Factors affecting field weed and field margin flora on a farm in Essex, UK

Field margins, particularly hedgerows, are important refuges for many species in intensively managed arable landscapes. Their management is influenced by the perception that weed species colonise adjacent crops. Mobile species, such as beetles, are able to use field margins as corridors to recolonis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Landscape and urban planning 1995-02, Vol.31 (1-3), p.205-216
Hauptverfasser: Marshall, E.J.P., Arnold, G.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 216
container_issue 1-3
container_start_page 205
container_title Landscape and urban planning
container_volume 31
creator Marshall, E.J.P.
Arnold, G.M.
description Field margins, particularly hedgerows, are important refuges for many species in intensively managed arable landscapes. Their management is influenced by the perception that weed species colonise adjacent crops. Mobile species, such as beetles, are able to use field margins as corridors to recolonise suitable habitat. This study examines whether field margins influence adjacent weed flora, and if there is evidence of the corridor effect of adjacent woodland in margin plant communities. The higher plants present in 51 field margin sites on a large farm in Essex, UK, were recorded. The weed flora in the adjacent arable crops was also assessed in 41 of the sites at 5 and 50 m into the field. Field margin floras were much more diverse than the weed flora, though 25% of species in the margins were also found in the adjacent crops. Most species of the margin were perennials, while arable weeds were dominated by annual species. There was little correlation between field margin and crop flora. The margin flora was correlated with margin structure, which ranged from woodland edge, to shelterbelt, to tall and short hedgerows. Principal component analysis of species indicated woodland sites and those close to woodland were differentiated from hedgerows. Site scores were positively correlated with distance from woodland, possibly indicating site history or colonisation along hedges were important in determining plant communities of field margins.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0169-2046(94)01047-C
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16807324</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>016920469401047C</els_id><sourcerecordid>16807324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-adcde12f4c540f1a765bdab8b8a474aa5b669b4a4f0b028bd50582e22e0336d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAMgCMEEmPwDzjkgBBIFJI0TdsLEqo2XpO4sHPkJs4U1LWQdDz-PR2bduRgWbY-2_JHyCln15xxdTNEmQgm1UUpLxlnMk-qPTLiRS4SxZTYJ6MdckiOYnxjjPFM8RF5moLpuxApOIem9-2COo-NpV-IlkJrt-USwsK31DVdANq1FKiDsKRDaxIjfl_R-fMxOXDQRDzZ5jGZTyev1UMye7l_rO5miUmV7BOwxiIXTppMMschV1ltoS7qAmQuAbJaqbKWIB2rmShqm7GsECgEsjRVtkzH5Hyz9z10HyuMvV76aLBpoMVuFTVXBctTIQdQbkATuhgDOv0e_PDIj-ZMr8XptRW9tqJLqf_E6WoYO9vuh2igcQFa4-NuNpWZKmUxYLcbDIdfPz0GHY3H1qD1YTCpbef_v_MLDiKAGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16807324</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors affecting field weed and field margin flora on a farm in Essex, UK</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Marshall, E.J.P. ; Arnold, G.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marshall, E.J.P. ; Arnold, G.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Field margins, particularly hedgerows, are important refuges for many species in intensively managed arable landscapes. Their management is influenced by the perception that weed species colonise adjacent crops. Mobile species, such as beetles, are able to use field margins as corridors to recolonise suitable habitat. This study examines whether field margins influence adjacent weed flora, and if there is evidence of the corridor effect of adjacent woodland in margin plant communities. The higher plants present in 51 field margin sites on a large farm in Essex, UK, were recorded. The weed flora in the adjacent arable crops was also assessed in 41 of the sites at 5 and 50 m into the field. Field margin floras were much more diverse than the weed flora, though 25% of species in the margins were also found in the adjacent crops. Most species of the margin were perennials, while arable weeds were dominated by annual species. There was little correlation between field margin and crop flora. The margin flora was correlated with margin structure, which ranged from woodland edge, to shelterbelt, to tall and short hedgerows. Principal component analysis of species indicated woodland sites and those close to woodland were differentiated from hedgerows. Site scores were positively correlated with distance from woodland, possibly indicating site history or colonisation along hedges were important in determining plant communities of field margins.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-2046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0169-2046(94)01047-C</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LUPLEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Corridors ; Field margins ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities, botany, ecology, damages, economic importance ; Hedges ; Parasitic plants. Weeds ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Plant community ; Plant distribution ; Weed flora ; Weeds ; Woodland</subject><ispartof>Landscape and urban planning, 1995-02, Vol.31 (1-3), p.205-216</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-adcde12f4c540f1a765bdab8b8a474aa5b669b4a4f0b028bd50582e22e0336d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-adcde12f4c540f1a765bdab8b8a474aa5b669b4a4f0b028bd50582e22e0336d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)01047-C$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,3537,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3456948$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marshall, E.J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, G.