LEED-ND as an urban metric
•We present a methodology for identifying parcels that are LEED-ND eligible.•We identify 9000 eligible acres in the City of Phoenix.•This represents 26% of the candidate acreage, higher than expected.•LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores.•Eligible parcels have...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Landscape and urban planning 2013-11, Vol.119, p.20-34 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 34 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 20 |
container_title | Landscape and urban planning |
container_volume | 119 |
creator | Talen, Emily Allen, Eliot Bosse, Amanda Ahmann, Josh Koschinsky, Julia Wentz, Elizabeth Anselin, Luc |
description | •We present a methodology for identifying parcels that are LEED-ND eligible.•We identify 9000 eligible acres in the City of Phoenix.•This represents 26% of the candidate acreage, higher than expected.•LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores.•Eligible parcels have lower densities than expected.
The LEED rating system for neighborhood development (LEED-ND) was developed in an effort to extend the certification of sustainability beyond green buildings. It has been most often used to certify a LEED-ND “project” in the same way that LEED certifies individual buildings. However, to date very few projects have been LEED-ND certified due to the significant costs in money, time and expertise involved in certifying individual projects. This paper argues that identifying LEED-ND eligible locations is more efficient at the scale of jurisdictions rather than individual projects. By identifying LEED-ND-ready parcels cities can incentivize more sustainable development in these locations and make it much more affordable for developers to utilize LEED-ND.
The paper presents a methodology that identifies which parcels are compliant with the most important criterion in the LEED-ND rating system: the “Smart Location and Linkage” or SLL prerequisite. Applying the method to the City of Phoenix, just over 9000acres in the city are found to be LEED-ND eligible lands, without constraints. This represents 26% of the candidate acreage (all vacant or redevelopable land), a somewhat higher percentage than expected. The paper further finds that LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores and that they tend to be located in areas with lower densities and lower market strength, as well as in areas with a higher proportion of renter-occupied units, including subsidized housing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.06.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685768277</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169204613001242</els_id><sourcerecordid>1676357678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-4a00ab7e5448057fbe0ae4ed1904c822a4359a4fb24eadd556c8c125934275103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EEuXjDzCVAYkl4ez4c0Rt-ZAqWGC2HOciuUqTYqdI_HtctUKMXe6W5967ewi5pVBSoPJhVXaub7ax3uReMqBVCbIE0CdkQrVihQTJTskks6ZgwOU5uUhpBQBUSDohN8vFYl68zacuTV0_zUG5rnGMwV-Rs9Z1Ca8P_ZJ8Pi0-Zi_F8v35dfa4LDynaiy4A3C1QsG5BqHaGsEhx4Ya4F4z5ngljONtzTi6phFCeu0pE6biTAkK1SW53-du4vC1xTTadUgeu_wQDttkqdRCSc2UOgJVssqw0hk1e9THIaWIrd3EsHbxx1KwO3V2Zf-pszt1FqTN6vLs3WGNS951bXS9D-kvIF_CjQCTudmew6znO2C0yQfsPTYhoh9tM4Qjtv0C_aOGfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1676357678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LEED-ND as an urban metric</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Talen, Emily ; Allen, Eliot ; Bosse, Amanda ; Ahmann, Josh ; Koschinsky, Julia ; Wentz, Elizabeth ; Anselin, Luc</creator><creatorcontrib>Talen, Emily ; Allen, Eliot ; Bosse, Amanda ; Ahmann, Josh ; Koschinsky, Julia ; Wentz, Elizabeth ; Anselin, Luc</creatorcontrib><description>•We present a methodology for identifying parcels that are LEED-ND eligible.•We identify 9000 eligible acres in the City of Phoenix.•This represents 26% of the candidate acreage, higher than expected.•LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores.•Eligible parcels have lower densities than expected.
