Newborn hearing screening: analysis and outcomes after 100,000 births in Upper-Normandy French region

Abstract Objectives Neonatal hearing impairment is a common disorder with a prevalence of 1 to 2‰ worldwide, with significant consequences on overall development when rehabilitated too late. New-born hearing screening has been implemented in the 1990s in most European countries and the USA. The Uppe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 2015-06, Vol.79 (6), p.829-833
Hauptverfasser: Caluraud, Sophie, Marcolla-Bouchetemblé, Aurore, de Barros, Angélique, Moreau-Lenoir, Florence, de Sevin, Emmanuel, Rerolle, Stéphane, Charrière, Elisabeth, Lecler-Scarcella, Véronique, Billet, François, Obstoy, Marie-Françoise, Amstutz-Montadert, Isabelle, Marie, Jean-Paul, Lerosey, Yannick
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 833
container_issue 6
container_start_page 829
container_title International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology
container_volume 79
creator Caluraud, Sophie
Marcolla-Bouchetemblé, Aurore
de Barros, Angélique
Moreau-Lenoir, Florence
de Sevin, Emmanuel
Rerolle, Stéphane
Charrière, Elisabeth
Lecler-Scarcella, Véronique
Billet, François
Obstoy, Marie-Françoise
Amstutz-Montadert, Isabelle
Marie, Jean-Paul
Lerosey, Yannick
description Abstract Objectives Neonatal hearing impairment is a common disorder with a prevalence of 1 to 2‰ worldwide, with significant consequences on overall development when rehabilitated too late. New-born hearing screening has been implemented in the 1990s in most European countries and the USA. The Upper-Normandy region of France has been conducting a pilot program since 1999. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate and critically analyse it. Methods The Upper-Normandy universal new-born hearing screening program is performed in two steps. Between 1999 and 2004, first, we administered a Transient Evoked Oto Acoustic Emission (TEOAE) test was administered a few days after birth for healthy newborns without risk factors. For newborns admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) or presenting risk factors, was administered an automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) test prior to discharge. Second, newborns who failed the initial hearing screening were retested as outpatients using TEOAE. Since 2004, infants who failed the initial screen were tested with AABR 3 to 4 weeks later as outpatients, providing an opportunity to compare the two protocols. Results Overall screening coverage in the Upper-Normandy region is 99.8%. First step coverage is 99.58% in well-infant nurseries and 97.09% in the NICU. The test–retest procedure during the first step and the use of AABR for the second resulted in higher follow-up rates and lower false positive rates. Conclusions The Upper-Normandy region universal newborn hearing screening program facilitated diagnosis and rehabilitation of infants before age of 9 months, most notably when severe to profound hearing impairment was found.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.03.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680209194</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165587615001238</els_id><sourcerecordid>1680209194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-d060b723bf4aefdbeaf7c45bfbcf8d4796f895c48f6819bf16bda9d9055db0243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCN0DIRw4kjJM4cTggVRUtSFU5QM-W_4y7Dkm82Alovz2OtnDgwslj6fdm9N4j5BWDkgFr3w2lHw4hjmUFjJdQl8CqJ2THRFcVommbp2SXMV5w0bVn5DylAYB1wPlzclZxITpW1zuCd_hLhzjTParo5weaTESc8_SeqlmNx-RTHiwN62LChPnjFoyUAbwFAKp9XPaJ-pneHw4Yi7sQp4wf6XXE2expxAcf5hfkmVNjwpeP7wW5v_747epTcfvl5vPV5W1hOK-XwkILuqtq7RqFzmpUrjMN104bJ2zT9a0TPTeNcK1gvXas1Vb1ts-mrIaqqS_Im9PeQww_VkyLnHwyOI5qxrAmyVoBFfSs39DmhJoYUoro5CH6ScWjZCC3gOUgTwHLLWAJtcwBZ9nrxwurntD-Ff1JNAMfTgBmnz89RpmMz1Gg9RHNIm3w_7vw7wIz-tkbNX7HI6YhrDH3kr3IVEmQX7eSt44Zh00u6t8vHKO5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1680209194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Newborn hearing screening: analysis and outcomes after 100,000 births in Upper-Normandy French region</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Caluraud, Sophie ; Marcolla-Bouchetemblé, Aurore ; de Barros, Angélique ; Moreau-Lenoir, Florence ; de Sevin, Emmanuel ; Rerolle, Stéphane ; Charrière, Elisabeth ; Lecler-Scarcella, Véronique ; Billet, François ; Obstoy, Marie-Françoise ; Amstutz-Montadert, Isabelle ; Marie, Jean-Paul ; Lerosey, Yannick</creator><creatorcontrib>Caluraud, Sophie ; Marcolla-Bouchetemblé, Aurore ; de Barros, Angélique ; Moreau-Lenoir, Florence ; de Sevin, Emmanuel ; Rerolle, Stéphane ; Charrière, Elisabeth ; Lecler-Scarcella, Véronique ; Billet, François ; Obstoy, Marie-Françoise ; Amstutz-Montadert, Isabelle ; Marie, Jean-Paul ; Lerosey, Yannick</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives Neonatal hearing impairment is a common disorder with a prevalence of 1 to 2‰ worldwide, with significant consequences on overall development when rehabilitated too late. New-born hearing screening has been implemented in the 1990s in most European countries and the USA. The Upper-Normandy region of France has been conducting a pilot program since 1999. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate and critically analyse it. Methods The Upper-Normandy universal new-born hearing screening program is performed in two steps. Between 1999 and 2004, first, we administered a Transient Evoked Oto Acoustic Emission (TEOAE) test was administered a few days after birth for healthy newborns without risk factors. For newborns admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) or presenting risk factors, was administered an automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) test prior to discharge. Second, newborns who failed the initial hearing screening were retested as outpatients using TEOAE. Since 2004, infants who failed the initial screen were tested with AABR 3 to 4 weeks later as outpatients, providing an opportunity to compare the two protocols. Results Overall screening coverage in the Upper-Normandy region is 99.8%. First step coverage is 99.58% in well-infant nurseries and 97.09% in the NICU. The test–retest procedure during the first step and the use of AABR for the second resulted in higher follow-up rates and lower false positive rates. Conclusions The Upper-Normandy region universal newborn hearing screening program facilitated diagnosis and rehabilitation of infants before age of 9 months, most notably when severe to profound hearing impairment was found.