Ecosystem approaches to environmental quality assessment

Environmental quality assessment has to focus more on the quality of whole ecosystems, instead of focusing on the direct effects of a specific stressor, because of a more integrated environmental policy approach. Yet, how can the ecosystem quality be measured? Partly this is a normative question, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental management (New York) 1995, Vol.19 (1), p.135-145
Hauptverfasser: Nip, M.I, Haes, H.A.U. de
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 145
container_issue 1
container_start_page 135
container_title Environmental management (New York)
container_volume 19
creator Nip, M.I
Haes, H.A.U. de
description Environmental quality assessment has to focus more on the quality of whole ecosystems, instead of focusing on the direct effects of a specific stressor, because of a more integrated environmental policy approach. Yet, how can the ecosystem quality be measured? Partly this is a normative question, a question of what is considered good and bad. At the same time, it is a scientific question, dealing with the problem of how the state of a system as complex as an ecosystem could be measured. Measuring all abiotic and biotic components, not to mention their many relationships, is not feasible. In this article we review several approaches dealing with this scientific question. Three approaches are distinguished; they differ in type of variable set and ecosystem model used. As a result of this, the information about the state of the ecosystem differs: ultimate breadth, comprising information about the whole ecosystem, is at the expense of detail, while ultimate detail is at the expense of breadth. We discuss whether the resultant quality assessments differ in character and are therefore suitable to answer different policy questions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02472010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16809786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16809786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-820701515298470bb63f3d7665ca34b0b229429ffb7c9a08a1626198758e94a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsb_4CzciGM3jwmj6WWVoWCCy24C5mY0ZGZSZs7FfrvTang6sA5H_ceDiGXFG4pgLp7WAATigGFIzKhgrMy2-aYTIBLUdKKvZ-SM8RvAOBaVxOi5z7iDsfQF269TtH5r4DFGIsw_LQpDn0YRtcVm63r2nFXOMSAuDfPyUnjOgwXfzolq8X8bfZULl8en2f3y9IzLcZSM1BAq_zZaKGgriVv-IeSsvKOixpqxoxgpmlq5Y0D7ahkkhqtKh2McJxPyfXhbi632QYcbd-iD13nhhC3aKnUYJSWGbw5gD5FxBQau05t79LOUrD7cez_OBm-OsCNi9Z9phbt6jUnHHIdaqjkvwsaXoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16809786</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecosystem approaches to environmental quality assessment</title><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><creator>Nip, M.I ; Haes, H.A.U. de</creator><creatorcontrib>Nip, M.I ; Haes, H.A.U. de</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental quality assessment has to focus more on the quality of whole ecosystems, instead of focusing on the direct effects of a specific stressor, because of a more integrated environmental policy approach. Yet, how can the ecosystem quality be measured? Partly this is a normative question, a question of what is considered good and bad. At the same time, it is a scientific question, dealing with the problem of how the state of a system as complex as an ecosystem could be measured. Measuring all abiotic and biotic components, not to mention their many relationships, is not feasible. In this article we review several approaches dealing with this scientific question. Three approaches are distinguished; they differ in type of variable set and ecosystem model used. As a result of this, the information about the state of the ecosystem differs: ultimate breadth, comprising information about the whole ecosystem, is at the expense of detail, while ultimate detail is at the expense of breadth. We discuss whether the resultant quality assessments differ in character and are therefore suitable to answer different policy questions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02472010</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>ecosystems ; environmental assessment</subject><ispartof>Environmental management (New York), 1995, Vol.19 (1), p.135-145</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-820701515298470bb63f3d7665ca34b0b229429ffb7c9a08a1626198758e94a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-820701515298470bb63f3d7665ca34b0b229429ffb7c9a08a1626198758e94a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nip, M.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haes, H.A.U. de</creatorcontrib><title>Ecosystem approaches to environmental quality assessment</title><title>Environmental management (New York)</title><description>Environmental quality assessment has to focus more on the quality of whole ecosystems, instead of focusing on the direct effects of a specific stressor, because of a more integrated environmental policy approach. Yet, how can the ecosystem quality be measured? Partly this is a normative question, a question of what is considered good and bad. At the same time, it is a scientific question, dealing with the problem of how the state of a system as complex as an ecosystem could be measured. Measuring all abiotic and biotic components, not to mention their many relationships, is not feasible. In this article we review several approaches dealing with this scientific question. Three approaches are distinguished; they differ in type of variable set and ecosystem model used. As a result of this, the information about the state of the ecosystem differs: ultimate breadth, comprising information about the whole ecosystem, is at the expense of detail, while ultimate detail is at the expense of breadth. We discuss whether the resultant quality assessments differ in character and are therefore suitable to answer different policy questions.</description><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>environmental assessment</subject><issn>0364-152X</issn><issn>1432-1009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsb_4CzciGM3jwmj6WWVoWCCy24C5mY0ZGZSZs7FfrvTang6sA5H_ceDiGXFG4pgLp7WAATigGFIzKhgrMy2-aYTIBLUdKKvZ-SM8RvAOBaVxOi5z7iDsfQF269TtH5r4DFGIsw_LQpDn0YRtcVm63r2nFXOMSAuDfPyUnjOgwXfzolq8X8bfZULl8en2f3y9IzLcZSM1BAq_zZaKGgriVv-IeSsvKOixpqxoxgpmlq5Y0D7ahkkhqtKh2McJxPyfXhbi632QYcbd-iD13nhhC3aKnUYJSWGbw5gD5FxBQau05t79LOUrD7cez_OBm-OsCNi9Z9phbt6jUnHHIdaqjkvwsaXoA</recordid><startdate>1995</startdate><enddate>1995</enddate><creator>Nip, M.I</creator><creator>Haes, H.A.U. de</creator><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1995</creationdate><title>Ecosystem approaches to environmental quality assessment</title><author>Nip, M.I ; Haes, H.A.U. de</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-820701515298470bb63f3d7665ca34b0b229429ffb7c9a08a1626198758e94a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>environmental assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nip, M.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haes, H.A.U. de</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nip, M.I</au><au>Haes, H.A.U. de</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecosystem approaches to environmental quality assessment</atitle><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle><date>1995</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>135-145</pages><issn>0364-152X</issn><eissn>1432-1009</eissn><abstract>Environmental quality assessment has to focus more on the quality of whole ecosystems, instead of focusing on the direct effects of a specific stressor, because of a more integrated environmental policy approach. Yet, how can the ecosystem quality be measured? Partly this is a normative question, a question of what is considered good and bad. At the same time, it is a scientific question, dealing with the problem of how the state of a system as complex as an ecosystem could be measured. Measuring all abiotic and biotic components, not to mention their many relationships, is not feasible. In this article we review several approaches dealing with this scientific question. Three approaches are distinguished; they differ in type of variable set and ecosystem model used. As a result of this, the information about the state of the ecosystem differs: ultimate breadth, comprising information about the whole ecosystem, is at the expense of detail, while ultimate detail is at the expense of breadth. We discuss whether the resultant quality assessments differ in character and are therefore suitable to answer different policy questions.</abstract><doi>10.1007/BF02472010</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-152X
ispartof Environmental management (New York), 1995, Vol.19 (1), p.135-145
issn 0364-152X
1432-1009
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16809786
source Springer Online Journals Complete
subjects ecosystems
environmental assessment
title Ecosystem approaches to environmental quality assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A14%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecosystem%20approaches%20to%20environmental%20quality%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20management%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Nip,%20M.I&rft.date=1995&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=135-145&rft.issn=0364-152X&rft.eissn=1432-1009&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02472010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16809786%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16809786&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true