Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: 2. Classification of Riparian Buffer Design Types with Application to Assess and Map Stream Corridors

A watershed’s riparian corridor presents opportunities to stabilize streambanks, intercept runoff, and influence shallow groundwater with riparian buffers. This paper presents a system to classify these riparian opportunities and apply it towards riparian management planning in HUC12 watersheds. Hig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental quality 2015-05, Vol.44 (3), p.768-779
Hauptverfasser: Tomer, M. D, Boomer, K. M. B, Porter, S. A, Gelder, B. K, James, D. E, McLellan, E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 779
container_issue 3
container_start_page 768
container_title Journal of environmental quality
container_volume 44
creator Tomer, M. D
Boomer, K. M. B
Porter, S. A
Gelder, B. K
James, D. E
McLellan, E
description A watershed’s riparian corridor presents opportunities to stabilize streambanks, intercept runoff, and influence shallow groundwater with riparian buffers. This paper presents a system to classify these riparian opportunities and apply it towards riparian management planning in HUC12 watersheds. High resolution (3-m grid) digital elevation models derived from LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data are analyzed to identify spatial distributions of surface runoff contributions and shallow water tables in a watershed’s riparian zones. Results are tabulated and a cross classification is applied to convey recommendations for buffer vegetation and width. Classes of buffers include those primarily placed to: 1) trap runoff and sediment; 2) influence shallow groundwater; 3) address both runoff and shallow groundwater, and; 4) maintain/improve stream bank stability. This system was applied to two headwater watersheds from each of three landform regions found in Iowa and Illinois. Riparian buffers that could intercept runoff and/or stabilize streambanks would occupy about 2.5% of the total areas of these watersheds, but intercept runoff contributions from 81-94% of the watersheds. However, the distributions of riparian zones where shallow water tables (SWT) were >25 m wide varied according to landform region. Nevertheless, these riparian zones with a wide SWT area were the most common riparian setting in all six watersheds, and found to occupy 23-53% of stream bank lengths among the six watersheds. The wide SWT setting provides opportunities to reduce nutrient loads carried via groundwater, and could be managed for a variety of ecosystem services. This riparian classification and mapping system should provide a consistent basis for developing riparian corridor plans and identifying management priorities in Midwestern headwater catchments where high resolution elevation data are available.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/jeq2014.09.0387
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685745154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1685745154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4737-29711a40615c58fe8fbd90328f6a5b132d8939a61b806be96f1ec8dac190363f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhzA185LJbf8ROwgFpWVo-VMRH27M1m9iLSxKnnoTV_g7-MI6y5QoHj0fjZ97R6DUhzzlbCS6zs1t7JxjPVqxcMVnkD8iCK5kvRQoPyYKxLOWZUCfkCeItY1ywXD8mJ0KzqZwvyO_1LvpqbIYxQkM3oUMbf8HgQ0e_NtB1vtvRiwit3Yf48zUVK7ppANE7X81UcPS77yF66Ojb0Tkb6TuLftfR60Nvke798IOu-765bxgCXSNaRApdTT9DT6-GaKFNw2P0dYj4lDxy0KB9drxPyc3F-fXmw_Lyy_uPm_XlErJ8WrLMOYeMaa4qVThbuG1dMikKp0FtuRR1UcoSNN8WTG9tqR23VVFDxROlpZOn5NWs28dwN1ocTOuxsk3a24YRDdeFzlPI1P-gKs8UV1lCz2a0igExWmf66FuIB8OZmUwzR9MMK81kWup4cRQft62t__L3LiXgzQzsfWMP_9Izn86_iemkGiuPE17OAg6CgeQ4mpur9K7Sl8i5LKX8Azxgrts</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1685745154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: 2. Classification of Riparian Buffer Design Types with Application to Assess and Map Stream Corridors</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tomer, M. D ; Boomer, K. M. B ; Porter, S. A ; Gelder, B. K ; James, D. E ; McLellan, E</creator><creatorcontrib>Tomer, M. D ; Boomer, K. M. B ; Porter, S. A ; Gelder, B. K ; James, D. E ; McLellan, E</creatorcontrib><description>A watershed’s riparian corridor presents opportunities to stabilize streambanks, intercept runoff, and influence shallow groundwater with riparian buffers. This paper presents a system to classify these riparian opportunities and apply it towards riparian management planning in HUC12 watersheds. High resolution (3-m grid) digital elevation models derived from LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data are analyzed to identify spatial distributions of surface runoff contributions and shallow water tables in a watershed’s riparian zones. Results are tabulated and a cross classification is applied to convey recommendations for buffer vegetation and width. Classes of buffers include those primarily placed to: 1) trap runoff and sediment; 2) influence shallow groundwater; 3) address both runoff and shallow groundwater, and; 4) maintain/improve stream bank stability. This system was applied to two headwater watersheds from each of three landform regions found in Iowa and Illinois. Riparian buffers that could intercept runoff and/or stabilize streambanks would occupy about 2.5% of the total areas of these watersheds, but intercept runoff contributions from 81-94% of the watersheds. However, the