Silvicultural Rehabilitation of Cutover Mixedwood Stands

We investigated rehabilitation of mixedwood stands degraded by exploitative cutting on the Penobscot Experimental Forest in Maine. Three precommercial rehabilitation treatments were applied: control (no rehabilitation), moderate rehabilitation (crop tree release [CTR]), and intensive rehabilitation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of forestry 2014-05, Vol.112 (3), p.261-271
Hauptverfasser: Kenefic, Laura S, Bataineh, Mohammad, Wilson, Jeremy S, Brissette, John C, Nyland, Ralph D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 271
container_issue 3
container_start_page 261
container_title Journal of forestry
container_volume 112
creator Kenefic, Laura S
Bataineh, Mohammad
Wilson, Jeremy S
Brissette, John C
Nyland, Ralph D
description We investigated rehabilitation of mixedwood stands degraded by exploitative cutting on the Penobscot Experimental Forest in Maine. Three precommercial rehabilitation treatments were applied: control (no rehabilitation), moderate rehabilitation (crop tree release [CTR]), and intensive rehabilitation (CTR, timber stand improvement [TSI], and red spruce fill planting). Crop trees (primarily red maple, paper birch, spruce, aspen, and eastern hemlock) were selected and released based on their potential for improved growth and value, spacing, and species composition. Rehabilitation reduced sapling basal area, density, and hardwood abundance and increased crop tree diameter increment. Fill planting increased spruce stocking, but many planted seedlings were browsed. Long-term projections suggested that future stand value will repay costs of moderate rehabilitation (CTR); intensive rehabilitation (CTR-TSI-planting) as applied in this study requires greater investment than can be repaid through quality and growth improvements of low-value hardwoods and softwoods. Although simulations suggested no difference in future stand value between treated and untreated stands, improvements in composition, growth, and quality after rehabilitation will facilitate later commercial thinning and shelterwood regeneration in stands which otherwise have few management options.
doi_str_mv 10.5849/jof.13-033
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685840298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1547851786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e9dd29073241d33267bbda70175cb6252ad534875646d524acddd351774c3b233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1KAzEYRYMoWKsbn2DAjQhTk3z5m6UUq0JFsLoeMpMMpkwnNclUfXsjdeXG1d2ce-FchM4JnnHFquu172YESgxwgCakAlWCZOIQTTCmtCQUk2N0EuMaY6wEsAlSK9fvXDv2aQy6L57tm25c75JOzg-F74r5mPzOhuLRfVrz4b0pVkkPJp6io0730Z795hS9Lm5f5vfl8unuYX6zLFsQJJW2MoZWWAJlxABQIZvGaImJ5G0jKKfacGBKcsGE4ZTp1hgDnEjJWmgowBRd7ne3wb-PNqZ642Jr-14P1o-xJkJlc0wr9T_KmVR5OptP0cUfdO3HMGSRTEHFAHMpM3W1p9rgYwy2q7fBbXT4qgmuf_7Ora4mUOe_4RvolXC9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1539430577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Silvicultural Rehabilitation of Cutover Mixedwood Stands</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Kenefic, Laura S ; Bataineh, Mohammad ; Wilson, Jeremy S ; Brissette, John C ; Nyland, Ralph D</creator><creatorcontrib>Kenefic, Laura S ; Bataineh, Mohammad ; Wilson, Jeremy S ; Brissette, John C ; Nyland, Ralph D</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated rehabilitation of mixedwood stands degraded by exploitative cutting on the Penobscot Experimental Forest in Maine. Three precommercial rehabilitation treatments were applied: control (no rehabilitation), moderate rehabilitation (crop tree release [CTR]), and intensive rehabilitation (CTR, timber stand improvement [TSI], and red spruce fill planting). Crop trees (primarily red maple, paper birch, spruce, aspen, and eastern hemlock) were selected and released based on their potential for improved growth and value, spacing, and species composition. Rehabilitation reduced sapling basal area, density, and hardwood abundance and increased crop tree diameter increment. Fill planting increased spruce stocking, but many planted seedlings were browsed. Long-term projections suggested that future stand value will repay costs of moderate rehabilitation (CTR); intensive rehabilitation (CTR-TSI-planting) as applied in this study requires greater investment than can be repaid through quality and growth improvements of low-value hardwoods and softwoods. Although simulations suggested no difference in future stand value between treated and untreated stands, improvements in composition, growth, and quality after rehabilitation will facilitate later commercial thinning and shelterwood regeneration in stands which otherwise have few management options.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1201</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5849/jof.13-033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Costs ; Crops ; Density ; Experiments ; Forests ; Hardwoods ; Planting ; Rehabilitation ; Stands ; Supports ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Journal of forestry, 2014-05, Vol.112 (3), p.261-271</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of American Foresters May 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e9dd29073241d33267bbda70175cb6252ad534875646d524acddd351774c3b233</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kenefic, Laura S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bataineh, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jeremy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brissette, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyland, Ralph D</creatorcontrib><title>Silvicultural Rehabilitation of Cutover Mixedwood Stands</title><title>Journal of forestry</title><description>We investigated rehabilitation of mixedwood stands degraded by exploitative cutting on the Penobscot Experimental Forest in