Ecology and geographic distribution of Yersinia enterocolitica among livestock and wildlife in China

[Display omitted] •The prevalence of Y. enterocolitica varies in different animal species and regions.•The highest prevalence is from pigs, dogs, and majority isolates were pathogenic.•The elevation, precipitation and air temperature are associated with Y. enterocolitica in animals.•Novel Y. enteroc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary microbiology 2015-07, Vol.178 (1-2), p.125-131
Hauptverfasser: Liang, Junrong, Duan, Ran, Xia, Shengli, Hao, Qiong, Yang, Jinchuan, Xiao, Yuchun, Qiu, Haiyan, Shi, Guoxiang, Wang, Shukun, Gu, Wenpeng, Wang, Chunxiang, Wang, Mingliu, Tian, Kecheng, Luo, Longze, Yang, Meng, Tian, Huaiyu, Wang, Jiazheng, Jing, Huaiqi, Wang, Xin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 131
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 125
container_title Veterinary microbiology
container_volume 178
creator Liang, Junrong
Duan, Ran
Xia, Shengli
Hao, Qiong
Yang, Jinchuan
Xiao, Yuchun
Qiu, Haiyan
Shi, Guoxiang
Wang, Shukun
Gu, Wenpeng
Wang, Chunxiang
Wang, Mingliu
Tian, Kecheng
Luo, Longze
Yang, Meng
Tian, Huaiyu
Wang, Jiazheng
Jing, Huaiqi
Wang, Xin
description [Display omitted] •The prevalence of Y. enterocolitica varies in different animal species and regions.•The highest prevalence is from pigs, dogs, and majority isolates were pathogenic.•The elevation, precipitation and air temperature are associated with Y. enterocolitica in animals.•Novel Y. enterocolitica was isolated from Microtus fuscus on plague foci.•Identical PFGE pattern from animals and patients suggested the source of infection. The results in this study show the prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica varies in different animal species and regions of China. The highest prevalence is among pigs (12.91%), followed by dogs (9.80%), Ochotona curzoniae (plateau pica) (6.76%), chickens (4.50%), rodents (3.40%), cattle (2.78%) and sheep (0.89%). Pathogenic isolates comprised the majority of the Y. enterocolitica recovered from pigs (73.50%) and dogs (59.44%); whereas the nonpathogenic Y. enterocolitica made up most of poultry and wildlife recovered strains. A correlation analysis comparing the prevalence and geographic factors showed the isolation rate of Y. enterocolitica in pigs and dogs was negatively correlated with elevation (r=−0.50, P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1686411639</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S037811351500190X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1686411639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-5aab163644e18e568b4c1b91d8ea962dc9d8b6629b049b193d4bdae4d24c8aaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9rGzEQxUVJqB2336AUHXNZV9Jq5d1LIRi3CQR6SQ45Cf2ZdcbdlVxp7ZBvX6VOcwwMzOX35s17hHzhbMkZV992yyNMI7qlYLxZsjJMfSBz3q7qSjRSnJE5q1dtxXndzMhFzjvGmOwU-0hmoukKxsSc-I2LQ9w-UxM83ULcJrN_REc95imhPUwYA409fYCUMaChECZIsYhwQmeoGWPY0gGPkKfofv8784SDH7AHioGuHzGYT-S8N0OGz697Qe5_bO7W19Xtr58366vbyslaTFVjjOWqVlICb6FRrZWO2477FkynhHedb61SorMlh-Vd7aX1BqQX0rXG9PWCXJ7u7lP8cygf6RGzg2EwAeIha65aJXmx6AoqT6hLMecEvd4nHE161pzpl371Tp_61S_9alaGqSL7-upwsCP4N9H_Qgvw_QRAyXlESDo7hODAYwI3aR_xfYe_Cl6PyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1686411639</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecology and geographic distribution of Yersinia enterocolitica among livestock and wildlife in China</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liang, Junrong ; Duan, Ran ; Xia, Shengli ; Hao, Qiong ; Yang, Jinchuan ; Xiao, Yuchun ; Qiu, Haiyan ; Shi, Guoxiang ; Wang, Shukun ; Gu, Wenpeng ; Wang, Chunxiang ; Wang, Mingliu ; Tian, Kecheng ; Luo, Longze ; Yang, Meng ; Tian, Huaiyu ; Wang, Jiazheng ; Jing, Huaiqi ; Wang, Xin</creator><creatorcontrib>Liang, Junrong ; Duan, Ran ; Xia, Shengli ; Hao, Qiong ; Yang, Jinchuan ; Xiao, Yuchun ; Qiu, Haiyan ; Shi, Guoxiang ; Wang, Shukun ; Gu, Wenpeng ; Wang, Chunxiang ; Wang, Mingliu ; Tian, Kecheng ; Luo, Longze ; Yang, Meng ; Tian, Huaiyu ; Wang, Jiazheng ; Jing, Huaiqi ; Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •The prevalence of Y. enterocolitica varies in different animal species and regions.•The highest prevalence is from pigs, dogs, and majority isolates were pathogenic.•The elevation, precipitation and air temperature are associated with Y. enterocolitica in animals.•Novel Y. enterocolitica was isolated from Microtus fuscus on plague foci.