ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FORCING–FEEDBACK FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE

The traditional forcing–feedback framework has provided an indispensable basis for discussing global climate changes. However, as analysis of model behavior has become more detailed, shortcomings and ambiguities in the framework have become more evident, and physical effects unaccounted for by the t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 2015-02, Vol.96 (2), p.217-228
Hauptverfasser: Sherwood, Steven C., Bony, Sandrine, Boucher, Olivier, Bretherton, Chris, Forster, Piers M., Gregory, Jonathan M., Stevens, Bjorn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 228
container_issue 2
container_start_page 217
container_title Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
container_volume 96
creator Sherwood, Steven C.
Bony, Sandrine
Boucher, Olivier
Bretherton, Chris
Forster, Piers M.
Gregory, Jonathan M.
Stevens, Bjorn
description The traditional forcing–feedback framework has provided an indispensable basis for discussing global climate changes. However, as analysis of model behavior has become more detailed, shortcomings and ambiguities in the framework have become more evident, and physical effects unaccounted for by the traditional framework have become interesting. In particular, the new concept of adjustments, which are responses to forcings that are not mediated by the global-mean temperature, has emerged. This concept, related to the older ones of climate efficacy and stratospheric adjustment, is a more physical way of capturing unique responses to specific forcings. We present a pedagogical review of the adjustment concept, why it is important, and how it can be used. The concept is particularly useful for aerosols, where it helps to organize what has become a complex array of forcing mechanisms. It also helps clarify issues around cloud and hydrological response, transient versus equilibrium climate change, and geoengineering.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/bams-d-13-00167.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680461158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A413780058</galeid><jstor_id>26219475</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A413780058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-bd058e301417b93df104c0cb17ba6218a448b36514211a549a5698d94882dd5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptksGuk0AUhidGE2v1AVyYkLjRBXUOzDDDkgu0xdtSAzQuJwMMDQ2Fexma6M538A19EuHWaGqaWcz8c77_z8nJQegt4AUAo59yedJmaYJtYgwOW8AzNANqYRMTxp6jGcZ4KmH2Er3S-jhJm8MMffGCz_s024ZxlhpRbGTr0FjuEj-KV79-_FyGYXDn-ffGMvG24dddcj8VjX0chEmaeXEwYoa_ibZeFhr-2otX4Wv0opKNVm_-3HO0X4aZvzY3u1XkexuzoMwZzLzElCsbAwGWu3ZZASYFLvJRSccCLgnhue1QIBaApMSV1HF56RLOrbKk0p6jD5fch757PCs9iFOtC9U0slXdWQtwOCYOAOUj-v4_9Nid-3bsbqQY5Q5YFvtHHWSjRN1W3dDLYgoVHgGbcYyfsswb1EG1qpdN16qqHr-v-MUNfjylOtXFTcPHK8PIDOrbcJBnrUWUJtcsXNii77TuVSUe-vok--8CsJjWQtx521QEAmzxtBbjY47eXTxHPXT9X4M1Dt0ljNq_Aeg_qU4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1675861227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FORCING–FEEDBACK FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Sherwood, Steven C. ; Bony, Sandrine ; Boucher, Olivier ; Bretherton, Chris ; Forster, Piers M. ; Gregory, Jonathan M. ; Stevens, Bjorn</creator><creatorcontrib>Sherwood, Steven C. ; Bony, Sandrine ; Boucher, Olivier ; Bretherton, Chris ; Forster, Piers M. ; Gregory, Jonathan M. ; Stevens, Bjorn</creatorcontrib><description>The traditional forcing–feedback framework has provided an indispensable basis for discussing global climate changes. However, as analysis of model behavior has become more detailed, shortcomings and ambiguities in the framework have become more evident, and physical effects unaccounted for by the traditional framework have become interesting. In particular, the new concept of adjustments, which are responses to forcings that are not mediated by the global-mean temperature, has emerged. This concept, related to the older ones of climate efficacy and stratospheric adjustment, is a more physical way of capturing unique responses to specific forcings. We present a pedagogical review of the adjustment concept, why it is important, and how it can be used. The concept is particularly useful for aerosols, where it helps to organize what has become a complex array of forcing mechanisms. It also helps clarify issues around cloud and hydrological response, transient versus equilibrium climate change, and geoengineering.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0477</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/bams-d-13-00167.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BAMIAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Carbon dioxide ; Climate change ; Climate change adaptation ; Climate cycles ; Climate models ; Climatic changes ; Clouds ; Concepts ; Control theory ; Equilibrium ; Feedback ; Geoengineering ; Global climate models ; Meteorology ; Methods ; Precipitation ; Precipitation variability ; Radiative forcing ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2015-02, Vol.96 (2), p.217-228</ispartof><rights>American Meteorological Society</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 American Meteorological Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Feb 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-bd058e301417b93df104c0cb17ba6218a448b36514211a549a5698d94882dd5a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-bd058e301417b93df104c0cb17ba6218a448b36514211a549a5698d94882dd5a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26219475$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26219475$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3668,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sherwood, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bony, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucher, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bretherton, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forster, Piers M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Bjorn</creatorcontrib><title>ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FORCING–FEEDBACK FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE</title><title>Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society</title><description>The traditional forcing–feedback framework has provided an indispensable basis for discussing global climate changes. However, as analysis of model behavior has become more detailed, shortcomings and ambiguities in the framework have become more evident, and physical effects unaccounted for by the traditional framework have become interesting. In particular, the new concept of adjustments, which are responses to forcings that are not mediated by the global-mean temperature, has emerged. This concept, related to the older ones of climate efficacy and stratospheric adjustment, is a more physical way of capturing unique responses to specific forcings. We present a pedagogical review of the adjustment concept, why it is important, and how it can be used. The concept is particularly useful for aerosols, where it helps to organize what has become a complex array of forcing mechanisms. It also helps clarify issues around cloud and hydrological response, transient versus equilibrium climate change, and geoengineering.