Analyzing Person, Situation and Person × Situation Interaction Effects: Latent State-Trait Models for the Combination of Random and Fixed Situations
Latent state-trait (LST) models (Steyer, Ferring, & Schmitt, 1992) allow separating person-specific (trait) effects from (1) effects of the situation and person × situation interactions, and (2) random measurement error in purely observational studies. Typical LST applications use measurement de...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological methods 2015-06, Vol.20 (2), p.165-192 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 192 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 165 |
container_title | Psychological methods |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Geiser, Christian Litson, Kaylee Bishop, Jacob Keller, Brian T. Burns, G. Leonard Servera, Mateu Shiffman, Saul |
description | Latent state-trait (LST) models (Steyer, Ferring, & Schmitt, 1992) allow separating person-specific (trait) effects from (1) effects of the situation and person × situation interactions, and (2) random measurement error in purely observational studies. Typical LST applications use measurement designs in which all situations are sampled randomly and do not have to be known for any individual. Limitations of conventional LST models for only random situations are that traits are implicitly assumed to generalize perfectly across situations, and that main effects of situations are inseparable from person × situation interaction effects because both are measured by the same latent variable. In this article, we show how these limitations can be overcome by using measurement designs in which two or more random situations are nested within two or more fixed situations that are known for each individual. We present extended LST models for the combination of random and fixed situations (LST-RF approach) and show that the extensions allow (1) examining the extent to which traits are situation-specific and (2) isolating person × situation interactions from situation main effects. We demonstrate that the LST-RF approach can be applied with both homogenous and heterogeneous indicators in either the single- or multilevel structural equation modeling frameworks. Advantages and limitations of the new models as well as their relation to other approaches for studying person × situation interactions are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/met0000026 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680748269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1640024033</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a266t-e5617605c1f8264d1b5bd2792354cd182a33e1ffa5d65908340aba45e85b78683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd9qFDEUh4NYbK3e-AAS8EbU0fyfxLuytFrYotgK3oVMJtEpM8maZMDtexQfyBdrtru1Ym7O4fDxnXB-ADzD6C1GtH03uYI2j4gH4AArqhrMBH1YeyRJo6T6tg8e53yJEGZUskdgn3BOJFPqAFwfBTOur4bwHX52KcfwBp4PZTZliAGa0O-m8M_vf-anobhk7G1_7L2zJb-HS1NcKPC81NpcJDMUeBZ7N2boY4Llh4OLOHVD2Cqih1-qPk63S06GX66_X5CfgD1vxuye7uoh-HpyfLH42Cw_fThdHC0bQ4QojeMCtwJxi70kgvW4411PWkUoZ7bHkhhKHfbe8F5whSRlyHSGcSd510oh6SF4ufWuUvw5u1z0NGTrxtEEF-essZCoZdWtKvriP_Qyzqkeb0OxenyGKK3Uqy1lU8w5Oa9XaZhMWmuM9CYsfR9WhZ_vlHM3uf4vepdOBV5vAbMyepXX1qQy2NFlO6dUj72RaYI0qV_g9AY9zZ_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1640024033</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analyzing Person, Situation and Person × Situation Interaction Effects: Latent State-Trait Models for the Combination of Random and Fixed Situations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Geiser, Christian ; Litson, Kaylee ; Bishop, Jacob ; Keller, Brian T. ; Burns, G. Leonard ; Servera, Mateu ; Shiffman, Saul</creator><contributor>Harlow, Lisa L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Geiser, Christian ; Litson, Kaylee ; Bishop, Jacob ; Keller, Brian T. ; Burns, G. Leonard ; Servera, Mateu ; Shiffman, Saul ; Harlow, Lisa L</creatorcontrib><description>Latent state-trait (LST) models (Steyer, Ferring, & Schmitt, 1992) allow separating person-specific (trait) effects from (1) effects of the situation and person × situation interactions, and (2) random measurement error in purely observational studies. Typical LST applications use measurement designs in which all situations are sampled randomly and do not have to be known for any individual. Limitations of conventional LST models for only random situations are that traits are implicitly assumed to generalize perfectly across situations, and that main effects of situations are inseparable from person × situation interaction effects because both are measured by the same latent variable. In this article, we show how these limitations can be overcome by using measurement designs in which two or more random situations are nested within two or more fixed situations that are known for each individual. We present extended LST models for the combination