Society, institutions, and common sense: Themes in the discourse of book challengers in 21st century United States

Understanding why people attempt to remove, relocate, or restrict books in an age of ubiquitous access is one of the more puzzling aspects of contemporary challenge cases. In order to better comprehend this largely symbolic phenomenon, this study focused on the arguments that book challengers employ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Library & information science research 2014-10, Vol.36 (3-4), p.171-178
1. Verfasser: Knox, Emily J.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 178
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 171
container_title Library & information science research
container_volume 36
creator Knox, Emily J.M.
description Understanding why people attempt to remove, relocate, or restrict books in an age of ubiquitous access is one of the more puzzling aspects of contemporary challenge cases. In order to better comprehend this largely symbolic phenomenon, this study focused on the arguments that book challengers employed to justify the removal, relocation, or restriction of books in 13 challenge cases in public libraries and schools across the United States between 2007 and 2011. Three sources of discourse, which were coded for common themes, were analyzed. The first consisted of a variety of documents, obtained via state open record requests to governing bodies, which were produced in the course of challenge cases. Recordings of book challenge public hearings constituted the second source of data. The third source of discourse consisted of interviews with challengers. The study found the following common themes in challengers' worldviews: First, they saw contemporary society as being in a state of decline and were concerned with preserving the innocence of children in the midst of this decay. Second, they constructed public institutions as symbols of the community that must represent their values and aid parents in their difficult role as boundary setters. Finally, challengers demonstrated a reverence for the books as a material object and employed common sense interpretive strategies. It is hoped that this analysis will offer a starting point for comparing the discourse of challengers to the discourse of other social actors and aid librarians and other information professionals in providing effective responses to challengers to materials in their respective institutions. •A discourse analysis of 13 book challenge cases from 2007 to 2011 revealed three primary themes.•1st theme: Society is on the decline and children's innocence must be protected.•2nd theme: Public institutions are public symbols of the community.•3rd theme: Reading is a powerful practice with significant short- and long-term effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.lisr.2014.06.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1684420360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S074081881400053X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1684420360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-7d5d7f4871633976ae1c0d205c81e49f1880be257a3038cb5001298a36b7d2bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhiMEEkvhBTj5gsShCWM7iR3EBVVAK1Xi0PZsOc6E9ZLYxeMg7dvjZSuOnOby_f_MfFX1lkPDgfcfDs3iKTUCeNtA3wDIZ9WOayVrrlv9vNqBaqHWXOuX1SuiAwAI0GJXpbvoPObjJfOBss9b9jHQJbNhYi6uawyMMBB-ZPd7XJEKxvIe2eTJxS0RsjizMcafzO3tsmD4gekvJDhl5jDkLR3ZQ_AZJ3aXbUZ6Xb2Y7UL45mleVA9fv9xfXde337_dXH2-rV0LKtdq6iY1t1rxXspB9Ra5g0lA5zTHdpjLLzCi6JSVILUbOwAuBm1lP6pJjLO8qN6fex9T_LUhZbOWo3FZbMC4keG9blsBsoeCijPqUiRKOJvH5FebjoaDOQk2B3MSbE6CDfSmCC6hd0_9lpxd5mSD8_QvKQboB9Xpwn06c1ie_e0xGSrKg8PJJ3TZTNH_b80fgD-RXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1684420360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Society, institutions, and common sense: Themes in the discourse of book challengers in 21st century United States</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Knox, Emily J.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Knox, Emily J.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding why people attempt to remove, relocate, or restrict books in an age of ubiquitous access is one of the more puzzling aspects of contemporary challenge cases. In order to better comprehend this largely symbolic phenomenon, this study focused on the arguments that book challengers employed to justify the removal, relocation, or restriction of books in 13 challenge cases in public libraries and schools across the United States between 2007 and 2011. Three sources of discourse, which were coded for common themes, were analyzed. The first consisted of a variety of documents, obtained via state open record requests to governing bodies, which were produced in the course of challenge cases. Recordings of book challenge public hearings constituted the second source of data. The third source of discourse consisted of interviews with challengers. The study found the following common themes in challengers' worldviews: First, they saw contemporary society as being in a state of decline and were concerned with preserving the innocence of children in the midst of this decay. Second, they constructed public institutions as symbols of the community that must represent their values and aid parents in their difficult role as boundary setters. Finally, challengers demonstrated a reverence for the books as a material object and employed common sense interpretive strategies. It is hoped that this analysis will offer a starting point for comparing the discourse of challengers to the discourse of other social actors and aid librarians and other information professionals in providing effective responses to challengers to materials in their respective institutions. •A discourse analysis of 13 book challenge cases from 2007 to 2011 revealed three primary themes.