•Identical PFGE pattern from animals and patients suggested the source of infection. The results in this study show the prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica varies in different animal species and regions of China. The highest prevalence is among pigs (12.91%), followed by dogs (9.80%), Ochotona curzoniae (plateau pica) (6.76%), chickens (4.50%), rodents (3.40%), cattle (2.78%) and sheep (0.89%). Pathogenic isolates comprised the majority of the Y. enterocolitica recovered from pigs (73.50%) and dogs (59.44%); whereas the nonpathogenic Y. enterocolitica made up most of poultry and wildlife recovered strains. A correlation analysis comparing the prevalence and geographic factors showed the isolation rate of Y. enterocolitica in pigs and dogs was negatively correlated with elevation (r=−0.50, P&lt;0.05) and annual average air temperature (r=−0.43, P&lt;0.05), but there was positive correlation with annual precipitation (r=0.43, P&lt;0.05); conversely, the isolation rate from wildlife is positively correlated with elevation (r=0.3, P&lt;0.05) contrary to the result seen in livestock. Twelve novel biotype 2 pathogenic Y. enterocolitica carried ail and ystB virulence genes, and one biotype 1A nonpathogenic strain positive with ail, ystB and ystA genes were isolated from Microtus fuscus (Qinghai vole) on plague foci of the Qinghai–Xizang plateau. The PFGE pattern K6GN11C30021 was predominant in pigs (44.25%) and patients (41.18%); K6GN11C30068 was predominant in dogs (40.16%). Animal isolates from the same region shared the same pattern (K6GN11C30021 and K6GN11C30012), indicating they may be from the same clone and arose through cross infection. Moreover, the identical PFGE pattern among local animals and diarrhea patients suggested that the animals may be the source of infections in these areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2542</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25987302</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Altitude ; Animals ; Animals, Wild - microbiology ; Chickens - microbiology ; China - epidemiology ; Dogs - microbiology ; Ecology distribution of Yersinia ; Geography ; Livestock ; Livestock - microbiology ; Multi-host pathogens ; Prevalence ; Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis ; Rain ; Rodentia - microbiology ; Temperature ; Virulence ; Wildlife ; Yersinia enterocolitica - genetics ; Yersinia enterocolitica - pathogenicity ; Yersinia Infections - epidemiology ; Yersinia Infections - transmission ; Yersinia Infections - veterinary ; Zoonosis</subject><ispartof>Veterinary microbiology, 2015-07, Vol.178 (1-2), p.125-131</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-5aab163644e18e568b4c1b91d8ea962dc9d8b6629b049b193d4bdae4d24c8aaf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-5aab163644e18e568b4c1b91d8ea962dc9d8b6629b049b193d4bdae4d24c8aaf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037811351500190X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25987302$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liang, Junrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duan, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Shengli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Qiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jinchuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yuchun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Haiyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Guoxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shukun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Wenpeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chunxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Mingliu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Kecheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Longze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Huaiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jiazheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jing, Huaiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><title>Ecology and geographic distribution of Yersinia enterocolitica among livestock and wildlife in China</title><title>Veterinary microbiology</title><addtitle>Vet Microbiol</addtitle><description>[Display omitted] •The prevalence of Y. enterocolitica varies in different animal species and regions.•The highest prevalence is from pigs, dogs, and majority isolates were pathogenic.•The elevation, precipitation and air temperature are associated with Y. enterocolitica in animals.•Novel Y. enterocolitica was isolated from Microtus fuscus on plague foci.•Identical PFGE pattern from animals and patients suggested the source of infection. The results in this study show the prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica varies in different animal species and regions of China. The highest prevalence is among pigs (12.91%), followed by dogs (9.80%), Ochotona curzoniae (plateau pica) (6.76%), chickens (4.50%), rodents (3.40%), cattle (2.78%) and sheep (0.89%). Pathogenic isolates comprised the majority of the Y. enterocolitica recovered from pigs (73.50%) and dogs (59.44%); whereas the nonpathogenic Y. enterocolitica made up most of poultry and wildlife recovered strains. A correlation analysis comparing the prevalence and geographic factors showed the isolation rate of Y. enterocolitica in pigs and dogs was negatively correlated with elevation (r=−0.50, P&lt;0.05) and annual average air temperature (r=−0.43, P&lt;0.05), but there was positive correlation with annual precipitation (r=0.43, P&lt;0.05); conversely, the isolation rate from wildlife is positively correlated