Vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy: danger or panacea? A systematic narrative review
Background Although vegan–vegetarian diets are increasingly popular, no recent systematic reviews on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy exist. Objectives To review the literature on vegan–vegetarian diets and pregnancy outcomes. Search strategy PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2015-04, Vol.122 (5), p.623-633 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 633 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 623 |
container_title | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology |
container_volume | 122 |
creator | Piccoli, GB Clari, R Vigotti, FN Leone, F Attini, R Cabiddu, G Mauro, G Castelluccia, N Colombi, N Capizzi, I Pani, A Todros, T Avagnina, P |
description | Background
Although vegan–vegetarian diets are increasingly popular, no recent systematic reviews on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy exist.
Objectives
To review the literature on vegan–vegetarian diets and pregnancy outcomes.
Search strategy
PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to September 2013 for pregnancy and vegan or vegetarian Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free‐text terms.
Selection criteria
Vegan or vegetarian diets in healthy pregnant women. We excluded case reports and papers analysing vegan–vegetarian diets in poverty and malnutrition. Searching, paper selection, and data extraction were performed in duplicate.
Data collection and analysis
The high heterogeneity of the studies led to a narrative review.
Main results
We obtained 262 full texts from 2329 references; 22 selected papers reporting maternal–fetal outcomes (13) and dietary deficiencies (nine) met the inclusion criteria. None of the studies reported an increase in severe adverse outcomes or in major malformations, except one report of increased hypospadias in infants of vegetarian mothers. Five studies reported vegetarian mothers had lower birthweight babies, yet two studies reported higher birthweights. The duration of pregnancy was available in six studies and was similar between vegan–vegetarians and omnivores. The nine heterogeneous studies on microelements and vitamins suggest vegan–vegetarian women may be at risk of vitamin B12 and iron deficiencies.
Author's conclusions
The evidence on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy is heterogeneous and scant. The lack of randomised studies prevents us from distinguishing the effects of diet from confounding factors. Within these limits, vegan–vegetarian diets may be considered safe in pregnancy, provided that attention is paid to vitamin and trace element requirements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1471-0528.13280 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680172023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3629323451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5150-33311d314246290160787087318e834859f375fdfeda66759de18de2893cfff43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1PGzEQhq2qiISUc2-VpV64LJmxd20vFwSIryoSl34cLXd3NlqUeIO9Ccqt_6H_kF-CkwAHLq0vHtmPX8_oYewzwjGmNcZcYwaFMMcohYEPbPh28nFbQwbpYsAOYrwHQCVA7rOBKBRACWLIfv2kqfNPf_6uaEq9C63zvG6pj7z1fBFo6p2v1ie8dn5KgXeBL5x3FblTfsbjOvY0d31bce9CSMWKeKBVS4-f2F7jZpEOX_YR-3F1-f3iJpvcXd9enE2yqsACMiklYi0xF7kSZeoPtNFgtERDRuamKBupi6ZuqHZK6aKsCU1NwpSyapomlyN2tMtdhO5hSbG38zZWNJs5T90yWlQGUAsQ8j_Q9INQRqiEfn2H3nfL4NMgGypXqLXARI13VBW6GAM1dhHauQtri2A3euxGht3IsFs96cWXl9zl7znVb_yrjwQUO-CxndH6X3n2_NvdLvgZDCeXdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1664617721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy: danger or panacea? A systematic narrative review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Piccoli, GB ; Clari, R ; Vigotti, FN ; Leone, F ; Attini, R ; Cabiddu, G ; Mauro, G ; Castelluccia, N ; Colombi, N ; Capizzi, I ; Pani, A ; Todros, T ; Avagnina, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Piccoli, GB ; Clari, R ; Vigotti, FN ; Leone, F ; Attini, R ; Cabiddu, G ; Mauro, G ; Castelluccia, N ; Colombi, N ; Capizzi, I ; Pani, A ; Todros, T ; Avagnina, P</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Although vegan–vegetarian diets are increasingly popular, no recent systematic reviews on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy exist.
Objectives
To review the literature on vegan–vegetarian diets and pregnancy outcomes.
Search strategy
PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to September 2013 for pregnancy and vegan or vegetarian Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free‐text terms.
Selection criteria
Vegan or vegetarian diets in healthy pregnant women. We excluded case reports and papers analysing vegan–vegetarian diets in poverty and malnutrition. Searching, paper selection, and data extraction were performed in duplicate.
Data collection and analysis
The high heterogeneity of the studies led to a narrative review.
