Society, institutions, and common sense: Themes in the discourse of book challengers in 21st century United States
Understanding why people attempt to remove, relocate, or restrict books in an age of ubiquitous access is one of the more puzzling aspects of contemporary challenge cases. In order to better comprehend this largely symbolic phenomenon, this study focused on the arguments that book challengers employ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Library & information science research 2014-10, Vol.36 (3-4), p.171-178 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 178 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 171 |
container_title | Library & information science research |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Knox, Emily J.M. |
description | Understanding why people attempt to remove, relocate, or restrict books in an age of ubiquitous access is one of the more puzzling aspects of contemporary challenge cases. In order to better comprehend this largely symbolic phenomenon, this study focused on the arguments that book challengers employed to justify the removal, relocation, or restriction of books in 13 challenge cases in public libraries and schools across the United States between 2007 and 2011. Three sources of discourse, which were coded for common themes, were analyzed. The first consisted of a variety of documents, obtained via state open record requests to governing bodies, which were produced in the course of challenge cases. Recordings of book challenge public hearings constituted the second source of data. The third source of discourse consisted of interviews with challengers. The study found the following common themes in challengers' worldviews: First, they saw contemporary society as being in a state of decline and were concerned with preserving the innocence of children in the midst of this decay. Second, they constructed public institutions as symbols of the community that must represent their values and aid parents in their difficult role as boundary setters. Finally, challengers demonstrated a reverence for the books as a material object and employed common sense interpretive strategies. It is hoped that this analysis will offer a starting point for comparing the discourse of challengers to the discourse of other social actors and aid librarians and other information professionals in providing effective responses to challengers to materials in their respective institutions.
•A discourse analysis of 13 book challenge cases from 2007 to 2011 revealed three primary themes.•1st theme: Society is on the decline and children's innocence must be protected.•2nd theme: Public institutions are public symbols of the community.•3rd theme: Reading is a powerful practice with significant short- and long-term effects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.lisr.2014.06.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1684420360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S074081881400053X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1684420360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-7d5d7f4871633976ae1c0d205c81e49f1880be257a3038cb5001298a36b7d2bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhiMEEkvhBTj5gsShCWM7iR3EBVVAK1Xi0PZsOc6E9ZLYxeMg7dvjZSuOnOby_f_MfFX1lkPDgfcfDs3iKTUCeNtA3wDIZ9WOayVrrlv9vNqBaqHWXOuX1SuiAwAI0GJXpbvoPObjJfOBss9b9jHQJbNhYi6uawyMMBB-ZPd7XJEKxvIe2eTJxS0RsjizMcafzO3tsmD4gekvJDhl5jDkLR3ZQ_AZJ3aXbUZ6Xb2Y7UL45mleVA9fv9xfXde337_dXH2-rV0LKtdq6iY1t1rxXspB9Ra5g0lA5zTHdpjLLzCi6JSVILUbOwAuBm1lP6pJjLO8qN6fex9T_LUhZbOWo3FZbMC4keG9blsBsoeCijPqUiRKOJvH5FebjoaDOQk2B3MSbE6CDfSmCC6hd0_9lpxd5mSD8_QvKQboB9Xpwn06c1ie_e0xGSrKg8PJJ3TZTNH_b80fgD-RXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1684420360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Society, institutions, and common sense: Themes in the discourse of book challengers in 21st century United States</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Knox, Emily J.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Knox, Emily J.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding why people attempt to remove, relocate, or restrict books in an age of ubiquitous access is one of the more puzzling aspects of contemporary challenge cases. In order to better comprehend this largely symbolic phenomenon, this study focused on the arguments that book challengers employed to justify the removal, relocation, or restriction of books in 13 challenge cases in public libraries and schools across the United States between 2007 and 2011. Three sources of discourse, which were coded for common themes, were analyzed. The first consisted of a variety of documents, obtained via state open record requests to governing bodies, which were produced in the course of challenge cases. Recordings of book challenge public hearings constituted the second source of data. The third source of discourse consisted of interviews with challengers. The study found the following common themes in challengers' worldviews: First, they saw contemporary society as being in a state of decline and were concerned with preserving the innocence of children in the midst of this decay. Second, they constructed public institutions as symbols of the community that must represent their values and aid parents in their difficult role as boundary setters. Finally, challengers demonstrated a reverence for the books as a material object and employed common sense interpretive strategies. It is hoped that this analysis will offer a starting point for comparing the discourse of challengers to the discourse of other social actors and aid librarians and other information professionals in providing effective responses to challengers to materials in their respective institutions.
