Diet of the Recovering Ohio Bobcat (Lynx rufus) with a Consideration of Two Subpopulations
Bobcats (Lynx rufus) are a native carnivore of Ohio, but by 1850 were extirpated or nearly so following pioneer settlement of the state. The first modern record of a bobcat in Ohio was an adult male killed in 1946. Distribution accounts indicate that population re- establishment began around 2000. T...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American midland naturalist 2015-04, Vol.173 (2), p.305-317 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 317 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 305 |
container_title | The American midland naturalist |
container_volume | 173 |
creator | Rose, Christa Prange, Suzanne |
description | Bobcats (Lynx rufus) are a native carnivore of Ohio, but by 1850 were extirpated or nearly so following pioneer settlement of the state. The first modern record of a bobcat in Ohio was an adult male killed in 1946. Distribution accounts indicate that population re- establishment began around 2000. Today the bobcat is protected, and verified sightings, camera surveys, and genetic analyses point to two subpopulations: a fast growing, self-sustaining eastern subpopulation, and a more slowly growing southern subpopulation. We evaluated stomach contents of 120 adult and subadult bobcat carcasses to help understand the disparity in subpopulation growth rates, and inform proper bobcat management. We identified prey species morphologically. We quantified prey species taken and converted their frequencies to caloric intake estimates. We calculated dry weight estimates of prey groups and compared them between bobcat age classes, sexes, regions, and across seasons. We examined regional diet differences further by calculating diet and condition indices. Eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) occurred most often. White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) supplied the greatest caloric value. Small rodents and insectivores were the most common prey group. Adults consumed more, as defined by weight, meso-mammals and large rodents than subadults. Diet composition did not differ between sexes. Weight of large mammal intake differed significantly between winter and summer, being greater in winter. Diet composition and prey group weights did not differ regionally. Dietary niche breadth of the southern subpopulation indicated more even consumption of prey groups than the eastern, whereas food niche overlap between regions was high. The condition index of eastern and southern bobcats also did not differ. We present the first rigorous analysis of bobcat diet in Ohio, and infer that diet is not a likely driver of disparate subpopulation growth rates of this recovering species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1674/amid-173-02-305-317.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680442945</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A413481626</galeid><jstor_id>43822858</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A413481626</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b543t-ba1d4ca462445d103b5fdeb6f101323c23ed1950c1558d43ea6da6ef4911e4da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkktv1DAUhSMEEkPhJ1RYYtMuMvj6kTjLMrwqjVSp027YWE7sZDzKxIPt0Pbf4xAEGjQL5IXle79z7GudLDsHvISiZO_V3uocSppjklPMcwrlEp5lC6ioyBmh4nm2wBinPqbwMnsVwi4dK1axRfbtozURuRbFrUG3pnE_jLdDh2621qEPrm5URBfrp-ER-bEdwyV6sHGLFFq5IVhtvIrWDZP-7sGhzVgf3GHsfxXD6-xFq_pg3vzez7L7z5_uVl_z9c2X69XVOq85ozGvFWjWKFYQxrgGTGvealMXLWCghDaEGg0Vxw1wLjSjRhVaFaZlFYBhWtGz7GL2PXj3fTQhyr0Njel7NRg3BgmFwIyRivGEvvsH3bnRD-l1iSorjAUW5V-qU72Rdmhd9KqZTOUVA8oEFKRIVH6C6syQPqV3g2ltKh_xyxN8WtrsbXNScHkkSEw0j7FTYwjyenN7zPKZbbwLwZtWHrzdK_8kAU-jMTmFRKaQSExkColMIZGQdOezbhei839EjApCBBep_3but8pJ1Xkb5P2GYChSgEhF-ORAZ6K2Lg3xn_f-BM9Lz3k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1679008087</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diet of the Recovering Ohio Bobcat (Lynx rufus) with a Consideration of Two Subpopulations</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Rose, Christa ; Prange, Suzanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Rose, Christa ; Prange, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><description>Bobcats (Lynx rufus) are a native carnivore of Ohio, but by 1850 were extirpated or nearly so following pioneer settlement of the state. The first modern record of a bobcat in Ohio was an adult male killed in 1946. Distribution accounts indicate that population re- establishment began around 2000. Today the bobcat is protected, and verified sightings, camera surveys, and genetic analyses point to two subpopulations: a fast growing, self-sustaining eastern subpopulation, and a more slowly growing southern subpopulation. We evaluated stomach contents of 120 adult and subadult bobcat carcasses to help understand the disparity in subpopulation growth rates, and inform proper bobcat management. We identified prey species morphologically. We quantified prey species taken and converted their frequencies to caloric intake estimates. We calculated dry weight estimates of prey groups and compared them between bobcat age classes, sexes, regions, and across seasons. We examined regional diet differences further by calculating diet and condition indices. Eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) occurred most often. White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) supplied the greatest caloric value. Small rodents and insectivores were the most common prey group. Adults consumed more, as defined by weight, meso-mammals and large rodents than subadults. Diet composition did not differ between sexes. Weight of large mammal intake differed significantly between winter and summer, being greater in winter. Diet composition and prey group weights did not differ regionally. Dietary niche breadth of the southern subpopulation indicated more even consumption of prey groups than the eastern, whereas food niche overlap between regions was high. The condition index of eastern and southern bobcats also did not differ. We present the first rigorous analysis of bobcat diet in Ohio, and infer that diet is not a likely driver of disparate subpopulation growth rates of this recovering species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-4238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1674/amid-173-02-305-317.