Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure: Are We Protecting Ourselves Adequately?

BACKGROUND:While traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy protection relies on thyroid shields and aprons, recent data suggest that the surgeon’s eyes and hands receive more exposure than previously appreciated. Using a distal radial fracture surgery model, we examined (1) radiation exposure to the ey...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2015-05, Vol.97 (9), p.721-725
Hauptverfasser: Hoffler, C Edward, Ilyas, Asif M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 725
container_issue 9
container_start_page 721
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 97
creator Hoffler, C Edward
Ilyas, Asif M
description BACKGROUND:While traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy protection relies on thyroid shields and aprons, recent data suggest that the surgeon’s eyes and hands receive more exposure than previously appreciated. Using a distal radial fracture surgery model, we examined (1) radiation exposure to the eyes, thyroid, chest, groin, and hands of a surgeon mannequin; (2) the degree to which shielding equipment can decrease exposure; and (3) how exposure varies with fluoroscopy unit size. METHODS:An anthropomorphic model was fit with radiation-attenuating glasses, a thyroid shield, an apron, and gloves. “Exposed” thermoluminescent dosimeters overlaid the protective equipment at the eyes, thyroid, chest, groin, and index finger while “shielded” dosimeters were placed beneath the protective equipment. Fluoroscopy position and settings were standardized. The mini-c-arm milliampere-seconds were fixed based on the selection of the kilovolt peak (kVp). Three mini and three standard c-arms scanned a model of the patient’s wrist continuously for fifteen minutes each. Ten dosimeter exposures were recorded for each c-arm. RESULTS:Hand exposure averaged 31 μSv/min (range, 22 to 48 μSv/min), which was 13.0 times higher than the other recorded exposures. Eye exposure averaged 4 μSv/min, 2.2 times higher than the mean thyroid, chest, and groin exposure. Gloves reduced hand exposure by 69.4%. Glasses decreased eye exposure by 65.6%. There was no significant difference in exposure between mini and standard fluoroscopy. CONCLUSIONS:Surgeons’ hands receive the most radiation exposure during distal radial plate fixation under fluoroscopy. There was a small but insignificant difference in mean exposure between standard fluoroscopy and mini-fluoroscopy, but some standard units resulted in lower exposure than some mini-units. On the basis of these findings, we recommend routine protective equipment to mitigate exposure to surgeons’ hands and eyes, in addition to the thyroid, chest, and groin, during fluoroscopy procedures.
doi_str_mv 10.2106/JBJS.N.00839
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680194268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1680194268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2934-ed4bf2608ca6c43661016db334f31e1ae35dc9435e49de0d216059015b418d173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtPGzEQgK2KqqS0N85ojxy66Yxf7HJBIQpQhEjVhzhajj2BBSdO7F0e_54NoT2NNPr0aeZjbB9hyBH098vTy9_D6yFAJeoPbIBKqBJFpXfYAIBjWQuldtnnnO8BQEo4-sR2uaplpbAasIuz0MUUs4urxhW_rG9s28RlMXlexdwlOi5GiYobKn6m2JJrm-VtMe1SpvBIuRh5Wne2pfBy8oV9nNuQ6ev73GN_zyZ_xhfl1fT8x3h0VTpeC1mSl7M511A5q50UWiOg9jMh5FwgoSWhvKulUCRrT-A5alA1oJpJrDweiT12uPWuUlx3lFuzaLKjEOySYpcN6gqwllxXPfpti7r-wZxoblapWdj0YhDMpp3ZtDPX5q1djx-8m7vZgvx_-F-sHpBb4CmGllJ-CN0TJXNHNrR3vaTPq7koeX8tKNBQvq3EK-oleDI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1680194268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure: Are We Protecting Ourselves Adequately?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hoffler, C Edward ; Ilyas, Asif M</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoffler, C Edward ; Ilyas, Asif M</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:While traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy protection relies on thyroid shields and aprons, recent data suggest that the surgeon’s eyes and hands receive more exposure than previously appreciated. Using a distal radial fracture surgery model, we examined (1) radiation exposure to the eyes, thyroid, chest, groin, and hands of a surgeon mannequin; (2) the degree to which shielding equipment can decrease exposure; and (3) how exposure varies with fluoroscopy unit size. METHODS:An anthropomorphic model was fit with radiation-attenuating glasses, a thyroid shield, an apron, and gloves. “Exposed” thermoluminescent dosimeters overlaid the protective equipment at the eyes, thyroid, chest, groin, and index finger while “shielded” dosimeters were placed beneath the protective equipment. Fluoroscopy position and settings were standardized. The mini-c-arm milliampere-seconds were fixed based on the selection of the kilovolt peak (kVp). Three