A new questionnaire to identify bodily distress in primary care: The ‘BDS checklist’

Abstract Background Functional symptoms and disorders are common in primary care. Bodily distress syndrome (BDS) is a newly proposed clinical diagnosis for functional disorders. The BDS diagnosis is based on empirical research, and the symptoms stated in the BDS criteria have been translated into a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of psychosomatic research 2015-06, Vol.78 (6), p.536-545
Hauptverfasser: Budtz-Lilly, Anna, Fink, Per, Ørnbøl, Eva, Vestergaard, Mogens, Moth, Grete, Christensen, Kaj Sparle, Rosendal, Marianne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 545
container_issue 6
container_start_page 536
container_title Journal of psychosomatic research
container_volume 78
creator Budtz-Lilly, Anna
Fink, Per
Ørnbøl, Eva
Vestergaard, Mogens
Moth, Grete
Christensen, Kaj Sparle
Rosendal, Marianne
description Abstract Background Functional symptoms and disorders are common in primary care. Bodily distress syndrome (BDS) is a newly proposed clinical diagnosis for functional disorders. The BDS diagnosis is based on empirical research, and the symptoms stated in the BDS criteria have been translated into a self-report questionnaire called the BDS checklist. The aim of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the checklist and to test the construct of BDS. Method The 30-item BDS checklist was completed by 2480 adult primary care patients in a cross-sectional study on contact and disease patterns in Danish general practice. We performed (internal) validation analyses of the collected checklist data. We also performed factor and latent class analyses to identify both BDS symptom groups and BDS patient groups. Results Internal validation analyses revealed acceptable and usable psychometric properties of the BDS checklist. The factor analyses identified the four distinct determining factors for BDS: cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and general symptoms. Results from factor and multi-trait analyses suggested a shortening of the BDS checklist (from 30 to 25 items). The latent class analyses resulted in three severity levels (no, moderate and severe BDS); the best fit index was found for a threshold of ≥ 4 symptoms in a symptom group. Conclusion The results provide empirical support for the previously described construct of BDS with four symptom groups and three patient groups. The BDS checklist is a self-report instrument that may be used for case finding in both clinical practice and in research.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680178789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022399915000604</els_id><sourcerecordid>1680178789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-9cc103dd7ed7b5306a9d759d32da40db5999d6f19be8402c2e4a1ba7e2dc622f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAURi0EokPhFZCXbBKu7fyZBVJbClSqxKJFYmc59o3GacYZ7ExRdn2M8np9EhxmChIrVt6cez_f8xFCGeQMWPW2z_ttnM16DBhzDqzMQeQA1ROyYk0tMyYqeEpWAJxnQkp5RF7E2EMiJC-fkyNeNqwRRbUi306oxx_0-w7j5EbvtQtIp5E6i35y3Uzb0bphptbFKYVF6jzdBrfRYaZGB3xHr9dIH-7uTz9cUbNGczMk8uHu50vyrNNDxFeH95h8_Xh-ffY5u_zy6eLs5DIzhZRTJo1hIKyt0dZtKaDS0taltIJbXYBty_R7W3VMttgUwA3HQrNW18itqTjvxDF5s9-7DePvK9TGRYPDoD2Ou6hY1QCrm7qRCW32qAljjAE7dbhEMVCLV9Wrv17V4lWBUMlaGn19SNm1G7R_Bh9FJuB0D2C69dZhUNE49AZtEmomZUf3Pynv_1liBued0cMNzhj7cRd8cqmYilyBulr6Xepl5VItFOIXHWWmHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1680178789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A new questionnaire to identify bodily distress in primary care: The ‘BDS checklist’</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Budtz-Lilly, Anna ; Fink, Per ; Ørnbøl, Eva ; Vestergaard, Mogens ; Moth, Grete ; Christensen, Kaj Sparle ; Rosendal, Marianne</creator><creatorcontrib>Budtz-Lilly, Anna ; Fink, Per ; Ørnbøl, Eva ; Vestergaard, Mogens ; Moth, Grete ; Christensen, Kaj Sparle ; Rosendal, Marianne</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Functional symptoms and disorders are common in primary care. Bodily distress syndrome (BDS) is a newly proposed clinical diagnosis for functional disorders. The BDS diagnosis is based on empirical research, and the symptoms stated in the BDS criteria have been translated into a self-report questionnaire called the BDS checklist. The aim of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the checklist and to test the construct of BDS. Method The 30-item BDS checklist was completed by 2480 adult primary care patients in a cross-sectional study on contact and disease patterns in Danish general practice. We performed (internal) validation analyses of the collected checklist data. We also performed factor and latent class analyses to identify both BDS symptom groups and BDS patient groups. Results Internal validation analyses revealed acceptable and usable psychometric properties of the BDS checklist. The factor analyses identified the four distinct determining factors for BDS: cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and general symptoms. Results from factor and multi-trait analyses suggested a shortening of the BDS checklist (from 30 to 25 items). The latent class analyses resulted in three severity levels (no, moderate and severe BDS); the best fit index was found for a threshold of ≥ 4 symptoms in a symptom group. Conclusion The results provide empirical