State of the art of 2D DIGE

Difference gel electrophoresis enables the accurate quantification of changes in the proteome including combinations of PTMs and protein isoform expression. Here, we review recent advances in study design, image acquisition, and statistical analysis. We also compare DIGE to established and emerging...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proteomics. Clinical applications 2015-04, Vol.9 (3-4), p.277-288
Hauptverfasser: Arentz, Georgia, Weiland, Florian, Oehler, Martin K., Hoffmann, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 288
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 277
container_title Proteomics. Clinical applications
container_volume 9
creator Arentz, Georgia
Weiland, Florian
Oehler, Martin K.
Hoffmann, Peter
description Difference gel electrophoresis enables the accurate quantification of changes in the proteome including combinations of PTMs and protein isoform expression. Here, we review recent advances in study design, image acquisition, and statistical analysis. We also compare DIGE to established and emerging mass spectrometric analysis technologies. Despite these recent advances in MS and the still unsolved limitations of 2DE to map hydrophobic, high molecular weight proteins with extreme pIs, DIGE remains the most comprehensive top‐down method to study changes in abundance of intact proteins.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/prca.201400119
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680462548</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1680462548</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5055-f5b89148979da4a7342d35456fb2327f19ffdbbc99fb8047630cc26ffd68e0553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1PwjAYhxujEUSvXkwMiRcvw7br5xEBkUjQ-Hlsuq2NIDBstyj_vZ3gDl701DfN8_v17QPAMYIdBCG-WLlUdzBEBEKE5A5oIsFwJGJKduuZsAY48H4GISWYw33QwLTiY9EEJw-FLkw7t-3i1bS1K6oR99v90XBwCPasnntztD1b4Olq8Ni7jsa3w1GvO45SCimNLE2ERERILjNNNI8JzsL7lNkEx5hbJK3NkiSV0iYCEs5imKaYhUsmTCiIW-B807ty-XtpfKEWU5-a-VwvTV56hViIsbCz-AfKiaRhEx7Qs1_oLC_dMnzkm0IUE4ED1dlQqcu9d8aqlZsutFsrBFVlWFWGVW04BE63tWWyMFmN_ygNANkAH9O5Wf9Rp-7ue11EZSUh2sSmvjCfdUy7N8V4zKl6mQzVpH_Jnye9G0XjL0wjkEU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674152482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>State of the art of 2D DIGE</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Arentz, Georgia ; Weiland, Florian ; Oehler, Martin K. ; Hoffmann, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Arentz, Georgia ; Weiland, Florian ; Oehler, Martin K. ; Hoffmann, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Difference gel electrophoresis enables the accurate quantification of changes in the proteome including combinations of PTMs and protein isoform expression. Here, we review recent advances in study design, image acquisition, and statistical analysis. We also compare DIGE to established and emerging mass spectrometric analysis technologies. Despite these recent advances in MS and the still unsolved limitations of 2DE to map hydrophobic, high molecular weight proteins with extreme pIs, DIGE remains the most comprehensive top‐down method to study changes in abundance of intact proteins.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1862-8346</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1862-8354</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/prca.201400119</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25400138</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>2DE ; DIGE ; Gel electrophoresis ; Mass Spectrometry ; Proteomics - methods ; Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis - methods</subject><ispartof>Proteomics. Clinical applications, 2015-04, Vol.9 (3-4), p.277-288</ispartof><rights>2014 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim.</rights><rights>2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5055-f5b89148979da4a7342d35456fb2327f19ffdbbc99fb8047630cc26ffd68e0553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5055-f5b89148979da4a7342d35456fb2327f19ffdbbc99fb8047630cc26ffd68e0553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fprca.201400119$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fprca.201400119$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25400138$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arentz, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiland, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oehler, Martin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>State of the art of 2D DIGE</title><title>Proteomics. Clinical applications</title><addtitle>Prot. Clin. Appl</addtitle><description>Difference gel electrophoresis enables the accurate quantification of changes in the proteome including combinations of PTMs and protein isoform expression. Here, we review recent advances in study design, image acquisition, and statistical analysis. We also compare DIGE to established and emerging mass spectrometric analysis technologies. Despite these recent advances in MS and the still unsolved limitations of 2DE to map hydrophobic, high molecular weight proteins with extreme pIs, DIGE remains the most comprehensive top‐down method to study changes in abundance of intact proteins.