Molecular and Phenotypic Characterization of Human Amniotic Fluid-Derived Cells: A Morphological and Proteomic Approach

Mesenchymal Stem Cells derived from Amniotic Fluid (AFMSCs) are multipotent cells of great interest for regenerative medicine. Two predominant cell types, that is, Epithelial-like (E-like) and Fibroblast-like (F-like), have been previously detected in the amniotic fluid (AF). In this study, we exami...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stem cells and development 2015-06, Vol.24 (12), p.1415-1428
Hauptverfasser: Pipino, Caterina, Pierdomenico, Laura, Di Tomo, Pamela, Di Giuseppe, Fabrizio, Cianci, Eleonora, D'Alimonte, Iolanda, Morabito, Caterina, Centurione, Lucia, Antonucci, Ivana, Mariggiò, Maria A., Di Pietro, Roberta, Ciccarelli, Renata, Marchisio, Marco, Romano, Mario, Angelucci, Stefania, Pandolfi, Assunta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1428
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1415
container_title Stem cells and development
container_volume 24
creator Pipino, Caterina
Pierdomenico, Laura
Di Tomo, Pamela
Di Giuseppe, Fabrizio
Cianci, Eleonora
D'Alimonte, Iolanda
Morabito, Caterina
Centurione, Lucia
Antonucci, Ivana
Mariggiò, Maria A.
Di Pietro, Roberta
Ciccarelli, Renata
Marchisio, Marco
Romano, Mario
Angelucci, Stefania
Pandolfi, Assunta
description Mesenchymal Stem Cells derived from Amniotic Fluid (AFMSCs) are multipotent cells of great interest for regenerative medicine. Two predominant cell types, that is, Epithelial-like (E-like) and Fibroblast-like (F-like), have been previously detected in the amniotic fluid (AF). In this study, we examined the AF from 12 donors and observed the prevalence of the E-like phenotype in 5, whereas the F-like morphology was predominant in 7 samples. These phenotypes showed slight differences in membrane markers, with higher CD90 and lower Sox2 and SSEA-4 expression in F-like than in E-like cells; whereas CD326 was expressed only in the E-like phenotype. They did not show any significant differences in osteogenic, adipogenic or chondrogenic differentiation. Proteomic analysis revealed that samples with a predominant E-like phenotype (HC1) showed a different profile than those with a predominant F-like phenotype (HC2). Twenty-five and eighteen protein spots were differentially expressed in HC1 and HC2 classes, respectively. Of these, 17 from HC1 and 4 from HC2 were identified by mass spectrometry. Protein-interaction networks for both phenotypes showed strong interactions between specific AFMSC proteins and molecular chaperones, such as preproteasomes and mature proteasomes, both of which are important for cell cycle regulation and apoptosis. Collectively, our results provide evidence that, regardless of differences in protein profiling, the prevalence of E-like or F-like cells in AF does not affect the differentiation capacity of AFMSC preparations. This may be valuable information with a view to the therapeutic use of AFMSCs.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/scd.2014.0453
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685755765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1685755765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-328848aba615b1d30d28b9a9751f6927749b86f55f078a011d41b21df4b8a6193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQRi0EoqUwsiKPLCl2YicOW1UoRWoFA8yRYzvEyImDnYDKr8dRCyvTnU7vvjs9AC4xmmPE8hsv5DxGmMwRockRmGJKs4jRhByPPcmiJGbZBJx5_45QnMaMnIJJTFPEKMNT8LW1RonBcAd5K-FzrVrb7zot4LLmjoteOf3Ne21baCu4HhrewkXTatsHZGUGLaO7gHwqCZfKGH8LF3BrXVdbY9-04GYf62yvbBNWFl3nLBf1OTipuPHq4lBn4HV1_7JcR5unh8flYhMJgpJ-fJ4RxkueYlpimSAZszLneUZxleZxlpG8ZGlFaYUyxhHGkuAyxrIiJQs7eTID1_vccPZjUL4vGu1F-JS3yg6-wCmjWVCW0oBGe1Q4671TVdE53XC3KzAqRtdFcF2MrovRdeCvDtFD2Sj5R__KDUCyB8Yxb1ujValc_0_sD2Pbi4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1685755765</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Molecular and Phenotypic Characterization of Human Amniotic Fluid-Derived Cells: A Morphological and Proteomic Approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pipino, Caterina ; Pierdomenico, Laura ; Di Tomo, Pamela ; Di Giuseppe, Fabrizio ; Cianci, Eleonora ; D'Alimonte, Iolanda ; Morabito, Caterina ; Centurione, Lucia ; Antonucci, Ivana ; Mariggiò, Maria A. ; Di Pietro, Roberta ; Ciccarelli, Renata ; Marchisio, Marco ; Romano, Mario ; Angelucci, Stefania ; Pandolfi, Assunta</creator><creatorcontrib>Pipino, Caterina ; Pierdomenico, Laura ; Di Tomo, Pamela ; Di Giuseppe, Fabrizio ; Cianci, Eleonora ; D'Alimonte, Iolanda ; Morabito, Caterina ; Centurione, Lucia ; Antonucci, Ivana ; Mariggiò, Maria A. ; Di Pietro, Roberta ; Ciccarelli, Renata ; Marchisio, Marco ; Romano, Mario ; Angelucci, Stefania ; Pandolfi, Assunta</creatorcontrib><description>Mesenchymal Stem Cells derived from Amniotic Fluid (AFMSCs) are multipotent cells of great interest for regenerative medicine. Two predominant cell types, that is, Epithelial-like (E-like) and Fibroblast-like (F-like), have been previously detected in the amniotic fluid (AF). In this study, we examined the AF from 12 donors and observed the prevalence of the E-like phenotype in 5, whereas the F-like morphology was predominant in 7 samples. These phenotypes showed slight differences in membrane markers, with higher CD90 and lower Sox2 and SSEA-4 expression in F-like than in E-like cells; whereas CD326 was expressed only in the E-like phenotype. They did not show any significant differences in osteogenic, adipogenic or chondrogenic differentiation. Proteomic analysis revealed that samples with a predominant E-like phenotype (HC1) showed a different profile than those with a predominant F-like phenotype (HC2). Twenty-five and eighteen protein spots were differentially expressed in HC1 and HC2 classes, respectively. Of these, 17 from HC1 and 4 from HC2 were identified by mass spectrometry. Protein-interaction networks for both phenotypes showed strong interactions between specific AFMSC proteins and molecular chaperones, such as preproteasomes and mature proteasomes, both of which are important for cell cycle regulation and apoptosis. Collectively, our results provide evidence that, regardless of differences in protein profiling, the prevalence of E-like or F-like cells in AF does not affect the differentiation capacity of AFMSC preparations. This may be valuable information with a view to the therapeutic use of AFMSCs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1547-3287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-8534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/scd.2014.0453</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25608581</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Amniocentesis ; Amniotic Fluid - cytology ; Amniotic Fluid - metabolism ; Cell Differentiation - genetics ; Cell Lineage ; Epithelial Cells - cytology ; Epithelial Cells - metabolism ; Female ; Fibroblasts - cytology ; Fibroblasts - metabolism ; Humans ; Mesenchymal Stromal Cells - cytology ; Mesenchymal Stromal Cells - metabolism ; Original Research Reports ; Pregnancy ; Protein Biosynthesis - genetics ; Protein Interaction Maps - genetics ; Proteomics ; Regenerative Medicine</subject><ispartof>Stem cells and development, 2015-06, Vol.24 (12), p.1415-1428</ispartof><rights>2015, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-328848aba615b1d30d28b9a9751f6927749b86f55f078a011d41b21df4b8a6193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-328848aba615b1d30d28b9a9751f6927749b86f55f078a011d41b21df4b8a6193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25608581$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pipino, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierdomenico, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Tomo, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Giuseppe, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cianci, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Alimonte, Iolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morabito, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Centurione, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonucci, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariggiò, Maria A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Pietro, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciccarelli, Renata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchisio, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romano, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angelucci, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandolfi, Assunta</creatorcontrib><title>Molecular and Phenotypic Characterization of Human Amniotic Fluid-Derived Cells: A Morphological and Proteomic Approach</title><title>Stem cells and development</title><addtitle>Stem Cells Dev</addtitle><description>Mesenchymal Stem Cells derived from Amniotic Fluid (AFMSCs) are multipotent cells of great interest for regenerative medicine. Two predominant cell types, that is, Epithelial-like (E-like) and Fibroblast-like (F-like), have been previously detected in the amniotic fluid (AF). In this study, we examined the AF from 12 donors and observed the prevalence of the E-like phenotype in 5, whereas the F-like morphology was predominant in 7 samples. These phenotypes showed slight differences in membrane markers, with higher CD90 and lower Sox2 and SSEA-4 expression in F-like than in E-like cells; whereas CD326 was expressed only in the E-like phenotype. They did not show any significant differences in osteogenic, adipogenic or chondrogenic differentiation. Proteomic analysis revealed that samples with a