Tools for Supporting Responsible Decision-Making?
In this paper, we assess the characteristics decision support tools should have in order to support “responsible decision‐making”. To this end, we first describe responsible decision‐making. We argue that responsibility relates to both the outcome and the process of decision‐making. On the basis of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Systems research and behavioral science 2015-05, Vol.32 (3), p.312-329 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 329 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 312 |
| container_title | Systems research and behavioral science |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Vriens, Dirk Achterbergh, Jan |
| description | In this paper, we assess the characteristics decision support tools should have in order to support “responsible decision‐making”. To this end, we first describe responsible decision‐making. We argue that responsibility relates to both the outcome and the process of decision‐making. On the basis of this description, we discuss which conditions should be in place so as to increase the possibility of responsible decision‐making. Next, we discuss the characteristics of tools supporting responsible decision‐making in terms of their ability to support the realization of the required conditions for responsible decision‐making. We use these characteristics to identify three types of tools: “responsible”, “neutral”, and “irresponsible” tools. We illustrate the assessment of the responsibility of support tools by looking at group model building. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sres.2246 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685799769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1683078010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3966-18d88ddfd87c6e722aba4599a2352dd319b36629895a4f80cfdb6851702a84c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0E1LwzAYB_AiCs7pwW9Q8KKHbnmSNi8nEZ2bsPmyTT2GtE2lW9fUZEP37c3c8CAInvJAfv-Q5x8Ep4A6gBDuOqtdB-OY7gUtQEJEwGKy_z3jiCFMD4Mj52YIAQKAVgBTYyoXFsaGk1XTGLss67dwrF1jalemlQ5vdFa60tTRSM393eVxcFCoyumT3dkOnm970-tBNHzo311fDaOMCEoj4DnneV7knGVUM4xVquJECIVJgvOcgEgJpVhwkai44Cgr8pTyBPwfFY8zIO3gfPtuY837SrulXJQu01Wlam1WToLXTAhGxX8oQYz7nT09-0VnZmVrv8hG4TjmMU-8utiqzBrnKy1kY8uFsmsJSG56lpue5aZnb7tb-1FWev03lJNxb7JLRNtE6Zb68yeh7FxSRlgiX-_7UrwIGMHToxyQL3LXjAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1682448485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tools for Supporting Responsible Decision-Making?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Vriens, Dirk ; Achterbergh, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Vriens, Dirk ; Achterbergh, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we assess the characteristics decision support tools should have in order to support “responsible decision‐making”. To this end, we first describe responsible decision‐making. We argue that responsibility relates to both the outcome and the process of decision‐making. On the basis of this description, we discuss which conditions should be in place so as to increase the possibility of responsible decision‐making. Next, we discuss the characteristics of tools supporting responsible decision‐making in terms of their ability to support the realization of the required conditions for responsible decision‐making. We use these characteristics to identify three types of tools: “responsible”, “neutral”, and “irresponsible” tools. We illustrate the assessment of the responsibility of support tools by looking at group model building. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7026</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1743</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sres.2246</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Behavioural sciences ; Buildings ; Construction ; Construction equipment ; Copyright ; Decision making ; Decision making models ; Decision support systems ; decision support tools ; Decision theory ; Evaluation ; Organizational behavior ; organizational responsibility ; Responsibilities ; Responsibility ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Systems research and behavioral science, 2015-05, Vol.32 (3), p.312-329</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. May-Jun 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3966-18d88ddfd87c6e722aba4599a2352dd319b36629895a4f80cfdb6851702a84c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsres.2246$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsres.2246$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vriens, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achterbergh, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Tools for Supporting Responsible Decision-Making?</title><title>Systems research and behavioral science</title><addtitle>Syst. Res</addtitle><description>In this paper, we assess the characteristics decision support tools should have in order to support “responsible decision‐making”. To this end, we first describe responsible decision‐making. We argue that responsibility relates to both the outcome and the process of decision‐making. On the basis of this description, we discuss which conditions should be in place so as to increase the possibility of responsible decision‐making. Next, we discuss the characteristics of tools supporting responsible decision‐making in terms of their ability to support the realization of the required conditions for responsible decision‐making. We use these characteristics to identify three types of tools: “responsible”, “neutral”, and “irresponsible” tools. We illustrate the assessment of the responsibility of support tools by looking at group model building. