Is the degree of food processing and convenience linked with the nutritional quality of foods purchased by US households?

Background: “Processed foods” are defined as any foods other than raw agricultural commodities and can be categorized by the extent of changes occurring in foods as a result of processing. Conclusions about the association between the degree of food processing and nutritional quality are discrepant....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of clinical nutrition 2015-06, Vol.101 (6), p.1251-1262
Hauptverfasser: Poti, Jennifer M, Mendez, Michelle A, Ng, Shu Wen, Popkin, Barry M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1262
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1251
container_title The American journal of clinical nutrition
container_volume 101
creator Poti, Jennifer M
Mendez, Michelle A
Ng, Shu Wen
Popkin, Barry M
description Background: “Processed foods” are defined as any foods other than raw agricultural commodities and can be categorized by the extent of changes occurring in foods as a result of processing. Conclusions about the association between the degree of food processing and nutritional quality are discrepant. Objective: We aimed to determine 2000–2012 trends in the contribution of processed and convenience food categories to purchases by US households and to compare saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content of purchases across levels of processing and convenience. Design: We analyzed purchases of consumer packaged goods for 157,142 households from the 2000–2012 Homescan Panel. We explicitly defined categories for classifying products by degree of industrial processing and separately by convenience of preparation. We classified >1.2 million products through use of barcode-specific descriptions and ingredient lists. Median saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content and the likelihood that purchases exceeded maximum daily intake recommendations for these components were compared across levels of processing or convenience by using quantile and logistic regression. Results: More than three-fourths of energy in purchases by US households came from moderately (15.9%) and highly processed (61.0%) foods and beverages in 2012 (939 kcal/d per capita). Trends between 2000 and 2012 were stable. When classifying foods by convenience, ready-to-eat (68.1%) and ready-to-heat (15.2%) products supplied the majority of energy in purchases. The adjusted proportion of household-level food purchases exceeding 10% kcal from saturated fat, 15% kcal from sugar, and 2400 mg sodium/2000 kcal simultaneously was significantly higher for highly processed (60.4%) and ready-to-eat (27.1%) food purchases than for purchases of less-processed foods (5.6%) or foods requiring cooking/preparation (4.9%). Conclusions: Highly processed food purchases are a dominant, unshifting part of US purchasing patterns, but highly processed foods may have higher saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content than less-processed foods. Wide variation in nutrient content suggests food choices within categories may be important.
doi_str_mv 10.3945/ajcn.114.100925
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685755285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1803115388</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-69dc9b94c6ae2fd9efc384789ace7f1b39f2ae3878070dca16841c4f7531c0673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1vEzEQhi0EoqFw5gaWuHDZ1N9rX0Co4qNSJQ4lZ8vxzmYdNnZq7xbl3-M2bQVcONnSPPPK43kQek3Jkhshz9zWxyWlYkkJMUw-QQtquG44I-1TtCCEsMZQJU_Qi1K2hFAmtHqOTpg09aLUAh0uCp4GwB1sMgBOPe5T6vA-Jw-lhLjBLnbYp3gDMUD0gMcQf0KHf4VpuOuM85TDFFJ0I76e3Rimw0NMwfs5-8GVyq8PeHWFhzQXGNLYlY8v0bPejQVe3Z-naPXl84_zb83l968X558uGy9aPTXKdN6sjfDKAes7A73nulaM89D2dM1Nzxxw3WrSks47qrSgXvSt5NQT1fJT9OGYu5_XO-g8xCm70e5z2Ll8sMkF-3clhsFu0o0VQlBNTA14fx-Q0_UMZbK7UDyMo4tQx7EV4pRKrvX_UaVlKyXTsqLv_kG3ac71E--ouhxmCK3U2ZHyOZWSoX98NyX21gB7a4CtBtijAbXjzZ_jPvIPK6_A2yPQu2TdJodiV1eMUFVtqYAw_DcfEbfd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1688662901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the degree of food processing and convenience linked with the nutritional quality of foods purchased by US households?