Interlaboratory Assessment of Cryomilling Sample Preparation for Residue Analysis

The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vess...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 2015-05, Vol.63 (18), p.4405-4408
Hauptverfasser: Riter, Leah S, Lynn, Kari J, Wujcik, Chad E, Buchholz, Lisa M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4408
container_issue 18
container_start_page 4405
container_title Journal of agricultural and food chemistry
container_volume 63
creator Riter, Leah S
Lynn, Kari J
Wujcik, Chad E
Buchholz, Lisa M
description The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/jf505249y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680959188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1680959188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a289y-1e1ad5499a0d3b964e8626f4d6848f4f08182ae4a0aafc7544ccca2d151095b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0D1v2zAQBmCiaFE7SYf-gURLgHRQc0eRMjkaRj4MGOhHmpk4S6QhQxJdnjXo31eB00yZbrgH7x1eIb4ifEeQeLsPGrRUdvwg5qgl5BrRfBRzmJa50SXOxBnzHgCMXsBnMZNaFygLOxe_1v3Rp5a2MdExpjFbMnvmzvfHLIZslcbYNW3b9LvsibpD67OfyR9owk3ssxBT9ttzUw8-W_bUjtzwhfgUqGX_5XWei-f7uz-rx3zz42G9Wm5yksaOOXqkWitrCepia0vlTSnLoOrSKBNUAINGklcERKFaaKWqqiJZo0awequKc3Fzyj2k-HfwfHRdw5VvW-p9HNhhaSZo0ZiJfjvRKkXm5IM7pKajNDoE99Kge2twspevscO28_Wb_F_ZBK5OIFB0tEsNu-cnCVgCINpF8fLZ9UlQxW4fhzQ1w--c-genQoEu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1680959188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interlaboratory Assessment of Cryomilling Sample Preparation for Residue Analysis</title><source>ACS Publications</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Riter, Leah S ; Lynn, Kari J ; Wujcik, Chad E ; Buchholz, Lisa M</creator><creatorcontrib>Riter, Leah S ; Lynn, Kari J ; Wujcik, Chad E ; Buchholz, Lisa M</creatorcontrib><description>The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/jf505249y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25531239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods ; Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards ; cost effectiveness ; Crops, Agricultural - chemistry ; Food Contamination - analysis ; Laboratories - standards ; Pesticide Residues - analysis ; pesticides ; Reproducibility of Results ; Selection Bias ; solvents</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2015-05, Vol.63 (18), p.4405-4408</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a289y-1e1ad5499a0d3b964e8626f4d6848f4f08182ae4a0aafc7544ccca2d151095b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a289y-1e1ad5499a0d3b964e8626f4d6848f4f08182ae4a0aafc7544ccca2d151095b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jf505249y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jf505249y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25531239$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riter, Leah S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynn, Kari J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wujcik, Chad E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchholz, Lisa M</creatorcontrib><title>Interlaboratory Assessment of Cryomilling Sample Preparation for Residue Analysis</title><title>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><description>The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability.</description><subject>Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods</subject><subject>Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards</subject><subject>cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural - chemistry</subject><subject>Food Contamination - analysis</subject><subject>Laboratories - standards</subject><subject>Pesticide Residues - analysis</subject><subject>pesticides</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Selection Bias</subject><subject>solvents</subject><issn>0021-8561</issn><issn>1520-5118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0D1v2zAQBmCiaFE7SYf-gURLgHRQc0eRMjkaRj4MGOhHmpk4S6QhQxJdnjXo31eB00yZbrgH7x1eIb4ifEeQeLsPGrRUdvwg5qgl5BrRfBRzmJa50SXOxBnzHgCMXsBnMZNaFygLOxe_1v3Rp5a2MdExpjFbMnvmzvfHLIZslcbYNW3b9LvsibpD67OfyR9owk3ssxBT9ttzUw8-W_bUjtzwhfgUqGX_5XWei-f7uz-rx3zz42G9Wm5yksaOOXqkWitrCepia0vlTSnLoOrSKBNUAINGklcERKFaaKWqqiJZo0awequKc3Fzyj2k-HfwfHRdw5VvW-p9HNhhaSZo0ZiJfjvRKkXm5IM7pKajNDoE99Kge2twspevscO28_Wb_F_ZBK5OIFB0tEsNu-cnCVgCINpF8fLZ9UlQxW4fhzQ1w--c-genQoEu</recordid><startdate>20150513</startdate><enddate>20150513</enddate><creator>Riter, Leah S</creator><creator>Lynn, Kari J</creator><creator>Wujcik, Chad E</creator><creator>Buchholz, Lisa M</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><general>American Chemical Society, Books and Journals Division</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150513</creationdate><title>Interlaboratory Assessment of Cryomilling Sample Preparation for Residue Analysis</title><author>Riter, Leah S ; Lynn, Kari J ; Wujcik, Chad E ; Buchholz, Lisa M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a289y-1e1ad5499a0d3b964e8626f4d6848f4f08182ae4a0aafc7544ccca2d151095b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods</topic><topic>Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards</topic><topic>cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural - chemistry</topic><topic>Food Contamination - analysis</topic><topic>Laboratories - standards</topic><topic>Pesticide Residues - analysis</topic><topic>pesticides</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Selection Bias</topic><topic>solvents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riter, Leah S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynn, Kari J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wujcik, Chad E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchholz, Lisa M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riter, Leah S</au><au>Lynn, Kari J</au><au>Wujcik, Chad E</au><au>Buchholz, Lisa M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interlaboratory Assessment of Cryomilling Sample Preparation for Residue Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><date>2015-05-13</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>4405</spage><epage>4408</epage><pages>4405-4408</pages><issn>0021-8561</issn><eissn>1520-5118</eissn><abstract>The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>25531239</pmid><doi>10.1021/jf505249y</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8561
ispartof Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2015-05, Vol.63 (18), p.4405-4408
issn 0021-8561
1520-5118
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680959188
source ACS Publications; MEDLINE
subjects Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods
Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards
cost effectiveness
Crops, Agricultural - chemistry
Food Contamination - analysis
Laboratories - standards
Pesticide Residues - analysis
pesticides
Reproducibility of Results
Selection Bias
solvents
title Interlaboratory Assessment of Cryomilling Sample Preparation for Residue Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T14%3A23%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interlaboratory%20Assessment%20of%20Cryomilling%20Sample%20Preparation%20for%20Residue%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20food%20chemistry&rft.au=Riter,%20Leah%20S&rft.date=2015-05-13&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=4405&rft.epage=4408&rft.pages=4405-4408&rft.issn=0021-8561&rft.eissn=1520-5118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/jf505249y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1680959188%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1680959188&rft_id=info:pmid/25531239&rfr_iscdi=true