with elevation (r=0.3, P&lt;0.05) contrary to the result seen in livestock. Twelve novel biotype 2 pathogenic Y. enterocolitica carried ail and ystB virulence genes, and one biotype 1A nonpathogenic strain positive with ail, ystB and ystA genes were isolated from Microtus fuscus (Qinghai vole) on plague foci of the Qinghai–Xizang plateau. The PFGE pattern K6GN11C30021 was predominant in pigs (44.25%) and patients (41.18%); K6GN11C30068 was predominant in dogs (40.16%). Animal isolates from the same region shared the same pattern (K6GN11C30021 and K6GN11C30012), indicating they may be from the same clone and arose through cross infection. Moreover, the identical PFGE pattern among local animals and diarrhea patients suggested that the animals may be the source of infections in these areas.</description><subject>Altitude</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Wild - microbiology</subject><subject>Chickens - microbiology</subject><subject>China - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dogs - microbiology</subject><subject>Ecology distribution of Yersinia</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock - microbiology</subject><subject>Multi-host pathogens</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rodentia - microbiology</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Virulence</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Yersinia enterocolitica - genetics</subject><subject>Yersinia enterocolitica - pathogenicity</subject><subject>Yersinia Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Yersinia Infections - transmission</subject><subject>Yersinia Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Zoonosis</subject><issn>0378-1135</issn><issn>1873-2542</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9rGzEQxUVJqB2336AUHXNZV9Jq5d1LIRi3CQR6SQ45Cf2ZdcbdlVxp7ZBvX6VOcwwMzOX35s17hHzhbMkZV992yyNMI7qlYLxZsjJMfSBz3q7qSjRSnJE5q1dtxXndzMhFzjvGmOwU-0hmoukKxsSc-I2LQ9w-UxM83ULcJrN_REc95imhPUwYA409fYCUMaChECZIsYhwQmeoGWPY0gGPkKfofv8784SDH7AHioGuHzGYT-S8N0OGz697Qe5_bO7W19Xtr58366vbyslaTFVjjOWqVlICb6FRrZWO2477FkynhHedb61SorMlh-Vd7aX1BqQX0rXG9PWCXJ7u7lP8cygf6RGzg2EwAeIha65aJXmx6AoqT6hLMecEvd4nHE161pzpl371Tp_61S_9alaGqSL7-upwsCP4N9H_Qgvw_QRAyXlESDo7hODAYwI3aR_xfYe_Cl6PyQ</recordid><startdate>20150709</startdate><enddate>20150709</enddate><creator>Liang, Junrong</creator><creator>Duan, Ran</creator><creator>Xia, Shengli</creator><creator>Hao, Qiong</creator><creator>Yang, Jinchuan</creator><creator>Xiao, Yuchun</creator><creator>Qiu, Haiyan</creator><creator>Shi, Guoxiang</creator><creator>Wang, Shukun</creator><creator>Gu, Wenpeng</creator><creator>Wang, Chunxiang</creator><creator>Wang, Mingliu</creator><creator>Tian, Kecheng</creator><creator>Luo, Longze</creator><creator>Yang, Meng</creator><creator>Tian, Huaiyu</creator><creator>Wang, Jiazheng</creator><creator>Jing, Huaiqi</creator><creator>Wang, Xin</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150709</creationdate><title>Ecology and geographic distribution of Yersinia enterocolitica among livestock and wildlife in China</title><author>Liang, Junrong ; Duan, Ran ; Xia, Shengli ; Hao, Qiong ; Yang, Jinchuan ; Xiao, Yuchun ; Qiu, Haiyan ; Shi, Guoxiang ; Wang, Shukun ; Gu, Wenpeng ; Wang, Chunxiang ; Wang, Mingliu ; Tian, Kecheng ; Luo, Longze ; Yang, Meng ; Tian, Huaiyu ; Wang, Jiazheng ; Jing, Huaiqi ; Wang, Xin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-5aab163644e18e568b4c1b91d8ea962dc9d8b6629b049b193d4bdae4d24c8aaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Altitude</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Wild - microbiology</topic><topic>Chickens - microbiology</topic><topic>China - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dogs - microbiology</topic><topic>Ecology distribution of Yersinia</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock - microbiology</topic><topic>Multi-host pathogens</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rodentia - microbiology</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Virulence</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Yersinia enterocolitica - genetics</topic><topic>Yersinia enterocolitica - pathogenicity</topic><topic>Yersinia Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Yersinia Infections - transmission</topic><topic>Yersinia Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Zoonosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liang, Junrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duan, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Shengli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Qiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jinchuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yuchun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Haiyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Guoxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shukun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Wenpeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chunxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