Multi‐site calibration using a grid‐based event rainfall–runoff model: a case study of the upstream areas of the Nakdong River basin in Korea

Most runoff analyses using a grid‐based distributed model use one parameter group calibrated at the outlet of a watershed, instead of dividing the watershed into subwatersheds. Significant differences between the observed value and the simulation result of the subwatersheds can occur if just one par...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrological processes 2015-04, Vol.29 (9), p.2089-2099
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Yun Seok, Choi, Cheon Kyu, Kim, Hung Soo, Kim, Kyung Tak, Kim, Soojun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2099
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2089
container_title Hydrological processes
container_volume 29
creator Choi, Yun Seok
Choi, Cheon Kyu
Kim, Hung Soo
Kim, Kyung Tak
Kim, Soojun
description Most runoff analyses using a grid‐based distributed model use one parameter group calibrated at the outlet of a watershed, instead of dividing the watershed into subwatersheds. Significant differences between the observed value and the simulation result of the subwatersheds can occur if just one parameter group is used in all subwatersheds that have different hydrological characteristics from each other. Therefore, to improve the simulation results of the subwatersheds within a watershed, a model calibrated at every subwatershed needs to be used to reflect the characteristics of each subwatershed. In this study, different parameter groups were set up for one or two sites using a distributed model, the GRM (Grid based Rainfall‐runoff Model), and the evaluations were based on the results of rainfall–runoff analysis, which uses a multi‐site calibration (MSC) technique to calibrate the model at the outlet of each site. The Hyangseok watershed in Naeseong River, which is a tributary of Nakdong River in Korea, was chosen as the study area. The watershed was divided into five subwatersheds each with a subwatershed outlet that was applied to the calibration sites. The MSC was applied for five cases. When a site was added for calibration in a watershed, the runoff simulation showed better results than the calibration of only one site at the most downstream area of the watershed. The MSC approach could improve the simulation results on the calibrated sites and even on the non‐calibrated sites, and the effect of MSC was improved when the calibrated site was closer to the runoff site. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hyp.10355
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685790037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3654338561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-4eb70babb93d7863e76303764d95a4ffd9f4b401874acae1c2e54da6dfd1db2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9qFTEUh4MoeK0ufAIDbnQx9mQmmUzcSVEr1j-oXbgKZyZJmzp3ck1mKnfXRxD6hn0Sj167ERQhJIfkO184_Bi7L-CJAKj3T7cbKhqlbrCVAGMqAZ26yVbQdapqodO32Z1SzgBAQgcrdvlmGed4dfG9xNnzAcfYZ5xjmvhS4nTCkZ_k6Oi9x-Id9-d-mnnGOAUcx6uLy7xMKQS-Ts6PT4keCONlXtyWp8DnU8-XTZmzxzVH2sv17Vv84hL5P8RznznJ48RpvU4E3WW3yF78vd_nHjt-8fzTwWF19O7lq4NnR9UghVKV9L2GHvveNE53beN120CjW-mMQhmCM0H2EkSnJQ7oxVB7JR22Ljjh-hqbPfZo593k9HXxZbbrWAY_jjj5tBQr2k5pA-T8D5Q-b8HUitCHf6BnackTDWJrbQRIpTv4F0Wu2pCuboh6vKOGnErJPthNjmvMWyvA_szbUt72V97E7u_Yb3H027-D9vDz--uOB7uOgMki5Vzs8ccahCIeFI3T_ACDz7ib</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1672976323</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi‐site calibration using a grid‐based event rainfall–runoff model: a case study of the upstream areas of the Nakdong River basin in Korea</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Choi, Yun Seok ; Choi, Cheon Kyu ; Kim, Hung Soo ; Kim, Kyung Tak ; Kim, Soojun</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yun Seok ; Choi, Cheon Kyu ; Kim, Hung Soo ; Kim, Kyung Tak ; Kim, Soojun</creatorcontrib><description>Most runoff analyses using a grid‐based distributed model use one parameter group calibrated at the outlet of a watershed, instead of dividing the watershed into subwatersheds. Significant differences between the observed value and the simulation result of the subwatersheds can occur if just one parameter group is used in all subwatersheds that have different hydrological characteristics from each other. Therefore, to improve the simulation results of the subwatersheds within a watershed, a model calibrated at every subwatershed needs to be used to reflect the characteristics of each subwatershed. In this study, different parameter groups were set up for one or two sites using a distributed model, the GRM (Grid based Rainfall‐runoff Model), and the evaluations were based on the results of rainfall–runoff analysis, which uses a multi‐site calibration (MSC) technique to calibrate the model at the outlet of each site. The Hyangseok watershed in Naeseong River, which is a tributary of Nakdong River in Korea, was chosen as the study area. The watershed was divided into five subwatersheds each with a subwatershed outlet that was applied to the calibration sites. The MSC was applied for five cases. When a site was added for calibration in a watershed, the runoff simulation showed better results than the calibration of only one site at the most downstream area of the watershed. The MSC approach could improve the simulation results on the calibrated sites and even on the non‐calibrated sites, and the effect of MSC was improved when the calibrated site was closer to the runoff site. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley</publisher><subject>Calibration ; case studies ; Computer simulation ; distributed runoff modelling ; GRM ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; multi‐site calibration ; Outlets ; parameter estimation ; Parameters ; Precipitation ; Rainfall ; Rainfall-runoff modeling ; Rainfall-runoff relationships ; River basins ; Rivers ; Runoff ; Runoff analysis ; Simulation ; subwatersheds ; Tributaries ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2015-04, Vol.29 (9), p.2089-2099</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-4eb70babb93d7863e76303764d95a4ffd9f4b401874acae1c2e54da6dfd1db2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-4eb70babb93d7863e76303764d95a4ffd9f4b401874acae1c2e54da6dfd1db2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhyp.10355$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhyp.10355$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yun Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Cheon Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hung Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kyung Tak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Soojun</creatorcontrib><title>Multi‐site calibration using a grid‐based event rainfall–runoff model: a case study of the upstream areas of the Nakdong River basin in Korea</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><description>Most runoff analyses using a grid‐based distributed model use one parameter group calibrated at the outlet of a watershed, instead of dividing the watershed into subwatersheds. Significant differences between the observed value and the simulation result of the subwatersheds can occur if just one parameter group is used in all subwatersheds that have different hydrological characteristics from each other. Therefore, to improve the simulation results of the subwatersheds within a watershed, a model calibrated at every subwatershed needs to be used to reflect the characteristics of each subwatershed. In this study, different parameter groups were set up for one or two sites using a distributed model, the GRM (Grid based Rainfall‐runoff Model), and the evaluations were based on the results of rainfall–runoff analysis, which uses a multi‐site calibration (MSC) technique to calibrate the model at the outlet of each site. The Hyangseok watershed in Naeseong River, which is a tributary of Nakdong River in Korea, was chosen as the study area. The watershed was divided into five subwatersheds each with a subwatershed outlet that was applied to the calibration sites. The MSC was applied for five cases. When a site was added for calibration in a watershed, the runoff simulation showed better results than the calibration of only one site at the most downstream area of the watershed. The MSC approach could improve the simulation results on the calibrated sites and even on the non‐calibrated sites, and the effect of MSC was improved when the calibrated site was closer to the runoff site. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>distributed runoff modelling</subject><subject>GRM</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>multi‐site calibration</subject><subject>Outlets</subject><subject>parameter estimation</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall-runoff modeling</subject><subject>Rainfall-runoff relationships</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Runoff analysis</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>subwatersheds</subject><subject>Tributaries</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9qFTEUh4MoeK0ufAIDbnQx9mQmmUzcSVEr1j-oXbgKZyZJmzp3ck1mKnfXRxD6hn0Sj167ERQhJIfkO184_Bi7L-CJAKj3T7cbKhqlbrCVAGMqAZ26yVbQdapqodO32Z1SzgBAQgcrdvlmGed4dfG9xNnzAcfYZ5xjmvhS4nTCkZ_k6Oi9x-Id9-d-mnnGOAUcx6uLy7xMKQS-Ts6PT4keCONlXtyWp8DnU8-XTZmzxzVH2sv17Vv84hL5P8RznznJ48RpvU4E3WW3yF78vd_nHjt-8fzTwWF19O7lq4NnR9UghVKV9L2GHvveNE53beN120CjW-mMQhmCM0H2EkSnJQ7oxVB7JR22Ljjh-hqbPfZo593k9HXxZbbrWAY_jjj5tBQr2k5pA-T8D5Q-b8HUitCHf6BnackTDWJrbQRIpTv4F0Wu2pCuboh6vKOGnErJPthNjmvMWyvA_szbUt72V97E7u_Yb3H027-D9vDz--uOB7uOgMki5Vzs8ccahCIeFI3T_ACDz7ib</recordid><startdate>20150430</startdate><enddate>20150430</enddate><creator>Choi, Yun Seok</creator><creator>Choi, Cheon Kyu</creator><creator>Kim, Hung Soo</creator><creator>Kim, Kyung