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Factors affecting field weed and field margin flora on a farm in Essex, UK</title><title>Landscape and urban planning</title><description>Field margins, particularly hedgerows, are important refuges for many species in intensively managed arable landscapes. Their management is influenced by the perception that weed species colonise adjacent crops. Mobile species, such as beetles, are able to use field margins as corridors to recolonise suitable habitat. This study examines whether field margins influence adjacent weed flora, and if there is evidence of the corridor effect of adjacent woodland in margin plant communities. The higher plants present in 51 field margin sites on a large farm in Essex, UK, were recorded. The weed flora in the adjacent arable crops was also assessed in 41 of the sites at 5 and 50 m into the field. Field margin floras were much more diverse than the weed flora, though 25% of species in the margins were also found in the adjacent crops. Most species of the margin were perennials, while arable weeds were dominated by annual species. There was little correlation between field margin and crop flora. The margin flora was correlated with margin structure, which ranged from woodland edge, to shelterbelt, to tall and short hedgerows. Principal component analysis of species indicated woodland sites and those close to woodland were differentiated from hedgerows. Site scores were positively correlated with distance from woodland, possibly indicating site history or colonisation along hedges were important in determining plant communities of field margins.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Corridors</subject><subject>Field margins</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities, botany, ecology, damages, economic importance</subject><subject>Hedges</subject><subject>Parasitic plants. Weeds</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Plant community</subject><subject>Plant distribution</subject><subject>Weed flora</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><subject>Woodland</subject><issn>0169-2046</issn><issn>1872-6062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAMgCMEEmPwDzjkgBBIFJI0TdsLEqo2XpO4sHPkJs4U1LWQdDz-PR2bduRgWbY-2_JHyCln15xxdTNEmQgm1UUpLxlnMk-qPTLiRS4SxZTYJ6MdckiOYnxjjPFM8RF5moLpuxApOIem9-2COo-NpV-IlkJrt-USwsK31DVdANq1FKiDsKRDaxIjfl_R-fMxOXDQRDzZ5jGZTyev1UMye7l_rO5miUmV7BOwxiIXTppMMschV1ltoS7qAmQuAbJaqbKWIB2rmShqm7GsECgEsjRVtkzH5Hyz9z10HyuMvV76aLBpoMVuFTVXBctTIQdQbkATuhgDOv0e_PDIj-ZMr8XptRW9tqJLqf_E6WoYO9vuh2igcQFa4-NuNpWZKmUxYLcbDIdfPz0GHY3H1qD1YTCpbef_v_MLDiKAGg</recordid><startdate>19950201</startdate><enddate>19950201</enddate><creator>Marshall, E.J.P.</creator><creator>Arnold, G.M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950201</creationdate><title>Factors affecting field weed and field margin flora on a farm in Essex, UK</title><author>Marshall, E.J.P. ; Arnold, G.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-adcde12f4c540f1a765bdab8b8a474aa5b669b4a4f0b028bd50582e22e0336d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Corridors</topic><topic>Field margins</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities, botany, ecology, damages, economic importance</topic><topic>Hedges</topic><topic>Parasitic plants. Weeds</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Plant community</topic><topic>Plant distribution</topic><topic>Weed flora</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><topic>Woodland</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marshall, E.J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, G.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Landscape and urban planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marshall, E.J.P.</au><au>Arnold, G.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors affecting field weed and field margin flora on a farm in Essex, UK</atitle><jtitle>Landscape and urban planning</jtitle><date>1995-02-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>205</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>205-216</pages><issn>0169-2046</issn><eissn>1872-6062</eissn><coden>LUPLEZ</coden><abstract>Field margins, particularly hedgerows, are important refuges for many species in intensively managed arable landscapes. Their management is influenced by the perception that weed species colonise adjacent crops. Mobile species, such as beetles, are able to use field margins as corridors to recolonise suitable habitat. This study examines whether field margins influence adjacent weed flora, and if there is evidence of the corridor effect of adjacent woodland in margin plant communities. The higher plants present in 51 field margin sites on a large farm in Essex, UK, were recorded. The weed flora in the adjacent arable crops was also assessed in 41 of the sites at 5 and 50 m into the field. Field margin floras were much more diverse than the weed flora, though 25% of species in the margins were also found in the adjacent crops. Most species of the margin were perennials, while arable weeds were dominated by annual species. There was little correlation between field margin and crop flora. The margin flora was correlated with margin structure, which ranged from woodland edge, to shelterbelt, to tall and short hedgerows. Principal component analysis of species indicated woodland sites and those close to woodland were differentiated from hedgerows. Site scores were positively correlated with distance from woodland, possibly indicating site history or colonisation along hedges were important in determining plant communities of field margins.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0169-2046(94)01047-C</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-2046
ispartof Landscape and urban planning, 1995-02, Vol.31 (1-3), p.205-216
issn 0169-2046
1872-6062
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16807324
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Corridors
Field margins
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Generalities, botany, ecology, damages, economic importance
Hedges
Parasitic plants. Weeds
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
Plant community
Plant distribution
Weed flora
Weeds
Woodland
title Factors affecting field weed and field margin flora on a farm in Essex, UK
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T05%3A37%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20affecting%20field%20weed%20and%20field%20margin%20flora%20on%20a%20farm%20in%20Essex,%20UK&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20and%20urban%20planning&rft.au=Marshall,%20E.J.P.&rft.date=1995-02-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=205&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=205-216&rft.issn=0169-2046&rft.eissn=1872-6062&rft.coden=LUPLEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0169-2046(94)01047-C&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16807324%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16807324&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=016920469401047C&rfr_iscdi=true