Pattern of rectal cancer recurrence after curative surgery
Purpose After curative rectal cancer surgery, local recurrences manifest in 2.4–10 % and distant metastases in 20–50 % of patients. The effectiveness of different surveillance regimens is not well established. We evaluated the pattern of recurrence and the utility of different surveillance instrumen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of colorectal disease 2015-06, Vol.30 (6), p.775-785 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 785 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 775 |
container_title | International journal of colorectal disease |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Räsänen, Minna Carpelan-Holmström, Monika Mustonen, Harri Renkonen-Sinisalo, Laura Lepistö, Anna |
description | Purpose
After curative rectal cancer surgery, local recurrences manifest in 2.4–10 % and distant metastases in 20–50 % of patients. The effectiveness of different surveillance regimens is not well established. We evaluated the pattern of recurrence and the utility of different surveillance instruments. Risk factors for recurrence were also recorded.
Methods
This retrospective study comprises 580 consecutive rectal cancer patients operated on at Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland, during 2005–2011. Data were collected from patient records. After exclusions, 481 patients treated with curative intent remained. Patients were followed up according to an intensive surveillance program.
Results
Rectal cancer recurrence was observed in 124 patients (25.8 %). Local recurrence manifested in 40 patients (8.3%) and distant metastases in 112 patients (23.3 %). Recurrences were observed a median of 1.3 years after surgery. Twelve patients had to be followed up to find one local recurrence and four patients to find one distant metastasis. Recurrences detected during regular follow-up visits were discovered on average earlier than those detected in additional visits arranged because of patient symptoms (
p
= 0.023 for local recurrence,
p
= 0.001 for distant metastases). All surveillance instruments were similarly useful in finding recurrence. Curative treatment was possible in 51 (41.1 %) of 124 patients with disease recurrence. Follow-up led to a 10.0 % chance of detecting recurrence that could be treated with curative intent.
Conclusions
Rectal cancer recurrences are detected earlier within a surveillance program than by symptoms alone. The most intensive follow-up should be focused on patients with known risk factors for recurrence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00384-015-2182-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1682208398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714490014</galeid><sourcerecordid>A714490014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-671f3fc831b02d54f9741e28798f09e9becc5b567dc543573b8c9afae508a3303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKxTAQhoMoerw8gBspuHFTzbVJ3MnBGwi60HVI04lUetGkFc7bm1LvKFlkJvn-YWZ-hPYJPiYYy5OIMVM8x0TklCiakzW0IJylgBZ0HS0wkTonWqgttB3jE055Ifkm2qJC6oJrtkCnd3YYIHRZ77MAbrBN5mznIEzZGAKkOLM-IVlK7VC_QhbH8AhhtYs2vG0i7L3fO-jh4vx-eZXf3F5eL89uciekGPJCEs-8U4yUmFaCey05AaqkVh5r0CU4J0pRyMoJzoRkpXLaegsCK8sYZjvoaK77HPqXEeJg2jo6aBrbQT9GQwpFKVZMq4Qe_kKf-jF0qbuJIpxjysgX9WgbMHXn-yFYNxU1ZzJBOi2KJ-r4DyqdCtra9R34Or3_EJBZ4EIfYwBvnkPd2rAyBJvJLzP7ZZJfZvLLTK0cvDc8li1Un4oPgxJAZyCmry6t_dtE_1Z9A5CknLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1681440231</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pattern of rectal cancer recurrence after curative surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Räsänen, Minna ; Carpelan-Holmström, Monika ; Mustonen, Harri ; Renkonen-Sinisalo, Laura ; Lepistö, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Räsänen, Minna ; Carpelan-Holmström, Monika ; Mustonen, Harri ; Renkonen-Sinisalo, Laura ; Lepistö, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
After curative rectal cancer surgery, local recurrences manifest in 2.4–10 % and distant metastases in 20–50 % of patients. The effectiveness of different surveillance regimens is not well established. We evaluated the pattern of recurrence and the utility of different surveillance instruments. Risk factors for recurrence were also recorded.
Methods
This retrospective study comprises 580 consecutive rectal cancer patients operated on at Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland, during 2005–2011. Data were collected from patient records. After exclusions, 481 patients treated with curative intent remained. Patients were followed up according to an intensive surveillance program.