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5876</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.03.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25887133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Audiometry, Evoked Response ; Automatic auditory brainstem response ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem ; France ; Hearing impairment ; Hearing Loss - diagnosis ; Hearing Loss - rehabilitation ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal ; Neonatal Screening - methods ; Newborn hearing screening ; Otoacoustic emissions ; Otolaryngology ; Pediatrics ; Pilot Projects ; Program Evaluation ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2015-06, Vol.79 (6), p.829-833</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-d060b723bf4aefdbeaf7c45bfbcf8d4796f895c48f6819bf16bda9d9055db0243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-d060b723bf4aefdbeaf7c45bfbcf8d4796f895c48f6819bf16bda9d9055db0243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.03.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27926,27927,45997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caluraud, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcolla-Bouchetemblé, Aurore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Barros, Angélique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreau-Lenoir, Florence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sevin, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rerolle, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charrière, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lecler-Scarcella, Véronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billet, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obstoy, Marie-Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amstutz-Montadert, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marie, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerosey, Yannick</creatorcontrib><title>Newborn hearing screening: analysis and outcomes after 100,000 births in Upper-Normandy French region</title><title>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</title><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives Neonatal hearing impairment is a common disorder with a prevalence of 1 to 2‰ worldwide, with significant consequences on overall development when rehabilitated too late. New-born hearing screening has been implemented in the 1990s in most European countries and the USA. The Upper-Normandy region of France has been conducting a pilot program since 1999. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate and critically analyse it. Methods The Upper-Normandy universal new-born hearing screening program is performed in two steps. Between 1999 and 2004, first, we administered a Transient Evoked Oto Acoustic Emission (TEOAE) test was administered a few days after birth for healthy newborns without risk factors. For newborns admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) or presenting risk factors, was administered an automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) test prior to discharge. Second, newborns who failed the initial hearing screening were retested as outpatients using TEOAE. Since 2004, infants who failed the initial screen were tested with AABR 3 to 4 weeks later as outpatients, providing an opportunity to compare the two protocols. Results Overall screening coverage in the Upper-Normandy region is 99.8%. First step coverage is 99.58% in well-infant nurseries and 97.09% in the NICU. The test–retest procedure during the first step and the use of AABR for the second resulted in higher follow-up rates and lower false positive rates. Conclusions The Upper-Normandy region universal newborn hearing screening program facilitated diagnosis and rehabilitation of infants before age of 9 months, most notably when severe to profound hearing impairment was found.</description><subject>Audiometry, Evoked Response</subject><subject>Automatic auditory brainstem response</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Hearing impairment</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal</subject><subject>Neonatal Screening - methods</subject><subject>Newborn hearing screening</subject><subject>Otoacoustic emissions</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0165-5876</issn><issn>1872-8464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCN0DIRw4kjJM4cTggVRUtSFU5QM-W_4y7Dkm82Alovz2OtnDgwslj6fdm9N4j5BWDkgFr3w2lHw4hjmUFjJdQl8CqJ2THRFcVommbp2SXMV5w0bVn5DylAYB1wPlzclZxITpW1zuCd_hLhzjTParo5weaTESc8_SeqlmNx-RTHiwN62LChPnjFoyUAbwFAKp9XPaJ-pneHw4Yi7sQp4wf6XXE2expxAcf5hfkmVNjwpeP7wW5v_747epTcfvl5vPV5W1hOK-XwkILuqtq7RqFzmpUrjMN104bJ2zT9a0TPTeNcK1gvXas1Vb1ts-mrIaqqS_Im9PeQww_VkyLnHwyOI5qxrAmyVoBFfSs39DmhJoYUoro5CH6ScWjZCC3gOUgTwHLLWAJtcwBZ9nrxwurntD-Ff1JNAMfTgBmnz89RpmMz1Gg9RHNIm3w_7vw7wIz-tkbNX7HI6YhrDH3kr3IVEmQX7eSt44Zh00u6t8vHKO5</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Caluraud, Sophie</creator><creator>Marcolla-Bouchetemblé, Aurore</creator><creator>de Barros, Angélique</creator><creator>Moreau-Lenoir, Florence</creator><creator>de Sevin, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Rerolle, Stéphane</creator><creator>Charrière, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Lecler-Scarcella, Véronique</creator><creator>Billet, François</creator><creator>Obstoy, Marie-Françoise</creator><creator>Amstutz-Montadert, Isabelle</creator><creator>Marie, Jean-Paul</creator><creator>Lerosey, Yannick</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Newborn