Effectiveness of Different Mechanical Methods on Dentin Caries Removal: Micro-CT and Digital Image Evaluation

To determine the caries removal effectiveness (CRE) and minimal invasive potential (MIP) of caries excavation methods using digital imaging and microtomography analyses. Twelve human molars with occlusal caries lesions in dentin were randomly divided into three groups (carbide bur, exacavator, and p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Operative dentistry 2015-05, Vol.40 (3), p.263-270
Hauptverfasser: Ferraz, C, Freire, A R, Mendonça, J S, Fernandes, C A O, Cardona, J C, Yamauti, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 270
container_issue 3
container_start_page 263
container_title Operative dentistry
container_volume 40
creator Ferraz, C
Freire, A R
Mendonça, J S
Fernandes, C A O
Cardona, J C
Yamauti, M
description To determine the caries removal effectiveness (CRE) and minimal invasive potential (MIP) of caries excavation methods using digital imaging and microtomography analyses. Twelve human molars with occlusal caries lesions in dentin were randomly divided into three groups (carbide bur, exacavator, and polymer bur). They were sectioned mesiodistally, and standardized digital and computed microtomography x-ray (micro-CT) images were taken from each section before and after caries excavation. On each image, initial carious dentin (IC), prepared cavity (PC), and residual caries (RC) were defined according to visual criteria using ImageJ software. CRE was determined based on the RC/IC ratio, whereas MIP was determined by the PC/IC ratio. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Student t-test or with Kruskal-Wallis and Student-Newman-Keuls test. The level of significance was set at 0.05. For both digital image and micro-CT analysis, the carbide bur showed higher CRE values than the excavator (p=0.0063 and p=0.0263, respectively) and the polymer bur (p=0.0028 and p=0.0005, respectively). The latter two presented similar results (p>0.05). Regarding MIP, for the digital image analysis, the polymer bur was different from the carbide bur (p=0.0030) but was not different from that of the excavator (p=0.1240). For micro-CT analysis, the MIP values of all the groups were significantly different, and the polymer bur was the most conservative method (p
doi_str_mv 10.2341/13-278-L
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1682886920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1682886920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d3d77b96a6115ef856e943d405706ffb9dac8de089cb2a652898274deea9aad13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkFtLw0AQhRdRbK2Cv0D20ZfoXrI336StF0gRpD6HTXbSruRSs0nBf--KVZ9mmPPN4XAQuqTkhvGU3lKeMKWT7AhNqRAmYVryYzQlXNJEKZ5O0FkI74SkIhXiFE2YEEpQI6eoWVYVlIPfQwsh4K7CCx8vPbQDXkG5ta0vbR3XYdu5qLd4ESXf4rntPQT8Ck23t_UdXvmy75L5GtvWRY-NH-Lbc2M3gJcRGO3gu_YcnVS2DnBxmDP09rBcz5-S7OXxeX6fJSWnakgcd0oVRlpJqYBKCwkm5S4lQhFZVYVxttQOiDZlwawUTBvNVOoArLHWUT5D1z--u777GCEMeeNDCXVtW-jGkFOpmdbSMPKPxvgh9FDlu943tv_MKcm_y80pz2O5eRbRq4PrWDTg_sDfNvkXXdV0Nw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1682886920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of Different Mechanical Methods on Dentin Caries Removal: Micro-CT and Digital Image Evaluation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Miscellaneous</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Ferraz, C ; Freire, A R ; Mendonça, J S ; Fernandes, C A O ; Cardona, J C ; Yamauti, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferraz, C ; Freire, A R ; Mendonça, J S ; Fernandes, C A O ; Cardona, J C ; Yamauti, M</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the caries removal effectiveness (CRE) and minimal invasive potential (MIP) of caries excavation methods using digital imaging and microtomography analyses. Twelve human molars with occlusal caries lesions in dentin were randomly divided into three groups (carbide bur, exacavator, and polymer bur). They were sectioned mesiodistally, and standardized digital and computed microtomography x-ray (micro-CT) images were taken from each section before and after caries excavation. On each image, initial carious dentin (IC), prepared cavity (PC), and residual caries (RC) were defined according to visual criteria using ImageJ software. CRE was determined based on the RC/IC ratio, whereas MIP was determined by the PC/IC ratio. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Student t-test or with Kruskal-Wallis and Student-Newman-Keuls test. The level of significance was set at 0.05. For both digital image and micro-CT analysis, the carbide bur showed higher CRE values than the excavator (p=0.0063 and p=0.0263, respectively) and the polymer bur (p=0.0028 and p=0.0005, respectively). The latter two presented similar results (p&gt;0.05). Regarding MIP, for the digital image analysis, the polymer bur was different from the carbide bur (p=0.0030) but was not different from that of the excavator (p=0.1240). For micro-CT analysis, the MIP values of all the groups were significantly different, and the polymer bur was the most conservative method (p&lt;0.05). The carbide bur was the most effective method for caries removal but was not completely conservative. The polymer bur and excavator presented low invasive potential but were not able to remove all of the carious dentin.