Main results
We obtained 262 full texts from 2329 references; 22 selected papers reporting maternal–fetal outcomes (13) and dietary deficiencies (nine) met the inclusion criteria. None of the studies reported an increase in severe adverse outcomes or in major malformations, except one report of increased hypospadias in infants of vegetarian mothers. Five studies reported vegetarian mothers had lower birthweight babies, yet two studies reported higher birthweights. The duration of pregnancy was available in six studies and was similar between vegan–vegetarians and omnivores. The nine heterogeneous studies on microelements and vitamins suggest vegan–vegetarian women may be at risk of vitamin B12 and iron deficiencies.
Author's conclusions
The evidence on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy is heterogeneous and scant. The lack of randomised studies prevents us from distinguishing the effects of diet from confounding factors. Within these limits, vegan–vegetarian diets may be considered safe in pregnancy, provided that attention is paid to vitamin and trace element requirements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13280</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25600902</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOGFQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Birthweight ; Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) ; Diet, Vegetarian - adverse effects ; Diet, Vegetarian - statistics & numerical data ; Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage ; Feeding Behavior ; Female ; Humans ; Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; maternal–fetal outcomes ; Nutrition Policy ; Nutritional Requirements ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Risk Factors ; Systematic review ; vegan diet ; vegetarian diet ; Vegetarianism ; Vitamins - administration & dosage</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2015-04, Vol.122 (5), p.623-633</ispartof><rights>2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><rights>2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5150-33311d314246290160787087318e834859f375fdfeda66759de18de2893cfff43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5150-33311d314246290160787087318e834859f375fdfeda66759de18de2893cfff43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1471-0528.13280$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1471-0528.13280$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25600902$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piccoli, GB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clari, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigotti, FN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leone, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attini, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabiddu, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauro, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelluccia, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombi, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capizzi, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pani, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todros, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avagnina, P</creatorcontrib><title>Vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy: danger or panacea? A systematic narrative review</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Background
Although vegan–vegetarian diets are increasingly popular, no recent systematic reviews on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy exist.
Objectives
To review the literature on vegan–vegetarian diets and pregnancy outcomes.
Search strategy
PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to September 2013 for pregnancy and vegan or vegetarian Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free‐text terms.
Selection criteria
Vegan or vegetarian diets in healthy pregnant women. We excluded case reports and papers analysing vegan–vegetarian diets in poverty and malnutrition. Searching, paper selection, and data extraction were performed in duplicate.
Data collection and analysis
The high heterogeneity of the studies led to a narrative review.
Main results
We obtained 262 full texts from 2329 references; 22 selected papers reporting maternal–fetal outcomes (13) and dietary deficiencies (nine) met the inclusion criteria. None of the studies reported an increase in severe adverse outcomes or in major malformations, except one report of increased hypospadias in infants of vegetarian mothers. Five studies reported vegetarian mothers had lower birthweight babies, yet two studies reported higher birthweights. The duration of pregnancy was available in six studies and was similar between vegan–vegetarians and omnivores. The nine heterogeneous studies on microelements and vitamins suggest vegan–vegetarian women may be at risk of vitamin B12 and iron deficiencies.
Author's conclusions
The evidence on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy is heterogeneous and scant. The lack of randomised studies prevents us from distinguishing the effects of diet from confounding factors. Within these limits, vegan–vegetarian diets may be considered safe in pregnancy, provided that attention is paid to vitamin and trace element requirements.</description><subject>Birthweight</subject><subject>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</subject><subject>Diet, Vegetarian - adverse effects</subject><subject>Diet, Vegetarian - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>maternal–fetal outcomes</subject><subject>Nutrition Policy</subject><subject>Nutritional Requirements</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>vegan diet</subject><subject>vegetarian diet</subject><subject>Vegetarianism</subject><subject>Vitamins - administration & dosage</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1PGzEQhq2qiISUc2-VpV64LJmxd20vFwSIryoSl34cLXd3NlqUeIO9Ccqt_6H_kF-CkwAHLq0vHtmPX8_oYewzwjGmNcZcYwaFMMcohYEPbPh28nFbQwbpYsAOYrwHQCVA7rOBKBRACWLIfv2kqfNPf_6uaEq9C63zvG6pj7z1fBFo6p2v1ie8dn5KgXeBL5x3FblTfsbjOvY0d31bce9CSMWKeKBVS4-f2F7jZpEOX_YR-3F1-f3iJpvcXd9enE2yqsACMiklYi0xF7kSZeoPtNFgtERDRuamKBupi6ZuqHZK6aKsCU1NwpSyapomlyN2tMtdhO5hSbG38zZWNJs5T90yWlQGUAsQ8j_Q9INQRqiEfn2H3nfL4NMgGypXqLXARI13VBW6GAM1dhHauQtri2A3euxGht3IsFs96cWXl9zl7znVb_yrjwQUO-CxndH6X3n2_NvdLvgZDCeXdg</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Piccoli, GB</creator><creator>Clari, R</creator><creator>Vigotti, FN</creator><creator>Leone, F</creator><creator>Attini, R</creator><creator>Cabiddu, G</creator><creator>Mauro, G</creator><creator>Castelluccia, N</creator><creator>Colombi, N</creator><creator>Capizzi, I</creator><creator>Pani, A</creator><creator>Todros, T</creator><creator>Avagnina, P</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy: danger or panacea? A systematic narrative review</title><author>Piccoli, GB ; Clari, R ; Vigotti, FN ; Leone, F ; Attini, R ; Cabiddu, G ; Mauro, G ; Castelluccia, N ; Colombi, N ; Capizzi, I ; Pani, A ; Todros, T ; Avagnina, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5150-33311d314246290160787087318e834859f375fdfeda66759de18de2893cfff43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Birthweight</topic><topic>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</topic><topic>Diet, Vegetarian - adverse effects</topic><topic>Diet, Vegetarian - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>maternal–fetal outcomes</topic><topic>Nutrition Policy</topic><topic>Nutritional Requirements</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>vegan diet</topic><topic>vegetarian diet</topic><topic>Vegetarianism</topic><topic>Vitamins - administration & dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piccoli, GB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clari, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigotti, FN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leone, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attini, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabiddu, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauro, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelluccia, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombi, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capizzi, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pani, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todros, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avagnina, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piccoli, GB</au><au>Clari, R</au><au>Vigotti, FN</au><au>Leone, F</au><au>Attini, R</au><au>Cabiddu, G</au><au>Mauro, G</au><au>Castelluccia, N</au><au>Colombi, N</au><au>Capizzi, I</au><au>Pani, A</au><au>Todros, T</au><au>Avagnina, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy: danger or panacea? A systematic narrative review</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>623</spage><epage>633</epage><pages>623-633</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><coden>BIOGFQ</coden><abstract>Background
Although vegan–vegetarian diets are increasingly popular, no recent systematic reviews on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy exist.
Objectives
To review the literature on vegan–vegetarian diets and pregnancy outcomes.
Search strategy
PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to September 2013 for pregnancy and vegan or vegetarian Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free‐text terms.
Selection criteria
Vegan or vegetarian diets in healthy pregnant women. We excluded case reports and papers analysing vegan–vegetarian diets in poverty and malnutrition. Searching, paper selection, and data extraction were performed in duplicate.
Data collection and analysis
The high heterogeneity of the studies led to a narrative review.
Main results
We obtained 262 full texts from 2329 references; 22 selected papers reporting maternal–fetal outcomes (13) and dietary deficiencies (nine) met the inclusion criteria. None of the studies reported an increase in severe adverse outcomes or in major malformations, except one report of increased hypospadias in infants of vegetarian mothers. Five studies reported vegetarian mothers had lower birthweight babies, yet two studies reported higher birthweights. The duration of pregnancy was available in six studies and was similar between vegan–vegetarians and omnivores. The nine heterogeneous studies on microelements and vitamins suggest vegan–vegetarian women may be at risk of vitamin B12 and iron deficiencies.
Author's conclusions
The evidence on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy is heterogeneous and scant. The lack of randomised studies prevents us from distinguishing the effects of diet from confounding factors. Within these limits, vegan–vegetarian diets may be considered safe in pregnancy, provided that attention is paid to vitamin and trace element requirements.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>25600902</pmid><doi>10.1111/1471-0528.13280</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-0328 |
ispartof | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2015-04, Vol.122 (5), p.623-633 |
issn | 1470-0328 1471-0528 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680172023 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Birthweight Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) Diet, Vegetarian - adverse effects Diet, Vegetarian - statistics & numerical data Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage Feeding Behavior Female Humans Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena maternal–fetal outcomes Nutrition Policy Nutritional Requirements Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Risk Factors Systematic review vegan diet vegetarian diet Vegetarianism Vitamins - administration & dosage |
title | Vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy: danger or panacea? A systematic narrative review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A16%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vegan%E2%80%93vegetarian%20diets%20in%20pregnancy:%20danger%20or%20panacea?%20A%20systematic%20narrative%20review&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Piccoli,%20GB&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=623&rft.epage=633&rft.pages=623-633&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft.coden=BIOGFQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1471-0528.13280&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3629323451%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1664617721&rft_id=info:pmid/25600902&rfr_iscdi=true |