical controls for an array of potential confounding influences such as, student race, sex, pre-college critical thinking ability, pre-college tested academic ability, parental educational degree attainment, pre-college academic motivation, and a measure of interaction with high school teachers. Net of these influences, our findings generally replicate those uncovered by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) which suggest that student perceptions of organized instruction are positively associated with gains in critical thinking. Perceptions of instructional clarity, however, failed to exert a statistically significant influence on the dependent variable. Lastly, the results of our analyses suggest the effect of student perceptions of organized instruction on critical thinking affects students similarly, regardless of tested academic preparation (ACT or equivalent score), sex, or pre-college critical thinking levels. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</description><subject>Ausland</subject><subject>Classroom communication</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>College Freshmen</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Critical theory</subject><subject>Critical Thinking</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Attainment</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Hochschule</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Knowledge acquisition</subject><subject>Lehre</subject><subject>Liberal Arts</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Parent Background</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Racial Differences</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Secondary School Teachers</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Self report</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Statistical Significance</subject><subject>Student</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student evaluation of teachers</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Student Participation</subject><subject>Student teacher relationship</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studium</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Teacher Student Relationship</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0018-1560</issn><issn>1573-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9rFTEUxQdR8Fn9ACLCgBs3U--d_JmZZSnVVgoutOAupMnNM895mTHJK_jtzTBSqzyQLAI5v3O4uaeqXiKcIkD3LiF0jDeAvBl66Bp4VG1QdKzBjn99XG0AsG9QSHhaPUtpBwAtCrapbj7ng6WQ65mioTn7KaR6cjU5Ryb7O6p9SDkezKLUOtg6f6Pa0h2N07xfjAU20Wdv9Fg0H777sH1ePXF6TPTi931S3by_-HJ-2Vx_-nB1fnbdGIF9bqzVwhmU1jlOtxqEZKLvWystgUEYhHQ4mOG2c8yZ8hkhLROaDYPsLDjs2En1ds2d4_TjQCmrvU-GxlEHmg5Joewlxw6HBX3zD7qbDjGU6RYKEFFy8Yfa6pGUD27KUZslVJ1xxnsued8XqjlCbSlQ1OMUyPny_Bd_eoQvx9Lem6MGXA0mTilFcmqOfq_jT4Wglr7V2rcqfaulbwXF83r1UPTmnr_4iCARWln0dtVT0cKW4oMF_D90l_IU71M5W8Zsl62-WnXr54dDSt5hy34B2bHHkA</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Loes, Chad N</creator><creator>Salisbury, Mark H</creator><creator>Pascarella, Ernest T</creator><general>Springer Science+Business Media B. V</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Student perceptions of effective instruction and the development of critical thinking</title><author>Loes, Chad N ; Salisbury, Mark H ; Pascarella, Ernest T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-dda5fc16dff4eba05635882d6de0c10956f19c9b7f3fc57356d35a39967d0f173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Ausland</topic><topic>Classroom communication</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>College Freshmen</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Critical theory</topic><topic>Critical Thinking</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Attainment</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Hochschule</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Knowledge acquisition</topic><topic>Lehre</topic><topic>Liberal Arts</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Parent Background</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Racial Differences</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Secondary School Teachers</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Self report</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Statistical Significance</topic><topic>Student</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student evaluation of teachers</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Student Participation</topic><topic>Student teacher relationship</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studium</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Teacher Student Relationship</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loes, Chad N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salisbury, Mark H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascarella, Ernest T</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loes, Chad N</au><au>Salisbury, Mark H</au><au>Pascarella, Ernest T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1061026</ericid><atitle>Student perceptions of effective instruction and the development of critical thinking: A replication and extension</atitle><jtitle>Higher education</jtitle><stitle>High Educ</stitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>823</spage><epage>838</epage><pages>823-838</pages><issn>0018-1560</issn><eissn>1573-174X</eissn><coden>HREDAN</coden><abstract>This study utilized data from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education to test the robustness of research conducted by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) that explored the relationship between student perceptions of exposure to organized and clear instruction and growth in critical thinking skills among college freshmen. To accomplish this, we created fully-specified models that included statistical controls for an array of potential confounding influences such as, student race, sex, pre-college critical thinking ability, pre-college tested academic ability, parental educational degree attainment, pre-college academic motivation, and a measure of interaction with high school teachers. Net of these influences, our findings generally replicate those uncovered by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) which suggest that student perceptions of organized instruction are positively associated with gains in critical thinking. Perceptions of instructional clarity, however, failed to exert a statistically significant influence on the dependent variable. Lastly, the results of our analyses suggest the effect of student perceptions of organized instruction on critical thinking affects students similarly, regardless of tested academic preparation (ACT or equivalent score), sex, or pre-college critical thinking levels. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Science+Business Media B. V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10734-014-9807-0</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-1560
ispartof Higher education, 2015-05, Vol.69 (5), p.823-838
issn 0018-1560
1573-174X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1686417197
source PAIS Index; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Ausland
Classroom communication
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive ability
College Freshmen
College students
Critical theory
Critical Thinking
Education
Educational Attainment
Gender Differences
Higher Education
Hochschule
Humanities
Instructional Effectiveness
Knowledge acquisition
Lehre
Liberal Arts
Motivation
Parent Background
Perception
Perceptions
Predictor Variables
Racial Differences
Research methods
Secondary School Teachers
Secondary schools
Self report
Skills
Statistical Significance
Student
Student Attitudes
Student evaluation of teachers
Student Motivation
Student Participation
Student teacher relationship
Students
Studium
Study and teaching
Teacher Student Relationship
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching methods
Thinking Skills
USA
title Student perceptions of effective instruction and the development of critical thinking: A replication and extension
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T05%3A52%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Student%20perceptions%20of%20effective%20instruction%20and%20the%20development%20of%20critical%20thinking:%20A%20replication%20and%20extension&rft.jtitle=Higher%20education&rft.au=Loes,%20Chad%20N&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=823&rft.epage=838&rft.pages=823-838&rft.issn=0018-1560&rft.eissn=1573-174X&rft.coden=HREDAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10734-014-9807-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA434846488%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1680111645&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A434846488&rft_ericid=EJ1061026&rft_jstor_id=43648827&rfr_iscdi=true