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-7734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2341/13-278-L</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25575196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Dental Caries - diagnostic imaging ; Dental Caries - surgery ; Dentin - diagnostic imaging ; Dentin - surgery ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Molar - diagnostic imaging ; Molar - surgery ; Radiography, Dental - methods ; X-Ray Microtomography - methods</subject><ispartof>Operative dentistry, 2015-05, Vol.40 (3), p.263-270</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d3d77b96a6115ef856e943d405706ffb9dac8de089cb2a652898274deea9aad13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d3d77b96a6115ef856e943d405706ffb9dac8de089cb2a652898274deea9aad13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25575196$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferraz, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freire, A R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendonça, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, C A O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardona, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamauti, M</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of Different Mechanical Methods on Dentin Caries Removal: Micro-CT and Digital Image Evaluation</title><title>Operative dentistry</title><addtitle>Oper Dent</addtitle><description>To determine the caries removal effectiveness (CRE) and minimal invasive potential (MIP) of caries excavation methods using digital imaging and microtomography analyses. Twelve human molars with occlusal caries lesions in dentin were randomly divided into three groups (carbide bur, exacavator, and polymer bur). They were sectioned mesiodistally, and standardized digital and computed microtomography x-ray (micro-CT) images were taken from each section before and after caries excavation. On each image, initial carious dentin (IC), prepared cavity (PC), and residual caries (RC) were defined according to visual criteria using ImageJ software. CRE was determined based on the RC/IC ratio, whereas MIP was determined by the PC/IC ratio. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Student t-test or with Kruskal-Wallis and Student-Newman-Keuls test. The level of significance was set at 0.05. For both digital image and micro-CT analysis, the carbide bur showed higher CRE values than the excavator (p=0.0063 and p=0.0263, respectively) and the polymer bur (p=0.0028 and p=0.0005, respectively). The latter two presented similar results (p&gt;0.05). Regarding MIP, for the digital image analysis, the polymer bur was different from the carbide bur (p=0.0030) but was not different from that of the excavator (p=0.1240). For micro-CT analysis, the MIP values of all the groups were significantly different, and the polymer bur was the most conservative method (p&lt;0.05). The carbide bur was the most effective method for caries removal but was not completely conservative. The polymer bur and excavator presented low invasive potential but were not able to remove all of the carious dentin.</description><subject>Dental Caries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Dental Caries - surgery</subject><subject>Dentin - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Dentin - surgery</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Molar - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Molar - surgery</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental - methods</subject><subject>X-Ray Microtomography - methods</subject><issn>0361-7734</issn><issn>1559-2863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkFtLw0AQhRdRbK2Cv0D20ZfoXrI336StF0gRpD6HTXbSruRSs0nBf--KVZ9mmPPN4XAQuqTkhvGU3lKeMKWT7AhNqRAmYVryYzQlXNJEKZ5O0FkI74SkIhXiFE2YEEpQI6eoWVYVlIPfQwsh4K7CCx8vPbQDXkG5ta0vbR3XYdu5qLd4ESXf4rntPQT8Ck23t_UdXvmy75L5GtvWRY-NH-Lbc2M3gJcRGO3gu_YcnVS2DnBxmDP09rBcz5-S7OXxeX6fJSWnakgcd0oVRlpJqYBKCwkm5S4lQhFZVYVxttQOiDZlwawUTBvNVOoArLHWUT5D1z--u777GCEMeeNDCXVtW-jGkFOpmdbSMPKPxvgh9FDlu943tv_MKcm_y80pz2O5eRbRq4PrWDTg_sDfNvkXXdV0Nw</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Ferraz, C</creator><creator>Freire, A R</creator><creator>Mendonça, J S</creator><creator>Fernandes, C A O</creator><creator>Cardona, J C</creator><creator>Yamauti, M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of