mini and three standard c-arms scanned a model of the patient’s wrist continuously for fifteen minutes each. Ten dosimeter exposures were recorded for each c-arm. RESULTS:Hand exposure averaged 31 μSv/min (range, 22 to 48 μSv/min), which was 13.0 times higher than the other recorded exposures. Eye exposure averaged 4 μSv/min, 2.2 times higher than the mean thyroid, chest, and groin exposure. Gloves reduced hand exposure by 69.4%. Glasses decreased eye exposure by 65.6%. There was no significant difference in exposure between mini and standard fluoroscopy. CONCLUSIONS:Surgeons’ hands receive the most radiation exposure during distal radial plate fixation under fluoroscopy. There was a small but insignificant difference in mean exposure between standard fluoroscopy and mini-fluoroscopy, but some standard units resulted in lower exposure than some mini-units. On the basis of these findings, we recommend routine protective equipment to mitigate exposure to surgeons’ hands and eyes, in addition to the thyroid, chest, and groin, during fluoroscopy procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00839</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25948518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</publisher><subject>Eye - radiation effects ; Eyeglasses ; Fluoroscopy - adverse effects ; General Surgery ; Hand - radiation effects ; Humans ; Intraoperative Period ; Models, Biological ; Occupational Exposure ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Protection ; Radiometry ; Thyroid Gland - radiation effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2015-05, Vol.97 (9), p.721-725</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2934-ed4bf2608ca6c43661016db334f31e1ae35dc9435e49de0d216059015b418d173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25948518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoffler, C Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilyas, Asif M</creatorcontrib><title>Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure: Are We Protecting Ourselves Adequately?</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:While traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy protection relies on thyroid shields and aprons, recent data suggest that the surgeon’s eyes and hands receive more exposure than previously appreciated. Using a distal radial fracture surgery model, we examined (1) radiation exposure to the eyes, thyroid, chest, groin, and hands of a surgeon mannequin; (2) the degree to which shielding equipment can decrease exposure; and (3) how exposure varies with fluoroscopy unit size. METHODS:An anthropomorphic model was fit with radiation-attenuating glasses, a thyroid shield, an apron, and gloves. “Exposed” thermoluminescent dosimeters overlaid the protective equipment at the eyes, thyroid, chest, groin, and index finger while “shielded” dosimeters were placed beneath the protective equipment. Fluoroscopy position and settings were standardized. The mini-c-arm milliampere-seconds were fixed based on the selection of the kilovolt peak (kVp). Three mini and three standard c-arms scanned a model of the patient’s wrist continuously for fifteen minutes each. Ten dosimeter exposures were recorded for each c-arm. RESULTS:Hand exposure averaged 31 μSv/min (range, 22 to 48 μSv/min), which was 13.0 times higher than the other recorded exposures. Eye exposure averaged 4 μSv/min, 2.2 times higher than the mean thyroid, chest, and groin exposure. Gloves reduced hand exposure by 69.4%. Glasses decreased eye exposure by 65.6%. There was no significant difference in exposure between mini and standard fluoroscopy. CONCLUSIONS:Surgeons’ hands receive the most radiation exposure during distal radial plate fixation under fluoroscopy. There was a small but insignificant difference in mean exposure between standard fluoroscopy and mini-fluoroscopy, but some standard units resulted in lower exposure than some mini-units. On the basis of these findings, we recommend routine protective equipment to mitigate exposure to surgeons’ hands and eyes, in addition to the thyroid, chest, and groin, during fluoroscopy procedures.</description><subject>Eye - radiation effects</subject><subject>Eyeglasses</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>General Surgery</subject><subject>Hand - radiation effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Period</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Protection</subject><subject>Radiometry</subject><subject>Thyroid Gland - radiation effects</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtPGzEQgK2KqqS0N85ojxy66Yxf7HJBIQpQhEjVhzhajj2BBSdO7F0e_54NoT2NNPr0aeZjbB9hyBH098vTy9_D6yFAJeoPbIBKqBJFpXfYAIBjWQuldtnnnO8BQEo4-sR2uaplpbAasIuz0MUUs4urxhW_rG9s28RlMXlexdwlOi5GiYobKn6m2JJrm-VtMe1SpvBIuRh5Wne2pfBy8oV9nNuQ6ev73GN_zyZ_xhfl1fT8x3h0VTpeC1mSl7M511A5q50UWiOg9jMh5FwgoSWhvKulUCRrT-A5alA1oJpJrDweiT12uPWuUlx3lFuzaLKjEOySYpcN6gqwllxXPfpti7r-wZxoblapWdj0YhDMpp3ZtDPX5q1djx-8m7vZgvx_-F-sHpBb4CmGllJ-CN0TJXNHNrR3vaTPq7koeX8tKNBQvq3EK-oleDI</recordid><startdate>20150506</startdate><enddate>20150506</enddate><creator>Hoffler, C Edward</creator><creator>Ilyas, Asif M</creator><general>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150506</creationdate><title>Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure: Are We Protecting Ourselves Adequately?