Biomass and carbon storage of Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations in the Pearl River Delta, South China
► Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations showed a high potential to sequester biomass and carbon in the Pearl River delta. ► The capacity of Acacia to sequester carbon was higher than that of Eucalyptus. ► The understory, litter and coarse woody debris contributed significantly to the biomass of plantati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forest ecology and management 2012-08, Vol.277, p.90-97 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 97 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 90 |
container_title | Forest ecology and management |
container_volume | 277 |
creator | Zhang, Hui Guan, DongSheng Song, MingWei |
description | ► Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations showed a high potential to sequester biomass and carbon in the Pearl River delta. ► The capacity of Acacia to sequester carbon was higher than that of Eucalyptus. ► The understory, litter and coarse woody debris contributed significantly to the biomass of plantation ecosystem. ► The biomass expansion factor (BEF) concept was extended to cover Eucalyptus plantations at a regional level. ► The continuos BEF method applicable to Acacia plantations was developed.
Forest plantations represent an important carbon sink. In the Pearl River Delta (PRD) in Southern China, fast-growing Eucalyptus and Acacia are favoured plantation species, but little is known regarding their efficiency with respect to biomass production, partitioning and dynamics with stand age, or the contribution made by the understory, litter and coarse woody debris (CWD) to the volume of biomass and fixed carbon. Here, a set of 21 plantations of various ages were monitored for the pattern of biomass accumulation and partitioning. A continuous biomass expansion factor (BEF) method was applied to a set of forest inventory data (FID) over the periods 1989–2003 to estimate biomass accumulation, carbon storage and its pattern of change over time. The accumulation of biomass increased with stand age, reaching, respectively, 207.45 and 189.35tha−1 in mature Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations. The contribution of secondary biomass from the understory, litter layer and CWD accounted for, respectively, up to 10.2% and 20.3% of the total biomass in the two types of plantation, highlighting the significance of secondary biomass. At a similar growth stage, the ranking of the contribution to secondary biomass in the Eucalyptus plantations was litter>herbaceous plants>shrubs>CWD, while in the Acacia plantations, it was litter>CWD>shrubs>herbaceous plants. The Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations in the PRD accumulated some 2.66–7.84Mt of biomass and sequestered 1.33–3.92Mt of carbon. For both species, the bulk of the plantations (Eucalyptus 82.1%, Acacia 89.3%) were at the young to middle-aged stage. The Acacia plantations generated a higher biomass density than the Eucalyptus plantations. Forest management intensification and reforestation programmes, especially targeting Acacia or mixed Eucalyptus/Acacia forests, offer good potential for future carbon sequestration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685815016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378112712002241</els_id><sourcerecordid>1685815016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-3045dab5529fff40f46af68fea02db1aa6ba898deb697ae0289e30d871dbf9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMoOK7-Aw-5CB7sNkkn3emLsM6uH7Cg6N5DdVJxMvR0xiS9sP_eLL141FNB8dT7Fg8hrzlrOeP9-2PrY0IbW8G4aJls6_IJ2XE9iGZgUjwlO9YNuuFcDM_Ji5yPjDGlpN4R_BjiCXKmsDhqIU1xobnEBL-QRk-vVwvz_bmsG3BpwQag5xmWAiXEJdOw0HJA-h0hzfRHuMNEr3Au8I7-jGs50P0hLPCSPPMwZ3z1OC_I7afr2_2X5ubb56_7y5vGyl6XpmNSOZiUEqP3XjIve_C99ghMuIkD9BPoUTuc-nEAZEKP2DGnB-4mP7rugrzdYs8p_l4xF3MK2eJc38W4ZsN7rTRX1c7_0RrORKeEqqjcUJtizgm9OadwgnRfIfPg3xzN5t88-DdMmq3hzWMD5CrRJ1hsyH9vRc84H0dWuQ8bh1XMXcBksg24WHShZhbjYvh30R9mVJ1m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1028023525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomass and carbon storage of Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations in the Pearl River Delta, South China</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhang, Hui ; Guan, DongSheng ; Song, MingWei</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hui ; Guan, DongSheng ; Song, MingWei</creatorcontrib><description>► Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations showed a high potential to sequester biomass and carbon in the Pearl River delta. ► The capacity of Acacia to sequester carbon was higher than that of Eucalyptus. ► The understory, litter and coarse woody debris contributed significantly to the biomass of plantation ecosystem. ► The biomass expansion factor (BEF) concept was extended to cover Eucalyptus plantations at a regional level. ► The continuos BEF method applicable to Acacia plantations was developed.
