Student perceptions of effective instruction and the development of critical thinking: A replication and extension
This study utilized data from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education to test the robustness of research conducted by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) that explored the relationship between student perceptions of exposure to organized and clear instruction and growth in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Higher education 2015-05, Vol.69 (5), p.823-838 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 838 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 823 |
container_title | Higher education |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Loes, Chad N Salisbury, Mark H Pascarella, Ernest T |
description | This study utilized data from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education to test the robustness of research conducted by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) that explored the relationship between student perceptions of exposure to organized and clear instruction and growth in critical thinking skills among college freshmen. To accomplish this, we created fully-specified models that included statistical controls for an array of potential confounding influences such as, student race, sex, pre-college critical thinking ability, pre-college tested academic ability, parental educational degree attainment, pre-college academic motivation, and a measure of interaction with high school teachers. Net of these influences, our findings generally replicate those uncovered by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) which suggest that student perceptions of organized instruction are positively associated with gains in critical thinking. Perceptions of instructional clarity, however, failed to exert a statistically significant influence on the dependent variable. Lastly, the results of our analyses suggest the effect of student perceptions of organized instruction on critical thinking affects students similarly, regardless of tested academic preparation (ACT or equivalent score), sex, or pre-college critical thinking levels. (HRK / Abstract übernommen). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10734-014-9807-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1686417197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A434846488</galeid><ericid>EJ1061026</ericid><jstor_id>43648827</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A434846488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-dda5fc16dff4eba05635882d6de0c10956f19c9b7f3fc57356d35a39967d0f173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9rFTEUxQdR8Fn9ACLCgBs3U--d_JmZZSnVVgoutOAupMnNM895mTHJK_jtzTBSqzyQLAI5v3O4uaeqXiKcIkD3LiF0jDeAvBl66Bp4VG1QdKzBjn99XG0AsG9QSHhaPUtpBwAtCrapbj7ng6WQ65mioTn7KaR6cjU5Ryb7O6p9SDkezKLUOtg6f6Pa0h2N07xfjAU20Wdv9Fg0H777sH1ePXF6TPTi931S3by_-HJ-2Vx_-nB1fnbdGIF9bqzVwhmU1jlOtxqEZKLvWystgUEYhHQ4mOG2c8yZ8hkhLROaDYPsLDjs2En1ds2d4_TjQCmrvU-GxlEHmg5Joewlxw6HBX3zD7qbDjGU6RYKEFFy8Yfa6pGUD27KUZslVJ1xxnsued8XqjlCbSlQ1OMUyPny_Bd_eoQvx9Lem6MGXA0mTilFcmqOfq_jT4Wglr7V2rcqfaulbwXF83r1UPTmnr_4iCARWln0dtVT0cKW4oMF_D90l_IU71M5W8Zsl62-WnXr54dDSt5hy34B2bHHkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1680111645</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Student perceptions of effective instruction and the development of critical thinking: A replication and extension</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Loes, Chad N ; Salisbury, Mark H ; Pascarella, Ernest T</creator><creatorcontrib>Loes, Chad N ; Salisbury, Mark H ; Pascarella, Ernest T</creatorcontrib><description>This study utilized data from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education to test the robustness of research conducted by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) that explored the relationship between student perceptions of exposure to organized and clear instruction and growth in critical thinking skills among college freshmen. To accomplish this, we created fully-specified models that included statistical controls for an array of potential confounding influences such as, student race, sex, pre-college critical thinking ability, pre-college tested academic ability, parental educational degree attainment, pre-college academic motivation, and a measure of interaction with high school teachers. Net of these influences, our findings generally replicate those uncovered by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) which suggest that student perceptions of organized instruction are positively associated with gains in critical thinking. Perceptions of instructional clarity, however, failed to exert a statistically significant influence on the dependent variable. Lastly, the results of our analyses suggest the effect of student perceptions of organized instruction on critical thinking affects students similarly, regardless of tested academic preparation (ACT or equivalent score), sex, or pre-college critical thinking levels. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-1560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10734-014-9807-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HREDAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B. V</publisher><subject>Ausland ; Classroom communication ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; College Freshmen ; College students ; Critical theory ; Critical Thinking ; Education ; Educational Attainment ; Gender Differences ; Higher Education ; Hochschule ; Humanities ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Knowledge acquisition ; Lehre ; Liberal Arts ; Motivation ; Parent Background ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Predictor Variables ; Racial Differences ; Research methods ; Secondary School Teachers ; Secondary schools ; Self report ; Skills ; Statistical Significance ; Student ; Student Attitudes ; Student evaluation of teachers ; Student Motivation ; Student Participation ; Student teacher relationship ; Students ; Studium ; Study and teaching ; Teacher Student Relationship ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching methods ; Thinking Skills ; USA</subject><ispartof>Higher education, 2015-05, Vol.69 (5), p.823-838</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-dda5fc16dff4eba05635882d6de0c10956f19c9b7f3fc57356d35a39967d0f173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-dda5fc16dff4eba05635882d6de0c10956f19c9b7f3fc57356d35a39967d0f173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43648827$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43648827$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27865,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=1064712$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1061026$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loes, Chad N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salisbury, Mark H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascarella, Ernest T</creatorcontrib><title>Student perceptions of effective instruction and the development of critical thinking: A replication and extension</title><title>Higher education</title><addtitle>High Educ</addtitle><description>This study utilized data from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education to test the robustness of research conducted by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) that explored the relationship between student perceptions of exposure to organized and clear instruction and growth in critical thinking skills among college freshmen. To accomplish this, we created fully-specified models that included statistical controls for an array of potential confounding influences such as, student race, sex, pre-college critical thinking ability, pre-college tested academic ability, parental educational degree attainment, pre-college academic motivation, and a measure of interaction with high school teachers. Net of these influences, our findings generally replicate those uncovered by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) which suggest that student perceptions of organized instruction are positively associated with gains in critical thinking. Perceptions of instructional clarity, however, failed to exert a statistically significant influence on the dependent variable. Lastly, the results of our analyses suggest the effect of student perceptions of organized instruction on critical thinking affects students similarly, regardless of tested academic preparation (ACT or equivalent score), sex, or pre-college critical thinking levels. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</description><subject>Ausland</subject><subject>Classroom communication</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>College Freshmen</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Critical theory</subject><subject>Critical Thinking</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Attainment</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Hochschule</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Knowledge acquisition</subject><subject>Lehre</subject><subject>Liberal Arts</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Parent Background</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Racial Differences</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Secondary School Teachers</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Self report</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Statistical Significance</subject><subject>Student</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student evaluation of teachers</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Student Participation</subject><subject>Student teacher relationship</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studium</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Teacher Student Relationship</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0018-1560</issn><issn>1573-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9rFTEUxQdR8Fn9ACLCgBs3U--d_JmZZSnVVgoutOAupMnNM895mTHJK_jtzTBSqzyQLAI5v3O4uaeqXiKcIkD3LiF0jDeAvBl66Bp4VG1QdKzBjn99XG0AsG9QSHhaPUtpBwAtCrapbj7ng6WQ65mioTn7KaR6cjU5Ryb7O6p9SDkezKLUOtg6f6Pa0h2N07xfjAU20Wdv9Fg0H777sH1ePXF6TPTi931S3by_-HJ-2Vx_-nB1fnbdGIF9bqzVwhmU1jlOtxqEZKLvWystgUEYhHQ4mOG2c8yZ8hkhLROaDYPsLDjs2En1ds2d4_TjQCmrvU-GxlEHmg5Joewlxw6HBX3zD7qbDjGU6RYKEFFy8Yfa6pGUD27KUZslVJ1xxnsued8XqjlCbSlQ1OMUyPny_Bd_eoQvx9Lem6MGXA0mTilFcmqOfq_jT4Wglr7V2rcqfaulbwXF83r1UPTmnr_4iCARWln0dtVT0cKW4oMF_D90l_IU71M5W8Zsl62-WnXr54dDSt5hy34B2bHHkA</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Loes, Chad N</creator><creator>Salisbury, Mark H</creator><creator>Pascarella, Ernest T</creator><general>Springer Science+Business Media B. V</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Student perceptions of effective instruction and the development of critical thinking</title><author>Loes, Chad N ; Salisbury, Mark H ; Pascarella, Ernest