Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: 2. Classification of Riparian Buffer Design Types with Application to Assess and Map Stream Corridors
A watershed’s riparian corridor presents opportunities to stabilize streambanks, intercept runoff, and influence shallow groundwater with riparian buffers. This paper presents a system to classify these riparian opportunities and apply it towards riparian management planning in HUC12 watersheds. Hig...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental quality 2015-05, Vol.44 (3), p.768-779 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 779 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 768 |
container_title | Journal of environmental quality |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Tomer, M. D Boomer, K. M. B Porter, S. A Gelder, B. K James, D. E McLellan, E |
description | A watershed’s riparian corridor presents opportunities to stabilize streambanks, intercept runoff, and influence shallow groundwater with riparian buffers. This paper presents a system to classify these riparian opportunities and apply it towards riparian management planning in HUC12 watersheds. High resolution (3-m grid) digital elevation models derived from LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data are analyzed to identify spatial distributions of surface runoff contributions and shallow water tables in a watershed’s riparian zones. Results are tabulated and a cross classification is applied to convey recommendations for buffer vegetation and width. Classes of buffers include those primarily placed to: 1) trap runoff and sediment; 2) influence shallow groundwater; 3) address both runoff and shallow groundwater, and; 4) maintain/improve stream bank stability. This system was applied to two headwater watersheds from each of three landform regions found in Iowa and Illinois. Riparian buffers that could intercept runoff and/or stabilize streambanks would occupy about 2.5% of the total areas of these watersheds, but intercept runoff contributions from 81-94% of the watersheds. However, the distributions of riparian zones where shallow water tables (SWT) were >25 m wide varied according to landform region. Nevertheless, these riparian zones with a wide SWT area were the most common riparian setting in all six watersheds, and found to occupy 23-53% of stream bank lengths among the six watersheds. The wide SWT setting provides opportunities to reduce nutrient loads carried via groundwater, and could be managed for a variety of ecosystem services. This riparian classification and mapping system should provide a consistent basis for developing riparian corridor plans and identifying management priorities in Midwestern headwater catchments where high resolution elevation data are available. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/jeq2014.09.0387 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685745154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1685745154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4737-29711a40615c58fe8fbd90328f6a5b132d8939a61b806be96f1ec8dac190363f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhzA185LJbf8ROwgFpWVo-VMRH27M1m9iLSxKnnoTV_g7-MI6y5QoHj0fjZ97R6DUhzzlbCS6zs1t7JxjPVqxcMVnkD8iCK5kvRQoPyYKxLOWZUCfkCeItY1ywXD8mJ0KzqZwvyO_1LvpqbIYxQkM3oUMbf8HgQ0e_NtB1vtvRiwit3Yf48zUVK7ppANE7X81UcPS77yF66Ojb0Tkb6TuLftfR60Nvke798IOu-765bxgCXSNaRApdTT9DT6-GaKFNw2P0dYj4lDxy0KB9drxPyc3F-fXmw_Lyy_uPm_XlErJ8WrLMOYeMaa4qVThbuG1dMikKp0FtuRR1UcoSNN8WTG9tqR23VVFDxROlpZOn5NWs28dwN1ocTOuxsk3a24YRDdeFzlPI1P-gKs8UV1lCz2a0igExWmf66FuIB8OZmUwzR9MMK81kWup4cRQft62t__L3LiXgzQzsfWMP_9Izn86_iemkGiuPE17OAg6CgeQ4mpur9K7Sl8i5LKX8Azxgrts</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1685745154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: 2. Classification of Riparian Buffer Design Types with Application to Assess and Map Stream Corridors</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tomer, M. D ; Boomer, K. M. B ; Porter, S. A ; Gelder, B. K ; James, D. E ; McLellan, E</creator><creatorcontrib>Tomer, M. D ; Boomer, K. M. B ; Porter, S. A ; Gelder, B. K ; James, D. E ; McLellan, E</creatorcontrib><description>A watershed’s riparian corridor presents opportunities to stabilize streambanks, intercept runoff, and influence shallow groundwater with riparian buffers. This paper presents a system to classify these riparian opportunities and apply it towards riparian management planning in HUC12 watersheds. High resolution (3-m grid) digital elevation models derived from LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data are analyzed to identify spatial distributions of surface runoff contributions and shallow water tables in a watershed’s riparian zones. Results are tabulated and a cross classification is applied to convey recommendations for buffer vegetation and width. Classes of buffers include those primarily placed to: 1) trap runoff and sediment; 2) influence shallow groundwater; 3) address both runoff and shallow groundwater, and; 4) maintain/improve stream bank stability. This system was applied to two headwater watersheds from each of three landform regions found in Iowa and Illinois. Riparian buffers that could intercept runoff and/or stabilize streambanks would occupy about 2.5% of the total areas of these watersheds, but intercept runoff contributions from 81-94% of the watersheds. However, the distributions of riparian zones