LEED-ND as an urban metric

•We present a methodology for identifying parcels that are LEED-ND eligible.•We identify 9000 eligible acres in the City of Phoenix.•This represents 26% of the candidate acreage, higher than expected.•LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores.•Eligible parcels have...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Landscape and urban planning 2013-11, Vol.119, p.20-34
Hauptverfasser: Talen, Emily, Allen, Eliot, Bosse, Amanda, Ahmann, Josh, Koschinsky, Julia, Wentz, Elizabeth, Anselin, Luc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue
container_start_page 20
container_title Landscape and urban planning
container_volume 119
creator Talen, Emily
Allen, Eliot
Bosse, Amanda
Ahmann, Josh
Koschinsky, Julia
Wentz, Elizabeth
Anselin, Luc
description •We present a methodology for identifying parcels that are LEED-ND eligible.•We identify 9000 eligible acres in the City of Phoenix.•This represents 26% of the candidate acreage, higher than expected.•LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores.•Eligible parcels have lower densities than expected. The LEED rating system for neighborhood development (LEED-ND) was developed in an effort to extend the certification of sustainability beyond green buildings. It has been most often used to certify a LEED-ND “project” in the same way that LEED certifies individual buildings. However, to date very few projects have been LEED-ND certified due to the significant costs in money, time and expertise involved in certifying individual projects. This paper argues that identifying LEED-ND eligible locations is more efficient at the scale of jurisdictions rather than individual projects. By identifying LEED-ND-ready parcels cities can incentivize more sustainable development in these locations and make it much more affordable for developers to utilize LEED-ND. The paper presents a methodology that identifies which parcels are compliant with the most important criterion in the LEED-ND rating system: the “Smart Location and Linkage” or SLL prerequisite. Applying the method to the City of Phoenix, just over 9000acres in the city are found to be LEED-ND eligible lands, without constraints. This represents 26% of the candidate acreage (all vacant or redevelopable land), a somewhat higher percentage than expected. The paper further finds that LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores and that they tend to be located in areas with lower densities and lower market strength, as well as in areas with a higher proportion of renter-occupied units, including subsidized housing.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.06.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685768277</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169204613001242</els_id><sourcerecordid>1676357678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-4a00ab7e5448057fbe0ae4ed1904c822a4359a4fb24eadd556c8c125934275103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EEuXjDzCVAYkl4ez4c0Rt-ZAqWGC2HOciuUqTYqdI_HtctUKMXe6W5967ewi5pVBSoPJhVXaub7ax3uReMqBVCbIE0CdkQrVihQTJTskks6ZgwOU5uUhpBQBUSDohN8vFYl68zacuTV0_zUG5rnGMwV-Rs9Z1Ca8P_ZJ8Pi0-Zi_F8v35dfa4LDynaiy4A3C1QsG5BqHaGsEhx4Ya4F4z5ngljONtzTi6phFCeu0pE6biTAkK1SW53-du4vC1xTTadUgeu_wQDttkqdRCSc2UOgJVssqw0hk1e9THIaWIrd3EsHbxx1KwO3V2Zf-pszt1FqTN6vLs3WGNS951bXS9D-kvIF_CjQCTudmew6znO2C0yQfsPTYhoh9tM4Qjtv0C_aOGfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1676357678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LEED-ND as an urban metric</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Talen, Emily ; Allen, Eliot ; Bosse, Amanda ; Ahmann, Josh ; Koschinsky, Julia ; Wentz, Elizabeth ; Anselin, Luc</creator><creatorcontrib>Talen, Emily ; Allen, Eliot ; Bosse, Amanda ; Ahmann, Josh ; Koschinsky, Julia ; Wentz, Elizabeth ; Anselin, Luc</creatorcontrib><description>•We present a methodology for identifying parcels that are LEED-ND eligible.•We identify 9000 eligible acres in the City of Phoenix.•This represents 26% of the candidate acreage, higher than expected.•LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores.•Eligible parcels have lower densities than expected. The LEED rating system for neighborhood development (LEED-ND) was developed in an effort to extend the certification of sustainability beyond green buildings. It has been most often used to certify a LEED-ND “project” in the same way that LEED certifies individual buildings. However, to date very few projects have been LEED-ND certified due to the significant costs in money, time and expertise involved in certifying individual projects. This paper argues that identifying LEED-ND eligible locations is more efficient at the scale of jurisdictions rather than individual projects. By identifying LEED-ND-ready parcels cities can incentivize more sustainable development in these locations and make