T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-dda5fc16dff4eba05635882d6de0c10956f19c9b7f3fc57356d35a39967d0f173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Ausland</topic><topic>Classroom communication</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>College Freshmen</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Critical theory</topic><topic>Critical Thinking</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Attainment</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Hochschule</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Knowledge acquisition</topic><topic>Lehre</topic><topic>Liberal Arts</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Parent Background</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Racial Differences</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Secondary School Teachers</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Self report</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Statistical Significance</topic><topic>Student</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student evaluation of teachers</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Student Participation</topic><topic>Student teacher relationship</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studium</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Teacher Student Relationship</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loes, Chad N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salisbury, Mark H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascarella, Ernest T</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loes, Chad N</au><au>Salisbury, Mark H</au><au>Pascarella, Ernest T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1061026</ericid><atitle>Student perceptions of effective instruction and the development of critical thinking: A replication and extension</atitle><jtitle>Higher education</jtitle><stitle>High Educ</stitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>823</spage><epage>838</epage><pages>823-838</pages><issn>0018-1560</issn><eissn>1573-174X</eissn><coden>HREDAN</coden><abstract>This study utilized data from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education to test the robustness of research conducted by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) that explored the relationship between student perceptions of exposure to organized and clear instruction and growth in critical thinking skills among college freshmen. To accomplish this, we created fully-specified models that included statistical controls for an array of potential confounding influences such as, student race, sex, pre-college critical thinking ability, pre-college tested academic ability, parental educational degree attainment, pre-college academic motivation, and a measure of interaction with high school teachers. Net of these influences, our findings generally replicate those uncovered by Pascarella et al. (J Coll Stud Dev 37:7-19, 1996) which suggest that student perceptions of organized instruction are positively associated with gains in critical thinking. Perceptions of instructional clarity, however, failed to exert a statistically significant influence on the dependent variable. Lastly, the results of our analyses suggest the effect of student perceptions of organized instruction on critical thinking affects students similarly, regardless of tested academic preparation (ACT or equivalent score), sex, or pre-college critical thinking levels. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Science+Business Media B. V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10734-014-9807-0</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-1560 |
ispartof | Higher education, 2015-05, Vol.69 (5), p.823-838 |
issn | 0018-1560 1573-174X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1686417197 |
source | PAIS Index; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Ausland Classroom communication Cognition Cognition & reasoning Cognitive ability College Freshmen College students Critical theory Critical Thinking Education Educational Attainment Gender Differences Higher Education Hochschule Humanities Instructional Effectiveness Knowledge acquisition Lehre Liberal Arts Motivation Parent Background Perception Perceptions Predictor Variables Racial Differences Research methods Secondary School Teachers Secondary schools Self report Skills Statistical Significance Student Student Attitudes Student evaluation of teachers Student Motivation Student Participation Student teacher relationship Students Studium Study and teaching Teacher Student Relationship Teachers Teaching Teaching methods Thinking Skills USA |
title | Student perceptions of effective instruction and the development of critical thinking: A replication and extension |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T05%3A52%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Student%20perceptions%20of%20effective%20instruction%20and%20the%20development%20of%20critical%20thinking:%20A%20replication%20and%20extension&rft.jtitle=Higher%20education&rft.au=Loes,%20Chad%20N&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=823&rft.epage=838&rft.pages=823-838&rft.issn=0018-1560&rft.eissn=1573-174X&rft.coden=HREDAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10734-014-9807-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA434846488%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1680111645&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A434846488&rft_ericid=EJ1061026&rft_jstor_id=43648827&rfr_iscdi=true |