•1st theme: Society is on the decline and children's innocence must be protected.•2nd theme: Public institutions are public symbols of the community.•3rd theme: Reading is a powerful practice with significant short- and long-term effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-8188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1848</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2014.06.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LISRDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Book challenges ; Censorship ; Content analysis ; Discourse analysis ; Exact sciences and technology ; Information and communication sciences ; Information processing and retrieval ; Information retrieval. Man machine relationship ; Information science. Documentation ; Intellectual freedom ; Library and information science. General aspects ; Reading ; Reading practices ; Sciences and techniques of general use ; Use and user studies. Information needs</subject><ispartof>Library &amp; information science research, 2014-10, Vol.36 (3-4), p.171-178</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-7d5d7f4871633976ae1c0d205c81e49f1880be257a3038cb5001298a36b7d2bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-7d5d7f4871633976ae1c0d205c81e49f1880be257a3038cb5001298a36b7d2bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074081881400053X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=29069758$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knox, Emily J.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Society, institutions, and common sense: Themes in the discourse of book challengers in 21st century United States</title><title>Library &amp; information science research</title><description>Understanding why people attempt to remove, relocate, or restrict books in an age of ubiquitous access is one of the more puzzling aspects of contemporary challenge cases. In order to better comprehend this largely symbolic phenomenon, this study focused on the arguments that book challengers employed to justify the removal, relocation, or restriction of books in 13 challenge cases in public libraries and schools across the United States between 2007 and 2011. Three sources of discourse, which were coded for common themes, were analyzed. The first consisted of a variety of documents, obtained via state open record requests to governing bodies, which were produced in the course of challenge cases. Recordings of book challenge public hearings constituted the second source of data. The third source of discourse consisted of interviews with challengers. The study found the following common themes in challengers' worldviews: First, they saw contemporary society as being in a state of decline and were concerned with preserving the innocence of children in the midst of this decay. Second, they constructed public institutions as symbols of the community that must represent their values and aid parents in their difficult role as boundary setters. Finally, challengers demonstrated a reverence for the books as a material object and employed common sense interpretive strategies. It is hoped that this analysis will offer a starting point for comparing the discourse of challengers to the discourse of other social actors and aid librarians and other information professionals in providing effective responses to challengers to materials in their respective institutions. •A discourse analysis of 13 book challenge cases from 2007 to 2011 revealed three primary themes.•1st theme: Society is on the decline and children's innocence must be protected.•2nd theme: Public institutions are public symbols of the community.•3rd theme: Reading is a powerful practice with significant short- and long-term effects.</description><subject>Book challenges</subject><subject>Censorship</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Information and communication sciences</subject><subject>Information processing and retrieval</subject><subject>Information retrieval. Man machine relationship</subject><subject>Information science. Documentation</subject><subject>Intellectual freedom</subject><subject>Library and information science. General aspects</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading practices</subject><subject>Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><subject>Use and user studies. Information needs</subject><issn>0740-8188</issn><issn>1873-1848</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhiMEEkvhBTj5gsShCWM7iR3EBVVAK1Xi0PZsOc6E9ZLYxeMg7dvjZSuOnOby_f_MfFX1lkPDgfcfDs3iKTUCeNtA3wDIZ9WOayVrrlv9vNqBaqHWXOuX1SuiAwAI0GJXpbvoPObjJfOBss9b9jHQJbNhYi6uawyMMBB-ZPd7XJEKxvIe2eTJxS0RsjizMcafzO3tsmD4gekvJDhl5jDkLR3ZQ_AZJ3aXbUZ6Xb2Y7UL45mleVA9fv9xfXde337_dXH2-rV0LKtdq6iY1t1rxXspB9Ra5g0lA5zTHdpjLLzCi6JSVILUbOwAuBm1lP6pJjLO8qN6fex9T_LUhZbOWo3FZbMC4keG9blsBsoeCijPqUiRKOJvH5FebjoaDOQk2B3MSbE6CDfSmCC6hd0_9lpxd5mSD8_QvKQboB9Xpwn06c1ie_e0xGSrKg8PJJ3TZTNH_b80fgD-RXg</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Knox, Emily J.