Tak</creator><creator>Kim, Soojun</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150430</creationdate><title>Multi‐site calibration using a grid‐based event rainfall–runoff model: a case study of the upstream areas of the Nakdong River basin in Korea</title><author>Choi, Yun Seok ; Choi, Cheon Kyu ; Kim, Hung Soo ; Kim, Kyung Tak ; Kim, Soojun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-4eb70babb93d7863e76303764d95a4ffd9f4b401874acae1c2e54da6dfd1db2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>distributed runoff modelling</topic><topic>GRM</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>multi‐site calibration</topic><topic>Outlets</topic><topic>parameter estimation</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall-runoff modeling</topic><topic>Rainfall-runoff relationships</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Runoff analysis</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>subwatersheds</topic><topic>Tributaries</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yun Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Cheon Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hung Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kyung Tak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Soojun</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, Yun Seok</au><au>Choi, Cheon Kyu</au><au>Kim, Hung Soo</au><au>Kim, Kyung Tak</au><au>Kim, Soojun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi‐site calibration using a grid‐based event rainfall–runoff model: a case study of the upstream areas of the Nakdong River basin in Korea</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><date>2015-04-30</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2089</spage><epage>2099</epage><pages>2089-2099</pages><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><abstract>Most runoff analyses using a grid‐based distributed model use one parameter group calibrated at the outlet of a watershed, instead of dividing the watershed into subwatersheds. Significant differences between the observed value and the simulation result of the subwatersheds can occur if just one parameter group is used in all subwatersheds that have different hydrological characteristics from each other. Therefore, to improve the simulation results of the subwatersheds within a watershed, a model calibrated at every subwatershed needs to be used to reflect the characteristics of each subwatershed. In this study, different parameter groups were set up for one or two sites using a distributed model, the GRM (Grid based Rainfall‐runoff Model), and the evaluations were based on the results of rainfall–runoff analysis, which uses a multi‐site calibration (MSC) technique to calibrate the model at the outlet of each site. The Hyangseok watershed in Naeseong River, which is a tributary of Nakdong River in Korea, was chosen as the study area. The watershed was divided into five subwatersheds each with a subwatershed outlet that was applied to the calibration sites. The MSC was applied for five cases. When a site was added for calibration in a watershed, the runoff simulation showed better results than the calibration of only one site at the most downstream area of the watershed. The MSC approach could improve the simulation results on the calibrated sites and even on the non‐calibrated sites, and the effect of MSC was improved when the calibrated site was closer to the runoff site. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.10355</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6087
ispartof Hydrological processes, 2015-04, Vol.29 (9), p.2089-2099
issn 0885-6087
1099-1085
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685790037
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Calibration
case studies
Computer simulation
distributed runoff modelling
GRM
Hydrologic models
Hydrology
Mathematical models
Modelling
multi‐site calibration
Outlets
parameter estimation
Parameters
Precipitation
Rainfall
Rainfall-runoff modeling
Rainfall-runoff relationships
River basins
Rivers
Runoff
Runoff analysis
Simulation
subwatersheds
Tributaries
Watersheds
title Multi‐site calibration using a grid‐based event rainfall–runoff model: a case study of the upstream areas of the Nakdong River basin in Korea
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T18%3A08%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi%E2%80%90site%20calibration%20using%20a%20grid%E2%80%90based%20event%20rainfall%E2%80%93runoff%20model:%20a%20case%20study%20of%20the%20upstream%20areas%20of%20the%20Nakdong%20River%20basin%20in%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Choi,%20Yun%20Seok&rft.date=2015-04-30&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2089&rft.epage=2099&rft.pages=2089-2099&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.10355&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3654338561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1672976323&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true