A new questionnaire to identify bodily distress in primary care: The ‘BDS checklist’
Abstract Background Functional symptoms and disorders are common in primary care. Bodily distress syndrome (BDS) is a newly proposed clinical diagnosis for functional disorders. The BDS diagnosis is based on empirical research, and the symptoms stated in the BDS criteria have been translated into a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of psychosomatic research 2015-06, Vol.78 (6), p.536-545 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 545 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 536 |
container_title | Journal of psychosomatic research |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Budtz-Lilly, Anna Fink, Per Ørnbøl, Eva Vestergaard, Mogens Moth, Grete Christensen, Kaj Sparle Rosendal, Marianne |
description | Abstract Background Functional symptoms and disorders are common in primary care. Bodily distress syndrome (BDS) is a newly proposed clinical diagnosis for functional disorders. The BDS diagnosis is based on empirical research, and the symptoms stated in the BDS criteria have been translated into a self-report questionnaire called the BDS checklist. The aim of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the checklist and to test the construct of BDS. Method The 30-item BDS checklist was completed by 2480 adult primary care patients in a cross-sectional study on contact and disease patterns in Danish general practice. We performed (internal) validation analyses of the collected checklist data. We also performed factor and latent class analyses to identify both BDS symptom groups and BDS patient groups. Results Internal validation analyses revealed acceptable and usable psychometric properties of the BDS checklist. The factor analyses identified the four distinct determining factors for BDS: cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and general symptoms. Results from factor and multi-trait analyses suggested a shortening of the BDS checklist (from 30 to 25 items). The latent class analyses resulted in three severity levels (no, moderate and severe BDS); the best fit index was found for a threshold of ≥ 4 symptoms in a symptom group. Conclusion The results provide empirical support for the previously described construct of BDS with four symptom groups and three patient groups. The BDS checklist is a self-report instrument that may be used for case finding in both clinical practice and in research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680178789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022399915000604</els_id><sourcerecordid>1680178789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-9cc103dd7ed7b5306a9d759d32da40db5999d6f19be8402c2e4a1ba7e2dc622f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAURi0EokPhFZCXbBKu7fyZBVJbClSqxKJFYmc59o3GacYZ7ExRdn2M8np9EhxmChIrVt6cez_f8xFCGeQMWPW2z_ttnM16DBhzDqzMQeQA1ROyYk0tMyYqeEpWAJxnQkp5RF7E2EMiJC-fkyNeNqwRRbUi306oxx_0-w7j5EbvtQtIp5E6i35y3Uzb0bphptbFKYVF6jzdBrfRYaZGB3xHr9dIH-7uTz9cUbNGczMk8uHu50vyrNNDxFeH95h8_Xh-ffY5u_zy6eLs5DIzhZRTJo1hIKyt0dZtKaDS0taltIJbXYBty_R7W3VMttgUwA3HQrNW18itqTjvxDF5s9-7DePvK9TGRYPDoD2Ou6hY1QCrm7qRCW32qAljjAE7dbhEMVCLV9Wrv17V4lWBUMlaGn19SNm1G7R_Bh9FJuB0D2C69dZhUNE49AZtEmomZUf3Pynv_1liBued0cMNzhj7cRd8cqmYilyBulr6Xepl5VItFOIXHWWmHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1680178789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A new questionnaire to identify bodily distress in primary care: The ‘BDS checklist’</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Budtz-Lilly, Anna ; Fink, Per ; Ørnbøl, Eva ; Vestergaard, Mogens ; Moth, Grete ; Christensen, Kaj Sparle ; Rosendal, Marianne</creator><creatorcontrib>Budtz-Lilly, Anna ; Fink, Per ; Ørnbøl, Eva ; Vestergaard, Mogens ; Moth, Grete ; Christensen, Kaj Sparle ; Rosendal, Marianne</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Functional symptoms and disorders are common in primary care. Bodily distress syndrome (BDS) is a newly proposed clinical diagnosis for functional disorders. The BDS diagnosis is based on empirical research, and the symptoms stated in the BDS criteria have been translated into a self-report questionnaire called the BDS checklist. The aim of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the checklist and to test the construct of BDS. Method The 30-item BDS checklist was completed by 2480 adult primary care patients in a cross-sectional study on contact and disease patterns in Danish general practice. We performed (internal) validation analyses of the collected checklist data. We also performed factor and latent class analyses to identify both BDS symptom groups and BDS patient groups. Results Internal validation analyses revealed acceptable and usable psychometric properties of the BDS checklist. The factor analyses identified the four distinct determining factors for BDS: cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and general symptoms. Results from factor and multi-trait analyses suggested a shortening of the BDS checklist (from 30 to 25 items). The latent class analyses resulted in three severity levels (no, moderate and severe BDS); the best fit index was found for a threshold of ≥ 4 symptoms in a symptom group. Conclusion The results provide empirical support for the previously described