Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure: Are We Protecting Ourselves Adequately?
BACKGROUND:While traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy protection relies on thyroid shields and aprons, recent data suggest that the surgeon’s eyes and hands receive more exposure than previously appreciated. Using a distal radial fracture surgery model, we examined (1) radiation exposure to the ey...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2015-05, Vol.97 (9), p.721-725 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 725 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 721 |
container_title | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Hoffler, C Edward Ilyas, Asif M |
description | BACKGROUND:While traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy protection relies on thyroid shields and aprons, recent data suggest that the surgeon’s eyes and hands receive more exposure than previously appreciated. Using a distal radial fracture surgery model, we examined (1) radiation exposure to the eyes, thyroid, chest, groin, and hands of a surgeon mannequin; (2) the degree to which shielding equipment can decrease exposure; and (3) how exposure varies with fluoroscopy unit size.
METHODS:An anthropomorphic model was fit with radiation-attenuating glasses, a thyroid shield, an apron, and gloves. “Exposed” thermoluminescent dosimeters overlaid the protective equipment at the eyes, thyroid, chest, groin, and index finger while “shielded” dosimeters were placed beneath the protective equipment. Fluoroscopy position and settings were standardized. The mini-c-arm milliampere-seconds were fixed based on the selection of the kilovolt peak (kVp). Three mini and three standard c-arms scanned a model of the patient’s wrist continuously for fifteen minutes each. Ten dosimeter exposures were recorded for each c-arm.
RESULTS:Hand exposure averaged 31 μSv/min (range, 22 to 48 μSv/min), which was 13.0 times higher than the other recorded exposures. Eye exposure averaged 4 μSv/min, 2.2 times higher than the mean thyroid, chest, and groin exposure. Gloves reduced hand exposure by 69.4%. Glasses decreased eye exposure by 65.6%. There was no significant difference in exposure between mini and standard fluoroscopy.
CONCLUSIONS:Surgeons’ hands receive the most radiation exposure during distal radial plate fixation under fluoroscopy. There was a small but insignificant difference in mean exposure between standard fluoroscopy and mini-fluoroscopy, but some standard units resulted in lower exposure than some mini-units. On the basis of these findings, we recommend routine protective equipment to mitigate exposure to surgeons’ hands and eyes, in addition to the thyroid, chest, and groin, during fluoroscopy procedures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2106/JBJS.N.00839 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680194268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1680194268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2934-ed4bf2608ca6c43661016db334f31e1ae35dc9435e49de0d216059015b418d173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtPGzEQgK2KqqS0N85ojxy66Yxf7HJBIQpQhEjVhzhajj2BBSdO7F0e_54NoT2NNPr0aeZjbB9hyBH098vTy9_D6yFAJeoPbIBKqBJFpXfYAIBjWQuldtnnnO8BQEo4-sR2uaplpbAasIuz0MUUs4urxhW_rG9s28RlMXlexdwlOi5GiYobKn6m2JJrm-VtMe1SpvBIuRh5Wne2pfBy8oV9nNuQ6ev73GN_zyZ_xhfl1fT8x3h0VTpeC1mSl7M511A5q50UWiOg9jMh5FwgoSWhvKulUCRrT-A5alA1oJpJrDweiT12uPWuUlx3lFuzaLKjEOySYpcN6gqwllxXPfpti7r-wZxoblapWdj0YhDMpp3ZtDPX5q1djx-8m7vZgvx_-F-sHpBb4CmGllJ-CN0TJXNHNrR3vaTPq7koeX8tKNBQvq3EK-oleDI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1680194268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure: Are We Protecting Ourselves Adequately?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hoffler, C Edward ; Ilyas, Asif M</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoffler, C Edward ; Ilyas, Asif M</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:While traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy protection relies on thyroid shields and aprons, recent data suggest that the surgeon’s eyes and hands receive more exposure than previously appreciated. Using a distal radial fracture surgery model, we examined (1) radiation exposure to the eyes, thyroid, chest, groin, and hands of a surgeon mannequin; (2) the degree to which shielding equipment can decrease exposure; and (3) how exposure varies with fluoroscopy unit size.