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Behavioural sciences</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction equipment</subject><subject>Copyright</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision making models</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>decision support tools</subject><subject>Decision theory</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>organizational responsibility</subject><subject>Responsibilities</subject><subject>Responsibility</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1092-7026</issn><issn>1099-1743</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0E1LwzAYB_AiCs7pwW9Q8KKHbnmSNi8nEZ2bsPmyTT2GtE2lW9fUZEP37c3c8CAInvJAfv-Q5x8Ep4A6gBDuOqtdB-OY7gUtQEJEwGKy_z3jiCFMD4Mj52YIAQKAVgBTYyoXFsaGk1XTGLss67dwrF1jalemlQ5vdFa60tTRSM393eVxcFCoyumT3dkOnm970-tBNHzo311fDaOMCEoj4DnneV7knGVUM4xVquJECIVJgvOcgEgJpVhwkai44Cgr8pTyBPwfFY8zIO3gfPtuY837SrulXJQu01Wlam1WToLXTAhGxX8oQYz7nT09-0VnZmVrv8hG4TjmMU-8utiqzBrnKy1kY8uFsmsJSG56lpue5aZnb7tb-1FWev03lJNxb7JLRNtE6Zb68yeh7FxSRlgiX-_7UrwIGMHToxyQL3LXjAA</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Vriens, Dirk</creator><creator>Achterbergh, Jan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Tools for Supporting Responsible Decision-Making?</title><author>Vriens, Dirk ; Achterbergh, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3966-18d88ddfd87c6e722aba4599a2352dd319b36629895a4f80cfdb6851702a84c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Behavioural sciences</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction equipment</topic><topic>Copyright</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision making models</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>decision support tools</topic><topic>Decision theory</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>organizational responsibility</topic><topic>Responsibilities</topic><topic>Responsibility</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vriens, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achterbergh, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Systems research and behavioral science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vriens, Dirk</au><au>Achterbergh, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tools for Supporting Responsible Decision-Making?</atitle><jtitle>Systems research and behavioral science</jtitle><addtitle>Syst. Res</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>312</spage><epage>329</epage><pages>312-329</pages><issn>1092-7026</issn><eissn>1099-1743</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we assess the characteristics decision support tools should have in order to support “responsible decision‐making”. To this end, we first describe responsible decision‐making. We argue that responsibility relates to both the outcome and the process of decision‐making. On the basis of this description, we discuss which conditions should be in place so as to increase the possibility of responsible decision‐making. Next, we discuss the characteristics of tools supporting responsible decision‐making in terms of their ability to support the realization of the required conditions for responsible decision‐making. We use these characteristics to identify three types of tools: “responsible”, “neutral”, and “irresponsible” tools. We illustrate the assessment of the responsibility of support tools by looking at group model building. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/sres.2246</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1092-7026 |
| ispartof | Systems research and behavioral science, 2015-05, Vol.32 (3), p.312-329 |
| issn | 1092-7026 1099-1743 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685799769 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Assessments Behavioural sciences Buildings Construction Construction equipment Copyright Decision making Decision making models Decision support systems decision support tools Decision theory Evaluation Organizational behavior organizational responsibility Responsibilities Responsibility Studies |
| title | Tools for Supporting Responsible Decision-Making? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T11%3A24%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tools%20for%20Supporting%20Responsible%20Decision-Making?&rft.jtitle=Systems%20research%20and%20behavioral%20science&rft.au=Vriens,%20Dirk&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=312&rft.epage=329&rft.pages=312-329&rft.issn=1092-7026&rft.eissn=1099-1743&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sres.2246&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1683078010%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1682448485&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |