Insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and chronic low grade inflammation in Sheehan’s syndrome on standard replacement therapy: a case control study

Background Increased clustering of metabolic risk factors has been demonstrated in patients with hypopituitarism on standard replacement therapy. This usually has been attributed to persistent growth hormone deficiency, though contribution from underlying etiology of hypopituitarism cannot be undere...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pituitary 2015-06, Vol.18 (3), p.312-318
Hauptverfasser: Bhat, Manzoor Ahmad, Laway, Bashir Ahmad, Shah, Zaffar Amin, Wani, Arshad Iqbal, Mubarik, Idrees
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Increased clustering of metabolic risk factors has been demonstrated in patients with hypopituitarism on standard replacement therapy. This usually has been attributed to persistent growth hormone deficiency, though contribution from underlying etiology of hypopituitarism cannot be underestimated. We, therefore, studied conventional metabolic risk factors and pro inflammatory markers in a cohort of hypopituitary patients in whom the etiology was Sheehan’s syndrome. Material & Methods We studied 30 GH naive patients with Sheehan’s syndrome (SS) on standard replacement therapy and compared with healthy age, BMI and parity matched controls. All subjects were normotensive, non-diabetic, non-smokers and none had history of any acute or chronic illness. We recorded height, weight, BMI, waist circumference and waist hip ratio, besides measuring biochemical parameters like lipid profile, fasting plasma glucose and insulin, sVCAM-1, ICAM-1 and hsCRP. Results Metabolic syndrome and impaired glucose tolerance were more common with SS patients. Similarly total cholesterol (mean ± SD, 5.21 ± 0.98 vs 4.57 ± 0.88, P  = 0.00), LDL-cholesterol (3.15 ± 0.90 vs 2.67 ± 0.75, P  = 0.02), triglycerides (2.14 ± 1.00 vs 1.43 ± 0.45, P  = 0.00) and pro-inflammatory markers i.e. hsCRP (3.95 ± 2.58 vs 1.45 ± 2.77, P  = 0.00) were significantly higher in patients with SS. hsCRP positively correlated with fasting insulin ( r  = 0.40, P  = 0.02), HOMA-IR ( r  = 0.38, P  = 0.03) and negatively with HDL ( r  = − 0.33, P  = 0.05). Conclusions GH naïve SS patients on standard replacement therapy have increased clustering of metabolic and pro-inflammatory risk factors.
ISSN:1386-341X
1573-7403
DOI:10.1007/s11102-014-0575-8