Results
Rectal cancer recurrence was observed in 124 patients (25.8 %). Local recurrence manifested in 40 patients (8.3%) and distant metastases in 112 patients (23.3 %). Recurrences were observed a median of 1.3 years after surgery. Twelve patients had to be followed up to find one local recurrence and four patients to find one distant metastasis. Recurrences detected during regular follow-up visits were discovered on average earlier than those detected in additional visits arranged because of patient symptoms (
p
= 0.023 for local recurrence,
p
= 0.001 for distant metastases). All surveillance instruments were similarly useful in finding recurrence. Curative treatment was possible in 51 (41.1 %) of 124 patients with disease recurrence. Follow-up led to a 10.0 % chance of detecting recurrence that could be treated with curative intent.
Conclusions
Rectal cancer recurrences are detected earlier within a surveillance program than by symptoms alone. The most intensive follow-up should be focused on patients with known risk factors for recurrence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-1958</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2182-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25796493</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cancer ; Care and treatment ; Colorectal cancer ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Medical records ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Medicine, Experimental ; Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Original Article ; Proctology ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Relapse ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International journal of colorectal disease, 2015-06, Vol.30 (6), p.775-785</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-671f3fc831b02d54f9741e28798f09e9becc5b567dc543573b8c9afae508a3303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-671f3fc831b02d54f9741e28798f09e9becc5b567dc543573b8c9afae508a3303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00384-015-2182-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00384-015-2182-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27913,27914,41477,42546,51308</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25796493$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Räsänen, Minna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpelan-Holmström, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustonen, Harri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renkonen-Sinisalo, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepistö, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Pattern of rectal cancer recurrence after curative surgery</title><title>International journal of colorectal disease</title><addtitle>Int J Colorectal Dis</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Colorectal Dis</addtitle><description>Purpose
After curative rectal cancer surgery, local recurrences manifest in 2.4–10 % and distant metastases in 20–50 % of patients. The effectiveness of different surveillance regimens is not well established. We evaluated the pattern of recurrence and the utility of different surveillance instruments. Risk factors for recurrence were also recorded.
Methods
This retrospective study comprises 580 consecutive rectal cancer patients operated on at Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland, during 2005–2011. Data were collected from patient records. After exclusions, 481 patients treated with curative intent remained. Patients were followed up according to an intensive surveillance program.
Results
Rectal cancer recurrence was observed in 124 patients (25.8 %). Local recurrence manifested in 40 patients (8.3%) and distant metastases in 112 patients (23.3 %). Recurrences were observed a median of 1.3 years after surgery. Twelve patients had to be followed up to find one local recurrence and four patients to find one distant metastasis. Recurrences detected during regular follow-up visits were discovered on average earlier than those detected in additional visits arranged because of patient symptoms (
p
= 0.023 for local recurrence,
p
= 0.001 for distant metastases). All surveillance instruments were similarly useful in finding recurrence. Curative treatment was possible in 51 (41.1 %) of 124 patients with disease recurrence. Follow-up led to a 10.0 % chance of detecting recurrence that could be treated with curative intent.
