Interlaboratory Assessment of Cryomilling Sample Preparation for Residue Analysis
The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vess...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 2015-05, Vol.63 (18), p.4405-4408 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4408 |
---|---|
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 4405 |
container_title | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Riter, Leah S Lynn, Kari J Wujcik, Chad E Buchholz, Lisa M |
description | The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/jf505249y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680959188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1680959188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a289y-1e1ad5499a0d3b964e8626f4d6848f4f08182ae4a0aafc7544ccca2d151095b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0D1v2zAQBmCiaFE7SYf-gURLgHRQc0eRMjkaRj4MGOhHmpk4S6QhQxJdnjXo31eB00yZbrgH7x1eIb4ifEeQeLsPGrRUdvwg5qgl5BrRfBRzmJa50SXOxBnzHgCMXsBnMZNaFygLOxe_1v3Rp5a2MdExpjFbMnvmzvfHLIZslcbYNW3b9LvsibpD67OfyR9owk3ssxBT9ttzUw8-W_bUjtzwhfgUqGX_5XWei-f7uz-rx3zz42G9Wm5yksaOOXqkWitrCepia0vlTSnLoOrSKBNUAINGklcERKFaaKWqqiJZo0awequKc3Fzyj2k-HfwfHRdw5VvW-p9HNhhaSZo0ZiJfjvRKkXm5IM7pKajNDoE99Kge2twspevscO28_Wb_F_ZBK5OIFB0tEsNu-cnCVgCINpF8fLZ9UlQxW4fhzQ1w--c-genQoEu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1680959188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interlaboratory Assessment of Cryomilling Sample Preparation for Residue Analysis</title><source>ACS Publications</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Riter, Leah S ; Lynn, Kari J ; Wujcik, Chad E ; Buchholz, Lisa M</creator><creatorcontrib>Riter, Leah S ; Lynn, Kari J ; Wujcik, Chad E ; Buchholz, Lisa M</creatorcontrib><description>The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/jf505249y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25531239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods ; Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards ; cost effectiveness ; Crops, Agricultural - chemistry ; Food Contamination - analysis ; Laboratories - standards ; Pesticide Residues - analysis ; pesticides ; Reproducibility of Results ; Selection Bias ; solvents</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2015-05, Vol.63 (18), p.4405-4408</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a289y-1e1ad5499a0d3b964e8626f4d6848f4f08182ae4a0aafc7544ccca2d151095b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a289y-1e1ad5499a0d3b964e8626f4d6848f4f08182ae4a0aafc7544ccca2d151095b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jf505249y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jf505249y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25531239$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riter, Leah S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynn, Kari J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wujcik, Chad E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchholz, Lisa M</creatorcontrib><title>Interlaboratory Assessment of Cryomilling Sample Preparation for Residue Analysis</title><title>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><description>The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability.</description><subject>Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods</subject><subject>Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards</subject><subject>cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural - chemistry</subject><subject>Food Contamination - analysis</subject><subject>Laboratories - standards</subject><subject>Pesticide Residues - analysis</subject><subject>pesticides</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Selection Bias</subject><subject>solvents</subject><issn>0021-8561</issn><issn>1520-5118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0D1v2zAQBmCiaFE7SYf-gURLgHRQc0eRMjkaRj4MGOhHmpk4S6QhQxJdnjXo31eB00yZbrgH7x1eIb4ifEeQeLsPGrRUdvwg5qgl5BrRfBRzmJa50SXOxBnzHgCMXsBnMZNaFygLOxe_1v3Rp5a2MdExpjFbMnvmzvfHLIZslcbYNW3b9LvsibpD67OfyR9owk3ssxBT9ttzUw8-W_bUjtzwhfgUqGX_5XWei-f7uz-rx3zz42G9Wm5yksaOOXqkWitrCepia0vlTSnLoOrSKBNUAINGklcERKFaaKWqqiJZo0awequKc3Fzyj2k-HfwfHRdw5VvW-p9HNhhaSZo0ZiJfjvRKkXm5IM7pKajNDoE99Kge2twspevscO28_Wb_F_ZBK5OIFB0tEsNu-cnCVgCINpF8fLZ9UlQxW4fhzQ1w--c-genQoEu</recordid><startdate>20150513</startdate><enddate>20150513</enddate><creator>Riter, Leah S</creator><creator>Lynn, Kari J</creator><creator>Wujcik, Chad E</creator><creator>Buchholz, Lisa M</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><general>American Chemical Society, Books and Journals Division</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150513</creationdate><title>Interlaboratory Assessment of Cryomilling Sample Preparation for Residue Analysis</title><author>Riter, Leah S ; Lynn, Kari J ; Wujcik, Chad E ; Buchholz, Lisa M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a289y-1e1ad5499a0d3b964e8626f4d6848f4f08182ae4a0aafc7544ccca2d151095b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods</topic><topic>Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards</topic><topic>cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural - chemistry</topic><topic>Food Contamination - analysis</topic><topic>Laboratories - standards</topic><topic>Pesticide Residues - analysis</topic><topic>pesticides</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Selection Bias</topic><topic>solvents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riter, Leah S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynn, Kari J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wujcik, Chad E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchholz, Lisa M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riter, Leah S</au><au>Lynn, Kari J</au><au>Wujcik, Chad E</au><au>Buchholz, Lisa M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interlaboratory Assessment of Cryomilling Sample Preparation for Residue Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><date>2015-05-13</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>4405</spage><epage>4408</epage><pages>4405-4408</pages><issn>0021-8561</issn><eissn>1520-5118</eissn><abstract>The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>25531239</pmid><doi>10.1021/jf505249y</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8561 |
ispartof | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2015-05, Vol.63 (18), p.4405-4408 |
issn | 0021-8561 1520-5118 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680959188 |
source | ACS Publications; MEDLINE |
subjects | Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards cost effectiveness Crops, Agricultural - chemistry Food Contamination - analysis Laboratories - standards Pesticide Residues - analysis pesticides Reproducibility of Results Selection Bias solvents |
title | Interlaboratory Assessment of Cryomilling Sample Preparation for Residue Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T14%3A23%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interlaboratory%20Assessment%20of%20Cryomilling%20Sample%20Preparation%20for%20Residue%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20food%20chemistry&rft.au=Riter,%20Leah%20S&rft.date=2015-05-13&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=4405&rft.epage=4408&rft.pages=4405-4408&rft.issn=0021-8561&rft.eissn=1520-5118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/jf505249y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1680959188%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1680959188&rft_id=info:pmid/25531239&rfr_iscdi=true |