Identification and distribution of multiple virus infections in Grapevine leafroll diseased vineyards
A survey of viruses affecting grapevine in the wine regions of the Western Cape Province in South Africa was conducted. The survey determined the relative abundance of five different Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 (GLRaV-3) variants. Virus profiles were also determined for individual vines. A...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of plant pathology 2015-06, Vol.142 (2), p.363-375 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 375 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 363 |
container_title | European journal of plant pathology |
container_volume | 142 |
creator | Jooste, Anna E. C Molenaar, Nicholas Maree, Hans J Bester, Rachelle Morey, Liesl de Koker, Wenhelene C Burger, Johan T |
description | A survey of viruses affecting grapevine in the wine regions of the Western Cape Province in South Africa was conducted. The survey determined the relative abundance of five different Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 (GLRaV-3) variants. Virus profiles were also determined for individual vines. A total of 315 plants were sampled and analysed over two growing seasons. Five GLRaV-3 variants were detected as either single or mixed infections, with GLRaV-3 variant groups II and VI being the most prominent as single infections and in combinations with each other and other variants. An analysis of the distribution of variants per region showed that single infections of variant groups II and VI occurred predominantly in certain regions, and were equally distributed in the red and white cultivars studied. The distribution of a recently identified, unclassified variant of GLRaV-3 (represented by isolates GH24 and GTG10) was included in the study. The overall analysis showed that infection with variant groups II and VI were the most abundant among the samples with 49.8 and 47.6 %, respectively, followed by variant group I, variants similar to isolate GH24 and variant group III with 16.2, 13.3 and 2.5 % infection, respectively. Mixed infections, representing 36 virus combinations, were found in 251 plants. The most abundant virus combination was GLRaV-3 with Grapevine virus E (GVE), found in 28 % of the plants. GLRaV-3 was the predominant virus detected in the samples with a frequency of 80 % detection, followed by GVE (57.4 %), Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus (GRSPaV) (36.8 %), Grapevine virus A (GVA) (19.3 %), Grapevine virus F (GVF) (16.25 %), Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2 (GLRaV-2) (8.25 %), Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 1 (GLRaV-1) (1.58 % infection) and Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 4 (GLRaV-4 like) (0.6 %). Most of the plants tested were infected with multiple viruses. The complexity of virus populations detected in this study, highlights the need for detection methods able to identify all viruses and their variants in vineyards. The information generated in this study will assist in the development of reliable detection assays that will benefit the monitoring of disease spread and aid in the efficient management of Grapevine leafroll disease (GLD). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10658-015-0620-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1683349272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1683349272</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-e0445c3ad4ff0564e2e3b5456afbbff7d247491d9ac9ef7842b1995af5345c223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA5iIxMIS8Gccj6iCglSJATpbTnKuXKVxsZNK_fc4hAExMN3p7nlOpxeha4LvCcbyIRJciDLHROS4oDjHJ2hGhGR5yQt1imZYUZWTUrJzdBHjFidHKTpD8NpA1zvratM732Wma7LGxT64avgeeJvthrZ3-xaygwtDzFxnoR53Y5stg9nDwXWQtWBs8G07-mAiNNk4PprQxEt0Zk0b4eqnztH6-elj8ZKv3pavi8dVXnPO-hww56JmpuHWYlFwoMAqwUVhbFVZKxvKJVekUaZWYGXJaUWUEsYKljxK2RzdTXf3wX8OEHu9c7GGtjUd-CFqUpSMcUXliN7-Qbd-CF36LlFSCEUoKxNFJqoOPsYAVu-D25lw1ATrMXg9Ba9T8HoMXuPk0MmJie02EH5d_ke6mSRrvDab4KJev9MEYEwUK6lkX6gNkF4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1675591238</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identification and distribution of multiple virus infections in Grapevine leafroll diseased vineyards</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Jooste, Anna E. C ; Molenaar, Nicholas ; Maree, Hans J ; Bester, Rachelle ; Morey, Liesl ; de Koker, Wenhelene C ; Burger, Johan T</creator><creatorcontrib>Jooste, Anna E. C ; Molenaar, Nicholas ; Maree, Hans J ; Bester, Rachelle ; Morey, Liesl ; de Koker, Wenhelene C ; Burger, Johan T</creatorcontrib><description>A survey of viruses affecting grapevine in the wine regions of the Western Cape Province in South Africa was conducted. The survey determined the relative abundance of five different Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 (GLRaV-3) variants. Virus profiles were also determined for individual vines. A total of 315 plants were sampled and analysed over two growing seasons. Five GLRaV-3 variants were detected as either single or mixed infections, with GLRaV-3 variant groups II and VI being the most prominent as single infections and in combinations with each other and other variants. An analysis of the distribution of variants per region showed that single infections of variant groups II and VI occurred predominantly in certain regions, and were equally distributed in the red and white cultivars studied. The distribution of a recently identified, unclassified variant of GLRaV-3 (represented by isolates GH24 and GTG10) was included in the study. The overall analysis showed that infection with variant groups II and VI were the most abundant among the samples with 49.8 and 47.6 %, respectively, followed by variant group I, variants similar to isolate GH24 and variant group III with 16.2, 13.3 and 2.5 % infection, respectively. Mixed infections, representing 36 virus combinations, were found in 251 plants. The most abundant virus combination was GLRaV-3 with Grapevine virus E (GVE), found in 28 % of the plants. GLRaV-3 was the predominant virus detected in the samples with a frequency of 80 % detection, followed by GVE (57.4 %), Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus (GRSPaV) (36.8 %), Grapevine virus A (GVA) (19.3 %), Grapevine virus F (GVF) (16.25 %), Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2 (GLRaV-2) (8.25 %), Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 1 (GLRaV-1) (1.58 % infection) and Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 4 (GLRaV-4 like) (0.6 %). Most of the plants tested were infected with multiple viruses. The complexity of virus populations detected in this study, highlights the need for detection methods able to identify all viruses and their variants in vineyards. The information generated in this study will assist in the development of reliable detection assays that will benefit the monitoring of disease spread and aid in the efficient management of Grapevine leafroll disease (GLD).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0929-1873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10658-015-0620-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Citrus tristeza virus ; Cultivars ; Disease spread ; disease surveillance ; Ecology ; Grapevine leafroll-associated virus ; Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 1 ; Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2 ; Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 ; Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 4 ; Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus ; Grapevine virus A ; Grapevine virus E ; Growing season ; Infections ; Life Sciences ; mixed infection ; Plant diseases ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Sciences ; Relative abundance ; surveys ; vines ; Vineyards ; Viruses ; Vitaceae ; Vitis ; Wineries & vineyards ; Wines</subject><ispartof>European journal of plant pathology, 2015-06, Vol.142 (2), p.363-375</ispartof><rights>Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-e0445c3ad4ff0564e2e3b5456afbbff7d247491d9ac9ef7842b1995af5345c223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-e0445c3ad4ff0564e2e3b5456afbbff7d247491d9ac9ef7842b1995af5345c223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10658-015-0620-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10658-015-0620-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jooste, Anna E. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molenaar, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maree, Hans J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bester, Rachelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morey, Liesl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Koker, Wenhelene C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Johan T</creatorcontrib><title>Identification and distribution of multiple virus infections in Grapevine leafroll diseased vineyards</title><title>European journal of plant pathology</title><addtitle>Eur J Plant Pathol</addtitle><description>A survey of viruses affecting grapevine in the wine regions of the Western Cape Province in South Africa was conducted. The survey determined the relative abundance of five different Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 (GLRaV-3) variants. Virus profiles were also determined for individual vines. A total of 315 plants were sampled and analysed over two growing seasons. Five GLRaV-3 variants were detected as either single or mixed infections, with GLRaV-3 variant groups II and VI being the most prominent as single infections and in combinations with each other and other variants. An analysis of the distribution of variants per region showed that single infections of variant groups II and VI occurred predominantly in certain regions, and were equally distributed in the red and white cultivars studied. The distribution of a recently identified, unclassified variant of GLRaV-3 (represented by isolates GH24 and GTG10) was included in the study. The overall analysis showed that infection with variant groups