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change adaptation</subject><subject>Climate cycles</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climatic changes</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Concepts</subject><subject>Control theory</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Geoengineering</subject><subject>Global climate models</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Precipitation variability</subject><subject>Radiative forcing</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>0003-0007</issn><issn>1520-0477</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptksGuk0AUhidGE2v1AVyYkLjRBXUOzDDDkgu0xdtSAzQuJwMMDQ2Fexma6M538A19EuHWaGqaWcz8c77_z8nJQegt4AUAo59yedJmaYJtYgwOW8AzNANqYRMTxp6jGcZ4KmH2Er3S-jhJm8MMffGCz_s024ZxlhpRbGTr0FjuEj-KV79-_FyGYXDn-ffGMvG24dddcj8VjX0chEmaeXEwYoa_ibZeFhr-2otX4Wv0opKNVm_-3HO0X4aZvzY3u1XkexuzoMwZzLzElCsbAwGWu3ZZASYFLvJRSccCLgnhue1QIBaApMSV1HF56RLOrbKk0p6jD5fch757PCs9iFOtC9U0slXdWQtwOCYOAOUj-v4_9Nid-3bsbqQY5Q5YFvtHHWSjRN1W3dDLYgoVHgGbcYyfsswb1EG1qpdN16qqHr-v-MUNfjylOtXFTcPHK8PIDOrbcJBnrUWUJtcsXNii77TuVSUe-vok--8CsJjWQtx521QEAmzxtBbjY47eXTxHPXT9X4M1Dt0ljNq_Aeg_qU4</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Sherwood, Steven C.</creator><creator>Bony, Sandrine</creator><creator>Boucher, Olivier</creator><creator>Bretherton, Chris</creator><creator>Forster, Piers M.</creator><creator>Gregory, Jonathan M.</creator><creator>Stevens, Bjorn</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FORCING–FEEDBACK FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE</title><author>Sherwood, Steven C. ; Bony, Sandrine ; Boucher, Olivier ; Bretherton, Chris ; Forster, Piers M. ; Gregory, Jonathan M. ; Stevens, Bjorn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-bd058e301417b93df104c0cb17ba6218a448b36514211a549a5698d94882dd5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change adaptation</topic><topic>Climate cycles</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climatic changes</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Concepts</topic><topic>Control theory</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Geoengineering</topic><topic>Global climate models</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Precipitation variability</topic><topic>Radiative forcing</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sherwood, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bony, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucher, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bretherton, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forster, Piers M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Bjorn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sherwood, Steven C.</au><au>Bony, Sandrine</au><au>Boucher, Olivier</au><au>Bretherton, Chris</au><au>Forster, Piers M.</au><au>Gregory, Jonathan M.</au><au>Stevens, Bjorn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FORCING–FEEDBACK FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society</jtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>217</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>217-228</pages><issn>0003-0007</issn><eissn>1520-0477</eissn><coden>BAMIAT</coden><abstract>The traditional forcing–feedback framework has provided an indispensable basis for discussing global climate changes. However, as analysis of model behavior has become more detailed, shortcomings and ambiguities in the framework have become more evident, and physical effects unaccounted for by the traditional framework have become interesting. In particular, the new concept of adjustments, which are responses to forcings that are not mediated by the global-mean temperature, has emerged. This concept, related to the older ones of climate efficacy and stratospheric adjustment, is a more physical way of capturing unique responses to specific forcings. We present a pedagogical review of the adjustment concept, why it is important, and how it can be used. The concept is particularly useful for aerosols, where it helps to organize what has become a complex array of forcing mechanisms. It also helps clarify issues around cloud and hydrological response, transient versus equilibrium climate change, and geoengineering.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/bams-d-13-00167.1</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0007
ispartof Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2015-02, Vol.96 (2), p.217-228
issn 0003-0007
1520-0477
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680461158
source Jstor Complete Legacy; American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Aerosols
Carbon dioxide
Climate change
Climate change adaptation
Climate cycles
Climate models
Climatic changes
Clouds
Concepts
Control theory
Equilibrium
Feedback
Geoengineering
Global climate models
Meteorology
Methods
Precipitation
Precipitation variability
Radiative forcing
Weather forecasting
title ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FORCING–FEEDBACK FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T16%3A17%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ADJUSTMENTS%20IN%20THE%20FORCING%E2%80%93FEEDBACK%20FRAMEWORK%20FOR%20UNDERSTANDING%20CLIMATE%20CHANGE&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20the%20American%20Meteorological%20Society&rft.au=Sherwood,%20Steven%20C.&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=217-228&rft.issn=0003-0007&rft.eissn=1520-0477&rft.coden=BAMIAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/bams-d-13-00167.1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA413780058%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1675861227&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A413780058&rft_jstor_id=26219475&rfr_iscdi=true