where shallow water tables (SWT) were >25 m wide varied according to landform region. Nevertheless, these riparian zones with a wide SWT area were the most common riparian setting in all six watersheds, and found to occupy 23-53% of stream bank lengths among the six watersheds. The wide SWT setting provides opportunities to reduce nutrient loads carried via groundwater, and could be managed for a variety of ecosystem services. This riparian classification and mapping system should provide a consistent basis for developing riparian corridor plans and identifying management priorities in Midwestern headwater catchments where high resolution elevation data are available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2014.09.0387</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26024257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>buffers ; classification ; digital elevation models ; ecosystem services ; groundwater ; Illinois ; Iowa ; landforms ; lidar ; planning ; pollution load ; riparian areas ; riparian buffers ; runoff ; sediments ; streambank stability ; streams ; vegetation ; water table ; watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2015-05, Vol.44 (3), p.768-779</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors.</rights><rights>Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4737-29711a40615c58fe8fbd90328f6a5b132d8939a61b806be96f1ec8dac190363f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4737-29711a40615c58fe8fbd90328f6a5b132d8939a61b806be96f1ec8dac190363f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fjeq2014.09.0387$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fjeq2014.09.0387$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26024257$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tomer, M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boomer, K. M. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, S. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelder, B. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, D. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLellan, E</creatorcontrib><title>Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: 2. Classification of Riparian Buffer Design Types with Application to Assess and Map Stream Corridors</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>A watershed’s riparian corridor presents opportunities to stabilize streambanks, intercept runoff, and influence shallow groundwater with riparian buffers. This paper presents a system to classify these riparian opportunities and apply it towards riparian management planning in HUC12 watersheds. High resolution (3-m grid) digital elevation models derived from LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data are analyzed to identify spatial distributions of surface runoff contributions and shallow water tables in a watershed’s riparian zones. Results are tabulated and a cross classification is applied to convey recommendations for buffer vegetation and width. Classes of buffers include those primarily placed to: 1) trap runoff and sediment; 2) influence shallow groundwater; 3) address both runoff and shallow groundwater, and; 4) maintain/improve stream bank stability. This system was applied to two headwater watersheds from each of three landform regions found in Iowa and Illinois. Riparian buffers that could intercept runoff and/or stabilize streambanks would occupy about 2.5% of the total areas of these watersheds, but intercept runoff contributions from 81-94% of the watersheds. However, the distributions of riparian zones where shallow water tables (SWT) were >25 m wide varied according to landform region. Nevertheless, these riparian zones with a wide SWT area were the most common riparian setting in all six watersheds, and found to occupy 23-53% of stream bank lengths among the six watersheds. The wide SWT setting provides opportunities to reduce nutrient loads carried via groundwater, and could be managed for a variety of ecosystem services. This riparian classification and mapping system should provide a consistent basis for developing riparian corridor plans and identifying management priorities in Midwestern headwater catchments where high resolution elevation data are available.</description><subject>buffers</subject><subject>classification</subject><subject>digital elevation models</subject><subject>ecosystem services</subject><subject>groundwater</subject><subject>Illinois</subject><subject>Iowa</subject><subject>landforms</subject><subject>lidar</subject><subject>planning</subject><subject>pollution load</subject><subject>riparian areas</subject><subject>riparian buffers</subject><subject>runoff</subject><subject>sediments</subject><subject>streambank stability</subject><subject>streams</subject><subject>vegetation</subject><subject>water table</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhzA185LJbf8ROwgFpWVo-VMRH27M1m9iLSxKnnoTV_g7-MI6y5QoHj0fjZ97R6DUhzzlbCS6zs1t7JxjPVqxcMVnkD8iCK5kvRQoPyYKxLOWZUCfkCeItY1ywXD8mJ0KzqZwvyO_1LvpqbIYxQkM3oUMbf8HgQ0e_NtB1vtvRiwit3Yf48zUVK7ppANE7X81UcPS77yF66Ojb0Tkb6TuLftfR60Nvke798IOu-765bxgCXSNaRApdTT9DT6-GaKFNw2P0dYj4lDxy0KB9drxPyc3F-fXmw_Lyy_uPm_XlErJ8WrLMOYeMaa4qVThbuG1dMikKp0FtuRR1UcoSNN8WTG9tqR23VVFDxROlpZOn5NWs28dwN1ocTOuxsk3a24YRDdeFzlPI1P-gKs8UV1lCz2a0igExWmf66FuIB8OZmUwzR9MMK81kWup4cRQft62t__L3LiXgzQzsfWMP_9Izn86_iemkGiuPE17OAg6CgeQ4mpur9K7Sl8i5LKX8Azxgrts</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Tomer, M. D</creator><creator>Boomer, K. M. B</creator><creator>Porter, S. A</creator><creator>Gelder, B. K</creator><creator>James, D. E</creator><creator>McLellan, E</creator><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: 