The LEED rating system for neighborhood development (LEED-ND) was developed in an effort to extend the certification of sustainability beyond green buildings. It has been most often used to certify a LEED-ND “project” in the same way that LEED certifies individual buildings. However, to date very few projects have been LEED-ND certified due to the significant costs in money, time and expertise involved in certifying individual projects. This paper argues that identifying LEED-ND eligible locations is more efficient at the scale of jurisdictions rather than individual projects. By identifying LEED-ND-ready parcels cities can incentivize more sustainable development in these locations and make it much more affordable for developers to utilize LEED-ND.
The paper presents a methodology that identifies which parcels are compliant with the most important criterion in the LEED-ND rating system: the “Smart Location and Linkage” or SLL prerequisite. Applying the method to the City of Phoenix, just over 9000acres in the city are found to be LEED-ND eligible lands, without constraints. This represents 26% of the candidate acreage (all vacant or redevelopable land), a somewhat higher percentage than expected. The paper further finds that LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores and that they tend to be located in areas with lower densities and lower market strength, as well as in areas with a higher proportion of renter-occupied units, including subsidized housing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-2046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.06.008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LUPLEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Density ; Exact sciences and technology ; GIS ; Green buildings ; Jurisdiction ; Land ; LEED-ND ; Markets ; Parcels ; Phoenix ; Ratings ; Sustainability ; Urban development</subject><ispartof>Landscape and urban planning, 2013-11, Vol.119, p.20-34</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-4a00ab7e5448057fbe0ae4ed1904c822a4359a4fb24eadd556c8c125934275103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-4a00ab7e5448057fbe0ae4ed1904c822a4359a4fb24eadd556c8c125934275103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204613001242$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27749509$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Talen, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Eliot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosse, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmann, Josh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koschinsky, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wentz, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anselin, Luc</creatorcontrib><title>LEED-ND as an urban metric</title><title>Landscape and urban planning</title><description>•We present a methodology for identifying parcels that are LEED-ND eligible.•We identify 9000 eligible acres in the City of Phoenix.•This represents 26% of the candidate acreage, higher than expected.•LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores.•Eligible parcels have lower densities than expected.
The LEED rating system for neighborhood development (LEED-ND) was developed in an effort to extend the certification of sustainability beyond green buildings. It has been most often used to certify a LEED-ND “project” in the same way that LEED certifies individual buildings. However, to date very few projects have been LEED-ND certified due to the significant costs in money, time and expertise involved in certifying individual projects. This paper argues that identifying LEED-ND eligible locations is more efficient at the scale of jurisdictions rather than individual projects. By identifying LEED-ND-ready parcels cities can incentivize more sustainable development in these locations and make it much more affordable for developers to utilize LEED-ND.
The paper presents a methodology that identifies which parcels are compliant with the most important criterion in the LEED-ND rating system: the “Smart Location and Linkage” or SLL prerequisite. Applying the method to the City of Phoenix, just over 9000acres in the city are found to be LEED-ND eligible lands, without constraints. This represents 26% of the candidate acreage (all vacant or redevelopable land), a somewhat higher percentage than expected. The paper further finds that LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores and that they tend to be located in areas with lower densities and lower market strength, as well as in areas with a higher proportion of renter-occupied units, including subsidized housing.