of random and fixed situations (LST-RF approach) and show that the extensions allow (1) examining the extent to which traits are situation-specific and (2) isolating person × situation interactions from situation main effects. We demonstrate that the LST-RF approach can be applied with both homogenous and heterogeneous indicators in either the single- or multilevel structural equation modeling frameworks. Advantages and limitations of the new models as well as their relation to other approaches for studying person × situation interactions are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1082-989X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1463</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/met0000026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25528499</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Environment ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Item Response Theory ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Models, Psychological ; Multilevel Analysis ; Personality ; Psychological Theory ; Research Design ; Social Interaction ; Structural Equation Modeling</subject><ispartof>Psychological methods, 2015-06, Vol.20 (2), p.165-192</ispartof><rights>2014 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2014, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a266t-e5617605c1f8264d1b5bd2792354cd182a33e1ffa5d65908340aba45e85b78683</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25528499$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Harlow, Lisa L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Geiser, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Litson, Kaylee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bishop, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Brian T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, G. Leonard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Servera, Mateu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiffman, Saul</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing Person, Situation and Person × Situation Interaction Effects: Latent State-Trait Models for the Combination of Random and Fixed Situations</title><title>Psychological methods</title><addtitle>Psychol Methods</addtitle><description>Latent state-trait (LST) models (Steyer, Ferring, & Schmitt, 1992) allow separating person-specific (trait) effects from (1) effects of the situation and person × situation interactions, and (2) random measurement error in purely observational studies. Typical LST applications use measurement designs in which all situations are sampled randomly and do not have to be known for any individual. Limitations of conventional LST models for only random situations are that traits are implicitly assumed to generalize perfectly across situations, and that main effects of situations are inseparable from person × situation interaction effects because both are measured by the same latent variable. In this article, we show how these limitations can be overcome by using measurement designs in which two or more random situations are nested within two or more fixed situations that are known for each individual. We present extended LST models for the combination of random and fixed situations (LST-RF approach) and show that the extensions allow (1) examining the extent to which traits are situation-specific and (2) isolating person × situation interactions from situation main effects. We demonstrate that the LST-RF approach can be applied with both homogenous and heterogeneous indicators in either the single- or multilevel structural equation modeling frameworks. Advantages and limitations of the new models as well as their relation to other approaches for studying person × situation interactions are discussed.</description><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Item Response Theory</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Multilevel Analysis</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Social Interaction</subject><subject>Structural Equation Modeling</subject><issn>1082-989X</issn><issn>1939-1463</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd9qFDEUh4NYbK3e-AAS8EbU0fyfxLuytFrYotgK3oVMJtEpM8maZMDtexQfyBdrtru1Ym7O4fDxnXB-ADzD6C1GtH03uYI2j4gH4AArqhrMBH1YeyRJo6T6tg8e53yJEGZUskdgn3BOJFPqAFwfBTOur4bwHX52KcfwBp4PZTZliAGa0O-m8M_vf-anobhk7G1_7L2zJb-HS1NcKPC81NpcJDMUeBZ7N2boY4Llh4OLOHVD2Cqih1-qPk63S06GX66_X5CfgD1vxuye7uoh-HpyfLH42Cw_fThdHC0bQ4QojeMCtwJxi70kgvW4411PWkUoZ7bHkhhKHfbe8F5whSRlyHSGcSd510oh6SF4ufWuUvw5u1z0NGTrxtEEF-essZCoZdWtKvriP_Qyzqkeb0OxenyGKK3Uqy1lU8w5Oa9XaZhMWmuM9CYsfR9WhZ_vlHM3uf4vepdOBV5vAbMyepXX1qQy2NFlO6dUj72RaYI0qV_g9AY9zZ_w</recordid><startdate>201506</startdate><enddate>201506</enddate><creator>Geiser, Christian</creator><creator>Litson, Kaylee</creator><creator>Bishop, Jacob</creator><creator>Keller, Brian T.