support for the previously described construct of BDS with four symptom groups and three patient groups. The BDS checklist is a self-report instrument that may be used for case finding in both clinical practice and in research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25818346</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bodily distress ; Cardiovascular System ; Checklist ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Denmark ; Diagnosis ; Factor analyses ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Functional somatic symptoms ; Gastrointestinal Tract ; General Practice - methods ; General Practice - standards ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Musculoskeletal System ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care - methods ; Primary Health Care - standards ; Psychiatry ; Psychometrics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Respiratory System ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Syndrome</subject><ispartof>Journal of psychosomatic research, 2015-06, Vol.78 (6), p.536-545</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-9cc103dd7ed7b5306a9d759d32da40db5999d6f19be8402c2e4a1ba7e2dc622f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-9cc103dd7ed7b5306a9d759d32da40db5999d6f19be8402c2e4a1ba7e2dc622f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399915000604$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25818346$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Budtz-Lilly, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Per</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ørnbøl, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vestergaard, Mogens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moth, Grete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Kaj Sparle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosendal, Marianne</creatorcontrib><title>A new questionnaire to identify bodily distress in primary care: The ‘BDS checklist’</title><title>Journal of psychosomatic research</title><addtitle>J Psychosom Res</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Functional symptoms and disorders are common in primary care. Bodily distress syndrome (BDS) is a newly proposed clinical diagnosis for functional disorders. The BDS diagnosis is based on empirical research, and the symptoms stated in the BDS criteria have been translated into a self-report questionnaire called the BDS checklist. The aim of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the checklist and to test the construct of BDS. Method The 30-item BDS checklist was completed by 2480 adult primary care patients in a cross-sectional study on contact and disease patterns in Danish general practice. We performed (internal) validation analyses of the collected checklist data. We also performed factor and latent class analyses to identify both BDS symptom groups and BDS patient groups. Results Internal validation analyses revealed acceptable and usable psychometric properties of the BDS checklist. The factor analyses identified the four distinct determining factors for BDS: cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and general symptoms. Results from factor and multi-trait analyses suggested a shortening of the BDS checklist (from 30 to 25 items). The latent class analyses resulted in three severity levels (no, moderate and severe BDS); the best fit index was found for a threshold of ≥ 4 symptoms in a symptom group. Conclusion The results provide empirical support for the previously described construct of BDS with four symptom groups and three patient groups. The BDS checklist is a self-report instrument that may be used for case finding in both clinical practice and in research.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bodily distress</subject><subject>Cardiovascular System</subject><subject>Checklist</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Factor analyses</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional somatic symptoms</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Tract</subject><subject>General Practice - methods</subject><subject>General Practice - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal System</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Respiratory System</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Syndrome</subject><issn>0022-3999</issn><issn>1879-1360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAURi0EokPhFZCXbBKu7fyZBVJbClSqxKJFYmc59o3GacYZ7ExRdn2M8np9EhxmChIrVt6cez_f8xFCGeQMWPW2z_ttnM16DBhzDqzMQeQA1ROyYk0tMyYqeEpWAJxnQkp5RF7E2EMiJC-fkyNeNqwRRbUi306oxx_0-w7j5EbvtQtIp5E6i35y3Uzb0bphptbFKYVF6jzdBrfRYaZGB3xHr9dIH-7uTz9cUbNGczMk8uHu50vyrNNDxFeH95h8_Xh-ffY5u_zy6eLs5DIzhZRTJo1hIKyt0dZtKaDS0taltIJbXYBty_R7W3VMttgUwA3HQrNW18itqTjvxDF5s9-7DePvK9TGRYPDoD2Ou6hY1QCrm7qRCW32qAljjAE7dbhEMVCLV9Wrv17V4lWBUMlaGn19SNm1G7R_Bh9FJuB0D2C69dZhUNE49AZtEmomZUf3Pynv_1liBued0cMNzhj7cRd8cqmYilyBulr6Xepl5VItFOIXHWWmHw</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Budtz-Lilly, Anna</creator><creator>Fink, Per</creator><creator>Ørnbøl, Eva</creator><creator>Vestergaard, Mogens</creator><creator>Moth, Grete</creator><creator>Christensen, Kaj Sparle</creator><creator>Rosendal, Marianne</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>A new questionnaire to identify bodily distress in primary care: The ‘BDS