hearing screening: analysis and outcomes after 100,000 births in Upper-Normandy French region</title><author>Caluraud, Sophie ; Marcolla-Bouchetemblé, Aurore ; de Barros, Angélique ; Moreau-Lenoir, Florence ; de Sevin, Emmanuel ; Rerolle, Stéphane ; Charrière, Elisabeth ; Lecler-Scarcella, Véronique ; Billet, François ; Obstoy, Marie-Françoise ; Amstutz-Montadert, Isabelle ; Marie, Jean-Paul ; Lerosey, Yannick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-d060b723bf4aefdbeaf7c45bfbcf8d4796f895c48f6819bf16bda9d9055db0243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Audiometry, Evoked Response</topic><topic>Automatic auditory brainstem response</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Hearing impairment</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal</topic><topic>Neonatal Screening - methods</topic><topic>Newborn hearing screening</topic><topic>Otoacoustic emissions</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caluraud, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcolla-Bouchetemblé, Aurore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Barros, Angélique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreau-Lenoir, Florence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sevin, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rerolle, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charrière, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lecler-Scarcella, Véronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billet, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obstoy, Marie-Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amstutz-Montadert, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marie, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerosey, Yannick</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caluraud, Sophie</au><au>Marcolla-Bouchetemblé, Aurore</au><au>de Barros, Angélique</au><au>Moreau-Lenoir, Florence</au><au>de Sevin, Emmanuel</au><au>Rerolle, Stéphane</au><au>Charrière, Elisabeth</au><au>Lecler-Scarcella, Véronique</au><au>Billet, François</au><au>Obstoy, Marie-Françoise</au><au>Amstutz-Montadert, Isabelle</au><au>Marie, Jean-Paul</au><au>Lerosey, Yannick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Newborn hearing screening: analysis and outcomes after 100,000 births in Upper-Normandy French region</atitle><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>829</spage><epage>833</epage><pages>829-833</pages><issn>0165-5876</issn><eissn>1872-8464</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives Neonatal hearing impairment is a common disorder with a prevalence of 1 to 2‰ worldwide, with significant consequences on overall development when rehabilitated too late. New-born hearing screening has been implemented in the 1990s in most European countries and the USA. The Upper-Normandy region of France has been conducting a pilot program since 1999. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate and critically analyse it. Methods The Upper-Normandy universal new-born hearing screening program is performed in two steps. Between 1999 and 2004, first, we administered a Transient Evoked Oto Acoustic Emission (TEOAE) test was administered a few days after birth for healthy newborns without risk factors. For newborns admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) or presenting risk factors, was administered an automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) test prior to discharge. Second, newborns who failed the initial hearing screening were retested as outpatients using TEOAE. Since 2004, infants who failed the initial screen were tested with AABR 3 to 4 weeks later as outpatients, providing an opportunity to compare the two protocols. Results Overall screening coverage in the Upper-Normandy region is 99.8%. First step coverage is 99.58% in well-infant nurseries and 97.09% in the NICU. The test–retest procedure during the first step and the use of AABR for the second resulted in higher follow-up rates and lower false positive rates. Conclusions The Upper-Normandy region universal newborn hearing screening program facilitated diagnosis and rehabilitation of infants before age of 9 months, most notably when severe to profound hearing impairment was found.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25887133</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.03.012</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-5876
ispartof International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2015-06, Vol.79 (6), p.829-833
issn 0165-5876
1872-8464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680209194
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Audiometry, Evoked Response
Automatic auditory brainstem response
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
France
Hearing impairment
Hearing Loss - diagnosis
Hearing Loss - rehabilitation
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
Neonatal Screening - methods
Newborn hearing screening
Otoacoustic emissions
Otolaryngology
Pediatrics
Pilot Projects
Program Evaluation
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
title Newborn hearing screening: analysis and outcomes after 100,000 births in Upper-Normandy French region
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T14%3A37%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Newborn%20hearing%20screening:%20analysis%20and%20outcomes%20after%20100,000%20births%20in%20Upper-Normandy%20French%20region&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20pediatric%20otorhinolaryngology&rft.au=Caluraud,%20Sophie&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=829&rft.epage=833&rft.pages=829-833&rft.issn=0165-5876&rft.eissn=1872-8464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.03.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1680209194%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1680209194&rft_id=info:pmid/25887133&rft_els_id=S0165587615001238&rfr_iscdi=true