Tutorial review on validation of liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry methods: Part II
[Display omitted] •The status of validation of LC–MS methods is comprehensively reviewed.•Clarity is brought into validation-related terminology.•Recommendations on difficult validation-related issues in LC–MS are given. This is the part II of a tutorial review intending to give an overview of the s...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Analytica chimica acta 2015-04, Vol.870, p.8-28 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 28 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 8 |
| container_title | Analytica chimica acta |
| container_volume | 870 |
| creator | Kruve, Anneli Rebane, Riin Kipper, Karin Oldekop, Maarja-Liisa Evard, Hanno Herodes, Koit Ravio, Pekka Leito, Ivo |
| description | [Display omitted]
•The status of validation of LC–MS methods is comprehensively reviewed.•Clarity is brought into validation-related terminology.•Recommendations on difficult validation-related issues in LC–MS are given.
This is the part II of a tutorial review intending to give an overview of the state of the art of method validation in liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC–MS) and discuss specific issues that arise with MS (and MS–MS) detection in LC (as opposed to the “conventional” detectors). The Part II starts with briefly introducing the main quantitation methods and then addresses the performance related to quantification: linearity of signal, sensitivity, precision, trueness, accuracy, stability and measurement uncertainty. The last section is devoted to practical considerations in validation. With every performance characteristic its essence and terminology are addressed, the current status of treating it is reviewed and recommendations are given, how to handle it, specifically in the case of LC–MS methods. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.aca.2015.02.016 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1681913565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003267015001944</els_id><sourcerecordid>1681913565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-de8e9e1908b3070706e860d239da3662b44db2aa00180d098471a76a02ab43dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9O3DAQxq2qVVloH6CXysdeEsZ_1knghFALKyGVA5x6sCbxbNerZL3YCWhvvEPfsE-C0QJHNNKMPfPNJ82PsW8CSgHCHK9L7LCUIOYlyDJ3PrCZqCtVaCX1RzYDAFVIU8EBO0xpnb9SgP7MDuS8Fk1V6xn7czONIXrseaR7Tw88bPg99t7h6PMzLHnv7ybveLeKYcAx_I24Xe3-P_4bMCWettSNeUBj3PGcV8GlE36NceSLxRf2aYl9oq8v9Yjd_vp5c35ZXP2-WJyfXRWdBjEWjmpqSDRQtwqqHIZqA06qxqEyRrZau1YiAogaHDS1rgRWBkFiq5Vz6oj92PtuY7ibKI128KmjvscNhSlZYfK1Qs3NPEvFXtrFkFKkpd1GP2DcWQH2mald28zUPjO1IG3u5J3vL_ZTO5B723iFmAWnewHlIzPEaFPnadOR8zHjsS74d-yfAKTwiBY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1681913565</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tutorial review on validation of liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry methods: Part II</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kruve, Anneli ; Rebane, Riin ; Kipper, Karin ; Oldekop, Maarja-Liisa ; Evard, Hanno ; Herodes, Koit ; Ravio, Pekka ; Leito, Ivo</creator><creatorcontrib>Kruve, Anneli ; Rebane, Riin ; Kipper, Karin ; Oldekop, Maarja-Liisa ; Evard, Hanno ; Herodes, Koit ; Ravio, Pekka ; Leito, Ivo</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted]
•The status of validation of LC–MS methods is comprehensively reviewed.•Clarity is brought into validation-related terminology.•Recommendations on difficult validation-related issues in LC–MS are given.
This is the part II of a tutorial review intending to give an overview of the state of the art of method validation in liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC–MS) and discuss specific issues that arise with MS (and MS–MS) detection in LC (as opposed to the “conventional” detectors). The Part II starts with briefly introducing the main quantitation methods and then addresses the performance related to quantification: linearity of signal, sensitivity, precision, trueness, accuracy, stability and measurement uncertainty. The last section is devoted to practical considerations in validation. With every performance characteristic its essence and terminology are addressed, the current status of treating it is reviewed and recommendations are given, how to handle it, specifically in the case of LC–MS methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2670</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4324</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.02.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25819784</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Electrospray ; Ionization suppression ; Limit of detection ; Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry ; Robustness ; Validation</subject><ispartof>Analytica chimica acta, 2015-04, Vol.870, p.8-28</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-de8e9e1908b3070706e860d239da3662b44db2aa00180d098471a76a02ab43dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-de8e9e1908b3070706e860d239da3662b44db2aa00180d098471a76a02ab43dd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7295-8993</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003267015001944$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25819784$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kruve, Anneli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebane, Riin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kipper, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldekop, Maarja-Liisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evard, Hanno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herodes, Koit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravio, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leito, Ivo</creatorcontrib><title>Tutorial review on validation of liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry methods: Part II</title><title>Analytica chimica acta</title><addtitle>Anal Chim Acta</addtitle><description>[Display omitted]
•The status of validation of LC–MS methods is comprehensively reviewed.•Clarity is brought into validation-related terminology.•Recommendations on difficult validation-related issues in LC–MS are given.