checklist’</title><author>Budtz-Lilly, Anna ; Fink, Per ; Ørnbøl, Eva ; Vestergaard, Mogens ; Moth, Grete ; Christensen, Kaj Sparle ; Rosendal, Marianne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-9cc103dd7ed7b5306a9d759d32da40db5999d6f19be8402c2e4a1ba7e2dc622f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bodily distress</topic><topic>Cardiovascular System</topic><topic>Checklist</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Factor analyses</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional somatic symptoms</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Tract</topic><topic>General Practice - methods</topic><topic>General Practice - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal System</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Respiratory System</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Syndrome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Budtz-Lilly, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Per</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ørnbøl, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vestergaard, Mogens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moth, Grete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Kaj Sparle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosendal, Marianne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of psychosomatic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Budtz-Lilly, Anna</au><au>Fink, Per</au><au>Ørnbøl, Eva</au><au>Vestergaard, Mogens</au><au>Moth, Grete</au><au>Christensen, Kaj Sparle</au><au>Rosendal, Marianne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A new questionnaire to identify bodily distress in primary care: The ‘BDS checklist’</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psychosomatic research</jtitle><addtitle>J Psychosom Res</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>536</spage><epage>545</epage><pages>536-545</pages><issn>0022-3999</issn><eissn>1879-1360</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Functional symptoms and disorders are common in primary care. Bodily distress syndrome (BDS) is a newly proposed clinical diagnosis for functional disorders. The BDS diagnosis is based on empirical research, and the symptoms stated in the BDS criteria have been translated into a self-report questionnaire called the BDS checklist. The aim of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the checklist and to test the construct of BDS. Method The 30-item BDS checklist was completed by 2480 adult primary care patients in a cross-sectional study on contact and disease patterns in Danish general practice. We performed (internal) validation analyses of the collected checklist data. We also performed factor and latent class analyses to identify both BDS symptom groups and BDS patient groups. Results Internal validation analyses revealed acceptable and usable psychometric properties of the BDS checklist. The factor analyses identified the four distinct determining factors for BDS: cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and general symptoms. Results from factor and multi-trait analyses suggested a shortening of the BDS checklist (from 30 to 25 items). The latent class analyses resulted in three severity levels (no, moderate and severe BDS); the best fit index was found for a threshold of ≥ 4 symptoms in a symptom group. Conclusion The results provide empirical support for the previously described construct of BDS with four symptom groups and three patient groups. The BDS checklist is a self-report instrument that may be used for case finding in both clinical practice and in research.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25818346</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.006</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3999
ispartof Journal of psychosomatic research, 2015-06, Vol.78 (6), p.536-545
issn 0022-3999
1879-1360
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680178789
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Bodily distress
Cardiovascular System
Checklist
Cross-Sectional Studies
Denmark
Diagnosis
Factor analyses
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Functional somatic symptoms
Gastrointestinal Tract
General Practice - methods
General Practice - standards
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Musculoskeletal System
Primary care
Primary Health Care - methods
Primary Health Care - standards
Psychiatry
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Respiratory System
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
Syndrome
title A new questionnaire to identify bodily distress in primary care: The ‘BDS checklist’
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T16%3A52%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20new%20questionnaire%20to%20identify%20bodily%20distress%20in%20primary%20care:%20The%20%E2%80%98BDS%20checklist%E2%80%99&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psychosomatic%20research&rft.au=Budtz-Lilly,%20Anna&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=536&rft.epage=545&rft.pages=536-545&rft.issn=0022-3999&rft.eissn=1879-1360&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1680178789%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1680178789&rft_id=info:pmid/25818346&rft_els_id=S0022399915000604&rfr_iscdi=true