predominant E-like phenotype (HC1) showed a different profile than those with a predominant F-like phenotype (HC2). Twenty-five and eighteen protein spots were differentially expressed in HC1 and HC2 classes, respectively. Of these, 17 from HC1 and 4 from HC2 were identified by mass spectrometry. Protein-interaction networks for both phenotypes showed strong interactions between specific AFMSC proteins and molecular chaperones, such as preproteasomes and mature proteasomes, both of which are important for cell cycle regulation and apoptosis. Collectively, our results provide evidence that, regardless of differences in protein profiling, the prevalence of E-like or F-like cells in AF does not affect the differentiation capacity of AFMSC preparations. This may be valuable information with a view to the therapeutic use of AFMSCs.</description><subject>Amniocentesis</subject><subject>Amniotic Fluid - cytology</subject><subject>Amniotic Fluid - metabolism</subject><subject>Cell Differentiation - genetics</subject><subject>Cell Lineage</subject><subject>Epithelial Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Epithelial Cells - metabolism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibroblasts - cytology</subject><subject>Fibroblasts - metabolism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mesenchymal Stromal Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Mesenchymal Stromal Cells - metabolism</subject><subject>Original Research Reports</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Protein Biosynthesis - genetics</subject><subject>Protein Interaction Maps - genetics</subject><subject>Proteomics</subject><subject>Regenerative Medicine</subject><issn>1547-3287</issn><issn>1557-8534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQRi0EoqUwsiKPLCl2YicOW1UoRWoFA8yRYzvEyImDnYDKr8dRCyvTnU7vvjs9AC4xmmPE8hsv5DxGmMwRockRmGJKs4jRhByPPcmiJGbZBJx5_45QnMaMnIJJTFPEKMNT8LW1RonBcAd5K-FzrVrb7zot4LLmjoteOf3Ne21baCu4HhrewkXTatsHZGUGLaO7gHwqCZfKGH8LF3BrXVdbY9-04GYf62yvbBNWFl3nLBf1OTipuPHq4lBn4HV1_7JcR5unh8flYhMJgpJ-fJ4RxkueYlpimSAZszLneUZxleZxlpG8ZGlFaYUyxhHGkuAyxrIiJQs7eTID1_vccPZjUL4vGu1F-JS3yg6-wCmjWVCW0oBGe1Q4671TVdE53XC3KzAqRtdFcF2MrovRdeCvDtFD2Sj5R__KDUCyB8Yxb1ujValc_0_sD2Pbi4w</recordid><startdate>20150615</startdate><enddate>20150615</enddate><creator>Pipino, Caterina</creator><creator>Pierdomenico, Laura</creator><creator>Di Tomo, Pamela</creator><creator>Di Giuseppe, Fabrizio</creator><creator>Cianci, Eleonora</creator><creator>D'Alimonte, Iolanda</creator><creator>Morabito, Caterina</creator><creator>Centurione, Lucia</creator><creator>Antonucci, Ivana</creator><creator>Mariggiò, Maria A.</creator><creator>Di Pietro, Roberta</creator><creator>Ciccarelli, Renata</creator><creator>Marchisio, Marco</creator><creator>Romano, Mario</creator><creator>Angelucci, Stefania</creator><creator>Pandolfi, Assunta</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150615</creationdate><title>Molecular and Phenotypic Characterization of Human Amniotic Fluid-Derived Cells: A Morphological and Proteomic Approach</title><author>Pipino, Caterina ; Pierdomenico, Laura ; Di Tomo, Pamela ; Di Giuseppe, Fabrizio ; Cianci, Eleonora ; D'Alimonte, Iolanda ; Morabito, Caterina ; Centurione, Lucia ; Antonucci, Ivana ; Mariggiò, Maria A. ; Di Pietro, Roberta ; Ciccarelli, Renata ; Marchisio, Marco ; Romano, Mario ; Angelucci, Stefania ; Pandolfi, Assunta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-328848aba615b1d30d28b9a9751f6927749b86f55f078a011d41b21df4b8a6193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Amniocentesis</topic><topic>Amniotic Fluid - cytology</topic><topic>Amniotic Fluid - metabolism</topic><topic>Cell Differentiation - genetics</topic><topic>Cell Lineage</topic><topic>Epithelial Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Epithelial Cells - metabolism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibroblasts - cytology</topic><topic>Fibroblasts - metabolism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mesenchymal Stromal Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Mesenchymal Stromal Cells - metabolism</topic><topic>Original Research Reports</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Protein Biosynthesis - genetics</topic><topic>Protein Interaction Maps - genetics</topic><topic>Proteomics</topic><topic>Regenerative Medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pipino, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierdomenico, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Tomo, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Giuseppe, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cianci, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Alimonte, Iolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morabito, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Centurione, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonucci, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariggiò, Maria