Forest plantations represent an important carbon sink. In the Pearl River Delta (PRD) in Southern China, fast-growing Eucalyptus and Acacia are favoured plantation species, but little is known regarding their efficiency with respect to biomass production, partitioning and dynamics with stand age, or the contribution made by the understory, litter and coarse woody debris (CWD) to the volume of biomass and fixed carbon. Here, a set of 21 plantations of various ages were monitored for the pattern of biomass accumulation and partitioning. A continuous biomass expansion factor (BEF) method was applied to a set of forest inventory data (FID) over the periods 1989–2003 to estimate biomass accumulation, carbon storage and its pattern of change over time. The accumulation of biomass increased with stand age, reaching, respectively, 207.45 and 189.35tha−1 in mature Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations. The contribution of secondary biomass from the understory, litter layer and CWD accounted for, respectively, up to 10.2% and 20.3% of the total biomass in the two types of plantation, highlighting the significance of secondary biomass. At a similar growth stage, the ranking of the contribution to secondary biomass in the Eucalyptus plantations was litter>herbaceous plants>shrubs>CWD, while in the Acacia plantations, it was litter>CWD>shrubs>herbaceous plants. The Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations in the PRD accumulated some 2.66–7.84Mt of biomass and sequestered 1.33–3.92Mt of carbon. For both species, the bulk of the plantations (Eucalyptus 82.1%, Acacia 89.3%) were at the young to middle-aged stage. The Acacia plantations generated a higher biomass density than the Eucalyptus plantations. Forest management intensification and reforestation programmes, especially targeting Acacia or mixed Eucalyptus/Acacia forests, offer good potential for future carbon sequestration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1127</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.016</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FECMDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acacia ; Age ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Biomass and carbon storage ; Carbon ; China ; Continuous biomass expansion factor method (BEF method) ; Eucalyptus ; Forestry ; Forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Partitioning ; Plantations ; Secondary biomass ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><ispartof>Forest ecology and management, 2012-08, Vol.277, p.90-97</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-3045dab5529fff40f46af68fea02db1aa6ba898deb697ae0289e30d871dbf9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-3045dab5529fff40f46af68fea02db1aa6ba898deb697ae0289e30d871dbf9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112712002241$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26011990$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guan, DongSheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, MingWei</creatorcontrib><title>Biomass and carbon storage of Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations in the Pearl River Delta, South China</title><title>Forest ecology and management</title><description>► Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations showed a high potential to sequester biomass and carbon in the Pearl River delta. ► The capacity of Acacia to sequester carbon was higher than that of Eucalyptus. ► The understory, litter and coarse woody debris contributed significantly to the biomass of plantation ecosystem. ► The biomass expansion factor (BEF) concept was extended to cover Eucalyptus plantations at a regional level. ► The continuos BEF method applicable to Acacia plantations was developed.
Forest plantations represent an important carbon sink. In the Pearl River Delta (PRD) in Southern China, fast-growing Eucalyptus and Acacia are favoured plantation species, but little is known regarding their efficiency with respect to biomass production, partitioning and dynamics with stand age, or the contribution made by the understory, litter and coarse woody debris (CWD) to the volume of biomass and fixed carbon. Here, a set of 21 plantations of various ages were monitored for the pattern of biomass accumulation and partitioning. A continuous biomass expansion factor (BEF) method was applied to a set of forest inventory data (FID) over the periods 1989–2003 to estimate biomass accumulation, carbon storage and its pattern of change over time. The accumulation of biomass increased with stand age, reaching, respectively, 207.45 and 189.35tha−1 in mature Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations. The contribution of secondary biomass from the understory, litter layer and CWD accounted for, respectively, up to 10.2% and 20.3% of the total biomass in the two types of plantation, highlighting the significance of secondary biomass. At a similar growth stage, the ranking of the contribution to secondary biomass in the Eucalyptus plantations was litter>herbaceous plants>shrubs>CWD, while in the Acacia plantations, it was litter>CWD>shrubs>herbaceous plants. The Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations in the PRD accumulated some 2.66–7.84Mt of biomass and sequestered 1.33–3.92Mt of carbon. For both species, the bulk of the plantations (Eucalyptus 82.1%, Acacia 89.3%) were at the young to middle-aged stage. The Acacia plantations generated a higher biomass density than the Eucalyptus plantations. Forest management intensification and reforestation programmes, especially targeting Acacia or mixed Eucalyptus/Acacia forests, offer good potential for future carbon sequestration.