METHODS:An anthropomorphic model was fit with radiation-attenuating glasses, a thyroid shield, an apron, and gloves. “Exposed” thermoluminescent dosimeters overlaid the protective equipment at the eyes, thyroid, chest, groin, and index finger while “shielded” dosimeters were placed beneath the protective equipment. Fluoroscopy position and settings were standardized. The mini-c-arm milliampere-seconds were fixed based on the selection of the kilovolt peak (kVp). Three mini and three standard c-arms scanned a model of the patient’s wrist continuously for fifteen minutes each. Ten dosimeter exposures were recorded for each c-arm.
RESULTS:Hand exposure averaged 31 μSv/min (range, 22 to 48 μSv/min), which was 13.0 times higher than the other recorded exposures. Eye exposure averaged 4 μSv/min, 2.2 times higher than the mean thyroid, chest, and groin exposure. Gloves reduced hand exposure by 69.4%. Glasses decreased eye exposure by 65.6%. There was no significant difference in exposure between mini and standard fluoroscopy.
CONCLUSIONS:Surgeons’ hands receive the most radiation exposure during distal radial plate fixation under fluoroscopy. There was a small but insignificant difference in mean exposure between standard fluoroscopy and mini-fluoroscopy, but some standard units resulted in lower exposure than some mini-units. On the basis of these findings, we recommend routine protective equipment to mitigate exposure to surgeons’ hands and eyes, in addition to the thyroid, chest, and groin, during fluoroscopy procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00839</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25948518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</publisher><subject>Eye - radiation effects ; Eyeglasses ; Fluoroscopy - adverse effects ; General Surgery ; Hand - radiation effects ; Humans ; Intraoperative Period ; Models, Biological ; Occupational Exposure ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Protection ; Radiometry ; Thyroid Gland - radiation effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2015-05, Vol.97 (9), p.721-725</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2934-ed4bf2608ca6c43661016db334f31e1ae35dc9435e49de0d216059015b418d173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25948518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoffler, C Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilyas, Asif M</creatorcontrib><title>Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure: Are We Protecting Ourselves Adequately?</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:While traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy protection relies on thyroid shields and aprons, recent data suggest that the surgeon’s eyes and hands receive more exposure than previously appreciated. Using a distal radial fracture surgery model, we examined (1) radiation exposure to the eyes, thyroid, chest, groin, and hands of a surgeon mannequin; (2) the degree to which shielding equipment can decrease exposure; and (3) how exposure varies with fluoroscopy unit size.
METHODS:An anthropomorphic model was fit with radiation-attenuating glasses, a thyroid shield, an apron, and gloves. “Exposed” thermoluminescent dosimeters overlaid the protective equipment at the eyes, thyroid, chest, groin, and index finger while “shielded” dosimeters were placed beneath the protective equipment. Fluoroscopy position and settings were standardized. The mini-c-arm milliampere-seconds were fixed based on the selection of the kilovolt peak (kVp). Three mini and three standard c-arms scanned a model of the patient’s wrist continuously for fifteen minutes each. Ten dosimeter exposures were recorded for each c-arm.
RESULTS:Hand exposure averaged 31 μSv/min (range, 22 to 48 μSv/min), which was 13.0 times higher than the other recorded exposures. Eye exposure averaged 4 μSv/min, 2.2 times higher than the mean thyroid, chest, and groin exposure. Gloves reduced hand exposure by 69.4%. Glasses decreased eye exposure by 65.6%. There was no significant difference in exposure between mini and standard fluoroscopy.
