The effects of different flooring types on the behavior, health, and welfare of finishing beef steers

Raising beef cattle on concrete floors can negatively impact their welfare by increasing joint swelling and body lesions, as well as abnormalities in resting behavior and postural changes. We hypothesized that the addition of rubber mats to concrete pens would improve beef cattle welfare by improvin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2015-03, Vol.93 (3), p.1258-1266
Hauptverfasser: Elmore, M R P, Elischer, M F, Claeys, M C, Pajor, E A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1266
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1258
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 93
creator Elmore, M R P
Elischer, M F
Claeys, M C
Pajor, E A
description Raising beef cattle on concrete floors can negatively impact their welfare by increasing joint swelling and body lesions, as well as abnormalities in resting behavior and postural changes. We hypothesized that the addition of rubber mats to concrete pens would improve beef cattle welfare by improving performance, health, hygiene, and resting behavior. Forty-eight crossbred Angus steers were housed in pens of 4 and randomly assigned to a single flooring treatment: (1) fully slatted concrete (CON), (2) fully slatted rubber mat (SLAT), or (3) solid rubber mat (SOLID; 60% of pen floor) from 36 to 48 wk of age. Weight, ADG, lesions, gait score, joint swelling, and animal and pen cleanliness were collected every 2 wk. Behavioral time budgets and frequency of postural changes (an indicator of floor traction and comfort) were collected at 0, 6, and 12 wk. No differences in weight gain or ADG were observed. Steers on SOLID flooring (0.80 ± 0.08) showed increased lesions compared to SLAT (0.38 ± 0.08) and CON (0.37 ± 0.08; both, = 0.05); however, there was no difference between SLAT and CON. SLAT steers (1.69 ± 0.04) showed a reduced gait score compared to SOLID (1.95 ± 0.04) and CON (1.98 ± 0.04; both, < 0.05), but SOLID and CON did not differ. Steers on SLAT flooring had less joint swelling (both knees and hocks) compared to SOLID and CON (all comparisons, < 0.05), but SOLID and CON did not differ. Steers on SOLID (3.64 ± 0.05) flooring were dirtier than those on SLAT (2.27 ± 0.05) and CON (2.19 ± 0.05; both, < 0.001), whereas SLAT and CON were similar. Additionally, SOLID and SLAT pens were less clean than CON pens ( < 0.001 and = 0.094, respectively), and SOLID was less clean than SLAT ( < 0.001). Time budget behavior was affected by treatment ( = 0.043), where SOLID differed from CON and SLAT (both, < 0.05). Steers on SOLID flooring preferred to rest on the rubber mat vs. slatted concrete ( = 0.001). Steers on SLAT flooring changed their posture more frequently than those on SOLID and CON flooring (both, < 0.05), but SOLID and CON did not differ. Compared to CON steers, SOLID steers showed an increase in lesions and a reduction in cleanliness, whereas SLAT steers showed a decrease in gait score and joint swelling and an increase in postural changes. Combined, these data suggest that the addition of slatted rubber mats to concrete pens may improve beef cattle welfare.
doi_str_mv 10.2527/jas.2014-8399
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1684437956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1684437956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-558bfa34b73a829e52617a58c63066b71f9be612ad7a59ede74321512c8a467d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsiKPDE3xR-zEI6r4kiqxlNmykzNxlSbFdkH99ySiIKZ7dffcOzwIXVOyYIIVdxsTF4zQPCu5UidoSgUTGaeSn_7LE3QR44YQyoQS52jCJGFEETZFsG4Ag3NQpYh7h2s_5ABdwq7t--C7d5wOOxhuHU4DaqExn74Pc9yAaVMzx6ar8Re0zgQYC5zvfGzGPwvgcEwAIV6iM2faCFfHOUNvjw_r5XO2en16Wd6vsopLnjIhSusMz23BTckUCCZpYURZSU6ktAV1yoKkzNTDVkENRc4ZFZRVpcllUfMZuv3p3YX-Yw8x6a2PFbSt6aDfR01lmee8UEIOaPaDVqGPMYDTu-C3Jhw0JXo0qwezejSrR7MDf3Os3tst1H_0r0r-Dctzc-U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1684437956</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of different flooring types on the behavior, health, and welfare of finishing beef steers</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Elmore, M R P ; Elischer, M F ; Claeys, M C ; Pajor, E A</creator><creatorcontrib>Elmore, M R P ; Elischer, M F ; Claeys, M C ; Pajor, E A</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Raising beef cattle on concrete floors can negatively impact their welfare by increasing joint swelling and body lesions, as well as abnormalities in resting behavior and postural changes. We hypothesized that the addition of rubber mats to concrete pens would improve beef cattle welfare by improving performance, health, hygiene, and resting behavior. Forty-eight crossbred Angus steers were housed in pens of 4 and randomly assigned to a single flooring treatment: (1) fully slatted concrete (CON), (2) fully slatted rubber mat (SLAT), or (3) solid rubber mat (SOLID; 60% of pen floor) from 36 to 48 wk of age. Weight, ADG, lesions, gait score, joint swelling, and animal and pen cleanliness were collected every 2 wk. Behavioral time budgets and frequency of postural changes (an indicator of floor traction and comfort) were collected at 0, 6, and 12 wk. No differences in weight gain or ADG were observed. Steers on SOLID flooring (0.80 ± 0.08) showed increased lesions compared to