distributions of riparian zones where shallow water tables (SWT) were &gt;25 m wide varied according to landform region. Nevertheless, these riparian zones with a wide SWT area were the most common riparian setting in all six watersheds, and found to occupy 23-53% of stream bank lengths among the six watersheds. The wide SWT setting provides opportunities to reduce nutrient loads carried via groundwater, and could be managed for a variety of ecosystem services. This riparian classification and mapping system should provide a consistent basis for developing riparian corridor plans and identifying management priorities in Midwestern headwater catchments where high resolution elevation data are available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2014.09.0387</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26024257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>buffers ; classification ; digital elevation models ; ecosystem services ; groundwater ; Illinois ; Iowa ; landforms ; lidar ; planning ; pollution load ; riparian areas ; riparian buffers ; runoff ; sediments ; streambank stability ; streams ; vegetation ; water table ; watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2015-05, Vol.44 (3), p.768-779</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors.</rights><rights>Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4737-29711a40615c58fe8fbd90328f6a5b132d8939a61b806be96f1ec8dac190363f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4737-29711a40615c58fe8fbd90328f6a5b132d8939a61b806be96f1ec8dac190363f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fjeq2014.09.0387$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fjeq2014.09.0387$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26024257$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tomer, M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boomer, K. M. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, S. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelder, B. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, D. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLellan, E</creatorcontrib><title>Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: 2. Classification of Riparian Buffer Design Types with Application to Assess and Map Stream Corridors</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>A watershed’s riparian corridor presents opportunities to stabilize streambanks, intercept runoff, and influence shallow groundwater with riparian buffers. This paper presents a system to classify these riparian opportunities and apply it towards riparian management planning in HUC12 watersheds. High resolution (3-m grid) digital elevation models derived from LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data are analyzed to identify spatial distributions of surface runoff contributions and shallow water tables in a watershed’s riparian zones. Results are tabulated and a cross classification is applied to convey recommendations for buffer vegetation and width. Classes of buffers include those primarily placed to: 1) trap runoff and sediment; 2) influence shallow groundwater; 3) address both runoff and shallow groundwater, and; 4) maintain/improve stream bank stability. This system was applied to two headwater watersheds from each of three landform regions found in Iowa and Illinois. Riparian buffers that could intercept runoff and/or stabilize streambanks would occupy about 2.5% of the total areas of these watersheds, but intercept runoff contributions from 81-94% of the watersheds. However, the distributions of riparian zones where shallow water tables (SWT) were &gt;25 m wide varied according to landform region. Nevertheless, these riparian zones with a wide SWT area were the most common riparian setting in all six watersheds, and found to occupy 23-53% of stream bank lengths among the six watersheds. The wide SWT setting provides opportunities to reduce nutrient loads carried via groundwater, and could be managed for a variety of ecosystem services. This riparian classification and mapping system should provide a consistent basis for developing riparian corridor plans and identifying management priorities in Midwestern headwater catchments where high resolution elevation data are available.</description><subject>buffers</subject><subject>classification</subject><subject>digital elevation models</subject><subject>ecosystem services</subject><subject>groundwater</subject><subject>Illinois</subject><subject>Iowa</subject><subject>landforms</subject><subject>lidar</subject><subject>planning</subject><subject>pollution load</subject><subject>riparian areas</subject><subject>riparian buffers</subject><subject>runoff</subject><subject>sediments</subject><subject>streambank stability</subject><subject>streams</subject><subject>vegetation</subject><subject>water table</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhzA185LJbf8ROwgFpWVo-VMRH27M1m9iLSxKnnoTV_g7-MI6y5QoHj0fjZ97R6DUhzzlbCS6zs1t7JxjPVqxcMVnkD8iCK5kvRQoPyYKxLOWZUCfkCeItY1ywXD8mJ0KzqZwvyO_1LvpqbIYxQkM3oUMbf8HgQ0e_NtB1vtvRiwit3Yf48zUVK7ppANE7X81UcPS77yF66Ojb0Tkb6TuLftfR60Nvke798IOu-765bxgCXSNaRApdTT9DT6-GaKFNw2P0dYj4lDxy0KB9drxPyc3F-fXmw_Lyy_uPm_XlErJ8WrLMOYeMaa4qVThbuG1dMikKp0FtuRR1UcoSNN8WTG9tqR23VVFDxROlpZOn5NWs28dwN1ocTOuxsk3a24YRDdeFzlPI1P-gKs8UV1lCz2a0igExWmf66FuIB8OZmUwzR9MMK81kWup4cRQft62t__L3LiXgzQzsfWMP_9Izn86_iemkGiuPE17OAg6CgeQ4mpur9K7Sl8i5LKX8Azxgrts</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Tomer, M. D</creator><creator>Boomer, K. M. B</creator><creator>Porter, S. A</creator><creator>Gelder, B. K</creator><creator>James, D. E</creator><creator>McLellan, E</creator><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: 