Conclusions
Rectal cancer recurrences are detected earlier within a surveillance program than by symptoms alone. The most intensive follow-up should be focused on patients with known risk factors for recurrence.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Relapse</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0179-1958</issn><issn>1432-1262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKxTAQhoMoerw8gBspuHFTzbVJ3MnBGwi60HVI04lUetGkFc7bm1LvKFlkJvn-YWZ-hPYJPiYYy5OIMVM8x0TklCiakzW0IJylgBZ0HS0wkTonWqgttB3jE055Ifkm2qJC6oJrtkCnd3YYIHRZ77MAbrBN5mznIEzZGAKkOLM-IVlK7VC_QhbH8AhhtYs2vG0i7L3fO-jh4vx-eZXf3F5eL89uciekGPJCEs-8U4yUmFaCey05AaqkVh5r0CU4J0pRyMoJzoRkpXLaegsCK8sYZjvoaK77HPqXEeJg2jo6aBrbQT9GQwpFKVZMq4Qe_kKf-jF0qbuJIpxjysgX9WgbMHXn-yFYNxU1ZzJBOi2KJ-r4DyqdCtra9R34Or3_EJBZ4EIfYwBvnkPd2rAyBJvJLzP7ZZJfZvLLTK0cvDc8li1Un4oPgxJAZyCmry6t_dtE_1Z9A5CknLw</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Räsänen, Minna</creator><creator>Carpelan-Holmström, Monika</creator><creator>Mustonen, Harri</creator><creator>Renkonen-Sinisalo, Laura</creator><creator>Lepistö, Anna</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Pattern of rectal cancer recurrence after curative surgery</title><author>Räsänen, Minna ; Carpelan-Holmström, Monika ; Mustonen, Harri ; Renkonen-Sinisalo, Laura ; Lepistö, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-671f3fc831b02d54f9741e28798f09e9becc5b567dc543573b8c9afae508a3303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Relapse</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Räsänen, Minna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpelan-Holmström, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustonen, Harri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renkonen-Sinisalo, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepistö, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of colorectal disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Räsänen, Minna</au><au>Carpelan-Holmström, Monika</au><au>Mustonen, Harri</au><au>Renkonen-Sinisalo, Laura</au><au>Lepistö, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pattern of rectal cancer recurrence after curative surgery</atitle><jtitle>International journal of colorectal disease</jtitle><stitle>Int J Colorectal Dis</stitle><addtitle>Int J Colorectal Dis</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>775</spage><epage>785</epage><pages>775-785</pages><issn>0179-1958</issn><eissn>1432-1262</eissn><abstract>Purpose
After curative rectal cancer surgery, local recurrences manifest in 2.4–10 % and distant metastases in 20–50 % of patients. The effectiveness of different surveillance regimens is not well established. We evaluated the pattern of recurrence and the utility of different surveillance instruments. Risk factors for recurrence were also recorded.
Methods
This retrospective study comprises 580 consecutive rectal cancer patients operated on at Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland, during 2005–2011. Data were collected from patient records. After exclusions, 481 patients treated with curative intent remained. Patients were followed up according to an intensive surveillance program.
Results
Rectal cancer recurrence was observed in 124 patients (25.8 %). Local recurrence manifested in 40 patients (8.3%) and distant metastases in 112 patients (23.3 %). Recurrences were observed a median of 1.3 years after surgery. Twelve patients had to be followed up to find one local recurrence and four patients to find one distant metastasis. Recurrences detected during regular follow-up visits were discovered on average earlier than those detected in additional visits arranged because of patient symptoms (
p
= 0.023 for local recurrence,
p
= 0.001 for distant metastases). All surveillance instruments were similarly useful in finding recurrence. Curative treatment was possible in 51 (41.1 %) of 124 patients with disease recurrence. Follow-up led to a 10.0 % chance of detecting recurrence that could be treated with curative intent.
Conclusions
Rectal cancer recurrences are detected earlier within a surveillance program than by symptoms alone. The most intensive follow-up should be focused on patients with known risk factors for recurrence.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>25796493</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00384-015-2182-1</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0179-1958 |
ispartof | International journal of colorectal disease, 2015-06, Vol.30 (6), p.775-785 |
issn | 0179-1958 1432-1262 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1682208398 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Cancer Care and treatment Colorectal cancer Female Follow-Up Studies Gastroenterology Hepatology Humans Internal Medicine Male Medical records Medical research Medicine Medicine & Public Health Medicine, Experimental Metastasis Middle Aged Neoplasm Metastasis Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Original Article Proctology Rectal Neoplasms - pathology Rectal Neoplasms - surgery Relapse Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Surgery Time Factors Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
title | Pattern of rectal cancer recurrence after curative surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A02%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pattern%20of%20rectal%20cancer%20recurrence%20after%20curative%20surgery&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20colorectal%20disease&rft.au=R%C3%A4s%C3%A4nen,%20Minna&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=775&rft.epage=785&rft.pages=775-785&rft.issn=0179-1958&rft.eissn=1432-1262&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00384-015-2182-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA714490014%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1681440231&rft_id=info:pmid/25796493&rft_galeid=A714490014&rfr_iscdi=true |