Mingliu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Kecheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Longze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Huaiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jiazheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jing, Huaiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liang, Junrong</au><au>Duan, Ran</au><au>Xia, Shengli</au><au>Hao, Qiong</au><au>Yang, Jinchuan</au><au>Xiao, Yuchun</au><au>Qiu, Haiyan</au><au>Shi, Guoxiang</au><au>Wang, Shukun</au><au>Gu, Wenpeng</au><au>Wang, Chunxiang</au><au>Wang, Mingliu</au><au>Tian, Kecheng</au><au>Luo, Longze</au><au>Yang, Meng</au><au>Tian, Huaiyu</au><au>Wang, Jiazheng</au><au>Jing, Huaiqi</au><au>Wang, Xin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecology and geographic distribution of Yersinia enterocolitica among livestock and wildlife in China</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Microbiol</addtitle><date>2015-07-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>178</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>125-131</pages><issn>0378-1135</issn><eissn>1873-2542</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •The prevalence of Y. enterocolitica varies in different animal species and regions.•The highest prevalence is from pigs, dogs, and majority isolates were pathogenic.•The elevation, precipitation and air temperature are associated with Y. enterocolitica in animals.•Novel Y. enterocolitica was isolated from Microtus fuscus on plague foci.•Identical PFGE pattern from animals and patients suggested the source of infection. The results in this study show the prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica varies in different animal species and regions of China. The highest prevalence is among pigs (12.91%), followed by dogs (9.80%), Ochotona curzoniae (plateau pica) (6.76%), chickens (4.50%), rodents (3.40%), cattle (2.78%) and sheep (0.89%). Pathogenic isolates comprised the majority of the Y. enterocolitica recovered from pigs (73.50%) and dogs (59.44%); whereas the nonpathogenic Y. enterocolitica made up most of poultry and wildlife recovered strains. A correlation analysis comparing the prevalence and geographic factors showed the isolation rate of Y. enterocolitica in pigs and dogs was negatively correlated with elevation (r=−0.50, P&lt;0.05) and annual average air temperature (r=−0.43, P&lt;0.05), but there was positive correlation with annual precipitation (r=0.43, P&lt;0.05); conversely, the isolation rate from wildlife is positively correlated with elevation (r=0.3, P&lt;0.05) contrary to the result seen in livestock. Twelve novel biotype 2 pathogenic Y. enterocolitica carried ail and ystB virulence genes, and one biotype 1A nonpathogenic strain positive with ail, ystB and ystA genes were isolated from Microtus fuscus (Qinghai vole) on plague foci of the Qinghai–Xizang plateau. The PFGE pattern K6GN11C30021 was predominant in pigs (44.25%) and patients (41.18%); K6GN11C30068 was predominant in dogs (40.16%). Animal isolates from the same region shared the same pattern (K6GN11C30021 and K6GN11C30012), indicating they may be from the same clone and arose through cross infection. Moreover, the identical PFGE pattern among local animals and diarrhea patients suggested that the animals may be the source of infections in these areas.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25987302</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.006</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-1135
ispartof Veterinary microbiology, 2015-07, Vol.178 (1-2), p.125-131
issn 0378-1135
1873-2542
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1686411639
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Altitude
Animals
Animals, Wild - microbiology
Chickens - microbiology
China - epidemiology
Dogs - microbiology
Ecology distribution of Yersinia
Geography
Livestock
Livestock - microbiology
Multi-host pathogens
Prevalence
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
Rain
Rodentia - microbiology
Temperature
Virulence
Wildlife
Yersinia enterocolitica - genetics
Yersinia enterocolitica - pathogenicity
Yersinia Infections - epidemiology
Yersinia Infections - transmission
Yersinia Infections - veterinary
Zoonosis
title Ecology and geographic distribution of Yersinia enterocolitica among livestock and wildlife in China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A39%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecology%20and%20geographic%20distribution%20of%20Yersinia%20enterocolitica%20among%20livestock%20and%20wildlife%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20microbiology&rft.au=Liang,%20Junrong&rft.date=2015-07-09&rft.volume=178&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=125-131&rft.issn=0378-1135&rft.eissn=1873-2542&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1686411639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1686411639&rft_id=info:pmid/25987302&rft_els_id=S037811351500190X&rfr_iscdi=true