A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Pietro, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciccarelli, Renata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchisio, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romano, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angelucci, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandolfi, Assunta</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Stem cells and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pipino, Caterina</au><au>Pierdomenico, Laura</au><au>Di Tomo, Pamela</au><au>Di Giuseppe, Fabrizio</au><au>Cianci, Eleonora</au><au>D'Alimonte, Iolanda</au><au>Morabito, Caterina</au><au>Centurione, Lucia</au><au>Antonucci, Ivana</au><au>Mariggiò, Maria A.</au><au>Di Pietro, Roberta</au><au>Ciccarelli, Renata</au><au>Marchisio, Marco</au><au>Romano, Mario</au><au>Angelucci, Stefania</au><au>Pandolfi, Assunta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Molecular and Phenotypic Characterization of Human Amniotic Fluid-Derived Cells: A Morphological and Proteomic Approach</atitle><jtitle>Stem cells and development</jtitle><addtitle>Stem Cells Dev</addtitle><date>2015-06-15</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1415</spage><epage>1428</epage><pages>1415-1428</pages><issn>1547-3287</issn><eissn>1557-8534</eissn><abstract>Mesenchymal Stem Cells derived from Amniotic Fluid (AFMSCs) are multipotent cells of great interest for regenerative medicine. Two predominant cell types, that is, Epithelial-like (E-like) and Fibroblast-like (F-like), have been previously detected in the amniotic fluid (AF). In this study, we examined the AF from 12 donors and observed the prevalence of the E-like phenotype in 5, whereas the F-like morphology was predominant in 7 samples. These phenotypes showed slight differences in membrane markers, with higher CD90 and lower Sox2 and SSEA-4 expression in F-like than in E-like cells; whereas CD326 was expressed only in the E-like phenotype. They did not show any significant differences in osteogenic, adipogenic or chondrogenic differentiation. Proteomic analysis revealed that samples with a predominant E-like phenotype (HC1) showed a different profile than those with a predominant F-like phenotype (HC2). Twenty-five and eighteen protein spots were differentially expressed in HC1 and HC2 classes, respectively. Of these, 17 from HC1 and 4 from HC2 were identified by mass spectrometry. Protein-interaction networks for both phenotypes showed strong interactions between specific AFMSC proteins and molecular chaperones, such as preproteasomes and mature proteasomes, both of which are important for cell cycle regulation and apoptosis. Collectively, our results provide evidence that, regardless of differences in protein profiling, the prevalence of E-like or F-like cells in AF does not affect the differentiation capacity of AFMSC preparations. This may be valuable information with a view to the therapeutic use of AFMSCs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>25608581</pmid><doi>10.1089/scd.2014.0453</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1547-3287
ispartof Stem cells and development, 2015-06, Vol.24 (12), p.1415-1428
issn 1547-3287
1557-8534
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685755765
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Amniocentesis
Amniotic Fluid - cytology
Amniotic Fluid - metabolism
Cell Differentiation - genetics
Cell Lineage
Epithelial Cells - cytology
Epithelial Cells - metabolism
Female
Fibroblasts - cytology
Fibroblasts - metabolism
Humans
Mesenchymal Stromal Cells - cytology
Mesenchymal Stromal Cells - metabolism
Original Research Reports
Pregnancy
Protein Biosynthesis - genetics
Protein Interaction Maps - genetics
Proteomics
Regenerative Medicine
title Molecular and Phenotypic Characterization of Human Amniotic Fluid-Derived Cells: A Morphological and Proteomic Approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T00%3A15%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Molecular%20and%20Phenotypic%20Characterization%20of%20Human%20Amniotic%20Fluid-Derived%20Cells:%20A%20Morphological%20and%20Proteomic%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Stem%20cells%20and%20development&rft.au=Pipino,%20Caterina&rft.date=2015-06-15&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1415&rft.epage=1428&rft.pages=1415-1428&rft.issn=1547-3287&rft.eissn=1557-8534&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/scd.2014.0453&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1685755765%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1685755765&rft_id=info:pmid/25608581&rfr_iscdi=true