Validation of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Scoring System in a UK Adult Cardiac Surgery Population
Objective The Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) scoring system was conceived in 2007, utilizing 12 physiologic variables taken from the first 24 hours of adult admissions to the general intensive care unit (ICU) to predict in-hospital mortality. The authors aimed to evaluate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 2015-06, Vol.29 (3), p.565-569 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 569 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 565 |
container_title | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Ariyaratnam, Priyadharshanan, BM, BSc (Hons), MRCS Loubani, Mahmoud, MD, FRCS, FECTS Biddulph, James, FRCA Moore, Julie, BSc Richards, Neil Chaudhry, Mubarak, FRCS Hong, Vincent, FRCA Haworth, Mark, MRCA Ananthasayanam, Anantha, FRCA |
description | Objective The Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) scoring system was conceived in 2007, utilizing 12 physiologic variables taken from the first 24 hours of adult admissions to the general intensive care unit (ICU) to predict in-hospital mortality. The authors aimed to evaluate the ICNARC score in predicting mortality in cardiac surgical patients compared to established cardiac risk models such as logistic EuroSCORE as well as to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II. Design Retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively. Setting Single-center study in a cardiac intensive care in a regional cardiothoracic center. Participants Patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January 2010 and June 2012. Methods A total of 1,646 patients were scored preoperatively using the logistic EuroSCORE and postoperatively using ICNARC and APACHE II. Data for comparison of scoring systems are presented as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Measurements and Main Results The mean age at surgery was 67 years±10.1. The mortality from all cardiac surgery was 3.2%. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 7.31±10.13, the mean ICNARC score was 13.42±5.055, while the mean APACHE II score was 6.32±7.731. The c-indices for logistic EuroSCORE, ICNARC, and APACHE II were 0.801, 0.847 and 0.648, respectively. Conclusion The authors have, for the first time, validated the ICNARC score as a useful predictor of postoperative mortality in adult cardiac surgical patients. This could have implications for postoperative management, focusing the utilization of resources as well as a method to measure and compare performance in the cardiothoracic ICU. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.09.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1683575571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S105307701400439X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1683575571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-86b064c0a86bda0566016ee95cc263b28cfecdfed25159b27fcc371f123ac3fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEoqXlD3BAPnJJ8EecDwkhrVZAKypA3bbiZnnHk9Yh62xtZ6UVf75Ot3DgwGlGmnceaZ7JsjeMFoxK8b4v-h3oglNWFrQtKBPPsmMmBc-bkvPnqU-pnNY1PcpehdBTypiU9cvsiKciS9oeZ79v9GCNjnZ0ZOxIvENy7iK6YHdIltoj-fY41ANZTMZGop0hlxhQe7gjS3QxRVYweutuyWofIm6IdUST669kYaYhzhBjNZDV5G_R78mPcTsNj8zT7EWnh4Cvn-pJdv3509XyLL_4_uV8ubjIoWxYzJtqTasSqE6N0VRWFWUVYisBeCXWvIEOwXRouGSyXfO6AxA16xgXGkSH4iR7d-Bu_Xg_YYhqYwPgMGiH4xQUqxqRfMiapSg_RMGPIXjs1NbbjfZ7xaiadapezdLVLF3RViXpaentE39ab9D8XfljOQU-HAKYrtxZ9CqARQdorEeIyoz2__yP_6zDYJ0FPfzCPYZ-nHz6T7pDBa6oWs2c-euspLQU7U_xAN4gqLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683575571</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Scoring System in a UK Adult Cardiac Surgery Population</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ariyaratnam, Priyadharshanan, BM, BSc (Hons), MRCS ; Loubani, Mahmoud, MD, FRCS, FECTS ; Biddulph, James, FRCA ; Moore, Julie, BSc ; Richards, Neil ; Chaudhry, Mubarak, FRCS ; Hong, Vincent, FRCA ; Haworth, Mark, MRCA ; Ananthasayanam, Anantha, FRCA</creator><creatorcontrib>Ariyaratnam, Priyadharshanan, BM, BSc (Hons), MRCS ; Loubani, Mahmoud, MD, FRCS, FECTS ; Biddulph, James, FRCA ; Moore, Julie, BSc ; Richards, Neil ; Chaudhry, Mubarak, FRCS ; Hong, Vincent, FRCA ; Haworth, Mark, MRCA ; Ananthasayanam, Anantha, FRCA</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) scoring system was conceived in 2007, utilizing 12 physiologic variables taken from the first 24 hours of adult admissions to the general intensive care unit (ICU) to predict in-hospital mortality. The authors aimed to evaluate the ICNARC score in predicting mortality in cardiac surgical patients compared to established cardiac risk models such as logistic EuroSCORE as well as to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II. Design Retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively. Setting Single-center study in a cardiac intensive care in a regional cardiothoracic center. Participants Patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January 2010 and June 2012. Methods A total of 1,646 patients were scored preoperatively using the logistic EuroSCORE and postoperatively using ICNARC and APACHE II. Data for comparison of scoring systems are presented as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Measurements and Main Results The mean age at surgery was 67 years±10.1. The mortality from all cardiac surgery was 3.2%. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 7.31±10.13, the mean ICNARC score was 13.42±5.055, while the mean APACHE II score was 6.32±7.731. The c-indices for logistic EuroSCORE, ICNARC, and APACHE II were 0.801, 0.847 and 0.648, respectively. Conclusion The authors have, for the first time, validated the ICNARC score as a useful predictor of postoperative mortality in adult cardiac surgical patients. This could have implications for postoperative management, focusing the utilization of resources as well as a method to measure and compare performance in the cardiothoracic ICU.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-0770</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.09.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25575409</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthesia & Perioperative Care ; APACHE ; APACHE II ; cardiac surgery ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - standards ; Critical Care ; Critical Care - standards ; EuroSCORE ; Female ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; ICNARC ; intensive care ; Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Medical Audit ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Care - statistics & numerical data ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; risk stratification ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2015-06, Vol.29 (3), p.565-569</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-86b064c0a86bda0566016ee95cc263b28cfecdfed25159b27fcc371f123ac3fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-86b064c0a86bda0566016ee95cc263b28cfecdfed25159b27fcc371f123ac3fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105307701400439X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25575409$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ariyaratnam, Priyadharshanan, BM, BSc (Hons), MRCS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loubani, Mahmoud, MD, FRCS, FECTS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biddulph, James, FRCA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Julie, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhry, Mubarak, FRCS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Vincent, FRCA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haworth, Mark, MRCA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ananthasayanam, Anantha, FRCA</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Scoring System in a UK Adult Cardiac Surgery Population</title><title>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth</addtitle><description>Objective The Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) scoring system was conceived in 2007, utilizing 12 physiologic variables taken from the first 24 hours of adult admissions to the general intensive care unit (ICU) to predict in-hospital mortality. The authors aimed to evaluate the ICNARC score in predicting mortality in cardiac surgical patients compared to established cardiac risk models such as logistic EuroSCORE as well as to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II. Design Retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively. Setting Single-center study in a cardiac intensive care in a regional cardiothoracic center. Participants Patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January 2010 and June 2012. Methods A total of 1,646 patients were scored preoperatively using the logistic EuroSCORE and postoperatively using ICNARC and APACHE II. Data for comparison of scoring systems are presented as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Measurements and Main Results The mean age at surgery was 67 years±10.1. The mortality from all cardiac surgery was 3.2%. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 7.31±10.13, the mean ICNARC score was 13.42±5.055, while the mean APACHE II score was 6.32±7.731. The c-indices for logistic EuroSCORE, ICNARC, and APACHE II were 0.801, 0.847 and 0.648, respectively. Conclusion The authors have, for the first time, validated the ICNARC score as a useful predictor of postoperative mortality in adult cardiac surgical patients. This could have implications for postoperative management, focusing the utilization of resources as well as a method to measure and compare performance in the cardiothoracic ICU.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</subject><subject>APACHE</subject><subject>APACHE II</subject><subject>cardiac surgery</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - standards</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Critical Care - standards</subject><subject>EuroSCORE</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>ICNARC</subject><subject>intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>risk stratification</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1053-0770</issn><issn>1532-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEoqXlD3BAPnJJ8EecDwkhrVZAKypA3bbiZnnHk9Yh62xtZ6UVf75Ot3DgwGlGmnceaZ7JsjeMFoxK8b4v-h3oglNWFrQtKBPPsmMmBc-bkvPnqU-pnNY1PcpehdBTypiU9cvsiKciS9oeZ79v9GCNjnZ0ZOxIvENy7iK6YHdIltoj-fY41ANZTMZGop0hlxhQe7gjS3QxRVYweutuyWofIm6IdUST669kYaYhzhBjNZDV5G_R78mPcTsNj8zT7EWnh4Cvn-pJdv3509XyLL_4_uV8ubjIoWxYzJtqTasSqE6N0VRWFWUVYisBeCXWvIEOwXRouGSyXfO6AxA16xgXGkSH4iR7d-Bu_Xg_YYhqYwPgMGiH4xQUqxqRfMiapSg_RMGPIXjs1NbbjfZ7xaiadapezdLVLF3RViXpaentE39ab9D8XfljOQU-HAKYrtxZ9CqARQdorEeIyoz2__yP_6zDYJ0FPfzCPYZ-nHz6T7pDBa6oWs2c-euspLQU7U_xAN4gqLw</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Ariyaratnam, Priyadharshanan, BM, BSc (Hons), MRCS</creator><creator>Loubani, Mahmoud, MD, FRCS, FECTS</creator><creator>Biddulph, James, FRCA</creator><creator>Moore, Julie, BSc</creator><creator>Richards, Neil</creator><creator>Chaudhry, Mubarak, FRCS</creator><creator>Hong, Vincent, FRCA</creator><creator>Haworth, Mark, MRCA</creator><creator>Ananthasayanam, Anantha, FRCA</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Validation of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Scoring System