construct of BDS with four symptom groups and three patient groups. The BDS checklist is a self-report instrument that may be used for case finding in both clinical practice and in research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25818346</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bodily distress ; Cardiovascular System ; Checklist ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Denmark ; Diagnosis ; Factor analyses ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Functional somatic symptoms ; Gastrointestinal Tract ; General Practice - methods ; General Practice - standards ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Musculoskeletal System ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care - methods ; Primary Health Care - standards ; Psychiatry ; Psychometrics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Respiratory System ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Syndrome</subject><ispartof>Journal of psychosomatic research, 2015-06, Vol.78 (6), p.536-545</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-9cc103dd7ed7b5306a9d759d32da40db5999d6f19be8402c2e4a1ba7e2dc622f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-9cc103dd7ed7b5306a9d759d32da40db5999d6f19be8402c2e4a1ba7e2dc622f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399915000604$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25818346$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Budtz-Lilly, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Per</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ørnbøl, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vestergaard, Mogens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moth, Grete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Kaj Sparle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosendal, Marianne</creatorcontrib><title>A new questionnaire to identify bodily distress in primary care: The ‘BDS checklist’</title><title>Journal of psychosomatic research</title><addtitle>J Psychosom Res</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Functional symptoms and disorders are common in primary care. Bodily distress syndrome (BDS) is a newly proposed clinical diagnosis for functional disorders. The BDS diagnosis is based on empirical research, and the symptoms stated in the BDS criteria have been translated into a self-report questionnaire called the BDS checklist. The aim of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the checklist and to test the construct of BDS. Method The 30-item BDS checklist was completed by 2480 adult primary care patients in a cross-sectional study on contact and disease patterns in Danish general practice. We performed (internal) validation analyses of the collected checklist data. We also performed factor and latent class analyses to identify both BDS symptom groups and BDS patient groups. Results Internal validation analyses revealed acceptable and usable psychometric properties of the BDS checklist. The factor analyses identified the four distinct determining factors for BDS: cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and general symptoms. Results from factor and multi-trait analyses suggested a shortening of the BDS checklist (from 30 to 25 items). The latent class analyses resulted in three severity levels (no, moderate and severe BDS); the best fit index was found for a threshold of ≥ 4 symptoms in a symptom group. Conclusion The results provide empirical support for the previously described construct of BDS with four symptom groups and three patient groups. The BDS checklist is a self-report instrument that may be used for case finding in both clinical practice and in research.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bodily distress</subject><subject>Cardiovascular System</subject><subject>Checklist</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Factor analyses</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional somatic symptoms</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Tract</subject><subject>General Practice - methods</subject><subject>General Practice - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal System</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Respiratory System</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Syndrome</subject><issn>0022-3999</issn><issn>1879-1360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAURi0EokPhFZCXbBKu7fyZBVJbClSqxKJFYmc59o3GacYZ7ExRdn2M8np9EhxmChIrVt6cez_f8xFCGeQMWPW2z_ttnM16DBhzDqzMQeQA1ROyYk0tMyYqeEpWAJxnQkp5RF7E2EMiJC-fkyNeNqwRRbUi306oxx_0-w7j5EbvtQtIp5E6i35y3Uzb0bphptbFKYVF6jzdBrfRYaZGB3xHr9dIH-7uTz9cUbNGczMk8uHu50vyrNNDxFeH95h8_Xh-ffY5u_zy6eLs5DIzhZRTJo1hIKyt0dZtKaDS0taltIJbXYBty_R7W3VMttgUwA3HQrNW18itqTjvxDF5s9-7DePvK9TGRYPDoD2Ou6hY1QCrm7qRCW32qAljjAE7dbhEMVCLV9Wrv17V4lWBUMlaGn19SNm1G7R_Bh9FJuB0D2C69dZhUNE49AZtEmomZUf3Pynv_1liBued0cMNzhj7cRd8cqmYilyBulr6Xepl5VItFOIXHWWmHw</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Budtz-Lilly, Anna</creator><creator>Fink, Per</creator><creator>Ørnbøl, Eva</creator><creator>Vestergaard, Mogens</creator><creator>Moth, Grete</creator><creator>Christensen, Kaj Sparle</creator><creator>Rosendal, Marianne</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>A new questionnaire to identify bodily distress in primary care: The ‘BDS