•A discourse analysis of 13 book challenge cases from 2007 to 2011 revealed three primary themes.•1st theme: Society is on the decline and children's innocence must be protected.•2nd theme: Public institutions are public symbols of the community.•3rd theme: Reading is a powerful practice with significant short- and long-term effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-8188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1848</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2014.06.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LISRDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Book challenges ; Censorship ; Content analysis ; Discourse analysis ; Exact sciences and technology ; Information and communication sciences ; Information processing and retrieval ; Information retrieval. Man machine relationship ; Information science. Documentation ; Intellectual freedom ; Library and information science. General aspects ; Reading ; Reading practices ; Sciences and techniques of general use ; Use and user studies. Information needs</subject><ispartof>Library & information science research, 2014-10, Vol.36 (3-4), p.171-178</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-7d5d7f4871633976ae1c0d205c81e49f1880be257a3038cb5001298a36b7d2bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-7d5d7f4871633976ae1c0d205c81e49f1880be257a3038cb5001298a36b7d2bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074081881400053X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=29069758$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knox, Emily J.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Society, institutions, and common sense: Themes in the discourse of book challengers in 21st century United States</title><title>Library & information science research</title><description>Understanding why people attempt to remove, relocate, or restrict books in an age of ubiquitous access is one of the more puzzling aspects of contemporary challenge cases. In order to better comprehend this largely symbolic phenomenon, this study focused on the arguments that book challengers employed to justify the removal, relocation, or restriction of books in 13 challenge cases in public libraries and schools across the United States between 2007 and 2011. Three sources of discourse, which were coded for common themes, were analyzed. The first consisted of a variety of documents, obtained via state open record requests to governing bodies, which were produced in the course of challenge cases. Recordings of book challenge public hearings constituted the second source of data. The third source of discourse consisted of interviews with challengers. The study found the following common themes in challengers' worldviews: First, they saw contemporary society as being in a state of decline and were concerned with preserving the innocence of children in the midst of this decay. Second, they constructed public institutions as symbols of the community that must represent their values and aid parents in their difficult role as boundary setters. Finally, challengers demonstrated a reverence for the books as a material object and employed common sense interpretive strategies. It is hoped that this analysis will offer a starting point for comparing the discourse of challengers to the discourse of other social actors and aid librarians and other information professionals in providing effective responses to challengers to materials in their respective institutions.
•A discourse analysis of 13 book challenge cases from 2007 to 2011 revealed three primary themes.•1st theme: Society is on the decline and children's innocence must be protected.•2nd theme: Public institutions are public symbols of the community.•3rd theme: Reading is a powerful practice with significant short- and long-term effects.</description><subject>Book challenges</subject><subject>Censorship</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Information and communication sciences</subject><subject>Information processing and retrieval</subject><subject>Information retrieval. Man machine relationship</subject><subject>Information science. Documentation</subject><subject>Intellectual freedom</subject><subject>Library and information science. General aspects</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading practices</subject><subject>Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><subject>Use and user studies. Information needs</subject><issn>0740-8188</issn><issn>1873-1848</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhiMEEkvhBTj5gsShCWM7iR3EBVVAK1Xi0PZsOc6E9ZLYxeMg7dvjZSuOnOby_f_MfFX1lkPDgfcfDs3iKTUCeNtA3wDIZ9WOayVrrlv9vNqBaqHWXOuX1SuiAwAI0GJXpbvoPObjJfOBss9b9jHQJbNhYi6uawyMMBB-ZPd7XJEKxvIe2eTJxS0RsjizMcafzO3tsmD4gekvJDhl5jDkLR3ZQ_AZJ3aXbUZ6Xb2Y7UL45mleVA9fv9xfXde337_dXH2-rV0LKtdq6iY1t1rxXspB9Ra5g0lA5zTHdpjLLzCi6JSVILUbOwAuBm1lP6pJjLO8qN6fex9T_LUhZbOWo3FZbMC4keG9blsBsoeCijPqUiRKOJvH5FebjoaDOQk2B3MSbE6CDfSmCC6hd0_9lpxd5mSD8_QvKQboB9Xpwn06c1ie_e0xGSrKg8PJJ3TZTNH_b80fgD-RXg</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Knox, Emily J.