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BP</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Society, institutions, and common sense: Themes in the discourse of book challengers in 21st century United States</title><author>Knox, Emily J.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-7d5d7f4871633976ae1c0d205c81e49f1880be257a3038cb5001298a36b7d2bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Book challenges</topic><topic>Censorship</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Information and communication sciences</topic><topic>Information processing and retrieval</topic><topic>Information retrieval. Man machine relationship</topic><topic>Information science. Documentation</topic><topic>Intellectual freedom</topic><topic>Library and information science. General aspects</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading practices</topic><topic>Sciences and techniques of general use</topic><topic>Use and user studies. Information needs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knox, Emily J.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) - CILIP Edition</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Library &amp; information science research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knox, Emily J.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Society, institutions, and common sense: Themes in the discourse of book challengers in 21st century United States</atitle><jtitle>Library &amp; information science research</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>171-178</pages><issn>0740-8188</issn><eissn>1873-1848</eissn><coden>LISRDH</coden><abstract>Understanding why people attempt to remove, relocate, or restrict books in an age of ubiquitous access is one of the more puzzling aspects of contemporary challenge cases. In order to better comprehend this largely symbolic phenomenon, this study focused on the arguments that book challengers employed to justify the removal, relocation, or restriction of books in 13 challenge cases in public libraries and schools across the United States between 2007 and 2011. Three sources of discourse, which were coded for common themes, were analyzed. The first consisted of a variety of documents, obtained via state open record requests to governing bodies, which were produced in the course of challenge cases. Recordings of book challenge public hearings constituted the second source of data. The third source of discourse consisted of interviews with challengers. The study found the following common themes in challengers' worldviews: First, they saw contemporary society as being in a state of decline and were concerned with preserving the innocence of children in the midst of this decay. Second, they constructed public institutions as symbols of the community that must represent their values and aid parents in their difficult role as boundary setters. Finally, challengers demonstrated a reverence for the books as a material object and employed common sense interpretive strategies. It is hoped that this analysis will offer a starting point for comparing the discourse of challengers to the discourse of other social actors and aid librarians and other information professionals in providing effective responses to challengers to materials in their respective institutions. •A discourse analysis of 13 book challenge cases from 2007 to 2011 revealed three primary themes.•1st theme: Society is on the decline and children's innocence must be protected.•2nd theme: Public institutions are public symbols of the community.•3rd theme: Reading is a powerful practice with significant short- and long-term effects.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.lisr.2014.06.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0740-8188
ispartof Library & information science research, 2014-10, Vol.36 (3-4), p.171-178
issn 0740-8188
1873-1848
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1684420360
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Book challenges
Censorship
Content analysis
Discourse analysis
Exact sciences and technology
Information and communication sciences
Information processing and retrieval
Information retrieval. Man machine relationship
Information science. Documentation
Intellectual freedom
Library and information science. General aspects
Reading
Reading practices
Sciences and techniques of general use
Use and user studies. Information needs
title Society, institutions, and common sense: Themes in the discourse of book challengers in 21st century United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T06%3A28%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Society,%20institutions,%20and%20common%20sense:%20Themes%20in%20the%20discourse%20of%20book%20challengers%20in%2021st%20century%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Library%20&%20information%20science%20research&rft.au=Knox,%20Emily%20J.M.&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=171-178&rft.issn=0740-8188&rft.eissn=1873-1848&rft.coden=LISRDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.06.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1684420360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1684420360&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S074081881400053X&rfr_iscdi=true