Very near-nozzle shear-layer turbulence and jet noise
One of the principal challenges in the prediction and design of low-noise nozzles is accounting for the near-nozzle turbulent mixing layers at the high Reynolds numbers of engineering conditions. Even large-eddy simulation is a challenge because the locally largest scales are so small relative to th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of fluid mechanics 2015-05, Vol.770, p.27-51 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 51 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 27 |
container_title | Journal of fluid mechanics |
container_volume | 770 |
creator | Fontaine, Ryan A. Elliott, Gregory S. Austin, Joanna M. Freund, Jonathan B. |
description | One of the principal challenges in the prediction and design of low-noise nozzles is accounting for the near-nozzle turbulent mixing layers at the high Reynolds numbers of engineering conditions. Even large-eddy simulation is a challenge because the locally largest scales are so small relative to the nozzle diameter. Model-scale experiments likewise typically have relatively thick near-nozzle shear layers, which potentially hampers their applicability to high-Reynolds-number design. To quantify the sensitivity of the far-field sound to nozzle turbulent-shear-layer conditions, a family of diameter
$D$
nozzles is studied in which the exit turbulent boundary layer momentum thickness is varied from
$0.0042D$
up to
$0.021D$
for otherwise identical flow conditions. Measurements include particle image velocimetry (PIV) to within
$0.04D$
of the exit plane and far-field acoustic spectra. The influence of the initial turbulent-shear-layer thickness is pronounced, though it is less significant than the well-known sensitivity of the far-field sound to laminar versus turbulent shear-layer exit conditions. For thicker shear layers, the nominally missing region, where the corresponding thinner shear layer would develop, leads to the noise difference. The nozzle-exit momentum thickness successfully scales the high-frequency radiated sound for nozzles of different sizes and exhaust conditions. Yet, despite this success, the detailed turbulence statistics show distinct signatures of the different nozzle boundary layers from the different nozzles. Still, the different nozzle shear-layer thicknesses and shapes have a similar downstream development, which is consistent with a linear stability analysis of the measured velocity profiles. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/jfm.2015.119 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685802479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_jfm_2015_119</cupid><sourcerecordid>3763467801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-b200dc7339287ddd30548cd3f5386d8f0a507894d0e9afecbe19649579b0d7d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0MtKw0AUgOFBFKzVnQ8QcOPCxDOZ-1KKNyi4UbfDJHOiLbnUmWTRPo3P4pOZ0i5EXLg6DHxz4PyEnFPIKFB1vayaLAcqMkrNAZlQLk2qJBeHZAKQ5ymlORyTkxiXAJSBURMiXzGskxZdSNtus6kxie_bR-3WGJJ-CMVQY1ti4lqfLLH_-my7RcRTclS5OuLZfk7Jy93t8-whnT_dP85u5mnJpO7TIgfwpWLM5Fp57xkIrkvPKsG09LoCJ0Bpwz2gcRWWBVIjuRHKFOCVl2xKLnd7V6H7GDD2tlnEEuvatdgN0VKphYacK_MPqiQTQLke6cUvuuyG0I6HWKrGNIJxno_qaqfK0MUYsLKrsGhcWFsKdtvbjr3ttrcde48823PXFGHh3_DH1r8-fANzE4DJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1700153442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Very near-nozzle shear-layer turbulence and jet noise</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Fontaine, Ryan A. ; Elliott, Gregory S. ; Austin, Joanna M. ; Freund, Jonathan B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, Ryan A. ; Elliott, Gregory S. ; Austin, Joanna M. ; Freund, Jonathan B.</creatorcontrib><description>One of the principal challenges in the prediction and design of low-noise nozzles is accounting for the near-nozzle turbulent mixing layers at the high Reynolds numbers of engineering conditions. Even large-eddy simulation is a challenge because the locally largest scales are so small relative to the nozzle diameter. Model-scale experiments likewise typically have relatively thick near-nozzle shear layers, which potentially hampers their applicability to high-Reynolds-number design. To quantify the sensitivity of the far-field sound to nozzle turbulent-shear-layer conditions, a family of diameter
$D$
nozzles is studied in which the exit turbulent boundary layer momentum thickness is varied from
$0.0042D$
up to
$0.021D$
for otherwise identical flow conditions. Measurements include particle image velocimetry (PIV) to within
$0.04D$