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNAAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The University of Notre Dame, P.O. Box 369, Notre Dame, IN 46556-0369: American Midland Naturalist</publisher><subject>adults ; age structure ; Animal behavior ; Bobcat ; Deer ; diet ; Distribution ; Ecological research ; Endangered & extinct species ; energy intake ; Food and nutrition ; genetic techniques and protocols ; insectivores ; Lynx rufus ; males ; Odocoileus virginianus ; rodents ; stomach ; Studies ; summer ; surveys ; Sylvilagus floridanus ; Wildcats ; winter</subject><ispartof>The American midland naturalist, 2015-04, Vol.173 (2), p.305-317</ispartof><rights>2015, American Midland Naturalist</rights><rights>2015, The American Midland Naturalist</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 University of Notre Dame, Department of Biological Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright American Midland Naturalist Apr 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b543t-ba1d4ca462445d103b5fdeb6f101323c23ed1950c1558d43ea6da6ef4911e4da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b543t-ba1d4ca462445d103b5fdeb6f101323c23ed1950c1558d43ea6da6ef4911e4da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43822858$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43822858$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rose, Christa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prange, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><title>Diet of the Recovering Ohio Bobcat (Lynx rufus) with a Consideration of Two Subpopulations</title><title>The American midland naturalist</title><description>Bobcats (Lynx rufus) are a native carnivore of Ohio, but by 1850 were extirpated or nearly so following pioneer settlement of the state. The first modern record of a bobcat in Ohio was an adult male killed in 1946. Distribution accounts indicate that population re- establishment began around 2000. Today the bobcat is protected, and verified sightings, camera surveys, and genetic analyses point to two subpopulations: a fast growing, self-sustaining eastern subpopulation, and a more slowly growing southern subpopulation. We evaluated stomach contents of 120 adult and subadult bobcat carcasses to help understand the disparity in subpopulation growth rates, and inform proper bobcat management. We identified prey species morphologically. We quantified prey species taken and converted their frequencies to caloric intake estimates. We calculated dry weight estimates of prey groups and compared them between bobcat age classes, sexes, regions, and across seasons. We examined regional diet differences further by calculating diet and condition indices. Eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) occurred most often. White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) supplied the greatest caloric value. Small rodents and insectivores were the most common prey group. Adults consumed more, as defined by weight, meso-mammals and large rodents than subadults. Diet composition did not differ between sexes. Weight of large mammal intake differed significantly between winter and summer, being greater in winter. Diet composition and prey group weights did not differ regionally. Dietary niche breadth of the southern subpopulation indicated more even consumption of prey groups than the eastern, whereas food niche overlap between regions was high. The condition index of eastern and southern bobcats also did not differ. We present the first rigorous analysis of bobcat diet in Ohio, and infer that diet is not a likely driver of disparate subpopulation growth rates of this recovering species.</description><subject>adults</subject><subject>age structure</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Bobcat</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>diet</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Ecological research</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>energy intake</subject><subject>Food and nutrition</subject><subject>genetic techniques and protocols</subject><subject>insectivores</subject><subject>Lynx rufus</subject><subject>males</subject><subject>Odocoileus virginianus</subject><subject>rodents</subject><subject>stomach</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>Sylvilagus floridanus</subject><subject>Wildcats</subject><subject>winter</subject><issn>0003-0031</issn><issn>1938-4238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkktv1DAUhSMEEkPhJ1RYYtMuMvj6kTjLMrwqjVSp027YWE7sZDzKxIPt0Pbf4xAEGjQL5IXle79z7GudLDsHvISiZO_V3uocSppjklPMcwrlEp5lC6ioyBmh4nm2wBinPqbwMnsVwi4dK1axRfbtozURuRbFrUG3pnE_jLdDh2621qEPrm5URBfrp-ER-bEdwyV6sHGLFFq5IVhtvIrWDZP-7sGhzVgf3GHsfxXD6-xFq_pg3vzez7L7z5_uVl_z9c2X69XVOq85ozGvFWjWKFYQxrgGTGvealMXLWCghDaEGg0Vxw1wLjSjRhVaFaZlFYBhWtGz7GL2PXj3fTQhyr0Njel7NRg3BgmFwIyRivGEvvsH3bnRD-l1iSorjAUW5V-qU72Rdmhd9KqZTOUVA8oEFKRIVH6C6syQPqV3g2ltKh_xyxN8WtrsbXNScHkkSEw0j7FTYwjyenN7zPKZbbwLwZtWHrzdK_8kAU-jMTmFRKaQSExkColMIZGQdOezbhei839EjApCBBep_3but8pJ1Xkb5P2GYChSgEhF-ORAZ6K2Lg3xn_f-BM9Lz3k</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Rose, Christa</creator><creator>Prange, Suzanne</creator><general>American