CONCLUSIONS:Surgeons’ hands receive the most radiation exposure during distal radial plate fixation under fluoroscopy. There was a small but insignificant difference in mean exposure between standard fluoroscopy and mini-fluoroscopy, but some standard units resulted in lower exposure than some mini-units. On the basis of these findings, we recommend routine protective equipment to mitigate exposure to surgeons’ hands and eyes, in addition to the thyroid, chest, and groin, during fluoroscopy procedures.</description><subject>Eye - radiation effects</subject><subject>Eyeglasses</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>General Surgery</subject><subject>Hand - radiation effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Period</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Protection</subject><subject>Radiometry</subject><subject>Thyroid Gland - radiation effects</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtPGzEQgK2KqqS0N85ojxy66Yxf7HJBIQpQhEjVhzhajj2BBSdO7F0e_54NoT2NNPr0aeZjbB9hyBH098vTy9_D6yFAJeoPbIBKqBJFpXfYAIBjWQuldtnnnO8BQEo4-sR2uaplpbAasIuz0MUUs4urxhW_rG9s28RlMXlexdwlOi5GiYobKn6m2JJrm-VtMe1SpvBIuRh5Wne2pfBy8oV9nNuQ6ev73GN_zyZ_xhfl1fT8x3h0VTpeC1mSl7M511A5q50UWiOg9jMh5FwgoSWhvKulUCRrT-A5alA1oJpJrDweiT12uPWuUlx3lFuzaLKjEOySYpcN6gqwllxXPfpti7r-wZxoblapWdj0YhDMpp3ZtDPX5q1djx-8m7vZgvx_-F-sHpBb4CmGllJ-CN0TJXNHNrR3vaTPq7koeX8tKNBQvq3EK-oleDI</recordid><startdate>20150506</startdate><enddate>20150506</enddate><creator>Hoffler, C Edward</creator><creator>Ilyas, Asif M</creator><general>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150506</creationdate><title>Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure: Are We Protecting Ourselves Adequately?</title><author>Hoffler, C Edward ; Ilyas, Asif M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2934-ed4bf2608ca6c43661016db334f31e1ae35dc9435e49de0d216059015b418d173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Eye - radiation effects</topic><topic>Eyeglasses</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>General Surgery</topic><topic>Hand - radiation effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Period</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Protection</topic><topic>Radiometry</topic><topic>Thyroid Gland - radiation effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoffler, C Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilyas, Asif M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoffler, C Edward</au><au>Ilyas, Asif M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure: Are We Protecting Ourselves Adequately?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2015-05-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>721</spage><epage>725</epage><pages>721-725</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:While traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy protection relies on thyroid shields and aprons, recent data suggest that the surgeon’s eyes and hands receive more exposure than previously appreciated. Using a distal radial fracture surgery model, we examined (1) radiation exposure to the eyes, thyroid, chest, groin, and hands of a surgeon mannequin; (2) the degree to which shielding equipment can decrease exposure; and (3) how exposure varies with fluoroscopy unit size.
METHODS:An anthropomorphic model was fit with radiation-attenuating glasses, a thyroid shield, an apron, and gloves. “Exposed” thermoluminescent dosimeters overlaid the protective equipment at the eyes, thyroid, chest, groin, and index finger while “shielded” dosimeters were placed beneath the protective equipment. Fluoroscopy position and settings were standardized. The mini-c-arm milliampere-seconds were fixed based on the selection of the kilovolt peak (kVp). Three mini and three standard c-arms scanned a model of the patient’s wrist continuously for fifteen minutes each. Ten dosimeter exposures were recorded for each c-arm.
RESULTS:Hand exposure averaged 31 μSv/min (range, 22 to 48 μSv/min), which was 13.0 times higher than the other recorded exposures. Eye exposure averaged 4 μSv/min, 2.2 times higher than the mean thyroid, chest, and groin exposure. Gloves reduced hand exposure by 69.4%. Glasses decreased eye exposure by 65.6%. There was no significant difference in exposure between mini and standard fluoroscopy.
CONCLUSIONS:Surgeons’ hands receive the most radiation exposure during distal radial plate fixation under fluoroscopy. There was a small but insignificant difference in mean exposure between standard fluoroscopy and mini-fluoroscopy, but some standard units resulted in lower exposure than some mini-units. On the basis of these findings, we recommend routine protective equipment to mitigate exposure to surgeons’ hands and eyes, in addition to the thyroid, chest, and groin, during fluoroscopy procedures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</pub><pmid>25948518</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.N.00839</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9355 |
ispartof | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2015-05, Vol.97 (9), p.721-725 |
issn | 0021-9355 1535-1386 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680194268 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Eye - radiation effects Eyeglasses Fluoroscopy - adverse effects General Surgery Hand - radiation effects Humans Intraoperative Period Models, Biological Occupational Exposure Radiation Dosage Radiation Protection Radiometry Thyroid Gland - radiation effects |
title | Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure: Are We Protecting Ourselves Adequately? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A30%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fluoroscopic%20Radiation%20Exposure:%20Are%20We%20Protecting%20Ourselves%20Adequately?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Hoffler,%20C%20Edward&rft.date=2015-05-06&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=721&rft.epage=725&rft.pages=721-725&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.N.00839&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1680194268%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1680194268&rft_id=info:pmid/25948518&rfr_iscdi=true |