checklist’</title><author>Budtz-Lilly, Anna ; Fink, Per ; Ørnbøl, Eva ; Vestergaard, Mogens ; Moth, Grete ; Christensen, Kaj Sparle ; Rosendal, Marianne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-9cc103dd7ed7b5306a9d759d32da40db5999d6f19be8402c2e4a1ba7e2dc622f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bodily distress</topic><topic>Cardiovascular System</topic><topic>Checklist</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Factor analyses</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional somatic symptoms</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Tract</topic><topic>General Practice - methods</topic><topic>General Practice - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal System</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Respiratory System</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Syndrome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Budtz-Lilly, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Per</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ørnbøl, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vestergaard, Mogens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moth, Grete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Kaj Sparle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosendal, Marianne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of psychosomatic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Budtz-Lilly, Anna</au><au>Fink, Per</au><au>Ørnbøl, Eva</au><au>Vestergaard, Mogens</au><au>Moth, Grete</au><au>Christensen, Kaj Sparle</au><au>Rosendal, Marianne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A new questionnaire to identify bodily distress in primary care: The ‘BDS checklist’</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psychosomatic research</jtitle><addtitle>J Psychosom Res</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>536</spage><epage>545</epage><pages>536-545</pages><issn>0022-3999</issn><eissn>1879-1360</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Functional symptoms and disorders are common in primary care. Bodily distress syndrome (BDS) is a newly proposed clinical diagnosis for functional disorders. The BDS diagnosis is based on empirical research, and the symptoms stated in the BDS criteria have been translated into a self-report questionnaire called the BDS checklist. The aim of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the checklist and to test the construct of BDS. Method The 30-item BDS checklist was completed by 2480 adult primary care patients in a cross-sectional study on contact and disease patterns in Danish general practice. We performed (internal) validation analyses of the collected checklist data. We also performed factor and latent class analyses to identify both BDS symptom groups and BDS patient groups. Results Internal validation analyses revealed acceptable and usable psychometric properties of the BDS checklist. The factor analyses identified the four distinct determining factors for BDS: cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and general symptoms. Results from factor and multi-trait analyses suggested a shortening of the BDS checklist (from 30 to 25 items). The latent class analyses resulted in three severity levels (no, moderate and severe BDS); the best fit index was found for a threshold of ≥ 4 symptoms in a symptom group. Conclusion The results provide empirical support for the previously described construct of BDS with four symptom groups and three patient groups. The BDS checklist is a self-report instrument that may be used for case finding in both clinical practice and in research.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25818346</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.006</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3999 |
ispartof | Journal of psychosomatic research, 2015-06, Vol.78 (6), p.536-545 |
issn | 0022-3999 1879-1360 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680178789 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Bodily distress Cardiovascular System Checklist Cross-Sectional Studies Denmark Diagnosis Factor analyses Factor Analysis, Statistical Female Functional somatic symptoms Gastrointestinal Tract General Practice - methods General Practice - standards Humans Male Middle Aged Musculoskeletal System Primary care Primary Health Care - methods Primary Health Care - standards Psychiatry Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Respiratory System Surveys and Questionnaires - standards Syndrome |
title | A new questionnaire to identify bodily distress in primary care: The ‘BDS checklist’ |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T16%3A52%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20new%20questionnaire%20to%20identify%20bodily%20distress%20in%20primary%20care:%20The%20%E2%80%98BDS%20checklist%E2%80%99&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psychosomatic%20research&rft.au=Budtz-Lilly,%20Anna&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=536&rft.epage=545&rft.pages=536-545&rft.issn=0022-3999&rft.eissn=1879-1360&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1680178789%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1680178789&rft_id=info:pmid/25818346&rft_els_id=S0022399915000604&rfr_iscdi=true |