2. Classification of Riparian Buffer Design Types with Application to Assess and Map Stream Corridors</title><author>Tomer, M. D ; Boomer, K. M. B ; Porter, S. A ; Gelder, B. K ; James, D. E ; McLellan, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4737-29711a40615c58fe8fbd90328f6a5b132d8939a61b806be96f1ec8dac190363f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>buffers</topic><topic>classification</topic><topic>digital elevation models</topic><topic>ecosystem services</topic><topic>groundwater</topic><topic>Illinois</topic><topic>Iowa</topic><topic>landforms</topic><topic>lidar</topic><topic>planning</topic><topic>pollution load</topic><topic>riparian areas</topic><topic>riparian buffers</topic><topic>runoff</topic><topic>sediments</topic><topic>streambank stability</topic><topic>streams</topic><topic>vegetation</topic><topic>water table</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tomer, M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boomer, K. M. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, S. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelder, B. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, D. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLellan, E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tomer, M. D</au><au>Boomer, K. M. B</au><au>Porter, S. A</au><au>Gelder, B. K</au><au>James, D. E</au><au>McLellan, E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: 2. Classification of Riparian Buffer Design Types with Application to Assess and Map Stream Corridors</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>768</spage><epage>779</epage><pages>768-779</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><abstract>A watershed’s riparian corridor presents opportunities to stabilize streambanks, intercept runoff, and influence shallow groundwater with riparian buffers. This paper presents a system to classify these riparian opportunities and apply it towards riparian management planning in HUC12 watersheds. High resolution (3-m grid) digital elevation models derived from LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data are analyzed to identify spatial distributions of surface runoff contributions and shallow water tables in a watershed’s riparian zones. Results are tabulated and a cross classification is applied to convey recommendations for buffer vegetation and width. Classes of buffers include those primarily placed to: 1) trap runoff and sediment; 2) influence shallow groundwater; 3) address both runoff and shallow groundwater, and; 4) maintain/improve stream bank stability. This system was applied to two headwater watersheds from each of three landform regions found in Iowa and Illinois. Riparian buffers that could intercept runoff and/or stabilize streambanks would occupy about 2.5% of the total areas of these watersheds, but intercept runoff contributions from 81-94% of the watersheds. However, the distributions of riparian zones where shallow water tables (SWT) were >25 m wide varied according to landform region. Nevertheless, these riparian zones with a wide SWT area were the most common riparian setting in all six watersheds, and found to occupy 23-53% of stream bank lengths among the six watersheds. The wide SWT setting provides opportunities to reduce nutrient loads carried via groundwater, and could be managed for a variety of ecosystem services. This riparian classification and mapping system should provide a consistent basis for developing riparian corridor plans and identifying management priorities in Midwestern headwater catchments where high resolution elevation data are available.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</pub><pmid>26024257</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2014.09.0387</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0047-2425 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental quality, 2015-05, Vol.44 (3), p.768-779 |
issn | 0047-2425 1537-2537 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685745154 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | buffers classification digital elevation models ecosystem services groundwater Illinois Iowa landforms lidar planning pollution load riparian areas riparian buffers runoff sediments streambank stability streams vegetation water table watersheds |
title | Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: 2. Classification of Riparian Buffer Design Types with Application to Assess and Map Stream Corridors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A27%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agricultural%20Conservation%20Planning%20Framework:%202.%20Classification%20of%20Riparian%20Buffer%20Design%20Types%20with%20Application%20to%20Assess%20and%20Map%20Stream%20Corridors&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Tomer,%20M.%20D&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=768&rft.epage=779&rft.pages=768-779&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2014.09.0387&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1685745154%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1685745154&rft_id=info:pmid/26024257&rfr_iscdi=true |