SLAT (0.38 ± 0.08) and CON (0.37 ± 0.08; both, = 0.05); however, there was no difference between SLAT and CON. SLAT steers (1.69 ± 0.04) showed a reduced gait score compared to SOLID (1.95 ± 0.04) and CON (1.98 ± 0.04; both, < 0.05), but SOLID and CON did not differ. Steers on SLAT flooring had less joint swelling (both knees and hocks) compared to SOLID and CON (all comparisons, < 0.05), but SOLID and CON did not differ. Steers on SOLID (3.64 ± 0.05) flooring were dirtier than those on SLAT (2.27 ± 0.05) and CON (2.19 ± 0.05; both, < 0.001), whereas SLAT and CON were similar. Additionally, SOLID and SLAT pens were less clean than CON pens ( < 0.001 and = 0.094, respectively), and SOLID was less clean than SLAT ( < 0.001). Time budget behavior was affected by treatment ( = 0.043), where SOLID differed from CON and SLAT (both, < 0.05). Steers on SOLID flooring preferred to rest on the rubber mat vs. slatted concrete ( = 0.001). Steers on SLAT flooring changed their posture more frequently than those on SOLID and CON flooring (both, < 0.05), but SOLID and CON did not differ. Compared to CON steers, SOLID steers showed an increase in lesions and a reduction in cleanliness, whereas SLAT steers showed a decrease in gait score and joint swelling and an increase in postural changes. Combined, these data suggest that the addition of slatted rubber mats to concrete pens may improve beef cattle welfare.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8399</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26020902</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animal Welfare ; Animals ; Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Body Weight ; Cattle - physiology ; Floors and Floorcoverings ; Housing, Animal ; Hygiene ; Male ; Weight Gain</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2015-03, Vol.93 (3), p.1258-1266</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-558bfa34b73a829e52617a58c63066b71f9be612ad7a59ede74321512c8a467d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26020902$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elmore, M R P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elischer, M F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claeys, M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pajor, E A</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of different flooring types on the behavior, health, and welfare of finishing beef steers</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Raising beef cattle on concrete floors can negatively impact their welfare by increasing joint swelling and body lesions, as well as abnormalities in resting behavior and postural changes. We hypothesized that the addition of rubber mats to concrete pens would improve beef cattle welfare by improving performance, health, hygiene, and resting behavior. Forty-eight crossbred Angus steers were housed in pens of 4 and randomly assigned to a single flooring treatment: (1) fully slatted concrete (CON), (2) fully slatted rubber mat (SLAT), or (3) solid rubber mat (SOLID; 60% of pen floor) from 36 to 48 wk of age. Weight, ADG, lesions, gait score, joint swelling, and animal and pen cleanliness were collected every 2 wk. Behavioral time budgets and frequency of postural changes (an indicator of floor traction and comfort) were collected at 0, 6, and 12 wk. No differences in weight gain or ADG were observed. Steers on SOLID flooring (0.80 ± 0.08) showed increased lesions compared to SLAT (0.38 ± 0.08) and CON (0.37 ± 0.08; both, = 0.05); however, there was no difference between SLAT and CON. SLAT steers (1.69 ± 0.04) showed a reduced gait score compared to SOLID (1.95 ± 0.04) and CON (1.98 ± 0.04; both, < 0.05), but SOLID and CON did not differ. Steers on SLAT flooring had less joint swelling (both knees and hocks) compared to SOLID and CON (all comparisons, < 0.05), but SOLID and CON did not differ. Steers on SOLID (3.64 ± 0.05) flooring were dirtier than those on SLAT (2.27 ± 0.05) and CON (2.19 ± 0.05; both, < 0.001), whereas SLAT and CON were similar. Additionally, SOLID and SLAT pens were less clean than CON pens ( < 0.001 and = 0.094, respectively), and SOLID was less clean than SLAT ( < 0.001). Time budget behavior was affected by treatment ( = 0.043), where SOLID differed from CON and SLAT (both, < 0.05). Steers on SOLID flooring preferred to rest on the rubber mat vs. slatted concrete ( = 0.001). Steers on SLAT flooring changed their posture more frequently than those on SOLID and CON flooring (both, < 0.05), but SOLID and CON did not differ. Compared to CON steers, SOLID steers showed an increase in lesions and a reduction in cleanliness, whereas SLAT steers showed a decrease in gait score and joint swelling and an increase in postural changes. Combined, these data suggest that the addition of slatted rubber mats to concrete pens may improve beef cattle welfare.]]