This is the part II of a tutorial review intending to give an overview of the state of the art of method validation in liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC–MS) and discuss specific issues that arise with MS (and MS–MS) detection in LC (as opposed to the “conventional” detectors). The Part II starts with briefly introducing the main quantitation methods and then addresses the performance related to quantification: linearity of signal, sensitivity, precision, trueness, accuracy, stability and measurement uncertainty. The last section is devoted to practical considerations in validation. With every performance characteristic its essence and terminology are addressed, the current status of treating it is reviewed and recommendations are given, how to handle it, specifically in the case of LC–MS methods.</description><subject>Electrospray</subject><subject>Ionization suppression</subject><subject>Limit of detection</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Validation</subject><issn>0003-2670</issn><issn>1873-4324</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9O3DAQxq2qVVloH6CXysdeEsZ_1knghFALKyGVA5x6sCbxbNerZL3YCWhvvEPfsE-C0QJHNNKMPfPNJ82PsW8CSgHCHK9L7LCUIOYlyDJ3PrCZqCtVaCX1RzYDAFVIU8EBO0xpnb9SgP7MDuS8Fk1V6xn7czONIXrseaR7Tw88bPg99t7h6PMzLHnv7ybveLeKYcAx_I24Xe3-P_4bMCWettSNeUBj3PGcV8GlE36NceSLxRf2aYl9oq8v9Yjd_vp5c35ZXP2-WJyfXRWdBjEWjmpqSDRQtwqqHIZqA06qxqEyRrZau1YiAogaHDS1rgRWBkFiq5Vz6oj92PtuY7ibKI128KmjvscNhSlZYfK1Qs3NPEvFXtrFkFKkpd1GP2DcWQH2mald28zUPjO1IG3u5J3vL_ZTO5B723iFmAWnewHlIzPEaFPnadOR8zHjsS74d-yfAKTwiBY</recordid><startdate>20150422</startdate><enddate>20150422</enddate><creator>Kruve, Anneli</creator><creator>Rebane, Riin</creator><creator>Kipper, Karin</creator><creator>Oldekop, Maarja-Liisa</creator><creator>Evard, Hanno</creator><creator>Herodes, Koit</creator><creator>Ravio, Pekka</creator><creator>Leito, Ivo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7295-8993</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150422</creationdate><title>Tutorial review on validation of liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry methods: Part II</title><author>Kruve, Anneli ; Rebane, Riin ; Kipper, Karin ; Oldekop, Maarja-Liisa ; Evard, Hanno ; Herodes, Koit ; Ravio, Pekka ; Leito, Ivo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-de8e9e1908b3070706e860d239da3662b44db2aa00180d098471a76a02ab43dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Electrospray</topic><topic>Ionization suppression</topic><topic>Limit of detection</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kruve, Anneli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebane, Riin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kipper, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldekop, Maarja-Liisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evard, Hanno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herodes, Koit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravio, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leito, Ivo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Analytica chimica acta</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kruve, Anneli</au><au>Rebane, Riin</au><au>Kipper, Karin</au><au>Oldekop, Maarja-Liisa</au><au>Evard, Hanno</au><au>Herodes, Koit</au><au>Ravio, Pekka</au><au>Leito, Ivo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tutorial review on validation of liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry methods: Part II</atitle><jtitle>Analytica chimica acta</jtitle><addtitle>Anal Chim Acta</addtitle><date>2015-04-22</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>870</volume><spage>8</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>8-28</pages><issn>0003-2670</issn><eissn>1873-4324</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted]
•The status of validation of LC–MS methods is comprehensively reviewed.•Clarity is brought into validation-related terminology.•Recommendations on difficult validation-related issues in LC–MS are given.
This is the part II of a tutorial review intending to give an overview of the state of the art of method validation in liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC–MS) and discuss specific issues that arise with MS (and MS–MS) detection in LC (as opposed to the “conventional” detectors). The Part II starts with briefly introducing the main quantitation methods and then addresses the performance related to quantification: linearity of signal, sensitivity, precision, trueness, accuracy, stability and measurement uncertainty. The last section is devoted to practical considerations in validation. With every performance characteristic its essence and terminology are addressed, the current status of treating it is reviewed and recommendations are given, how to handle it, specifically in the case of LC–MS methods.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25819784</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.aca.2015.02.016</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7295-8993</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-2670 |
| ispartof | Analytica chimica acta, 2015-04, Vol.870, p.8-28 |
| issn | 0003-2670 1873-4324 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1681913565 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Electrospray Ionization suppression Limit of detection Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry Robustness Validation |
| title | Tutorial review on validation of liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry methods: Part II |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T02%3A02%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tutorial%20review%20on%20validation%20of%20liquid%20chromatography%E2%80%93mass%20spectrometry%20methods:%20Part%20II&rft.jtitle=Analytica%20chimica%20acta&rft.au=Kruve,%20Anneli&rft.date=2015-04-22&rft.volume=870&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=8-28&rft.issn=0003-2670&rft.eissn=1873-4324&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aca.2015.02.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1681913565%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1681913565&rft_id=info:pmid/25819784&rft_els_id=S0003267015001944&rfr_iscdi=true |