The management of sharps in the Emergency Department: Is it safe?

In this study, we observed the management of sharps by health care workers including physicians, nurses, technicians, and students in the Emergency Department of the University of California-San Diego Medical Center. Twenty-eight percent of 418 observed sharp utilizations were managed in such a way...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of emergency medicine 1994-11, Vol.12 (6), p.745-752
Hauptverfasser: Moss, Steven T., Clark, Richard F., Guss, David A., Rosen, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 752
container_issue 6
container_start_page 745
container_title The Journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 12
creator Moss, Steven T.
Clark, Richard F.
Guss, David A.
Rosen, Peter
description In this study, we observed the management of sharps by health care workers including physicians, nurses, technicians, and students in the Emergency Department of the University of California-San Diego Medical Center. Twenty-eight percent of 418 observed sharp utilizations were managed in such a way that excess risk was conferred to the user, another person, or both. Twenty-seven percent conferred excess risk to the user and 12% to another person. Twenty percent of 322 recappable needles were recapped using a two-handed technique; 64% were disposed of uncapped. Four sharps (1%) were inadvertently thrown in the trash. Of the 418 observed sharp utilizations, none resulted in a puncture wound, although the four that were thrown in the trash represent a very high risk of injury to others. Physicians were observed handling the highest percentage of sharps in manners associated with excess risk while technicians and students managed sharps with the least risk. Among sharps used on patients who were IV drug abusers with unknown HIV status, 29% ( n = 28) were handled with excess risk to the user, another person, or both. Of 24 sharps used on known HIV-infected patients, there were no practices observed that subjected either the user or another person to excess risk.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0736-4679(94)90479-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16823724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0736467994904790</els_id><sourcerecordid>16823724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-cefe88adf8439fd8401dc563904b1fb88cf6bc21e7219f568e940ab27fecdddb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AURQdRaq3-A4UsRHQRna8kMy6UUqsWCm7qepjMvGkjTVJnUqH_3sSGLl29xT338jgIXRJ8TzBJH3DG0pinmbyV_E5inskYH6EhZQmNE0zlMRoekFN0FsIXxiTDggzQIBOCE0mHaLxYQVTqSi-hhKqJaheFlfabEBVV1LTZtAS_hMrsohfYaN901GM0a_MmCtrB8zk6cXod4KK_I_T5Ol1M3uP5x9tsMp7HhjHaxAYcCKGtE5xJZwXHxJokZe3jOXG5EMaluaEEMkqkS1IBkmOd08yBsdbmbIRu9rsbX39vITSqLIKB9VpXUG-DIqmgLKO8BfkeNL4OwYNTG1-U2u8UwaozpzotqtOiJFd_5hRua1f9_jYvwR5Kvao2v-5zHYxeO68rU4QDxljCRNLNPO0xaF38FOBVMEXrD2zhwTTK1sX_f_wCVD-JaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16823724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The management of sharps in the Emergency Department: Is it safe?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Moss, Steven T. ; Clark, Richard F. ; Guss, David A. ; Rosen, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Moss, Steven T. ; Clark, Richard F. ; Guss, David A. ; Rosen, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we observed the management of sharps by health care workers including physicians, nurses, technicians, and students in the Emergency Department of the University of California-San Diego Medical Center. Twenty-eight percent of 418 observed sharp utilizations were managed in such a way that excess risk was conferred to the user, another person, or both. Twenty-seven percent conferred excess risk to the user and 12% to another person. Twenty percent of 322 recappable needles were recapped using a two-handed technique; 64% were disposed of uncapped. Four sharps (1%) were inadvertently thrown in the trash. Of the 418 observed sharp utilizations, none resulted in a puncture wound, although the four that were thrown in the trash represent a very high risk of injury to others. Physicians were observed handling the highest percentage of sharps in manners associated with excess risk while technicians and students managed sharps with the least risk. Among sharps used on patients who were IV drug abusers with unknown HIV status, 29% ( n = 28) were handled with excess risk to the user, another person, or both. Of 24 sharps used on known HIV-infected patients, there were no practices observed that subjected either the user or another person to excess risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-4679</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-5029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0736-4679(94)90479-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7884192</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEMMDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; California ; Chemical, physic and infectious diseases ; Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data ; excess risk ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Medical Waste Disposal - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Needles - standards ; needlestick ; Needlestick Injuries - prevention &amp; control ; Occupational medicine ; Personnel, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Physic and infectious agents ; Prospective Studies ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; puncture wound ; Safety Management ; sharps ; Universal Precautions ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>The Journal of emergency medicine, 1994-11, Vol.12 (6), p.745-752</ispartof><rights>1994</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-cefe88adf8439fd8401dc563904b1fb88cf6bc21e7219f568e940ab27fecdddb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-cefe88adf8439fd8401dc563904b1fb88cf6bc21e7219f568e940ab27fecdddb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0736-4679(94)90479-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3353850$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7884192$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moss, Steven T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Richard F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guss, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>The management of sharps in the Emergency Department: Is it safe?