in a UK Adult Cardiac Surgery Population</title><author>Ariyaratnam, Priyadharshanan, BM, BSc (Hons), MRCS ; Loubani, Mahmoud, MD, FRCS, FECTS ; Biddulph, James, FRCA ; Moore, Julie, BSc ; Richards, Neil ; Chaudhry, Mubarak, FRCS ; Hong, Vincent, FRCA ; Haworth, Mark, MRCA ; Ananthasayanam, Anantha, FRCA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-86b064c0a86bda0566016ee95cc263b28cfecdfed25159b27fcc371f123ac3fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</topic><topic>APACHE</topic><topic>APACHE II</topic><topic>cardiac surgery</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - standards</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Critical Care - standards</topic><topic>EuroSCORE</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>ICNARC</topic><topic>intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>risk stratification</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ariyaratnam, Priyadharshanan, BM, BSc (Hons), MRCS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loubani, Mahmoud, MD, FRCS, FECTS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biddulph, James, FRCA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Julie, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhry, Mubarak, FRCS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Vincent, FRCA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haworth, Mark, MRCA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ananthasayanam, Anantha, FRCA</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ariyaratnam, Priyadharshanan, BM, BSc (Hons), MRCS</au><au>Loubani, Mahmoud, MD, FRCS, FECTS</au><au>Biddulph, James, FRCA</au><au>Moore, Julie, BSc</au><au>Richards, Neil</au><au>Chaudhry, Mubarak, FRCS</au><au>Hong, Vincent, FRCA</au><au>Haworth, Mark, MRCA</au><au>Ananthasayanam, Anantha, FRCA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Scoring System in a UK Adult Cardiac Surgery Population</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>565</spage><epage>569</epage><pages>565-569</pages><issn>1053-0770</issn><eissn>1532-8422</eissn><abstract>Objective The Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) scoring system was conceived in 2007, utilizing 12 physiologic variables taken from the first 24 hours of adult admissions to the general intensive care unit (ICU) to predict in-hospital mortality. The authors aimed to evaluate the ICNARC score in predicting mortality in cardiac surgical patients compared to established cardiac risk models such as logistic EuroSCORE as well as to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II. Design Retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively. Setting Single-center study in a cardiac intensive care in a regional cardiothoracic center. Participants Patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January 2010 and June 2012. Methods A total of 1,646 patients were scored preoperatively using the logistic EuroSCORE and postoperatively using ICNARC and APACHE II. Data for comparison of scoring systems are presented as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Measurements and Main Results The mean age at surgery was 67 years±10.1. The mortality from all cardiac surgery was 3.2%. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 7.31±10.13, the mean ICNARC score was 13.42±5.055, while the mean APACHE II score was 6.32±7.731. The c-indices for logistic EuroSCORE, ICNARC, and APACHE II were 0.801, 0.847 and 0.648, respectively. Conclusion The authors have, for the first time, validated the ICNARC score as a useful predictor of postoperative mortality in adult cardiac surgical patients. This could have implications for postoperative management, focusing the utilization of resources as well as a method to measure and compare performance in the cardiothoracic ICU.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25575409</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.jvca.2014.09.013</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-0770 |
ispartof | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2015-06, Vol.29 (3), p.565-569 |
issn | 1053-0770 1532-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1683575571 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Anesthesia & Perioperative Care APACHE APACHE II cardiac surgery Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality Cardiac Surgical Procedures - standards Critical Care Critical Care - standards EuroSCORE Female Hospital Mortality Humans ICNARC intensive care Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data Male Medical Audit Middle Aged Postoperative Care - statistics & numerical data Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies Risk Factors risk stratification Socioeconomic Factors Treatment Outcome United Kingdom |
title | Validation of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Scoring System in a UK Adult Cardiac Surgery Population |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A41%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20Intensive%20Care%20National%20Audit%20and%20Research%20Centre%20Scoring%20System%20in%20a%20UK%20Adult%20Cardiac%20Surgery%20Population&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiothoracic%20and%20vascular%20anesthesia&rft.au=Ariyaratnam,%20Priyadharshanan,%20BM,%20BSc%20(Hons),%20MRCS&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=565&rft.epage=569&rft.pages=565-569&rft.issn=1053-0770&rft.eissn=1532-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.jvca.2014.09.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1683575571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683575571&rft_id=info:pmid/25575409&rft_els_id=S105307701400439X&rfr_iscdi=true |