of the exit plane and far-field acoustic spectra. The influence of the initial turbulent-shear-layer thickness is pronounced, though it is less significant than the well-known sensitivity of the far-field sound to laminar versus turbulent shear-layer exit conditions. For thicker shear layers, the nominally missing region, where the corresponding thinner shear layer would develop, leads to the noise difference. The nozzle-exit momentum thickness successfully scales the high-frequency radiated sound for nozzles of different sizes and exhaust conditions. Yet, despite this success, the detailed turbulence statistics show distinct signatures of the different nozzle boundary layers from the different nozzles. Still, the different nozzle shear-layer thicknesses and shapes have a similar downstream development, which is consistent with a linear stability analysis of the measured velocity profiles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1120</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2015.119</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Boundary layers ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Mathematical models ; Nozzles ; Shear layers ; Sound ; Stability analysis ; Turbulence ; Turbulent flow</subject><ispartof>Journal of fluid mechanics, 2015-05, Vol.770, p.27-51</ispartof><rights>2015 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-b200dc7339287ddd30548cd3f5386d8f0a507894d0e9afecbe19649579b0d7d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-b200dc7339287ddd30548cd3f5386d8f0a507894d0e9afecbe19649579b0d7d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022112015001196/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27923,27924,55627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, Ryan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Joanna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freund, Jonathan B.</creatorcontrib><title>Very near-nozzle shear-layer turbulence and jet noise</title><title>Journal of fluid mechanics</title><addtitle>J. Fluid Mech</addtitle><description>One of the principal challenges in the prediction and design of low-noise nozzles is accounting for the near-nozzle turbulent mixing layers at the high Reynolds numbers of engineering conditions. Even large-eddy simulation is a challenge because the locally largest scales are so small relative to the nozzle diameter. Model-scale experiments likewise typically have relatively thick near-nozzle shear layers, which potentially hampers their applicability to high-Reynolds-number design. To quantify the sensitivity of the far-field sound to nozzle turbulent-shear-layer conditions, a family of diameter
$D$
nozzles is studied in which the exit turbulent boundary layer momentum thickness is varied from
$0.0042D$
up to
$0.021D$
for otherwise identical flow conditions. Measurements include particle image velocimetry (PIV) to within
$0.04D$
of the exit plane and far-field acoustic spectra. The influence of the initial turbulent-shear-layer thickness is pronounced, though it is less significant than the well-known sensitivity of the far-field sound to laminar versus turbulent shear-layer exit conditions. For thicker shear layers, the nominally missing region, where the corresponding thinner shear layer would develop, leads to the noise difference. The nozzle-exit momentum thickness successfully scales the high-frequency radiated sound for nozzles of different sizes and exhaust conditions. Yet, despite this success, the detailed turbulence statistics show distinct signatures of the different nozzle boundary layers from the different nozzles. Still, the different nozzle shear-layer thicknesses and shapes have a similar downstream development, which is consistent with a linear stability analysis of the measured velocity profiles.</description><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nozzles</subject><subject>Shear layers</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Turbulent flow</subject><issn>0022-1120</issn><issn>1469-7645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0MtKw0AUgOFBFKzVnQ8QcOPCxDOZ-1KKNyi4UbfDJHOiLbnUmWTRPo3P4pOZ0i5EXLg6DHxz4PyEnFPIKFB1vayaLAcqMkrNAZlQLk2qJBeHZAKQ5ymlORyTkxiXAJSBURMiXzGskxZdSNtus6kxie_bR-3WGJJ-CMVQY1ti4lqfLLH_-my7RcRTclS5OuLZfk7Jy93t8-whnT_dP85u5mnJpO7TIgfwpWLM5Fp57xkIrkvPKsG09LoCJ0Bpwz2gcRWWBVIjuRHKFOCVl2xKLnd7V6H7GDD2tlnEEuvatdgN0VKphYacK_MPqiQTQLke6cUvuuyG0I6HWKrGNIJxno_qaqfK0MUYsLKrsGhcWFsKdtvbjr3ttrcde48823PXFGHh3_DH1r8-fANzE4DJ</recordid><startdate>20150510</startdate><enddate>20150510</enddate><creator>Fontaine, Ryan A.