Thunderstorm characteristics of importance to wind engineering

The idea that “wind is wind”, irrespective of causal mechanism, allows wind and pressure information collected in wind tunnels to be used in wind load standards. This concept is based on inherently stationary data and validated with field data that are collected from the stationary boundary layer (S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics 2014-02, Vol.125, p.121-132
Hauptverfasser: Lombardo, Franklin T., Smith, Douglas A., Schroeder, John L., Mehta, Kishor C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 132
container_issue
container_start_page 121
container_title Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics
container_volume 125
creator Lombardo, Franklin T.
Smith, Douglas A.
Schroeder, John L.
Mehta, Kishor C.
description The idea that “wind is wind”, irrespective of causal mechanism, allows wind and pressure information collected in wind tunnels to be used in wind load standards. This concept is based on inherently stationary data and validated with field data that are collected from the stationary boundary layer (SBL). Thunderstorms, important events for wind loading, display non-stationary characteristics. Yet thunderstorms are assumed to have the same properties as the SBL, even though differences have been shown, especially in short duration events. In this study, near-surface wind data from thunderstorms which displayed short and rapid wind speed increases (i.e., “ramp-up”) were identified and analyzed. Characteristics of the ramp-up events are detailed and compared with SBL data. Analysis revealed averaging times (moving averages) of 15–60s can be used on ramp-up wind data for comparison to SBL winds and ramp-up events have shorter time scales (1–5min) than those used in wind engineering practice. Within these shorter time scales turbulence spectra was similar to the SBL. Ramp-up vertical wind profiles rapidly evolve, have a downward transfer of momentum, and show differences from the SBL log-profile. Gust factors of ramp-up events differed from those of the SBL at averaging times greater than 60s and may differ between thunderstorm types. Overall, properties of ramp-up events also display considerable variability when compared to the SBL, which may need to be considered in wind load standards. •Shorter time scales than used in wind engineering were found for thunderstorm events which displayed rapid wind speed increases (i.e., ramp-up).•Ramp-up turbulence in the frequency domain was similar to the SBL and turbulence intensities fell within the range of the SBL at 15–60s averaging times.•Vertical ramp-up profiles show evolutionary behavior while maximum gust profiles suggest differences from the SBL.•Gust factors for ramp-up events show that the Durst curve should not be used for averaging times greater than 60s and can be fit to a cubic polynomial.•Thunderstorm events also display considerable variability, which may affect wind load standards.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jweia.2013.12.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685785554</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167610513002791</els_id><sourcerecordid>1676347659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-56e00a8397c49a2f1a09fc7a06bdbbee23578418b8fc7e117d518e4e89246ff53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gZss3STOTeaVhYIUX1BwU9fDZHLTTmiTOjO1-O-dWtfi6sLhOwfuR8g10AIoiNu-6PfoTFFSqAooC0rZCZmAkmWuoJanZJIomQug_JxchNBTSiWT1YTcL1a7oUUf4ug3mV0Zb2xE70J0NmRjl7nNdvTRDBazOGZ7N7QZDks3YIKG5SU568w64NXvnZL3p8fF7CWfvz2_zh7muWVAY84FUmpUVUvLalN2YGjdWWmoaNqmQSwrLhUD1aiUIoBsOShkqOqSia7j1ZTcHHe3fvzYYYh644LF9doMOO6CBqHSAuec_QOVomJS8Dqh1RG1fgzBY6e33m2M_9JA9UGs7vWPWH0Qq6HUSWxq3R1bmB7-dOh1sA6ToNZ5tFG3o_uz_w0l24JX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1676347659</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thunderstorm characteristics of importance to wind engineering</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lombardo, Franklin T. ; Smith, Douglas A. ; Schroeder, John L. ; Mehta, Kishor C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lombardo, Franklin T. ; Smith, Douglas A. ; Schroeder, John L. ; Mehta, Kishor C.</creatorcontrib><description>The idea that “wind is wind”, irrespective of causal mechanism, allows wind and pressure information collected in wind tunnels to be used in wind load standards. This concept is based on inherently stationary data and validated with field data that are collected from the stationary boundary layer (SBL). Thunderstorms, important events for wind loading, display non-stationary characteristics. Yet thunderstorms are assumed to have the same properties as the SBL, even though differences have been shown, especially in short duration events. In this study, near-surface wind data from thunderstorms which displayed short and rapid wind speed increases (i.e., “ramp-up”) were identified and analyzed. Characteristics of the ramp-up events are detailed and compared with SBL data. Analysis revealed averaging times (moving averages) of 15–60s can be used on ramp-up wind data for comparison to SBL winds and ramp-up events have shorter time scales (1–5min) than those used in wind engineering practice. Within these shorter time scales turbulence spectra was similar to the SBL. Ramp-up vertical wind profiles rapidly evolve, have a downward transfer of momentum, and show differences from the SBL log-profile. Gust factors of ramp-up events differed from those of the SBL at averaging times greater than 60s and may differ between thunderstorm types. Overall, properties of ramp-up events also display considerable variability when compared to the SBL, which may need to be considered in wind load standards. •Shorter time scales than used in wind engineering were found for thunderstorm events which displayed rapid wind speed increases (i.e., ramp-up).