</description><subject>2DE</subject><subject>DIGE</subject><subject>Gel electrophoresis</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Proteomics - methods</subject><subject>Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis - methods</subject><issn>1862-8346</issn><issn>1862-8354</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1PwjAYhxujEUSvXkwMiRcvw7br5xEBkUjQ-Hlsuq2NIDBstyj_vZ3gDl701DfN8_v17QPAMYIdBCG-WLlUdzBEBEKE5A5oIsFwJGJKduuZsAY48H4GISWYw33QwLTiY9EEJw-FLkw7t-3i1bS1K6oR99v90XBwCPasnntztD1b4Olq8Ni7jsa3w1GvO45SCimNLE2ERERILjNNNI8JzsL7lNkEx5hbJK3NkiSV0iYCEs5imKaYhUsmTCiIW-B807ty-XtpfKEWU5-a-VwvTV56hViIsbCz-AfKiaRhEx7Qs1_oLC_dMnzkm0IUE4ED1dlQqcu9d8aqlZsutFsrBFVlWFWGVW04BE63tWWyMFmN_ygNANkAH9O5Wf9Rp-7ue11EZSUh2sSmvjCfdUy7N8V4zKl6mQzVpH_Jnye9G0XjL0wjkEU</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Arentz, Georgia</creator><creator>Weiland, Florian</creator><creator>Oehler, Martin K.</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Peter</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>State of the art of 2D DIGE</title><author>Arentz, Georgia ; Weiland, Florian ; Oehler, Martin K. ; Hoffmann, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5055-f5b89148979da4a7342d35456fb2327f19ffdbbc99fb8047630cc26ffd68e0553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>2DE</topic><topic>DIGE</topic><topic>Gel electrophoresis</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Proteomics - methods</topic><topic>Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arentz, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiland, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oehler, Martin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Proteomics. Clinical applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arentz, Georgia</au><au>Weiland, Florian</au><au>Oehler, Martin K.</au><au>Hoffmann, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>State of the art of 2D DIGE</atitle><jtitle>Proteomics. Clinical applications</jtitle><addtitle>Prot. Clin. Appl</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>277</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>277-288</pages><issn>1862-8346</issn><eissn>1862-8354</eissn><abstract>Difference gel electrophoresis enables the accurate quantification of changes in the proteome including combinations of PTMs and protein isoform expression. Here, we review recent advances in study design, image acquisition, and statistical analysis. We also compare DIGE to established and emerging mass spectrometric analysis technologies. Despite these recent advances in MS and the still unsolved limitations of 2DE to map hydrophobic, high molecular weight proteins with extreme pIs, DIGE remains the most comprehensive top‐down method to study changes in abundance of intact proteins.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25400138</pmid><doi>10.1002/prca.201400119</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1862-8346
ispartof Proteomics. Clinical applications, 2015-04, Vol.9 (3-4), p.277-288
issn 1862-8346
1862-8354
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680462548
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects 2DE
DIGE
Gel electrophoresis
Mass Spectrometry
Proteomics - methods
Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis - methods
title State of the art of 2D DIGE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A20%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State%20of%20the%20art%20of%202D%20DIGE&rft.jtitle=Proteomics.%20Clinical%20applications&rft.au=Arentz,%20Georgia&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=277&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=277-288&rft.issn=1862-8346&rft.eissn=1862-8354&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/prca.201400119&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1680462548%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674152482&rft_id=info:pmid/25400138&rfr_iscdi=true