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>GIS</subject><subject>Green buildings</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>LEED-ND</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Parcels</subject><subject>Phoenix</subject><subject>Ratings</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><issn>0169-2046</issn><issn>1872-6062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EEuXjDzCVAYkl4ez4c0Rt-ZAqWGC2HOciuUqTYqdI_HtctUKMXe6W5967ewi5pVBSoPJhVXaub7ax3uReMqBVCbIE0CdkQrVihQTJTskks6ZgwOU5uUhpBQBUSDohN8vFYl68zacuTV0_zUG5rnGMwV-Rs9Z1Ca8P_ZJ8Pi0-Zi_F8v35dfa4LDynaiy4A3C1QsG5BqHaGsEhx4Ya4F4z5ngljONtzTi6phFCeu0pE6biTAkK1SW53-du4vC1xTTadUgeu_wQDttkqdRCSc2UOgJVssqw0hk1e9THIaWIrd3EsHbxx1KwO3V2Zf-pszt1FqTN6vLs3WGNS951bXS9D-kvIF_CjQCTudmew6znO2C0yQfsPTYhoh9tM4Qjtv0C_aOGfA</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Talen, Emily</creator><creator>Allen, Eliot</creator><creator>Bosse, Amanda</creator><creator>Ahmann, Josh</creator><creator>Koschinsky, Julia</creator><creator>Wentz, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Anselin, Luc</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>LEED-ND as an urban metric</title><author>Talen, Emily ; Allen, Eliot ; Bosse, Amanda ; Ahmann, Josh ; Koschinsky, Julia ; Wentz, Elizabeth ; Anselin, Luc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-4a00ab7e5448057fbe0ae4ed1904c822a4359a4fb24eadd556c8c125934275103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>GIS</topic><topic>Green buildings</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>LEED-ND</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Parcels</topic><topic>Phoenix</topic><topic>Ratings</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Talen, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Eliot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosse, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmann, Josh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koschinsky, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wentz, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anselin, Luc</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Landscape and urban planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Talen, Emily</au><au>Allen, Eliot</au><au>Bosse, Amanda</au><au>Ahmann, Josh</au><au>Koschinsky, Julia</au><au>Wentz, Elizabeth</au><au>Anselin, Luc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LEED-ND as an urban metric</atitle><jtitle>Landscape and urban planning</jtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>119</volume><spage>20</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>20-34</pages><issn>0169-2046</issn><eissn>1872-6062</eissn><coden>LUPLEZ</coden><abstract>•We present a methodology for identifying parcels that are LEED-ND eligible.•We identify 9000 eligible acres in the City of Phoenix.•This represents 26% of the candidate acreage, higher than expected.•LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores.•Eligible parcels have lower densities than expected.
The LEED rating system for neighborhood development (LEED-ND) was developed in an effort to extend the certification of sustainability beyond green buildings. It has been most often used to certify a LEED-ND “project” in the same way that LEED certifies individual buildings. However, to date very few projects have been LEED-ND certified due to the significant costs in money, time and expertise involved in certifying individual projects. This paper argues that identifying LEED-ND eligible locations is more efficient at the scale of jurisdictions rather than individual projects. By identifying LEED-ND-ready parcels cities can incentivize more sustainable development in these locations and make it much more affordable for developers to utilize LEED-ND.
The paper presents a methodology that identifies which parcels are compliant with the most important criterion in the LEED-ND rating system: the “Smart Location and Linkage” or SLL prerequisite. Applying the method to the City of Phoenix, just over 9000acres in the city are found to be LEED-ND eligible lands, without constraints. This represents 26% of the candidate acreage (all vacant or redevelopable land), a somewhat higher percentage than expected. The paper further finds that LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores and that they tend to be located in areas with lower densities and lower market strength, as well as in areas with a higher proportion of renter-occupied units, including subsidized housing.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.06.008</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-2046 |
ispartof | Landscape and urban planning, 2013-11, Vol.119, p.20-34 |
issn | 0169-2046 1872-6062 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685768277 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Applied sciences Buildings. Public works Density Exact sciences and technology GIS Green buildings Jurisdiction Land LEED-ND Markets Parcels Phoenix Ratings Sustainability Urban development |
title | LEED-ND as an urban metric |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T22%3A38%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LEED-ND%20as%20an%20urban%20metric&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20and%20urban%20planning&rft.au=Talen,%20Emily&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=119&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=20-34&rft.issn=0169-2046&rft.eissn=1872-6062&rft.coden=LUPLEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.06.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1676357678%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1676357678&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169204613001242&rfr_iscdi=true |