</title><author>Hoffler, C Edward ; Ilyas, Asif M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2934-ed4bf2608ca6c43661016db334f31e1ae35dc9435e49de0d216059015b418d173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Eye - radiation effects</topic><topic>Eyeglasses</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>General Surgery</topic><topic>Hand - radiation effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Period</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Protection</topic><topic>Radiometry</topic><topic>Thyroid Gland - radiation effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoffler, C Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilyas, Asif M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoffler, C Edward</au><au>Ilyas, Asif M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure: Are We Protecting Ourselves Adequately?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2015-05-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>721</spage><epage>725</epage><pages>721-725</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:While traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy protection relies on thyroid shields and aprons, recent data suggest that the surgeon’s eyes and hands receive more exposure than previously appreciated. Using a distal radial fracture surgery model, we examined (1) radiation exposure to the eyes, thyroid, chest, groin, and hands of a surgeon mannequin; (2) the degree to which shielding equipment can decrease exposure; and (3) how exposure varies with fluoroscopy unit size. METHODS:An anthropomorphic model was fit with radiation-attenuating glasses, a thyroid shield, an apron, and gloves. “Exposed” thermoluminescent dosimeters overlaid the protective equipment at the eyes, thyroid, chest, groin, and index finger while “shielded” dosimeters were placed beneath the protective equipment. Fluoroscopy position and settings were standardized. The mini-c-arm milliampere-seconds were fixed based on the selection of the kilovolt peak (kVp). Three mini and three standard c-arms scanned a model of the patient’s wrist continuously for fifteen minutes each. Ten dosimeter exposures were recorded for each c-arm. RESULTS:Hand exposure averaged 31 μSv/min (range, 22 to 48 μSv/min), which was 13.0 times higher than the other recorded exposures. Eye exposure averaged 4 μSv/min, 2.2 times higher than the mean thyroid, chest, and groin exposure. Gloves reduced hand exposure by 69.4%. Glasses decreased eye exposure by 65.6%. There was no significant difference in exposure between mini and standard fluoroscopy. CONCLUSIONS:Surgeons’ hands receive the most radiation exposure during distal radial plate fixation under fluoroscopy. There was a small but insignificant difference in mean exposure between standard fluoroscopy and mini-fluoroscopy, but some standard units resulted in lower exposure than some mini-units. On the basis of these findings, we recommend routine protective equipment to mitigate exposure to surgeons’ hands and eyes, in addition to the thyroid, chest, and groin, during fluoroscopy procedures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</pub><pmid>25948518</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.N.00839</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2015-05, Vol.97 (9), p.721-725
issn 0021-9355
1535-1386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680194268
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Eye - radiation effects
Eyeglasses
Fluoroscopy - adverse effects
General Surgery
Hand - radiation effects
Humans
Intraoperative Period
Models, Biological
Occupational Exposure
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Protection
Radiometry
Thyroid Gland - radiation effects
title Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure: Are We Protecting Ourselves Adequately?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A30%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fluoroscopic%20Radiation%20Exposure:%20Are%20We%20Protecting%20Ourselves%20Adequately?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Hoffler,%20C%20Edward&rft.date=2015-05-06&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=721&rft.epage=725&rft.pages=721-725&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.N.00839&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1680194268%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1680194268&rft_id=info:pmid/25948518&rfr_iscdi=true