•Ramp-up turbulence in the frequency domain was similar to the SBL and turbulence intensities fell within the range of the SBL at 15–60s averaging times.•Vertical ramp-up profiles show evolutionary behavior while maximum gust profiles suggest differences from the SBL.•Gust factors for ramp-up events show that the Durst curve should not be used for averaging times greater than 60s and can be fit to a cubic polynomial.•Thunderstorm events also display considerable variability, which may affect wind load standards.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6105</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2013.12.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Fluid dynamics ; Gust factor ; Non-stationary ; Spectra ; Thunderstorm ; Thunderstorms ; Time ; Time scale ; Turbulence ; Wind engineering ; Wind profiles ; Wind tunnels</subject><ispartof>Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics, 2014-02, Vol.125, p.121-132</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-56e00a8397c49a2f1a09fc7a06bdbbee23578418b8fc7e117d518e4e89246ff53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-56e00a8397c49a2f1a09fc7a06bdbbee23578418b8fc7e117d518e4e89246ff53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.12.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lombardo, Franklin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Kishor C.</creatorcontrib><title>Thunderstorm characteristics of importance to wind engineering</title><title>Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics</title><description>The idea that “wind is wind”, irrespective of causal mechanism, allows wind and pressure information collected in wind tunnels to be used in wind load standards. This concept is based on inherently stationary data and validated with field data that are collected from the stationary boundary layer (SBL). Thunderstorms, important events for wind loading, display non-stationary characteristics. Yet thunderstorms are assumed to have the same properties as the SBL, even though differences have been shown, especially in short duration events. In this study, near-surface wind data from thunderstorms which displayed short and rapid wind speed increases (i.e., “ramp-up”) were identified and analyzed. Characteristics of the ramp-up events are detailed and compared with SBL data. Analysis revealed averaging times (moving averages) of 15–60s can be used on ramp-up wind data for comparison to SBL winds and ramp-up events have shorter time scales (1–5min) than those used in wind engineering practice. Within these shorter time scales turbulence spectra was similar to the SBL. Ramp-up vertical wind profiles rapidly evolve, have a downward transfer of momentum, and show differences from the SBL log-profile. Gust factors of ramp-up events differed from those of the SBL at averaging times greater than 60s and may differ between thunderstorm types. Overall, properties of ramp-up events also display considerable variability when compared to the SBL, which may need to be considered in wind load standards. •Shorter time scales than used in wind engineering were found for thunderstorm events which displayed rapid wind speed increases (i.e., ramp-up).•Ramp-up turbulence in the frequency domain was similar to the SBL and turbulence intensities fell within the range of the SBL at 15–60s averaging times.•Vertical ramp-up profiles show evolutionary behavior while maximum gust profiles suggest differences from the SBL.•Gust factors for ramp-up events show that the Durst curve should not be used for averaging times greater than 60s and can be fit to a cubic polynomial.•Thunderstorm events also display considerable variability, which may affect wind load standards.</description><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Gust factor</subject><subject>Non-stationary</subject><subject>Spectra</subject><subject>Thunderstorm</subject><subject>Thunderstorms</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Time scale</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Wind engineering</subject><subject>Wind profiles</subject><subject>Wind tunnels</subject><issn>0167-6105</issn><issn>1872-8197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gZss3STOTeaVhYIUX1BwU9fDZHLTTmiTOjO1-O-dWtfi6sLhOwfuR8g10AIoiNu-6PfoTFFSqAooC0rZCZmAkmWuoJanZJIomQug_JxchNBTSiWT1YTcL1a7oUUf4ug3mV0Zb2xE70J0NmRjl7nNdvTRDBazOGZ7N7QZDks3YIKG5SU568w64NXvnZL3p8fF7CWfvz2_zh7muWVAY84FUmpUVUvLalN2YGjdWWmoaNqmQSwrLhUD1aiUIoBsOShkqOqSia7j1ZTcHHe3fvzYYYh644LF9doMOO6CBqHSAuec_QOVomJS8Dqh1RG1fgzBY6e33m2M_9JA9UGs7vWPWH0Qq6HUSWxq3R1bmB7-dOh1sA6ToNZ5tFG3o_uz_w0l24JX</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Lombardo, Franklin T.