Different Mechanical Methods on Dentin Caries Removal: Micro-CT and Digital Image Evaluation</title><author>Ferraz, C ; Freire, A R ; Mendonça, J S ; Fernandes, C A O ; Cardona, J C ; Yamauti, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d3d77b96a6115ef856e943d405706ffb9dac8de089cb2a652898274deea9aad13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Dental Caries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Dental Caries - surgery</topic><topic>Dentin - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Dentin - surgery</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Molar - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Molar - surgery</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental - methods</topic><topic>X-Ray Microtomography - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferraz, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freire, A R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendonça, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, C A O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardona, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamauti, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Operative dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferraz, C</au><au>Freire, A R</au><au>Mendonça, J S</au><au>Fernandes, C A O</au><au>Cardona, J C</au><au>Yamauti, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of Different Mechanical Methods on Dentin Caries Removal: Micro-CT and Digital Image Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Operative dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Oper Dent</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>270</epage><pages>263-270</pages><issn>0361-7734</issn><eissn>1559-2863</eissn><abstract>To determine the caries removal effectiveness (CRE) and minimal invasive potential (MIP) of caries excavation methods using digital imaging and microtomography analyses. Twelve human molars with occlusal caries lesions in dentin were randomly divided into three groups (carbide bur, exacavator, and polymer bur). They were sectioned mesiodistally, and standardized digital and computed microtomography x-ray (micro-CT) images were taken from each section before and after caries excavation. On each image, initial carious dentin (IC), prepared cavity (PC), and residual caries (RC) were defined according to visual criteria using ImageJ software. CRE was determined based on the RC/IC ratio, whereas MIP was determined by the PC/IC ratio. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Student t-test or with Kruskal-Wallis and Student-Newman-Keuls test. The level of significance was set at 0.05. For both digital image and micro-CT analysis, the carbide bur showed higher CRE values than the excavator (p=0.0063 and p=0.0263, respectively) and the polymer bur (p=0.0028 and p=0.0005, respectively). The latter two presented similar results (p&gt;0.05). Regarding MIP, for the digital image analysis, the polymer bur was different from the carbide bur (p=0.0030) but was not different from that of the excavator (p=0.1240). For micro-CT analysis, the MIP values of all the groups were significantly different, and the polymer bur was the most conservative method (p&lt;0.05). The carbide bur was the most effective method for caries removal but was not completely conservative. The polymer bur and excavator presented low invasive potential but were not able to remove all of the carious dentin.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>25575196</pmid><doi>10.2341/13-278-L</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-7734
ispartof Operative dentistry, 2015-05, Vol.40 (3), p.263-270
issn 0361-7734
1559-2863
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1682886920
source MEDLINE; Allen Press Miscellaneous; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Dental Caries - diagnostic imaging
Dental Caries - surgery
Dentin - diagnostic imaging
Dentin - surgery
Dentistry
Humans
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods
Molar - diagnostic imaging
Molar - surgery
Radiography, Dental - methods
X-Ray Microtomography - methods
title Effectiveness of Different Mechanical Methods on Dentin Caries Removal: Micro-CT and Digital Image Evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T21%3A52%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20Different%20Mechanical%20Methods%20on%20Dentin%20Caries%20Removal:%20Micro-CT%20and%20Digital%20Image%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Operative%20dentistry&rft.au=Ferraz,%20C&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=270&rft.pages=263-270&rft.issn=0361-7734&rft.eissn=1559-2863&rft_id=info:doi/10.2341/13-278-L&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1682886920%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1682886920&rft_id=info:pmid/25575196&rfr_iscdi=true