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Poti, Jennifer M ; Mendez, Michelle A ; Ng, Shu Wen ; Popkin, Barry M</creator><creatorcontrib>Poti, Jennifer M ; Mendez, Michelle A ; Ng, Shu Wen ; Popkin, Barry M</creatorcontrib><description>Background: “Processed foods” are defined as any foods other than raw agricultural commodities and can be categorized by the extent of changes occurring in foods as a result of processing. Conclusions about the association between the degree of food processing and nutritional quality are discrepant. Objective: We aimed to determine 2000–2012 trends in the contribution of processed and convenience food categories to purchases by US households and to compare saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content of purchases across levels of processing and convenience. Design: We analyzed purchases of consumer packaged goods for 157,142 households from the 2000–2012 Homescan Panel. We explicitly defined categories for classifying products by degree of industrial processing and separately by convenience of preparation. We classified &gt;1.2 million products through use of barcode-specific descriptions and ingredient lists. Median saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content and the likelihood that purchases exceeded maximum daily intake recommendations for these components were compared across levels of processing or convenience by using quantile and logistic regression. Results: More than three-fourths of energy in purchases by US households came from moderately (15.9%) and highly processed (61.0%) foods and beverages in 2012 (939 kcal/d per capita). Trends between 2000 and 2012 were stable. When classifying foods by convenience, ready-to-eat (68.1%) and ready-to-heat (15.2%) products supplied the majority of energy in purchases. The adjusted proportion of household-level food purchases exceeding 10% kcal from saturated fat, 15% kcal from sugar, and 2400 mg sodium/2000 kcal simultaneously was significantly higher for highly processed (60.4%) and ready-to-eat (27.1%) food purchases than for purchases of less-processed foods (5.6%) or foods requiring cooking/preparation (4.9%). Conclusions: Highly processed food purchases are a dominant, unshifting part of US purchasing patterns, but highly processed foods may have higher saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content than less-processed foods. Wide variation in nutrient content suggests food choices within categories may be important.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3207</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.114.100925</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25948666</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Clinical Nutrition</publisher><subject>Beverages ; Carbohydrates - analysis ; cooking ; Data Collection ; Diet - trends ; energy ; Energy Intake ; Family Characteristics ; Fast Foods ; Fatty Acids - analysis ; food choices ; Food Handling ; Food products ; Food quality ; Households ; ingredients ; Logistic Models ; Longitudinal Studies ; nutrient content ; Nutrition ; Nutritional Epidemiology and Public Health ; Nutritive Value ; processing technology ; Purchasing ; ready-to-cook foods ; ready-to-eat foods ; regression analysis ; saturated fats ; sodium ; Sodium, Dietary - analysis ; sugars ; United States</subject><ispartof>The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2015-06, Vol.101 (6), p.1251-1262</ispartof><rights>2015 American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc. Jun 1, 2015</rights><rights>2015 American Society for Nutrition 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-69dc9b94c6ae2fd9efc384789ace7f1b39f2ae3878070dca16841c4f7531c0673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-69dc9b94c6ae2fd9efc384789ace7f1b39f2ae3878070dca16841c4f7531c0673</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7651-3625 ; 0000-0001-9495-9324 ; 0000-0003-0582-110X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25948666$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poti, Jennifer M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendez, Michelle A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Shu Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popkin, Barry M</creatorcontrib><title>Is the degree of food processing and convenience linked with the nutritional quality of foods purchased by US households?</title><title>The American journal of clinical nutrition</title><addtitle>Am J Clin Nutr</addtitle><description>Background: “Processed foods” are defined as any foods other than raw agricultural commodities and can be categorized by the extent of changes occurring in foods as a result of processing. Conclusions about the association between the degree of food processing and nutritional quality are discrepant. Objective: We aimed to determine 2000–2012 trends in the contribution of processed and convenience food categories to purchases by US households and to compare saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content of purchases across levels of processing and convenience. Design: We analyzed purchases of consumer packaged goods for 157,142 households from the 2000–2012 Homescan Panel. We explicitly defined categories for classifying products by degree of industrial processing and separately by convenience of preparation. We classified &gt;1.2 million products through use of barcode-specific descriptions and ingredient lists. Median saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content and the likelihood that purchases exceeded maximum daily intake recommendations for these components were compared across levels of processing or convenience by using quantile and logistic regression. Results: More than three-fourths of energy in purchases by US households came from moderately (15.9%) and highly processed (61.0%) foods and beverages in 2012 (939 kcal/d per capita). Trends between 2000 and 2012 were stable. When classifying foods by convenience, ready-to-eat (68.1%) and ready-to-heat (15.2%) products supplied the majority of energy in purchases. The adjusted proportion of household-level food purchases exceeding 10% kcal from saturated fat, 15% kcal from sugar, and 2400 mg sodium/2000 kcal simultaneously was significantly higher for highly processed (60.4%) and ready-to-eat (27.1%) food purchases than for purchases of less-processed foods (5.6%) or foods requiring cooking/preparation (4.9%). Conclusions: Highly processed food purchases are a dominant, unshifting part of US purchasing patterns, but highly processed foods may have higher saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content than less-processed foods. Wide variation in nutrient content suggests food choices within categories may be important.</description><subject>Beverages</subject><subject>Carbohydrates - analysis</subject><subject>cooking</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Diet - trends</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Energy Intake</subject><subject>Family Characteristics</subject><subject>Fast Foods</subject><subject>Fatty Acids - analysis</subject><subject>food choices</subject><subject>Food Handling</subject><subject>Food products</subject><subject>Food quality</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>ingredients</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>nutrient content</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutritional Epidemiology and Public Health</subject><subject>Nutritive Value</subject><subject>processing technology</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>ready-to-cook foods</subject><subject>ready-to-eat foods</subject><subject>regression analysis</subject><subject>saturated fats</subject><subject>sodium</subject><subject>Sodium, Dietary - analysis</subject><subject>sugars</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0002-9165</issn><issn>1938-3207</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1vEzEQhi0EoqFw5gaWuHDZ1N9rX0Co4qNSJQ4lZ8vxzmYdNnZq7xbl3-M2bQVcONnSPPPK43kQek3Jkhshz9zWxyWlYkkJMUw-QQtquG44I-1TtCCEsMZQJU_Qi1K2hFAmtHqOTpg09aLUAh0uCp4GwB1sMgBOPe5T6vA-Jw-lhLjBLnbYp3gDMUD0gMcQf0KHf4VpuOuM85TDFFJ0I76e3Rimw0NMwfs5-8GVyq8PeHWFhzQXGNLYlY8v0bPejQVe3Z-naPXl84_zb83l968X558uGy9aPTXKdN6sjfDKAes7A73nulaM89D2dM1Nzxxw3WrSks47qrSgXvSt5NQT1fJT9OGYu5_XO-g8xCm70e5z2Ll8sMkF-3clhsFu0o0VQlBNTA14fx-Q0_UMZbK7UDyMo4tQx7EV4pRKrvX_UaVlKyXTsqLv_kG3ac71E--ouhxmCK3U2ZHyOZWSoX98NyX21gB7a4CtBtijAbXjzZ_jPvIPK6_A2yPQu2TdJodiV1eMUFVtqYAw_DcfEbfd</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Poti, Jennifer M</creator><creator>Mendez, Michelle A</creator><creator>Ng, Shu Wen</creator><creator>Popkin, Barry M</creator><general>American Society for Clinical Nutrition</general><general>American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc</general><general>American Society for Nutrition</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7651-3625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9495-9324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0582-110X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Is the degree of food processing and convenience linked with the nutritional quality of foods purchased by US households?</title><author>Poti, Jennifer M ; Mendez, Michelle A ; Ng, Shu Wen ; Popkin, Barry M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-69dc9b94c6ae2fd9efc384789ace7f1b39f2ae3878070dca16841c4f7531c0673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Beverages</topic><topic>Carbohydrates - analysis</topic><topic>cooking</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Diet - trends</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Energy Intake</topic><topic>Family Characteristics</topic><topic>Fast Foods</topic><topic>Fatty Acids - analysis</topic><topic>food choices</topic><topic>Food Handling</topic><topic>Food products</topic><topic>Food quality</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>ingredients</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>nutrient content</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutritional Epidemiology and Public Health</topic><topic>Nutritive Value</topic><topic>processing technology</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>ready-to-cook foods</topic><topic>ready-to-eat foods</topic><topic>regression analysis</topic><topic>saturated fats</topic><topic>sodium</topic><topic>Sodium, Dietary - analysis</topic><topic>sugars</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poti, Jennifer M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendez, Michelle A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Shu Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popkin, Barry M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The American journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poti, Jennifer M</au><au>Mendez, Michelle A</au><au>Ng, Shu Wen</au><au>Popkin, Barry M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the degree of food processing and convenience linked with the nutritional quality of foods purchased by US households?