</creator><creator>Smith, Douglas A.</creator><creator>Schroeder, John L.</creator><creator>Mehta, Kishor C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Thunderstorm characteristics of importance to wind engineering</title><author>Lombardo, Franklin T. ; Smith, Douglas A. ; Schroeder, John L. ; Mehta, Kishor C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-56e00a8397c49a2f1a09fc7a06bdbbee23578418b8fc7e117d518e4e89246ff53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Gust factor</topic><topic>Non-stationary</topic><topic>Spectra</topic><topic>Thunderstorm</topic><topic>Thunderstorms</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Time scale</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Wind engineering</topic><topic>Wind profiles</topic><topic>Wind tunnels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lombardo, Franklin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Kishor C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lombardo, Franklin T.</au><au>Smith, Douglas A.</au><au>Schroeder, John L.</au><au>Mehta, Kishor C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thunderstorm characteristics of importance to wind engineering</atitle><jtitle>Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics</jtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>125</volume><spage>121</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>121-132</pages><issn>0167-6105</issn><eissn>1872-8197</eissn><abstract>The idea that “wind is wind”, irrespective of causal mechanism, allows wind and pressure information collected in wind tunnels to be used in wind load standards. This concept is based on inherently stationary data and validated with field data that are collected from the stationary boundary layer (SBL). Thunderstorms, important events for wind loading, display non-stationary characteristics. Yet thunderstorms are assumed to have the same properties as the SBL, even though differences have been shown, especially in short duration events. In this study, near-surface wind data from thunderstorms which displayed short and rapid wind speed increases (i.e., “ramp-up”) were identified and analyzed. Characteristics of the ramp-up events are detailed and compared with SBL data. Analysis revealed averaging times (moving averages) of 15–60s can be used on ramp-up wind data for comparison to SBL winds and ramp-up events have shorter time scales (1–5min) than those used in wind engineering practice. Within these shorter time scales turbulence spectra was similar to the SBL. Ramp-up vertical wind profiles rapidly evolve, have a downward transfer of momentum, and show differences from the SBL log-profile. Gust factors of ramp-up events differed from those of the SBL at averaging times greater than 60s and may differ between thunderstorm types. Overall, properties of ramp-up events also display considerable variability when compared to the SBL, which may need to be considered in wind load standards. •Shorter time scales than used in wind engineering were found for thunderstorm events which displayed rapid wind speed increases (i.e., ramp-up).•Ramp-up turbulence in the frequency domain was similar to the SBL and turbulence intensities fell within the range of the SBL at 15–60s averaging times.•Vertical ramp-up profiles show evolutionary behavior while maximum gust profiles suggest differences from the SBL.•Gust factors for ramp-up events show that the Durst curve should not be used for averaging times greater than 60s and can be fit to a cubic polynomial.•Thunderstorm events also display considerable variability, which may affect wind load standards.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jweia.2013.12.004</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6105
ispartof Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics, 2014-02, Vol.125, p.121-132
issn 0167-6105
1872-8197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685785554
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Fluid dynamics
Gust factor
Non-stationary
Spectra
Thunderstorm
Thunderstorms
Time
Time scale
Turbulence
Wind engineering
Wind profiles
Wind tunnels
title Thunderstorm characteristics of importance to wind engineering
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T05%3A15%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thunderstorm%20characteristics%20of%20importance%20to%20wind%20engineering&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20wind%20engineering%20and%20industrial%20aerodynamics&rft.au=Lombardo,%20Franklin%20T.&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=125&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=121-132&rft.issn=0167-6105&rft.eissn=1872-8197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.12.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1676347659%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1676347659&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167610513002791&rfr_iscdi=true