</title><title>The Journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>In this study, we observed the management of sharps by health care workers including physicians, nurses, technicians, and students in the Emergency Department of the University of California-San Diego Medical Center. Twenty-eight percent of 418 observed sharp utilizations were managed in such a way that excess risk was conferred to the user, another person, or both. Twenty-seven percent conferred excess risk to the user and 12% to another person. Twenty percent of 322 recappable needles were recapped using a two-handed technique; 64% were disposed of uncapped. Four sharps (1%) were inadvertently thrown in the trash. Of the 418 observed sharp utilizations, none resulted in a puncture wound, although the four that were thrown in the trash represent a very high risk of injury to others. Physicians were observed handling the highest percentage of sharps in manners associated with excess risk while technicians and students managed sharps with the least risk. Among sharps used on patients who were IV drug abusers with unknown HIV status, 29% ( n = 28) were handled with excess risk to the user, another person, or both. Of 24 sharps used on known HIV-infected patients, there were no practices observed that subjected either the user or another person to excess risk.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Chemical, physic and infectious diseases</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>excess risk</subject><subject>Hospitals, University</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical Waste Disposal - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Needles - standards</subject><subject>needlestick</subject><subject>Needlestick Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Occupational medicine</subject><subject>Personnel, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Physic and infectious agents</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>puncture wound</subject><subject>Safety Management</subject><subject>sharps</subject><subject>Universal Precautions</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0736-4679</issn><issn>2352-5029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AURQdRaq3-A4UsRHQRna8kMy6UUqsWCm7qepjMvGkjTVJnUqH_3sSGLl29xT338jgIXRJ8TzBJH3DG0pinmbyV_E5inskYH6EhZQmNE0zlMRoekFN0FsIXxiTDggzQIBOCE0mHaLxYQVTqSi-hhKqJaheFlfabEBVV1LTZtAS_hMrsohfYaN901GM0a_MmCtrB8zk6cXod4KK_I_T5Ol1M3uP5x9tsMp7HhjHaxAYcCKGtE5xJZwXHxJokZe3jOXG5EMaluaEEMkqkS1IBkmOd08yBsdbmbIRu9rsbX39vITSqLIKB9VpXUG-DIqmgLKO8BfkeNL4OwYNTG1-U2u8UwaozpzotqtOiJFd_5hRua1f9_jYvwR5Kvao2v-5zHYxeO68rU4QDxljCRNLNPO0xaF38FOBVMEXrD2zhwTTK1sX_f_wCVD-JaA</recordid><startdate>199411</startdate><enddate>199411</enddate><creator>Moss, Steven T.</creator><creator>Clark, Richard F.</creator><creator>Guss, David A.</creator><creator>Rosen, Peter</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199411</creationdate><title>The management of sharps in the Emergency Department: Is it safe?</title><author>Moss, Steven T. ; Clark, Richard F. ; Guss, David A. ; Rosen, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-cefe88adf8439fd8401dc563904b1fb88cf6bc21e7219f568e940ab27fecdddb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Chemical, physic and infectious diseases</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>excess risk</topic><topic>Hospitals, University</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical Waste Disposal - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Needles - standards</topic><topic>needlestick</topic><topic>Needlestick Injuries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Occupational medicine</topic><topic>Personnel, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Physic and infectious agents</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>puncture wound</topic><topic>Safety Management</topic><topic>sharps</topic><topic>Universal Precautions</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moss, Steven T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Richard F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guss, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moss, Steven T.</au><au>Clark, Richard F.</au><au>Guss, David A.</au><au>Rosen, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The management of sharps in the Emergency Department: Is it safe?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>1994-11</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>745</spage><epage>752</epage><pages>745-752</pages><issn>0736-4679</issn><eissn>2352-5029</eissn><coden>JEMMDO</coden><abstract>In this study, we observed the management of sharps by health care workers including physicians, nurses, technicians, and students in the Emergency Department of the University of California-San Diego Medical Center. Twenty-eight percent of 418 observed sharp utilizations were managed in such a way that excess risk was conferred to the user, another person, or both. Twenty-seven percent conferred excess risk to the user and 12% to another person. Twenty percent of 322 recappable needles were recapped using a two-handed technique; 64% were disposed of uncapped. Four sharps (1%) were inadvertently thrown in the trash. Of the 418 observed sharp utilizations, none resulted in a puncture wound, although the four that were thrown in the trash represent a very high risk of injury to others. Physicians were observed handling the highest percentage of sharps in manners associated with excess risk while technicians and students managed sharps with the least risk. Among sharps used on patients who were IV drug abusers with unknown HIV status, 29% ( n = 28) were handled with excess risk to the user, another person, or both. Of 24 sharps used on known HIV-infected patients, there were no practices observed that subjected either the user or another person to excess risk.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>7884192</pmid><doi>10.1016/0736-4679(94)90479-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0736-4679
ispartof The Journal of emergency medicine, 1994-11, Vol.12 (6), p.745-752
issn 0736-4679
2352-5029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16823724
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
California
Chemical, physic and infectious diseases
Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data
excess risk
Hospitals, University
Humans
Medical sciences
Medical Waste Disposal - statistics & numerical data
Needles - standards
needlestick
Needlestick Injuries - prevention & control
Occupational medicine
Personnel, Hospital - statistics & numerical data
Physic and infectious agents
Prospective Studies
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
puncture wound
Safety Management
sharps
Universal Precautions
Workforce
title The management of sharps in the Emergency Department: Is it safe?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T01%3A19%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20management%20of%20sharps%20in%20the%20Emergency%20Department:%20Is%20it%20safe?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Moss,%20Steven%20T.&rft.date=1994-11&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=745&rft.epage=752&rft.pages=745-752&rft.issn=0736-4679&rft.eissn=2352-5029&rft.coden=JEMMDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0736-4679(94)90479-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16823724%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16823724&rft_id=info:pmid/7884192&rft_els_id=0736467994904790&rfr_iscdi=true