II and VI were the most abundant among the samples with 49.8 and 47.6 %, respectively, followed by variant group I, variants similar to isolate GH24 and variant group III with 16.2, 13.3 and 2.5 % infection, respectively. Mixed infections, representing 36 virus combinations, were found in 251 plants. The most abundant virus combination was GLRaV-3 with Grapevine virus E (GVE), found in 28 % of the plants. GLRaV-3 was the predominant virus detected in the samples with a frequency of 80 % detection, followed by GVE (57.4 %), Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus (GRSPaV) (36.8 %), Grapevine virus A (GVA) (19.3 %), Grapevine virus F (GVF) (16.25 %), Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2 (GLRaV-2) (8.25 %), Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 1 (GLRaV-1) (1.58 % infection) and Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 4 (GLRaV-4 like) (0.6 %). Most of the plants tested were infected with multiple viruses. The complexity of virus populations detected in this study, highlights the need for detection methods able to identify all viruses and their variants in vineyards. The information generated in this study will assist in the development of reliable detection assays that will benefit the monitoring of disease spread and aid in the efficient management of Grapevine leafroll disease (GLD).</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Citrus tristeza virus</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Disease spread</subject><subject>disease surveillance</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Grapevine leafroll-associated virus</subject><subject>Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 1</subject><subject>Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2</subject><subject>Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3</subject><subject>Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 4</subject><subject>Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus</subject><subject>Grapevine virus A</subject><subject>Grapevine virus E</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>mixed infection</subject><subject>Plant diseases</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Relative abundance</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>vines</subject><subject>Vineyards</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>Vitaceae</subject><subject>Vitis</subject><subject>Wineries & vineyards</subject><subject>Wines</subject><issn>0929-1873</issn><issn>1573-8469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA5iIxMIS8Gccj6iCglSJATpbTnKuXKVxsZNK_fc4hAExMN3p7nlOpxeha4LvCcbyIRJciDLHROS4oDjHJ2hGhGR5yQt1imZYUZWTUrJzdBHjFidHKTpD8NpA1zvratM732Wma7LGxT64avgeeJvthrZ3-xaygwtDzFxnoR53Y5stg9nDwXWQtWBs8G07-mAiNNk4PprQxEt0Zk0b4eqnztH6-elj8ZKv3pavi8dVXnPO-hww56JmpuHWYlFwoMAqwUVhbFVZKxvKJVekUaZWYGXJaUWUEsYKljxK2RzdTXf3wX8OEHu9c7GGtjUd-CFqUpSMcUXliN7-Qbd-CF36LlFSCEUoKxNFJqoOPsYAVu-D25lw1ATrMXg9Ba9T8HoMXuPk0MmJie02EH5d_ke6mSRrvDab4KJev9MEYEwUK6lkX6gNkF4</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Jooste, Anna E. C</creator><creator>Molenaar, Nicholas</creator><creator>Maree, Hans J</creator><creator>Bester, Rachelle</creator><creator>Morey, Liesl</creator><creator>de Koker, Wenhelene C</creator><creator>Burger, Johan T</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Identification and distribution of multiple virus infections in Grapevine leafroll diseased vineyards</title><author>Jooste, Anna E. C ; Molenaar, Nicholas ; Maree, Hans J ; Bester, Rachelle ; Morey, Liesl ; de Koker, Wenhelene C ; Burger, Johan T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-e0445c3ad4ff0564e2e3b5456afbbff7d247491d9ac9ef7842b1995af5345c223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Citrus tristeza virus</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Disease spread</topic><topic>disease surveillance</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Grapevine leafroll-associated virus</topic><topic>Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 1</topic><topic>Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2</topic><topic>Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3</topic><topic>Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 4</topic><topic>Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus</topic><topic>Grapevine virus A</topic><topic>Grapevine virus E</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>mixed infection</topic><topic>Plant diseases</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Relative abundance</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>vines</topic><topic>Vineyards</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>Vitaceae</topic><topic>Vitis</topic><topic>Wineries & vineyards</topic><topic>Wines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jooste, Anna E. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molenaar, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maree, Hans J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bester, Rachelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morey, Liesl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Koker, Wenhelene C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Johan T</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>European journal of plant pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jooste, Anna E. C</au><au>Molenaar, Nicholas</au><au>Maree, Hans J</au><au>Bester, Rachelle</au><au>Morey, Liesl</au><au>de Koker, Wenhelene C</au><au>Burger, Johan T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identification and distribution of multiple virus infections in Grapevine leafroll diseased vineyards</atitle><jtitle>European journal of plant pathology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Plant Pathol</stitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>363-375</pages><issn>0929-1873</issn><eissn>1573-8469</eissn><abstract>A survey of viruses affecting grapevine in the wine regions of the Western Cape Province in South Africa was conducted. The survey determined the relative abundance of five different Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 (GLRaV-3) variants. Virus profiles were also determined for individual vines. A total of 315 plants were sampled and analysed over two growing seasons. Five GLRaV-3 variants were detected as either single or mixed infections, with GLRaV-3 variant groups II and VI being the most prominent as single infections and in combinations with each other and other variants. An analysis of the distribution of variants per region showed that single infections of variant groups II and VI occurred predominantly in certain regions, and were equally distributed in the red and white cultivars studied. The distribution of a recently identified, unclassified variant of GLRaV-3 (represented by isolates GH24 and GTG10) was included in the study. The overall analysis showed that infection with variant groups II and VI were the most abundant among the samples with 49.8 and 47.6 %, respectively, followed by variant group I, variants similar to isolate GH24 and variant group III with 16.2, 13.3 and 2.5 % infection, respectively. Mixed infections, representing 36 virus combinations, were found in 251 plants. The most abundant virus combination was GLRaV-3 with Grapevine virus E (GVE), found in 28 % of the plants. GLRaV-3 was the predominant virus detected in the samples with a frequency of 80 % detection, followed by GVE (57.4 %), Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus (GRSPaV) (36.8 %), Grapevine virus A (GVA) (19.3 %), Grapevine virus F (GVF) (16.25 %), Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2 (GLRaV-2) (8.25 %), Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 1 (GLRaV-1) (1.58 % infection) and Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 4 (GLRaV-4 like) (0.6 %). Most of the plants tested were infected with multiple viruses. The complexity of virus populations detected in this study, highlights the need for detection methods able to identify all viruses and their variants in vineyards. The information generated in this study will assist in the development of reliable detection assays that will benefit the monitoring of disease spread and aid in the efficient management of Grapevine leafroll disease (GLD).</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10658-015-0620-0</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0929-1873 |
ispartof | European journal of plant pathology, 2015-06, Vol.142 (2), p.363-375 |
issn | 0929-1873 1573-8469 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1683349272 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Agriculture Biomedical and Life Sciences Citrus tristeza virus Cultivars Disease spread disease surveillance Ecology Grapevine leafroll-associated virus Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 1 Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2 Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 4 Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus Grapevine virus A Grapevine virus E Growing season Infections Life Sciences mixed infection Plant diseases Plant Pathology Plant Sciences Relative abundance surveys vines Vineyards Viruses Vitaceae Vitis Wineries & vineyards Wines |
title | Identification and distribution of multiple virus infections in Grapevine leafroll diseased vineyards |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T04%3A05%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification%20and%20distribution%20of%20multiple%20virus%20infections%20in%20Grapevine%20leafroll%20diseased%20vineyards&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20plant%20pathology&rft.au=Jooste,%20Anna%20E.%20C&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=363-375&rft.issn=0929-1873&rft.eissn=1573-8469&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10658-015-0620-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1683349272%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1675591238&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |