Flexibility of collective decision making during house hunting in Temnothorax ants

Many social animals cooperatively process information during decision making, allowing them to concentrate on the best of several options. However, positive feedback created by information sharing can also lock the group into a suboptimal outcome if option quality changes over time. This creates a t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2015-05, Vol.69 (5), p.707-714
Hauptverfasser: Sasaki, Takao, Colling, Blake, Sonnenschein, Anne, Boggess, May M, Pratt, Stephen C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 714
container_issue 5
container_start_page 707
container_title Behavioral ecology and sociobiology
container_volume 69
creator Sasaki, Takao
Colling, Blake
Sonnenschein, Anne
Boggess, May M
Pratt, Stephen C.
description Many social animals cooperatively process information during decision making, allowing them to concentrate on the best of several options. However, positive feedback created by information sharing can also lock the group into a suboptimal outcome if option quality changes over time. This creates a trade-off between consensus and flexibility, whose resolution depends on the information-sharing mechanisms groups employ. We investigated the influence of communication behavior on decision flexibility in nest site choice y colonies of the ant Temnothorax rugatulus. These ants divide their emigration into two distinct phases separated by a quorum rule. In the first phase, scouts recruit nestmates to promising sites using the slow method of tandem running. Once a site's population surpasses a quorum, they switch to the faster method of social transport. We gave colonies a choice between two sites of different quality, and then switched site quality at different points during the emigration. Before the quorum was met, colonies were able to switch their choice to the newly superior site, but once they began to transport, their flexibility dropped significantly. Close observation of single ants revealed that transporters were more likely than tandem leaders to continue recruiting to a site even after its quality was diminished. That is, tandem leaders continued to monitor the quality of the site, while transporters instead fully committed to the site without further assessment. We discuss how this change in commitment with quorum attainment may enhance the rapid achievement of consensus needed for nest site selection, but at a cost in flexibility once the quorum is met.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00265-015-1882-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680448259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43599593</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43599593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-fb86a64c37d7fc618f5952bef059ac6379151522bd90f8b1b67b5a08dc15e79e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouH78AA9CwYuX6iRNmuQo4qogCKLnkKapm7Vt1qQV99-bUhHx4GkYeN6ZlwehEwwXGIBfRgBSshwwy7EQJKc7aIFpQXLgJdlFCygo5IzSYh8dxLgGgDJxC_S0bO2nq1zrhm3mm8z4trVmcB82q61x0fk-6_Sb61-zegzTWPkx2mw19sO0uT57tl3vh5UP-jPT_RCP0F6j22iPv-chelnePF_f5Q-Pt_fXVw-5YcCHvKlEqUtqCl7zxqQ2DZOMVLYBJrUpCy4xw4yQqpbQiApXJa-YBlEbzCyXtjhE5_PdTfDvo42D6lw0tm11b1NHhUsBlArCZELP_qBrP4Y-tUsUJ4JQKUWi8EyZ4GMMtlGb4DodtgqDmiyr2bJKltVkWdGUIXMmbiY7Nvy6_E_odA6t4-DDzxdaMClT2-ILCeiJGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1672824998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flexibility of collective decision making during house hunting in Temnothorax ants</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sasaki, Takao ; Colling, Blake ; Sonnenschein, Anne ; Boggess, May M ; Pratt, Stephen C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Takao ; Colling, Blake ; Sonnenschein, Anne ; Boggess, May M ; Pratt, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><description>Many social animals cooperatively process information during decision making, allowing them to concentrate on the best of several options. However, positive feedback created by information sharing can also lock the group into a suboptimal outcome if option quality changes over time. This creates a trade-off between consensus and flexibility, whose resolution depends on the information-sharing mechanisms groups employ. We investigated the influence of communication behavior on decision flexibility in nest site choice y colonies of the ant Temnothorax rugatulus. These ants divide their emigration into two distinct phases separated by a quorum rule. In the first phase, scouts recruit nestmates to promising sites using the slow method of tandem running. Once a site's population surpasses a quorum, they switch to the faster method of social transport. We gave colonies a choice between two sites of different quality, and then switched site quality at different points during the emigration. Before the quorum was met, colonies were able to switch their choice to the newly superior site, but once they began to transport, their flexibility dropped significantly. Close observation of single ants revealed that transporters were more likely than tandem leaders to continue recruiting to a site even after its quality was diminished. That is, tandem leaders continued to monitor the quality of the site, while transporters instead fully committed to the site without further assessment. We discuss how this change in commitment with quorum attainment may enhance the rapid achievement of consensus needed for nest site selection, but at a cost in flexibility once the quorum is met.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-015-1882-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Animal Ecology ; Animal populations ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Decision making ; Decision making models ; Emigration ; Formicidae ; Insects ; Life Sciences ; Original Paper ; Predation ; Site selection ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2015-05, Vol.69 (5), p.707-714</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-fb86a64c37d7fc618f5952bef059ac6379151522bd90f8b1b67b5a08dc15e79e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-fb86a64c37d7fc618f5952bef059ac6379151522bd90f8b1b67b5a08dc15e79e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43599593$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43599593$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Takao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colling, Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnenschein, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggess, May M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><title>Flexibility of collective decision making during house hunting in Temnothorax ants</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><addtitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</addtitle><description>Many social animals cooperatively process information during decision making, allowing them to concentrate on the best of several options. However, positive feedback created by information sharing can also lock the group into a suboptimal outcome if option quality changes over time. This creates a trade-off between consensus and flexibility, whose resolution depends on the information-sharing mechanisms groups employ. We investigated the influence of communication behavior on decision flexibility in nest site choice y colonies of the ant Temnothorax rugatulus. These ants divide their emigration into two distinct phases separated by a quorum rule. In the first phase, scouts recruit nestmates to promising sites using the slow method of tandem running. Once a site's population surpasses a quorum, they switch to the faster method of social transport. We gave colonies a choice between two sites of different quality, and then switched site quality at different points during the emigration. Before the quorum was met, colonies were able to switch their choice to the newly superior site, but once they began to transport, their flexibility dropped significantly. Close observation of single ants revealed that transporters were more likely than tandem leaders to continue recruiting to a site even after its quality was diminished. That is, tandem leaders continued to monitor the quality of the site, while transporters instead fully committed to the site without further assessment. We discuss how this change in commitment with quorum attainment may enhance the rapid achievement of consensus needed for nest site selection, but at a cost in flexibility once the quorum is met.</description><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision making models</subject><subject>Emigration</subject><subject>Formicidae</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Site selection</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouH78AA9CwYuX6iRNmuQo4qogCKLnkKapm7Vt1qQV99-bUhHx4GkYeN6ZlwehEwwXGIBfRgBSshwwy7EQJKc7aIFpQXLgJdlFCygo5IzSYh8dxLgGgDJxC_S0bO2nq1zrhm3mm8z4trVmcB82q61x0fk-6_Sb61-zegzTWPkx2mw19sO0uT57tl3vh5UP-jPT_RCP0F6j22iPv-chelnePF_f5Q-Pt_fXVw-5YcCHvKlEqUtqCl7zxqQ2DZOMVLYBJrUpCy4xw4yQqpbQiApXJa-YBlEbzCyXtjhE5_PdTfDvo42D6lw0tm11b1NHhUsBlArCZELP_qBrP4Y-tUsUJ4JQKUWi8EyZ4GMMtlGb4DodtgqDmiyr2bJKltVkWdGUIXMmbiY7Nvy6_E_odA6t4-DDzxdaMClT2-ILCeiJGw</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Sasaki, Takao</creator><creator>Colling, Blake</creator><creator>Sonnenschein, Anne</creator><creator>Boggess, May M</creator><creator>Pratt, Stephen C.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Flexibility of collective decision making during house hunting in Temnothorax ants</title><author>Sasaki, Takao ; Colling, Blake ; Sonnenschein, Anne ; Boggess, May M ; Pratt, Stephen C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-fb86a64c37d7fc618f5952bef059ac6379151522bd90f8b1b67b5a08dc15e79e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision making models</topic><topic>Emigration</topic><topic>Formicidae</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Site selection</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Takao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colling, Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnenschein, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggess, May M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sasaki, Takao</au><au>Colling, Blake</au><au>Sonnenschein, Anne</au><au>Boggess, May M</au><au>Pratt, Stephen C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flexibility of collective decision making during house hunting in Temnothorax ants</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><stitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</stitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>707</spage><epage>714</epage><pages>707-714</pages><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><abstract>Many social animals cooperatively process information during decision making, allowing them to concentrate on the best of several options. However, positive feedback created by information sharing can also lock the group into a suboptimal outcome if option quality changes over time. This creates a trade-off between consensus and flexibility, whose resolution depends on the information-sharing mechanisms groups employ. We investigated the influence of communication behavior on decision flexibility in nest site choice y colonies of the ant Temnothorax rugatulus. These ants divide their emigration into two distinct phases separated by a quorum rule. In the first phase, scouts recruit nestmates to promising sites using the slow method of tandem running. Once a site's population surpasses a quorum, they switch to the faster method of social transport. We gave colonies a choice between two sites of different quality, and then switched site quality at different points during the emigration. Before the quorum was met, colonies were able to switch their choice to the newly superior site, but once they began to transport, their flexibility dropped significantly. Close observation of single ants revealed that transporters were more likely than tandem leaders to continue recruiting to a site even after its quality was diminished. That is, tandem leaders continued to monitor the quality of the site, while transporters instead fully committed to the site without further assessment. We discuss how this change in commitment with quorum attainment may enhance the rapid achievement of consensus needed for nest site selection, but at a cost in flexibility once the quorum is met.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-015-1882-4</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-5443
ispartof Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2015-05, Vol.69 (5), p.707-714
issn 0340-5443
1432-0762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680448259
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Animal Ecology
Animal populations
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Decision making
Decision making models
Emigration
Formicidae
Insects
Life Sciences
Original Paper
Predation
Site selection
Zoology
title Flexibility of collective decision making during house hunting in Temnothorax ants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T08%3A06%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flexibility%20of%20collective%20decision%20making%20during%20house%20hunting%20in%20Temnothorax%20ants&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Sasaki,%20Takao&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=707&rft.epage=714&rft.pages=707-714&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-015-1882-4&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43599593%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1672824998&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43599593&rfr_iscdi=true