Vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy: danger or panacea? A systematic narrative review

Background Although vegan–vegetarian diets are increasingly popular, no recent systematic reviews on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy exist. Objectives To review the literature on vegan–vegetarian diets and pregnancy outcomes. Search strategy PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2015-04, Vol.122 (5), p.623-633
Hauptverfasser: Piccoli, GB, Clari, R, Vigotti, FN, Leone, F, Attini, R, Cabiddu, G, Mauro, G, Castelluccia, N, Colombi, N, Capizzi, I, Pani, A, Todros, T, Avagnina, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 633
container_issue 5
container_start_page 623
container_title BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
container_volume 122
creator Piccoli, GB
Clari, R
Vigotti, FN
Leone, F
Attini, R
Cabiddu, G
Mauro, G
Castelluccia, N
Colombi, N
Capizzi, I
Pani, A
Todros, T
Avagnina, P
description Background Although vegan–vegetarian diets are increasingly popular, no recent systematic reviews on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy exist. Objectives To review the literature on vegan–vegetarian diets and pregnancy outcomes. Search strategy PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to September 2013 for pregnancy and vegan or vegetarian Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free‐text terms. Selection criteria Vegan or vegetarian diets in healthy pregnant women. We excluded case reports and papers analysing vegan–vegetarian diets in poverty and malnutrition. Searching, paper selection, and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Data collection and analysis The high heterogeneity of the studies led to a narrative review. Main results We obtained 262 full texts from 2329 references; 22 selected papers reporting maternal–fetal outcomes (13) and dietary deficiencies (nine) met the inclusion criteria. None of the studies reported an increase in severe adverse outcomes or in major malformations, except one report of increased hypospadias in infants of vegetarian mothers. Five studies reported vegetarian mothers had lower birthweight babies, yet two studies reported higher birthweights. The duration of pregnancy was available in six studies and was similar between vegan–vegetarians and omnivores. The nine heterogeneous studies on microelements and vitamins suggest vegan–vegetarian women may be at risk of vitamin B12 and iron deficiencies. Author's conclusions The evidence on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy is heterogeneous and scant. The lack of randomised studies prevents us from distinguishing the effects of diet from confounding factors. Within these limits, vegan–vegetarian diets may be considered safe in pregnancy, provided that attention is paid to vitamin and trace element requirements.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1471-0528.13280
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680172023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3629323451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5150-33311d314246290160787087318e834859f375fdfeda66759de18de2893cfff43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1PGzEQhq2qiISUc2-VpV64LJmxd20vFwSIryoSl34cLXd3NlqUeIO9Ccqt_6H_kF-CkwAHLq0vHtmPX8_oYewzwjGmNcZcYwaFMMcohYEPbPh28nFbQwbpYsAOYrwHQCVA7rOBKBRACWLIfv2kqfNPf_6uaEq9C63zvG6pj7z1fBFo6p2v1ie8dn5KgXeBL5x3FblTfsbjOvY0d31bce9CSMWKeKBVS4-f2F7jZpEOX_YR-3F1-f3iJpvcXd9enE2yqsACMiklYi0xF7kSZeoPtNFgtERDRuamKBupi6ZuqHZK6aKsCU1NwpSyapomlyN2tMtdhO5hSbG38zZWNJs5T90yWlQGUAsQ8j_Q9INQRqiEfn2H3nfL4NMgGypXqLXARI13VBW6GAM1dhHauQtri2A3euxGht3IsFs96cWXl9zl7znVb_yrjwQUO-CxndH6X3n2_NvdLvgZDCeXdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1664617721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy: danger or panacea? A systematic narrative review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Piccoli, GB ; Clari, R ; Vigotti, FN ; Leone, F ; Attini, R ; Cabiddu, G ; Mauro, G ; Castelluccia, N ; Colombi, N ; Capizzi, I ; Pani, A ; Todros, T ; Avagnina, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Piccoli, GB ; Clari, R ; Vigotti, FN ; Leone, F ; Attini, R ; Cabiddu, G ; Mauro, G ; Castelluccia, N ; Colombi, N ; Capizzi, I ; Pani, A ; Todros, T ; Avagnina, P</creatorcontrib><description>Background Although vegan–vegetarian diets are increasingly popular, no recent systematic reviews on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy exist. Objectives To review the literature on vegan–vegetarian diets and pregnancy outcomes. Search strategy PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to September 2013 for pregnancy and vegan or vegetarian Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free‐text terms. Selection criteria Vegan or vegetarian diets in healthy pregnant women. We excluded case reports and papers analysing vegan–vegetarian diets in poverty and malnutrition. Searching, paper selection, and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Data collection and analysis The high heterogeneity of the studies led to a narrative review. Main results We obtained 262 full texts from 2329 references; 22 selected papers reporting maternal–fetal outcomes (13) and dietary deficiencies (nine) met the inclusion criteria. None of the studies reported an increase in severe adverse outcomes or in major malformations, except one report of increased hypospadias in infants of vegetarian mothers. Five studies reported vegetarian mothers had lower birthweight babies, yet two studies reported higher birthweights. The duration of pregnancy was available in six studies and was similar between