</creator><creator>Burns, G. Leonard</creator><creator>Servera, Mateu</creator><creator>Shiffman, Saul</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201506</creationdate><title>Analyzing Person, Situation and Person × Situation Interaction Effects: Latent State-Trait Models for the Combination of Random and Fixed Situations</title><author>Geiser, Christian ; Litson, Kaylee ; Bishop, Jacob ; Keller, Brian T. ; Burns, G. Leonard ; Servera, Mateu ; Shiffman, Saul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a266t-e5617605c1f8264d1b5bd2792354cd182a33e1ffa5d65908340aba45e85b78683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Item Response Theory</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Multilevel Analysis</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Social Interaction</topic><topic>Structural Equation Modeling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geiser, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Litson, Kaylee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bishop, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Brian T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, G. Leonard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Servera, Mateu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiffman, Saul</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geiser, Christian</au><au>Litson, Kaylee</au><au>Bishop, Jacob</au><au>Keller, Brian T.</au><au>Burns, G. Leonard</au><au>Servera, Mateu</au><au>Shiffman, Saul</au><au>Harlow, Lisa L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analyzing Person, Situation and Person × Situation Interaction Effects: Latent State-Trait Models for the Combination of Random and Fixed Situations</atitle><jtitle>Psychological methods</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Methods</addtitle><date>2015-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>165-192</pages><issn>1082-989X</issn><eissn>1939-1463</eissn><abstract>Latent state-trait (LST) models (Steyer, Ferring, & Schmitt, 1992) allow separating person-specific (trait) effects from (1) effects of the situation and person × situation interactions, and (2) random measurement error in purely observational studies. Typical LST applications use measurement designs in which all situations are sampled randomly and do not have to be known for any individual. Limitations of conventional LST models for only random situations are that traits are implicitly assumed to generalize perfectly across situations, and that main effects of situations are inseparable from person × situation interaction effects because both are measured by the same latent variable. In this article, we show how these limitations can be overcome by using measurement designs in which two or more random situations are nested within two or more fixed situations that are known for each individual. We present extended LST models for the combination of random and fixed situations (LST-RF approach) and show that the extensions allow (1) examining the extent to which traits are situation-specific and (2) isolating person × situation interactions from situation main effects. We demonstrate that the LST-RF approach can be applied with both homogenous and heterogeneous indicators in either the single- or multilevel structural equation modeling frameworks. Advantages and limitations of the new models as well as their relation to other approaches for studying person × situation interactions are discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>25528499</pmid><doi>10.1037/met0000026</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1082-989X |
ispartof | Psychological methods, 2015-06, Vol.20 (2), p.165-192 |
issn | 1082-989X 1939-1463 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680748269 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Environment Female Human Humans Item Response Theory Longitudinal Studies Male Models, Psychological Multilevel Analysis Personality Psychological Theory Research Design Social Interaction Structural Equation Modeling |
title | Analyzing Person, Situation and Person × Situation Interaction Effects: Latent State-Trait Models for the Combination of Random and Fixed Situations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A03%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing%20Person,%20Situation%20and%20Person%20%C3%97%20Situation%20Interaction%20Effects:%20Latent%20State-Trait%20Models%20for%20the%20Combination%20of%20Random%20and%20Fixed%20Situations&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20methods&rft.au=Geiser,%20Christian&rft.date=2015-06&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=165-192&rft.issn=1082-989X&rft.eissn=1939-1463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/met0000026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1640024033%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1640024033&rft_id=info:pmid/25528499&rfr_iscdi=true |