</creator><creator>Elliott, Gregory S.</creator><creator>Austin, Joanna M.</creator><creator>Freund, Jonathan B.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0W</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150510</creationdate><title>Very near-nozzle shear-layer turbulence and jet noise</title><author>Fontaine, Ryan A. ; Elliott, Gregory S. ; Austin, Joanna M. ; Freund, Jonathan B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-b200dc7339287ddd30548cd3f5386d8f0a507894d0e9afecbe19649579b0d7d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nozzles</topic><topic>Shear layers</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Turbulent flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, Ryan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Joanna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freund, Jonathan B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering & Technology Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of fluid mechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fontaine, Ryan A.</au><au>Elliott, Gregory S.</au><au>Austin, Joanna M.</au><au>Freund, Jonathan B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Very near-nozzle shear-layer turbulence and jet noise</atitle><jtitle>Journal of fluid mechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J. Fluid Mech</addtitle><date>2015-05-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>770</volume><spage>27</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>27-51</pages><issn>0022-1120</issn><eissn>1469-7645</eissn><abstract>One of the principal challenges in the prediction and design of low-noise nozzles is accounting for the near-nozzle turbulent mixing layers at the high Reynolds numbers of engineering conditions. Even large-eddy simulation is a challenge because the locally largest scales are so small relative to the nozzle diameter. Model-scale experiments likewise typically have relatively thick near-nozzle shear layers, which potentially hampers their applicability to high-Reynolds-number design. To quantify the sensitivity of the far-field sound to nozzle turbulent-shear-layer conditions, a family of diameter
$D$
nozzles is studied in which the exit turbulent boundary layer momentum thickness is varied from
$0.0042D$
up to
$0.021D$
for otherwise identical flow conditions. Measurements include particle image velocimetry (PIV) to within
$0.04D$
of the exit plane and far-field acoustic spectra. The influence of the initial turbulent-shear-layer thickness is pronounced, though it is less significant than the well-known sensitivity of the far-field sound to laminar versus turbulent shear-layer exit conditions. For thicker shear layers, the nominally missing region, where the corresponding thinner shear layer would develop, leads to the noise difference. The nozzle-exit momentum thickness successfully scales the high-frequency radiated sound for nozzles of different sizes and exhaust conditions. Yet, despite this success, the detailed turbulence statistics show distinct signatures of the different nozzle boundary layers from the different nozzles. Still, the different nozzle shear-layer thicknesses and shapes have a similar downstream development, which is consistent with a linear stability analysis of the measured velocity profiles.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/jfm.2015.119</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1120 |
ispartof | Journal of fluid mechanics, 2015-05, Vol.770, p.27-51 |
issn | 0022-1120 1469-7645 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685802479 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Boundary layers Computational fluid dynamics Fluid flow Mathematical models Nozzles Shear layers Sound Stability analysis Turbulence Turbulent flow |
title | Very near-nozzle shear-layer turbulence and jet noise |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T09%3A54%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Very%20near-nozzle%20shear-layer%20turbulence%20and%20jet%C2%A0noise&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20fluid%20mechanics&rft.au=Fontaine,%20Ryan%20A.&rft.date=2015-05-10&rft.volume=770&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=27-51&rft.issn=0022-1120&rft.eissn=1469-7645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/jfm.2015.119&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3763467801%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1700153442&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_jfm_2015_119&rfr_iscdi=true |