it much more affordable for developers to utilize LEED-ND. The paper presents a methodology that identifies which parcels are compliant with the most important criterion in the LEED-ND rating system: the “Smart Location and Linkage” or SLL prerequisite. Applying the method to the City of Phoenix, just over 9000acres in the city are found to be LEED-ND eligible lands, without constraints. This represents 26% of the candidate acreage (all vacant or redevelopable land), a somewhat higher percentage than expected. The paper further finds that LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores and that they tend to be located in areas with lower densities and lower market strength, as well as in areas with a higher proportion of renter-occupied units, including subsidized housing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-2046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.06.008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LUPLEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Density ; Exact sciences and technology ; GIS ; Green buildings ; Jurisdiction ; Land ; LEED-ND ; Markets ; Parcels ; Phoenix ; Ratings ; Sustainability ; Urban development</subject><ispartof>Landscape and urban planning, 2013-11, Vol.119, p.20-34</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-4a00ab7e5448057fbe0ae4ed1904c822a4359a4fb24eadd556c8c125934275103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-4a00ab7e5448057fbe0ae4ed1904c822a4359a4fb24eadd556c8c125934275103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204613001242$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27749509$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Talen, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Eliot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosse, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmann, Josh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koschinsky, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wentz, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anselin, Luc</creatorcontrib><title>LEED-ND as an urban metric</title><title>Landscape and urban planning</title><description>•We present a methodology for identifying parcels that are LEED-ND eligible.•We identify 9000 eligible acres in the City of Phoenix.•This represents 26% of the candidate acreage, higher than expected.•LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores.•Eligible parcels have lower densities than expected. The LEED rating system for neighborhood development (LEED-ND) was developed in an effort to extend the certification of sustainability beyond green buildings. It has been most often used to certify a LEED-ND “project” in the same way that LEED certifies individual buildings. However, to date very few projects have been LEED-ND certified due to the significant costs in money, time and expertise involved in certifying individual projects. This paper argues that identifying LEED-ND eligible locations is more efficient at the scale of jurisdictions rather than individual projects. By identifying LEED-ND-ready parcels cities can incentivize more sustainable development in these locations and make it much more affordable for developers to utilize LEED-ND. The paper presents a methodology that identifies which parcels are compliant with the most important criterion in the LEED-ND rating system: the “Smart Location and Linkage” or SLL prerequisite. Applying the method to the City of Phoenix, just over 9000acres in the city are found to be LEED-ND eligible lands, without constraints. This represents 26% of the candidate acreage (all vacant or redevelopable land), a somewhat higher percentage than expected. The paper further finds that LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores and that they tend to be located in areas with lower densities and lower market strength, as well as in areas with a higher proportion of renter-occupied units, including subsidized housing.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>GIS</subject><subject>Green buildings</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>LEED-ND</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Parcels</subject><subject>Phoenix</subject><subject>Ratings</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><issn>0169-2046</issn><issn>1872-6062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EEuXjDzCVAYkl4ez4c0Rt-ZAqWGC2HOciuUqTYqdI_HtctUKMXe6W5967ewi5pVBSoPJhVXaub7ax3uReMqBVCbIE0CdkQrVihQTJTskks6ZgwOU5uUhpBQBUSDohN8vFYl68zacuTV0_zUG5rnGMwV-Rs9Z1Ca8P_ZJ8Pi0-Zi_F8v35dfa4LDynaiy4A3C1QsG5BqHaGsEhx4Ya4F4z5ngljONtzTi6phFCeu0pE6biTAkK1SW53-du4vC1xTTadUgeu_wQDttkqdRCSc2UOgJVssqw0hk1e9THIaWIrd3EsHbxx1KwO3V2Zf-pszt1FqTN6vLs3WGNS951bXS9D-kvIF_CjQCTudmew6znO2C0yQfsPTYhoh9tM4Qjtv0C_aOGfA</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Talen, Emily</creator><creator>Allen, Eliot</creator><creator>Bosse, Amanda</creator><creator>Ahmann, Josh</creator><creator>Koschinsky, Julia</creator><creator>Wentz, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Anselin, Luc</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>LEED-ND as an urban metric</title><author>Talen, Emily ; Allen, Eliot ; Bosse, Amanda ; Ahmann, Josh ; Koschinsky, Julia ; Wentz, Elizabeth ; Anselin, Luc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-4a00ab7e5448057fbe0ae4ed1904c822a4359a4fb24eadd556c8c125934275103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>GIS</topic><topic>Green buildings</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>LEED-ND</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Parcels</topic><topic>Phoenix</topic><topic>Ratings</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Talen, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Eliot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosse, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmann, Josh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koschinsky, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wentz, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anselin, Luc</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Landscape and urban planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Talen, Emily</au><au>Allen, Eliot</au><au>Bosse, Amanda</au><au>Ahmann, Josh</au><au>Koschinsky, Julia</au><au>Wentz, Elizabeth</au><au>Anselin, Luc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LEED-ND as an urban metric</atitle><jtitle>Landscape and urban planning</jtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>119</volume><spage>20</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>20-34</pages><issn>0169-2046</issn><eissn>1872-6062</eissn><coden>LUPLEZ</coden><abstract>•We present a methodology for identifying parcels that are LEED-ND eligible.•We identify 9000 eligible acres in the City of Phoenix.•This represents 26% of the candidate acreage, higher than expected.•LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores.•Eligible parcels have lower densities than expected. The LEED rating system for neighborhood development (LEED-ND) was developed in an effort to extend the certification of sustainability beyond green buildings. It has been most often used to certify a LEED-ND “project” in the same way that LEED certifies individual buildings. However, to date very few projects have been LEED-ND certified due to the significant costs in money, time and expertise involved in certifying individual projects. This paper argues that identifying LEED-ND eligible locations is more efficient at the scale of jurisdictions rather than individual projects. By identifying LEED-ND-ready parcels cities can incentivize more sustainable development in these locations and make it much more affordable for developers to utilize LEED-ND. The paper presents a methodology that identifies which parcels are compliant with the most important criterion in the LEED-ND rating system: the “Smart Location and Linkage” or SLL prerequisite. Applying the method to the City of Phoenix, just over 9000acres in the city are found to be LEED-ND eligible lands, without constraints. This represents 26% of the candidate acreage (all vacant or redevelopable land), a somewhat higher percentage than expected. The paper further finds that LEED-ND eligible parcels in Phoenix are not approximated well by Walk Scores and that they tend to be located in areas with lower densities and lower market strength, as well as in areas with a higher proportion of renter-occupied units, including subsidized housing.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.06.008</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-2046
ispartof Landscape and urban planning, 2013-11, Vol.119, p.20-34
issn 0169-2046
1872-6062
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685768277
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Applied sciences
Buildings. Public works
Density
Exact sciences and technology
GIS
Green buildings
Jurisdiction
Land
LEED-ND
Markets
Parcels
Phoenix
Ratings
Sustainability
Urban development
title LEED-ND as an urban metric
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T22%3A38%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LEED-ND%20as%20an%20urban%20metric&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20and%20urban%20planning&rft.au=Talen,%20Emily&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=119&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=20-34&rft.issn=0169-2046&rft.eissn=1872-6062&rft.coden=LUPLEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.06.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1676357678%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1676357678&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169204613001242&rfr_iscdi=true