></description><subject>Animal Welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>Floors and Floorcoverings</subject><subject>Housing, Animal</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Weight Gain</subject><issn>1525-3163</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsiKPDE3xR-zEI6r4kiqxlNmykzNxlSbFdkH99ySiIKZ7dffcOzwIXVOyYIIVdxsTF4zQPCu5UidoSgUTGaeSn_7LE3QR44YQyoQS52jCJGFEETZFsG4Ag3NQpYh7h2s_5ABdwq7t--C7d5wOOxhuHU4DaqExn74Pc9yAaVMzx6ar8Re0zgQYC5zvfGzGPwvgcEwAIV6iM2faCFfHOUNvjw_r5XO2en16Wd6vsopLnjIhSusMz23BTckUCCZpYURZSU6ktAV1yoKkzNTDVkENRc4ZFZRVpcllUfMZuv3p3YX-Yw8x6a2PFbSt6aDfR01lmee8UEIOaPaDVqGPMYDTu-C3Jhw0JXo0qwezejSrR7MDf3Os3tst1H_0r0r-Dctzc-U</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Elmore, M R P</creator><creator>Elischer, M F</creator><creator>Claeys, M C</creator><creator>Pajor, E A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>The effects of different flooring types on the behavior, health, and welfare of finishing beef steers</title><author>Elmore, M R P ; Elischer, M F ; Claeys, M C ; Pajor, E A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-558bfa34b73a829e52617a58c63066b71f9be612ad7a59ede74321512c8a467d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal Welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>Floors and Floorcoverings</topic><topic>Housing, Animal</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Weight Gain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elmore, M R P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elischer, M F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claeys, M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pajor, E A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elmore, M R P</au><au>Elischer, M F</au><au>Claeys, M C</au><au>Pajor, E A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of different flooring types on the behavior, health, and welfare of finishing beef steers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1258</spage><epage>1266</epage><pages>1258-1266</pages><issn>1525-3163</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Raising beef cattle on concrete floors can negatively impact their welfare by increasing joint swelling and body lesions, as well as abnormalities in resting behavior and postural changes. We hypothesized that the addition of rubber mats to concrete pens would improve beef cattle welfare by improving performance, health, hygiene, and resting behavior. Forty-eight crossbred Angus steers were housed in pens of 4 and randomly assigned to a single flooring treatment: (1) fully slatted concrete (CON), (2) fully slatted rubber mat (SLAT), or (3) solid rubber mat (SOLID; 60% of pen floor) from 36 to 48 wk of age. Weight, ADG, lesions, gait score, joint swelling, and animal and pen cleanliness were collected every 2 wk. Behavioral time budgets and frequency of postural changes (an indicator of floor traction and comfort) were collected at 0, 6, and 12 wk. No differences in weight gain or ADG were observed. Steers on SOLID flooring (0.80 ± 0.08) showed increased lesions compared to SLAT (0.38 ± 0.08) and CON (0.37 ± 0.08; both, = 0.05); however, there was no difference between SLAT and CON. SLAT steers (1.69 ± 0.04) showed a reduced gait score compared to SOLID (1.95 ± 0.04) and CON (1.98 ± 0.04; both, < 0.05), but SOLID and CON did not differ. Steers on SLAT flooring had less joint swelling (both knees and hocks) compared to SOLID and CON (all comparisons, < 0.05), but SOLID and CON did not differ. Steers on SOLID (3.64 ± 0.05) flooring were dirtier than those on SLAT (2.27 ± 0.05) and CON (2.19 ± 0.05; both, < 0.001), whereas SLAT and CON were similar. Additionally, SOLID and SLAT pens were less clean than CON pens ( < 0.001 and = 0.094, respectively), and SOLID was less clean than SLAT ( < 0.001). Time budget behavior was affected by treatment ( = 0.043), where SOLID differed from CON and SLAT (both, < 0.05). Steers on SOLID flooring preferred to rest on the rubber mat vs. slatted concrete ( = 0.001). Steers on SLAT flooring changed their posture more frequently than those on SOLID and CON flooring (both, < 0.05), but SOLID and CON did not differ. Compared to CON steers, SOLID steers showed an increase in lesions and a reduction in cleanliness, whereas SLAT steers showed a decrease in gait score and joint swelling and an increase in postural changes. Combined, these data suggest that the addition of slatted rubber mats to concrete pens may improve beef cattle welfare.]]></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>26020902</pmid><doi>10.2527/jas.2014-8399</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-3163
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2015-03, Vol.93 (3), p.1258-1266
issn 1525-3163
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1684437956
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE
subjects Animal Welfare
Animals
Behavior, Animal - physiology
Body Weight
Cattle - physiology
Floors and Floorcoverings
Housing, Animal
Hygiene
Male
Weight Gain
title The effects of different flooring types on the behavior, health, and welfare of finishing beef steers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T07%3A13%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20different%20flooring%20types%20on%20the%20behavior,%20health,%20and%20welfare%20of%20finishing%20beef%20steers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Elmore,%20M%20R%20P&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1258&rft.epage=1266&rft.pages=1258-1266&rft.issn=1525-3163&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas.2014-8399&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1684437956%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1684437956&rft_id=info:pmid/26020902&rfr_iscdi=true