Platelet Reactivity After Receiving Clopidogrel Compared With Ticagrelor in Patients With Kidney Failure Treated With Hemodialysis: A Randomized Crossover Study

Background Patients with kidney failure treated with maintenance hemodialysis (HD) are poor responders to clopidogrel. More beneficial platelet-inhibiting strategies in HD patients therefore are required. Study Design Single-center, prospective, randomized, crossover study. Setting & Participant...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of kidney diseases 2015-06, Vol.65 (6), p.916-924
Hauptverfasser: Jeong, Kyung Hwan, MD, PhD, Cho, Ju Hee, MD, Woo, Jong Shin, MD, PhD, Kim, Jin Bae, MD, PhD, Kim, Woo-Shik, MD, PhD, Lee, Tae Won, MD, PhD, Kim, Kwon Sam, MD, PhD, Ihm, Chun Gyoo, MD, PhD, Kim, Weon, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 924
container_issue 6
container_start_page 916
container_title American journal of kidney diseases
container_volume 65
creator Jeong, Kyung Hwan, MD, PhD
Cho, Ju Hee, MD
Woo, Jong Shin, MD, PhD
Kim, Jin Bae, MD, PhD
Kim, Woo-Shik, MD, PhD
Lee, Tae Won, MD, PhD
Kim, Kwon Sam, MD, PhD
Ihm, Chun Gyoo, MD, PhD
Kim, Weon, MD, PhD
description Background Patients with kidney failure treated with maintenance hemodialysis (HD) are poor responders to clopidogrel. More beneficial platelet-inhibiting strategies in HD patients therefore are required. Study Design Single-center, prospective, randomized, crossover study. Setting & Participants 25 HD patients in Seoul, Korea. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel (300 mg loading, 75 mg once daily for maintenance dose) or ticagrelor (180 mg loading, 90 mg twice daily for maintenance dose) for 14 days, and after a 14-day washout period, crossover treatment for another 14 days. All patients received aspirin (100 mg/d). Outcomes & Measurements Platelet function was evaluated predosing and at 1, 5, and 48 hours and 14 days after the first loading dose. During the offset phase, platelet function was assessed at 1 hour and 2, 4, and 14 days after the last dose by light transmittance aggregometry and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, and patients were genotyped for the CYP2C19*2 allele. Maximal extent of aggregation, inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA), P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs), and percentage of inhibition were evaluated. We performed per-protocol analysis, excluding patients who did not complete the protocol. Results 9 patients did not complete the protocol (7 patients due to adverse events; 2, nonadherence). Higher IPA occurred with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel at 1, 5, and 48 hours and 14 days after loading. By 5 hours after loading, a greater proportion of patients in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group achieved IPA > 50% (75% vs 12%, respectively; P < 0.05) and IPA > 70% (44% vs 0%, respectively; P < 0.05). Rates (slope) of onset and offset of the antiplatelet effect were faster in patients receiving ticagrelor than for those receiving clopidogrel ( P < 0.05). Regardless of CYP2C19*2 allele, the ticagrelor group had significantly lower PRUs at all times than the clopidogrel group. Limitations Single-center study with a small number of patients, not a double-blind study, and not intention-to-treat analysis. Conclusions Ticagrelor may result in more rapid and greater platelet inhibition than clopidogrel in patients with kidney failure receiving HD.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1683357384</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0272638614015339</els_id><sourcerecordid>1683357384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-8f91b59385b514bd8e40de87d54a8ec8badd6cd5702f371865c906489cbd13613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAUjBCILoU_wAH5yGW3_ogTByGkVUQpohJVu4ij5dhvi7dOvNjOSuHX8FPraBcOHDhZfm9m_DzziuI1wSuCObvYrdTuwawoJuWKkBWm7EmxIJyyZSWYeFosMK3psmKiOitexLjDGDesqp4XZ5RXlNZ1uSh-3ziVwEFCt6B0sgebJrTeJgi5oCHfh3vUOr-3xt8HcKj1_V4FMOi7TT_Qxmo1l31AdkA3KlkYUjz2vlgzwIQulXVjALQJkF868a6g98YqN0Ub36E1ulWD8b39lftt8DH6Qx7gLo1melk82yoX4dXpPC--XX7ctFfL66-fPrfr66UuCUlLsW1IxxsmeMdJ2RkBJTYgasNLJUCLThlTacNrTLesJqLiusFVKRrdGcIqws6Lt0fdffA_R4hJ9jZqcE4N4McoSfaU8ZqJMkPpEarnUQNs5T7YXoVJEiznZOROzsnIORlJiMzJZNKbk_7Y9WD-Uv5EkQHvjwDIvzxYCDLq7KYGYwPoJI23_9f_8A9dOzvkeNwDTBB3fgxD9k8SGanE8m7ejXk1SIkJZ6xhjysstp8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683357384</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Platelet Reactivity After Receiving Clopidogrel Compared With Ticagrelor in Patients With Kidney Failure Treated With Hemodialysis: A Randomized Crossover Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jeong, Kyung Hwan, MD, PhD ; Cho, Ju Hee, MD ; Woo, Jong Shin, MD, PhD ; Kim, Jin Bae, MD, PhD ; Kim, Woo-Shik, MD, PhD ; Lee, Tae Won, MD, PhD ; Kim, Kwon Sam, MD, PhD ; Ihm, Chun Gyoo, MD, PhD ; Kim, Weon, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Kyung Hwan, MD, PhD ; Cho, Ju Hee, MD ; Woo, Jong Shin, MD, PhD ; Kim, Jin Bae, MD, PhD ; Kim, Woo-Shik, MD, PhD ; Lee, Tae Won, MD, PhD ; Kim, Kwon Sam, MD, PhD ; Ihm, Chun Gyoo, MD, PhD ; Kim, Weon, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Patients with kidney failure treated with maintenance hemodialysis (HD) are poor responders to clopidogrel. More beneficial platelet-inhibiting strategies in HD patients therefore are required. Study Design Single-center, prospective, randomized, crossover study. Setting &amp; Participants 25 HD patients in Seoul, Korea. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel (300 mg loading, 75 mg once daily for maintenance dose) or ticagrelor (180 mg loading, 90 mg twice daily for maintenance dose) for 14 days, and after a 14-day washout period, crossover treatment for another 14 days. All patients received aspirin (100 mg/d). Outcomes &amp; Measurements Platelet function was evaluated predosing and at 1, 5, and 48 hours and 14 days after the first loading dose. During the offset phase, platelet function was assessed at 1 hour and 2, 4, and 14 days after the last dose by light transmittance aggregometry and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, and patients were genotyped for the CYP2C19*2 allele. Maximal extent of aggregation, inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA), P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs), and percentage of inhibition were evaluated. We performed per-protocol analysis, excluding patients who did not complete the protocol. Results 9 patients did not complete the protocol (7 patients due to adverse events; 2, nonadherence). Higher IPA occurred with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel at 1, 5, and 48 hours and 14 days after loading. By 5 hours after loading, a greater proportion of patients in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group achieved IPA &gt; 50% (75% vs 12%, respectively; P &lt; 0.05) and IPA &gt; 70% (44% vs 0%, respectively; P &lt; 0.05). Rates (slope) of onset and offset of the antiplatelet effect were faster in patients receiving ticagrelor than for those receiving clopidogrel ( P &lt; 0.05). Regardless of CYP2C19*2 allele, the ticagrelor group had significantly lower PRUs at all times than the clopidogrel group. Limitations Single-center study with a small number of patients, not a double-blind study, and not intention-to-treat analysis. Conclusions Ticagrelor may result in more rapid and greater platelet inhibition than clopidogrel in patients with kidney failure receiving HD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-6386</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-6838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25622774</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adenosine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Adenosine - therapeutic use ; Adult ; antiplatelet therapy ; Aspirin - therapeutic use ; clopidogrel ; Cross-Over Studies ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; end-stage renal disease (ESRD) ; Female ; hemodialysis (HD) ; high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) ; Humans ; kidney failure ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology ; Platelet Activation ; platelet aggregation assay ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Platelet Function Tests ; Platelet inhibition ; platelet reactivity ; Renal Dialysis ; Single-Blind Method ; thrombosis ; Thrombosis - prevention &amp; control ; ticagrelor ; Ticlopidine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Ticlopidine - therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>American journal of kidney diseases, 2015-06, Vol.65 (6), p.916-924</ispartof><rights>National Kidney Foundation, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 National Kidney Foundation, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-8f91b59385b514bd8e40de87d54a8ec8badd6cd5702f371865c906489cbd13613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-8f91b59385b514bd8e40de87d54a8ec8badd6cd5702f371865c906489cbd13613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272638614015339$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25622774$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Kyung Hwan, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Ju Hee, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Jong Shin, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin Bae, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Woo-Shik, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Tae Won, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kwon Sam, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihm, Chun Gyoo, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Weon, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Platelet Reactivity After Receiving Clopidogrel Compared With Ticagrelor in Patients With Kidney Failure Treated With Hemodialysis: A Randomized Crossover Study</title><title>American journal of kidney diseases</title><addtitle>Am J Kidney Dis</addtitle><description>Background Patients with kidney failure treated with maintenance hemodialysis (HD) are poor responders to clopidogrel. More beneficial platelet-inhibiting strategies in HD patients therefore are required. Study Design Single-center, prospective, randomized, crossover study. Setting &amp; Participants 25 HD patients in Seoul, Korea. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel (300 mg loading, 75 mg once daily for maintenance dose) or ticagrelor (180 mg loading, 90 mg twice daily for maintenance dose) for 14 days, and after a 14-day washout period, crossover treatment for another 14 days. All patients received aspirin (100 mg/d). Outcomes &amp; Measurements Platelet function was evaluated predosing and at 1, 5, and 48 hours and 14 days after the first loading dose. During the offset phase, platelet function was assessed at 1 hour and 2, 4, and 14 days after the last dose by light transmittance aggregometry and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, and patients were genotyped for the CYP2C19*2 allele. Maximal extent of aggregation, inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA), P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs), and percentage of inhibition were evaluated. We performed per-protocol analysis, excluding patients who did not complete the protocol. Results 9 patients did not complete the protocol (7 patients due to adverse events; 2, nonadherence). Higher IPA occurred with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel at 1, 5, and 48 hours and 14 days after loading. By 5 hours after loading, a greater proportion of patients in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group achieved IPA &gt; 50% (75% vs 12%, respectively; P &lt; 0.05) and IPA &gt; 70% (44% vs 0%, respectively; P &lt; 0.05). Rates (slope) of onset and offset of the antiplatelet effect were faster in patients receiving ticagrelor than for those receiving clopidogrel ( P &lt; 0.05). Regardless of CYP2C19*2 allele, the ticagrelor group had significantly lower PRUs at all times than the clopidogrel group. Limitations Single-center study with a small number of patients, not a double-blind study, and not intention-to-treat analysis. Conclusions Ticagrelor may result in more rapid and greater platelet inhibition than clopidogrel in patients with kidney failure receiving HD.</description><subject>Adenosine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Adenosine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>antiplatelet therapy</subject><subject>Aspirin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>clopidogrel</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>end-stage renal disease (ESRD)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>hemodialysis (HD)</subject><subject>high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR)</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>kidney failure</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Platelet Activation</subject><subject>platelet aggregation assay</subject><subject>Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Platelet Function Tests</subject><subject>Platelet inhibition</subject><subject>platelet reactivity</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>thrombosis</subject><subject>Thrombosis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>ticagrelor</subject><subject>Ticlopidine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Ticlopidine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0272-6386</issn><issn>1523-6838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAUjBCILoU_wAH5yGW3_ogTByGkVUQpohJVu4ij5dhvi7dOvNjOSuHX8FPraBcOHDhZfm9m_DzziuI1wSuCObvYrdTuwawoJuWKkBWm7EmxIJyyZSWYeFosMK3psmKiOitexLjDGDesqp4XZ5RXlNZ1uSh-3ziVwEFCt6B0sgebJrTeJgi5oCHfh3vUOr-3xt8HcKj1_V4FMOi7TT_Qxmo1l31AdkA3KlkYUjz2vlgzwIQulXVjALQJkF868a6g98YqN0Ub36E1ulWD8b39lftt8DH6Qx7gLo1melk82yoX4dXpPC--XX7ctFfL66-fPrfr66UuCUlLsW1IxxsmeMdJ2RkBJTYgasNLJUCLThlTacNrTLesJqLiusFVKRrdGcIqws6Lt0fdffA_R4hJ9jZqcE4N4McoSfaU8ZqJMkPpEarnUQNs5T7YXoVJEiznZOROzsnIORlJiMzJZNKbk_7Y9WD-Uv5EkQHvjwDIvzxYCDLq7KYGYwPoJI23_9f_8A9dOzvkeNwDTBB3fgxD9k8SGanE8m7ejXk1SIkJZ6xhjysstp8</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Jeong, Kyung Hwan, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Cho, Ju Hee, MD</creator><creator>Woo, Jong Shin, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Kim, Jin Bae, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Kim, Woo-Shik, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Lee, Tae Won, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Kim, Kwon Sam, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Ihm, Chun Gyoo, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Kim, Weon, MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Platelet Reactivity After Receiving Clopidogrel Compared With Ticagrelor in Patients With Kidney Failure Treated With Hemodialysis: A Randomized Crossover Study</title><author>Jeong, Kyung Hwan, MD, PhD ; Cho, Ju Hee, MD ; Woo, Jong Shin, MD, PhD ; Kim, Jin Bae, MD, PhD ; Kim, Woo-Shik, MD, PhD ; Lee, Tae Won, MD, PhD ; Kim, Kwon Sam, MD, PhD ; Ihm, Chun Gyoo, MD, PhD ; Kim, Weon, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-8f91b59385b514bd8e40de87d54a8ec8badd6cd5702f371865c906489cbd13613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adenosine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Adenosine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>antiplatelet therapy</topic><topic>Aspirin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>clopidogrel</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>end-stage renal disease (ESRD)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>hemodialysis (HD)</topic><topic>high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR)</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>kidney failure</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Platelet Activation</topic><topic>platelet aggregation assay</topic><topic>Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Platelet Function Tests</topic><topic>Platelet inhibition</topic><topic>platelet reactivity</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>thrombosis</topic><topic>Thrombosis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>ticagrelor</topic><topic>Ticlopidine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Ticlopidine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Kyung Hwan, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Ju Hee, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Jong Shin, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin Bae, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Woo-Shik, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Tae Won, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kwon Sam, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihm, Chun Gyoo, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Weon, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of kidney diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeong, Kyung Hwan, MD, PhD</au><au>Cho, Ju Hee, MD</au><au>Woo, Jong Shin, MD, PhD</au><au>Kim, Jin Bae, MD, PhD</au><au>Kim, Woo-Shik, MD, PhD</au><au>Lee, Tae Won, MD, PhD</au><au>Kim, Kwon Sam, MD, PhD</au><au>Ihm, Chun Gyoo, MD, PhD</au><au>Kim, Weon, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Platelet Reactivity After Receiving Clopidogrel Compared With Ticagrelor in Patients With Kidney Failure Treated With Hemodialysis: A Randomized Crossover Study</atitle><jtitle>American journal of kidney diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Kidney Dis</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>916</spage><epage>924</epage><pages>916-924</pages><issn>0272-6386</issn><eissn>1523-6838</eissn><abstract>Background Patients with kidney failure treated with maintenance hemodialysis (HD) are poor responders to clopidogrel. More beneficial platelet-inhibiting strategies in HD patients therefore are required. Study Design Single-center, prospective, randomized, crossover study. Setting &amp; Participants 25 HD patients in Seoul, Korea. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel (300 mg loading, 75 mg once daily for maintenance dose) or ticagrelor (180 mg loading, 90 mg twice daily for maintenance dose) for 14 days, and after a 14-day washout period, crossover treatment for another 14 days. All patients received aspirin (100 mg/d). Outcomes &amp; Measurements Platelet function was evaluated predosing and at 1, 5, and 48 hours and 14 days after the first loading dose. During the offset phase, platelet function was assessed at 1 hour and 2, 4, and 14 days after the last dose by light transmittance aggregometry and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, and patients were genotyped for the CYP2C19*2 allele. Maximal extent of aggregation, inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA), P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs), and percentage of inhibition were evaluated. We performed per-protocol analysis, excluding patients who did not complete the protocol. Results 9 patients did not complete the protocol (7 patients due to adverse events; 2, nonadherence). Higher IPA occurred with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel at 1, 5, and 48 hours and 14 days after loading. By 5 hours after loading, a greater proportion of patients in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group achieved IPA &gt; 50% (75% vs 12%, respectively; P &lt; 0.05) and IPA &gt; 70% (44% vs 0%, respectively; P &lt; 0.05). Rates (slope) of onset and offset of the antiplatelet effect were faster in patients receiving ticagrelor than for those receiving clopidogrel ( P &lt; 0.05). Regardless of CYP2C19*2 allele, the ticagrelor group had significantly lower PRUs at all times than the clopidogrel group. Limitations Single-center study with a small number of patients, not a double-blind study, and not intention-to-treat analysis. Conclusions Ticagrelor may result in more rapid and greater platelet inhibition than clopidogrel in patients with kidney failure receiving HD.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25622774</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.023</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-6386
ispartof American journal of kidney diseases, 2015-06, Vol.65 (6), p.916-924
issn 0272-6386
1523-6838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1683357384
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adenosine - analogs & derivatives
Adenosine - therapeutic use
Adult
antiplatelet therapy
Aspirin - therapeutic use
clopidogrel
Cross-Over Studies
Drug Therapy, Combination
end-stage renal disease (ESRD)
Female
hemodialysis (HD)
high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR)
Humans
kidney failure
Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Nephrology
Platelet Activation
platelet aggregation assay
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Platelet Function Tests
Platelet inhibition
platelet reactivity
Renal Dialysis
Single-Blind Method
thrombosis
Thrombosis - prevention & control
ticagrelor
Ticlopidine - analogs & derivatives
Ticlopidine - therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
title Platelet Reactivity After Receiving Clopidogrel Compared With Ticagrelor in Patients With Kidney Failure Treated With Hemodialysis: A Randomized Crossover Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T12%3A18%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Platelet%20Reactivity%20After%20Receiving%20Clopidogrel%20Compared%20With%20Ticagrelor%20in%20Patients%20With%20Kidney%20Failure%20Treated%20With%20Hemodialysis:%20A%20Randomized%20Crossover%20Study&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20kidney%20diseases&rft.au=Jeong,%20Kyung%20Hwan,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=916&rft.epage=924&rft.pages=916-924&rft.issn=0272-6386&rft.eissn=1523-6838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1683357384%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683357384&rft_id=info:pmid/25622774&rft_els_id=S0272638614015339&rfr_iscdi=true