Maine. Three precommercial rehabilitation treatments were applied: control (no rehabilitation), moderate rehabilitation (crop tree release [CTR]), and intensive rehabilitation (CTR, timber stand improvement [TSI], and red spruce fill planting). Crop trees (primarily red maple, paper birch, spruce, aspen, and eastern hemlock) were selected and released based on their potential for improved growth and value, spacing, and species composition. Rehabilitation reduced sapling basal area, density, and hardwood abundance and increased crop tree diameter increment. Fill planting increased spruce stocking, but many planted seedlings were browsed. Long-term projections suggested that future stand value will repay costs of moderate rehabilitation (CTR); intensive rehabilitation (CTR-TSI-planting) as applied in this study requires greater investment than can be repaid through quality and growth improvements of low-value hardwoods and softwoods. Although simulations suggested no difference in future stand value between treated and untreated stands, improvements in composition, growth, and quality after rehabilitation will facilitate later commercial thinning and shelterwood regeneration in stands which otherwise have few management options.</description><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Hardwoods</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Stands</subject><subject>Supports</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0022-1201</issn><issn>1938-3746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1KAzEYRYMoWKsbn2DAjQhTk3z5m6UUq0JFsLoeMpMMpkwnNclUfXsjdeXG1d2ce-FchM4JnnHFquu172YESgxwgCakAlWCZOIQTTCmtCQUk2N0EuMaY6wEsAlSK9fvXDv2aQy6L57tm25c75JOzg-F74r5mPzOhuLRfVrz4b0pVkkPJp6io0730Z795hS9Lm5f5vfl8unuYX6zLFsQJJW2MoZWWAJlxABQIZvGaImJ5G0jKKfacGBKcsGE4ZTp1hgDnEjJWmgowBRd7ne3wb-PNqZ642Jr-14P1o-xJkJlc0wr9T_KmVR5OptP0cUfdO3HMGSRTEHFAHMpM3W1p9rgYwy2q7fBbXT4qgmuf_7Ora4mUOe_4RvolXC9</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Kenefic, Laura S</creator><creator>Bataineh, Mohammad</creator><creator>Wilson, Jeremy S</creator><creator>Brissette, John C</creator><creator>Nyland, Ralph D</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Silvicultural Rehabilitation of Cutover Mixedwood Stands</title><author>Kenefic, Laura S ; Bataineh, Mohammad ; Wilson, Jeremy S ; Brissette, John C ; Nyland, Ralph D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e9dd29073241d33267bbda70175cb6252ad534875646d524acddd351774c3b233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Hardwoods</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Stands</topic><topic>Supports</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kenefic, Laura S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bataineh, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jeremy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brissette, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyland, Ralph D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of forestry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kenefic, Laura S</au><au>Bataineh, Mohammad</au><au>Wilson, Jeremy S</au><au>Brissette, John C</au><au>Nyland, Ralph D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Silvicultural Rehabilitation of Cutover Mixedwood Stands</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forestry</jtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>261-271</pages><issn>0022-1201</issn><eissn>1938-3746</eissn><abstract>We investigated rehabilitation of mixedwood stands degraded by exploitative cutting on the Penobscot Experimental Forest in Maine. Three precommercial rehabilitation treatments were applied: control (no rehabilitation), moderate rehabilitation (crop tree release [CTR]), and intensive rehabilitation (CTR, timber stand improvement [TSI], and red spruce fill planting). Crop trees (primarily red maple, paper birch, spruce, aspen, and eastern hemlock) were selected and released based on their potential for improved growth and value, spacing, and species composition. Rehabilitation reduced sapling basal area, density, and hardwood abundance and increased crop tree diameter increment. Fill planting increased spruce stocking, but many planted seedlings were browsed. Long-term projections suggested that future stand value will repay costs of moderate rehabilitation (CTR); intensive rehabilitation (CTR-TSI-planting) as applied in this study requires greater investment than can be repaid through quality and growth improvements of low-value hardwoods and softwoods. Although simulations suggested no difference in future stand value between treated and untreated stands, improvements in composition, growth, and quality after rehabilitation will facilitate later commercial thinning and shelterwood regeneration in stands which otherwise have few management options.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.5849/jof.13-033</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1201
ispartof Journal of forestry, 2014-05, Vol.112 (3), p.261-271
issn 0022-1201
1938-3746
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685840298
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Costs
Crops
Density
Experiments
Forests
Hardwoods
Planting
Rehabilitation
Stands
Supports
Trees
title Silvicultural Rehabilitation of Cutover Mixedwood Stands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T21%3A09%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Silvicultural%20Rehabilitation%20of%20Cutover%20Mixedwood%20Stands&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forestry&rft.au=Kenefic,%20Laura%20S&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=261-271&rft.issn=0022-1201&rft.eissn=1938-3746&rft_id=info:doi/10.5849/jof.13-033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1547851786%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1539430577&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true