</description><subject>Acacia</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass and carbon storage</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Continuous biomass expansion factor method (BEF method)</subject><subject>Eucalyptus</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Partitioning</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Secondary biomass</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><issn>0378-1127</issn><issn>1872-7042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMoOK7-Aw-5CB7sNkkn3emLsM6uH7Cg6N5DdVJxMvR0xiS9sP_eLL141FNB8dT7Fg8hrzlrOeP9-2PrY0IbW8G4aJls6_IJ2XE9iGZgUjwlO9YNuuFcDM_Ji5yPjDGlpN4R_BjiCXKmsDhqIU1xobnEBL-QRk-vVwvz_bmsG3BpwQag5xmWAiXEJdOw0HJA-h0hzfRHuMNEr3Au8I7-jGs50P0hLPCSPPMwZ3z1OC_I7afr2_2X5ubb56_7y5vGyl6XpmNSOZiUEqP3XjIve_C99ghMuIkD9BPoUTuc-nEAZEKP2DGnB-4mP7rugrzdYs8p_l4xF3MK2eJc38W4ZsN7rTRX1c7_0RrORKeEqqjcUJtizgm9OadwgnRfIfPg3xzN5t88-DdMmq3hzWMD5CrRJ1hsyH9vRc84H0dWuQ8bh1XMXcBksg24WHShZhbjYvh30R9mVJ1m</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Zhang, Hui</creator><creator>Guan, DongSheng</creator><creator>Song, MingWei</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>Biomass and carbon storage of Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations in the Pearl River Delta, South China</title><author>Zhang, Hui ; Guan, DongSheng ; Song, MingWei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-3045dab5529fff40f46af68fea02db1aa6ba898deb697ae0289e30d871dbf9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Acacia</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass and carbon storage</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Continuous biomass expansion factor method (BEF method)</topic><topic>Eucalyptus</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Partitioning</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Secondary biomass</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guan, DongSheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, MingWei</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Hui</au><au>Guan, DongSheng</au><au>Song, MingWei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomass and carbon storage of Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations in the Pearl River Delta, South China</atitle><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>277</volume><spage>90</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>90-97</pages><issn>0378-1127</issn><eissn>1872-7042</eissn><coden>FECMDW</coden><abstract>► Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations showed a high potential to sequester biomass and carbon in the Pearl River delta. ► The capacity of Acacia to sequester carbon was higher than that of Eucalyptus. ► The understory, litter and coarse woody debris contributed significantly to the biomass of plantation ecosystem. ► The biomass expansion factor (BEF) concept was extended to cover Eucalyptus plantations at a regional level. ► The continuos BEF method applicable to Acacia plantations was developed.
Forest plantations represent an important carbon sink. In the Pearl River Delta (PRD) in Southern China, fast-growing Eucalyptus and Acacia are favoured plantation species, but little is known regarding their efficiency with respect to biomass production, partitioning and dynamics with stand age, or the contribution made by the understory, litter and coarse woody debris (CWD) to the volume of biomass and fixed carbon. Here, a set of 21 plantations of various ages were monitored for the pattern of biomass accumulation and partitioning. A continuous biomass expansion factor (BEF) method was applied to a set of forest inventory data (FID) over the periods 1989–2003 to estimate biomass accumulation, carbon storage and its pattern of change over time. The accumulation of biomass increased with stand age, reaching, respectively, 207.45 and 189.35tha−1 in mature Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations. The contribution of secondary biomass from the understory, litter layer and CWD accounted for, respectively, up to 10.2% and 20.3% of the total biomass in the two types of plantation, highlighting the significance of secondary biomass. At a similar growth stage, the ranking of the contribution to secondary biomass in the Eucalyptus plantations was litter>herbaceous plants>shrubs>CWD, while in the Acacia plantations, it was litter>CWD>shrubs>herbaceous plants. The Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations in the PRD accumulated some 2.66–7.84Mt of biomass and sequestered 1.33–3.92Mt of carbon. For both species, the bulk of the plantations (Eucalyptus 82.1%, Acacia 89.3%) were at the young to middle-aged stage. The Acacia plantations generated a higher biomass density than the Eucalyptus plantations. Forest management intensification and reforestation programmes, especially targeting Acacia or mixed Eucalyptus/Acacia forests, offer good potential for future carbon sequestration.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.016</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-1127 |
ispartof | Forest ecology and management, 2012-08, Vol.277, p.90-97 |
issn | 0378-1127 1872-7042 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685815016 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Acacia Age Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Biomass Biomass and carbon storage Carbon China Continuous biomass expansion factor method (BEF method) Eucalyptus Forestry Forests Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Partitioning Plantations Secondary biomass Synecology Terrestrial ecosystems |
title | Biomass and carbon storage of Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations in the Pearl River Delta, South China |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T07%3A36%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomass%20and%20carbon%20storage%20of%20Eucalyptus%20and%20Acacia%20plantations%20in%20the%20Pearl%20River%20Delta,%20South%20China&rft.jtitle=Forest%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.au=Zhang,%20Hui&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=277&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=90-97&rft.issn=0378-1127&rft.eissn=1872-7042&rft.coden=FECMDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1685815016%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1028023525&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378112712002241&rfr_iscdi=true |