Midland Naturalist</general><general>University of Notre Dame</general><general>University of Notre Dame, Department of Biological Sciences</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>Diet of the Recovering Ohio Bobcat (Lynx rufus) with a Consideration of Two Subpopulations</title><author>Rose, Christa ; Prange, Suzanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b543t-ba1d4ca462445d103b5fdeb6f101323c23ed1950c1558d43ea6da6ef4911e4da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>adults</topic><topic>age structure</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Bobcat</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>diet</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Ecological research</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>energy intake</topic><topic>Food and nutrition</topic><topic>genetic techniques and protocols</topic><topic>insectivores</topic><topic>Lynx rufus</topic><topic>males</topic><topic>Odocoileus virginianus</topic><topic>rodents</topic><topic>stomach</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>Sylvilagus floridanus</topic><topic>Wildcats</topic><topic>winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rose, Christa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prange, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The American midland naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rose, Christa</au><au>Prange, Suzanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diet of the Recovering Ohio Bobcat (Lynx rufus) with a Consideration of Two Subpopulations</atitle><jtitle>The American midland naturalist</jtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>173</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>317</epage><pages>305-317</pages><issn>0003-0031</issn><eissn>1938-4238</eissn><coden>AMNAAF</coden><abstract>Bobcats (Lynx rufus) are a native carnivore of Ohio, but by 1850 were extirpated or nearly so following pioneer settlement of the state. The first modern record of a bobcat in Ohio was an adult male killed in 1946. Distribution accounts indicate that population re- establishment began around 2000. Today the bobcat is protected, and verified sightings, camera surveys, and genetic analyses point to two subpopulations: a fast growing, self-sustaining eastern subpopulation, and a more slowly growing southern subpopulation. We evaluated stomach contents of 120 adult and subadult bobcat carcasses to help understand the disparity in subpopulation growth rates, and inform proper bobcat management. We identified prey species morphologically. We quantified prey species taken and converted their frequencies to caloric intake estimates. We calculated dry weight estimates of prey groups and compared them between bobcat age classes, sexes, regions, and across seasons. We examined regional diet differences further by calculating diet and condition indices. Eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) occurred most often. White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) supplied the greatest caloric value. Small rodents and insectivores were the most common prey group. Adults consumed more, as defined by weight, meso-mammals and large rodents than subadults. Diet composition did not differ between sexes. Weight of large mammal intake differed significantly between winter and summer, being greater in winter. Diet composition and prey group weights did not differ regionally. Dietary niche breadth of the southern subpopulation indicated more even consumption of prey groups than the eastern, whereas food niche overlap between regions was high. The condition index of eastern and southern bobcats also did not differ. We present the first rigorous analysis of bobcat diet in Ohio, and infer that diet is not a likely driver of disparate subpopulation growth rates of this recovering species.</abstract><cop>The University of Notre Dame, P.O. Box 369, Notre Dame, IN 46556-0369</cop><pub>American Midland Naturalist</pub><doi>10.1674/amid-173-02-305-317.1</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0031 |
ispartof | The American midland naturalist, 2015-04, Vol.173 (2), p.305-317 |
issn | 0003-0031 1938-4238 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680442945 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | adults age structure Animal behavior Bobcat Deer diet Distribution Ecological research Endangered & extinct species energy intake Food and nutrition genetic techniques and protocols insectivores Lynx rufus males Odocoileus virginianus rodents stomach Studies summer surveys Sylvilagus floridanus Wildcats winter |
title | Diet of the Recovering Ohio Bobcat (Lynx rufus) with a Consideration of Two Subpopulations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T06%3A05%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diet%20of%20the%20Recovering%20Ohio%20Bobcat%20(Lynx%20rufus)%20with%20a%20Consideration%20of%20Two%20Subpopulations&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20midland%20naturalist&rft.au=Rose,%20Christa&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=173&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=317&rft.pages=305-317&rft.issn=0003-0031&rft.eissn=1938-4238&rft.coden=AMNAAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1674/amid-173-02-305-317.1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA413481626%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1679008087&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A413481626&rft_jstor_id=43822858&rfr_iscdi=true |