</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Clin Nutr</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1251</spage><epage>1262</epage><pages>1251-1262</pages><issn>0002-9165</issn><eissn>1938-3207</eissn><abstract>Background: “Processed foods” are defined as any foods other than raw agricultural commodities and can be categorized by the extent of changes occurring in foods as a result of processing. Conclusions about the association between the degree of food processing and nutritional quality are discrepant. Objective: We aimed to determine 2000–2012 trends in the contribution of processed and convenience food categories to purchases by US households and to compare saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content of purchases across levels of processing and convenience. Design: We analyzed purchases of consumer packaged goods for 157,142 households from the 2000–2012 Homescan Panel. We explicitly defined categories for classifying products by degree of industrial processing and separately by convenience of preparation. We classified &gt;1.2 million products through use of barcode-specific descriptions and ingredient lists. Median saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content and the likelihood that purchases exceeded maximum daily intake recommendations for these components were compared across levels of processing or convenience by using quantile and logistic regression. Results: More than three-fourths of energy in purchases by US households came from moderately (15.9%) and highly processed (61.0%) foods and beverages in 2012 (939 kcal/d per capita). Trends between 2000 and 2012 were stable. When classifying foods by convenience, ready-to-eat (68.1%) and ready-to-heat (15.2%) products supplied the majority of energy in purchases. The adjusted proportion of household-level food purchases exceeding 10% kcal from saturated fat, 15% kcal from sugar, and 2400 mg sodium/2000 kcal simultaneously was significantly higher for highly processed (60.4%) and ready-to-eat (27.1%) food purchases than for purchases of less-processed foods (5.6%) or foods requiring cooking/preparation (4.9%). Conclusions: Highly processed food purchases are a dominant, unshifting part of US purchasing patterns, but highly processed foods may have higher saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content than less-processed foods. Wide variation in nutrient content suggests food choices within categories may be important.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Clinical Nutrition</pub><pmid>25948666</pmid><doi>10.3945/ajcn.114.100925</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7651-3625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9495-9324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0582-110X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9165
ispartof The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2015-06, Vol.101 (6), p.1251-1262
issn 0002-9165
1938-3207
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685755285
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Beverages
Carbohydrates - analysis
cooking
Data Collection
Diet - trends
energy
Energy Intake
Family Characteristics
Fast Foods
Fatty Acids - analysis
food choices
Food Handling
Food products
Food quality
Households
ingredients
Logistic Models
Longitudinal Studies
nutrient content
Nutrition
Nutritional Epidemiology and Public Health
Nutritive Value
processing technology
Purchasing
ready-to-cook foods
ready-to-eat foods
regression analysis
saturated fats
sodium
Sodium, Dietary - analysis
sugars
United States
title Is the degree of food processing and convenience linked with the nutritional quality of foods purchased by US households?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A38%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20degree%20of%20food%20processing%20and%20convenience%20linked%20with%20the%20nutritional%20quality%20of%20foods%20purchased%20by%20US%20households?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20clinical%20nutrition&rft.au=Poti,%20Jennifer%20M&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1251&rft.epage=1262&rft.pages=1251-1262&rft.issn=0002-9165&rft.eissn=1938-3207&rft_id=info:doi/10.3945/ajcn.114.100925&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1803115388%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1688662901&rft_id=info:pmid/25948666&rfr_iscdi=true