The landscape of genetic variation in dilated cardiomyopathy as surveyed by clinical DNA sequencing

Purpose: Dilated cardiomyopathy is characterized by substantial locus, allelic, and clinical heterogeneity that necessitates testing of many genes across clinically overlapping diseases. Few studies have sequenced sufficient individuals; thus, the contributions of individual genes and the pathogenic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genetics in medicine 2014-08, Vol.16 (8), p.601-608
Hauptverfasser: Pugh, Trevor J., Kelly, Melissa A., Gowrisankar, Sivakumar, Hynes, Elizabeth, Seidman, Michael A., Baxter, Samantha M., Bowser, Mark, Harrison, Bryan, Aaron, Daniel, Mahanta, Lisa M., Lakdawala, Neal K., McDermott, Gregory, White, Emily T., Rehm, Heidi L., Lebo, Matthew, Funke, Birgit H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: Dilated cardiomyopathy is characterized by substantial locus, allelic, and clinical heterogeneity that necessitates testing of many genes across clinically overlapping diseases. Few studies have sequenced sufficient individuals; thus, the contributions of individual genes and the pathogenic variant spectrum are still poorly defined. We analyzed 766 dilated cardiomyopathy patients tested over 5 years in our molecular diagnostics laboratory. Methods: Patients were tested using gene panels of increasing size from 5 to 46 genes, including 121 cases tested with a multiple-cardiomyopathy next-generation panel covering 46 genes. All variants were reassessed using our current clinical-grade scoring system to eliminate false-positive disease associations that afflict many older analyses. Results: Up to 37% of dilated cardiomyopathy cases carry a clinically relevant variant in one of 20 genes, titin ( TTN ) being the largest contributor (up to 14%). Desmoplakin ( DSP ), an arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy gene, contributed 2.4%, illustrating the utility of multidisease testing. The clinical sensitivity increased from 10 to 37% as gene panel sizes increased. However, the number of inconclusive cases also increased from 4.6 to 51%. Conclusion: Our data illustrate the utility of broad gene panels for genetically and clinically heterogeneous diseases but also highlight challenges as molecular diagnostics moves toward genome-wide testing. Genet Med 16 8, 601–608.
ISSN:1098-3600
1530-0366
DOI:10.1038/gim.2013.204