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BP</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Society, institutions, and common sense: Themes in the discourse of book challengers in 21st century United States</title><author>Knox, Emily J.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-7d5d7f4871633976ae1c0d205c81e49f1880be257a3038cb5001298a36b7d2bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Book challenges</topic><topic>Censorship</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Information and communication sciences</topic><topic>Information processing and retrieval</topic><topic>Information retrieval. Man machine relationship</topic><topic>Information science. Documentation</topic><topic>Intellectual freedom</topic><topic>Library and information science. General aspects</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading practices</topic><topic>Sciences and techniques of general use</topic><topic>Use and user studies. Information needs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knox, Emily J.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) - CILIP Edition</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Library & information science research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knox, Emily J.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Society, institutions, and common sense: Themes in the discourse of book challengers in 21st century United States</atitle><jtitle>Library & information science research</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>171-178</pages><issn>0740-8188</issn><eissn>1873-1848</eissn><coden>LISRDH</coden><abstract>Understanding why people attempt to remove, relocate, or restrict books in an age of ubiquitous access is one of the more puzzling aspects of contemporary challenge cases. In order to better comprehend this largely symbolic phenomenon, this study focused on the arguments that book challengers employed to justify the removal, relocation, or restriction of books in 13 challenge cases in public libraries and schools across the United States between 2007 and 2011. Three sources of discourse, which were coded for common themes, were analyzed. The first consisted of a variety of documents, obtained via state open record requests to governing bodies, which were produced in the course of challenge cases. Recordings of book challenge public hearings constituted the second source of data. The third source of discourse consisted of interviews with challengers. The study found the following common themes in challengers' worldviews: First, they saw contemporary society as being in a state of decline and were concerned with preserving the innocence of children in the midst of this decay. Second, they constructed public institutions as symbols of the community that must represent their values and aid parents in their difficult role as boundary setters. Finally, challengers demonstrated a reverence for the books as a material object and employed common sense interpretive strategies. It is hoped that this analysis will offer a starting point for comparing the discourse of challengers to the discourse of other social actors and aid librarians and other information professionals in providing effective responses to challengers to materials in their respective institutions.
•A discourse analysis of 13 book challenge cases from 2007 to 2011 revealed three primary themes.•1st theme: Society is on the decline and children's innocence must be protected.•2nd theme: Public institutions are public symbols of the community.•3rd theme: Reading is a powerful practice with significant short- and long-term effects.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.lisr.2014.06.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0740-8188 |
ispartof | Library & information science research, 2014-10, Vol.36 (3-4), p.171-178 |
issn | 0740-8188 1873-1848 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1684420360 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Book challenges Censorship Content analysis Discourse analysis Exact sciences and technology Information and communication sciences Information processing and retrieval Information retrieval. Man machine relationship Information science. Documentation Intellectual freedom Library and information science. General aspects Reading Reading practices Sciences and techniques of general use Use and user studies. Information needs |
title | Society, institutions, and common sense: Themes in the discourse of book challengers in 21st century United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T06%3A28%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Society,%20institutions,%20and%20common%20sense:%20Themes%20in%20the%20discourse%20of%20book%20challengers%20in%2021st%20century%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Library%20&%20information%20science%20research&rft.au=Knox,%20Emily%20J.M.&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=171-178&rft.issn=0740-8188&rft.eissn=1873-1848&rft.coden=LISRDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.06.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1684420360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1684420360&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S074081881400053X&rfr_iscdi=true |