2. Classification of Riparian Buffer Design Types with Application to Assess and Map Stream Corridors</title><author>Tomer, M. D ; Boomer, K. M. B ; Porter, S. A ; Gelder, B. K ; James, D. E ; McLellan, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4737-29711a40615c58fe8fbd90328f6a5b132d8939a61b806be96f1ec8dac190363f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>buffers</topic><topic>classification</topic><topic>digital elevation models</topic><topic>ecosystem services</topic><topic>groundwater</topic><topic>Illinois</topic><topic>Iowa</topic><topic>landforms</topic><topic>lidar</topic><topic>planning</topic><topic>pollution load</topic><topic>riparian areas</topic><topic>riparian buffers</topic><topic>runoff</topic><topic>sediments</topic><topic>streambank stability</topic><topic>streams</topic><topic>vegetation</topic><topic>water table</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tomer, M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boomer, K. M. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, S. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelder, B. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, D. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLellan, E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tomer, M. D</au><au>Boomer, K. M. B</au><au>Porter, S. A</au><au>Gelder, B. K</au><au>James, D. E</au><au>McLellan, E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: 2. Classification of Riparian Buffer Design Types with Application to Assess and Map Stream Corridors</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>768</spage><epage>779</epage><pages>768-779</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><abstract>A watershed’s riparian corridor presents opportunities to stabilize streambanks, intercept runoff, and influence shallow groundwater with riparian buffers. This paper presents a system to classify these riparian opportunities and apply it towards riparian management planning in HUC12 watersheds. High resolution (3-m grid) digital elevation models derived from LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data are analyzed to identify spatial distributions of surface runoff contributions and shallow water tables in a watershed’s riparian zones. Results are tabulated and a cross classification is applied to convey recommendations for buffer vegetation and width. Classes of buffers include those primarily placed to: 1) trap runoff and sediment; 2) influence shallow groundwater; 3) address both runoff and shallow groundwater, and; 4) maintain/improve stream bank stability. This system was applied to two headwater watersheds from each of three landform regions found in Iowa and Illinois. Riparian buffers that could intercept runoff and/or stabilize streambanks would occupy about 2.5% of the total areas of these watersheds, but intercept runoff contributions from 81-94% of the watersheds. However, the distributions of riparian zones where shallow water tables (SWT) were &gt;25 m wide varied according to landform region. Nevertheless, these riparian zones with a wide SWT area were the most common riparian setting in all six watersheds, and found to occupy 23-53% of stream bank lengths among the six watersheds. The wide SWT setting provides opportunities to reduce nutrient loads carried via groundwater, and could be managed for a variety of ecosystem services. This riparian classification and mapping system should provide a consistent basis for developing riparian corridor plans and identifying management priorities in Midwestern headwater catchments where high resolution elevation data are available.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</pub><pmid>26024257</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2014.09.0387</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2425
ispartof Journal of environmental quality, 2015-05, Vol.44 (3), p.768-779
issn 0047-2425
1537-2537
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685745154
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects buffers
classification
digital elevation models
ecosystem services
groundwater
Illinois
Iowa
landforms
lidar
planning
pollution load
riparian areas
riparian buffers
runoff
sediments
streambank stability
streams
vegetation
water table
watersheds
title Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: 2. Classification of Riparian Buffer Design Types with Application to Assess and Map Stream Corridors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A27%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agricultural%20Conservation%20Planning%20Framework:%202.%20Classification%20of%20Riparian%20Buffer%20Design%20Types%20with%20Application%20to%20Assess%20and%20Map%20Stream%20Corridors&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Tomer,%20M.%20D&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=768&rft.epage=779&rft.pages=768-779&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2014.09.0387&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1685745154%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1685745154&rft_id=info:pmid/26024257&rfr_iscdi=true