vegan–vegetarians and omnivores. The nine heterogeneous studies on microelements and vitamins suggest vegan–vegetarian women may be at risk of vitamin B12 and iron deficiencies. Author's conclusions The evidence on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy is heterogeneous and scant. The lack of randomised studies prevents us from distinguishing the effects of diet from confounding factors. Within these limits, vegan–vegetarian diets may be considered safe in pregnancy, provided that attention is paid to vitamin and trace element requirements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13280</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25600902</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOGFQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Birthweight ; Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) ; Diet, Vegetarian - adverse effects ; Diet, Vegetarian - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Dietary Proteins - administration &amp; dosage ; Feeding Behavior ; Female ; Humans ; Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; maternal–fetal outcomes ; Nutrition Policy ; Nutritional Requirements ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Risk Factors ; Systematic review ; vegan diet ; vegetarian diet ; Vegetarianism ; Vitamins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2015-04, Vol.122 (5), p.623-633</ispartof><rights>2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><rights>2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5150-33311d314246290160787087318e834859f375fdfeda66759de18de2893cfff43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5150-33311d314246290160787087318e834859f375fdfeda66759de18de2893cfff43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1471-0528.13280$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1471-0528.13280$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25600902$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piccoli, GB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clari, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigotti, FN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leone, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attini, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabiddu, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauro, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelluccia, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombi, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capizzi, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pani, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todros, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avagnina, P</creatorcontrib><title>Vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy: danger or panacea? A systematic narrative review</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Background Although vegan–vegetarian diets are increasingly popular, no recent systematic reviews on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy exist. Objectives To review the literature on vegan–vegetarian diets and pregnancy outcomes. Search strategy PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to September 2013 for pregnancy and vegan or vegetarian Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free‐text terms. Selection criteria Vegan or vegetarian diets in healthy pregnant women. We excluded case reports and papers analysing vegan–vegetarian diets in poverty and malnutrition. Searching, paper selection, and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Data collection and analysis The high heterogeneity of the studies led to a narrative review. Main results We obtained 262 full texts from 2329 references; 22 selected papers reporting maternal–fetal outcomes (13) and dietary deficiencies (nine) met the inclusion criteria. None of the studies reported an increase in severe adverse outcomes or in major malformations, except one report of increased hypospadias in infants of vegetarian mothers. Five studies reported vegetarian mothers had lower birthweight babies, yet two studies reported higher birthweights. The duration of pregnancy was available in six studies and was similar between vegan–vegetarians and omnivores. The nine heterogeneous studies on microelements and vitamins suggest vegan–vegetarian women may be at risk of vitamin B12 and iron deficiencies. Author's conclusions The evidence on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy is heterogeneous and scant. The lack of randomised studies prevents us from distinguishing the effects of diet from confounding factors. Within these limits, vegan–vegetarian diets may be considered safe in pregnancy, provided that attention is paid to vitamin and trace element requirements.</description><subject>Birthweight</subject><subject>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</subject><subject>Diet, Vegetarian - adverse effects</subject><subject>Diet, Vegetarian - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>maternal–fetal outcomes</subject><subject>Nutrition Policy</subject><subject>Nutritional Requirements</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>vegan diet</subject><subject>vegetarian diet</subject><subject>Vegetarianism</subject><subject>Vitamins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1PGzEQhq2qiISUc2-VpV64LJmxd20vFwSIryoSl34cLXd3NlqUeIO9Ccqt_6H_kF-CkwAHLq0vHtmPX8_oYewzwjGmNcZcYwaFMMcohYEPbPh28nFbQwbpYsAOYrwHQCVA7rOBKBRACWLIfv2kqfNPf_6uaEq9C63zvG6pj7z1fBFo6p2v1ie8dn5KgXeBL5x3FblTfsbjOvY0d31bce9CSMWKeKBVS4-f2F7jZpEOX_YR-3F1-f3iJpvcXd9enE2yqsACMiklYi0xF7kSZeoPtNFgtERDRuamKBupi6ZuqHZK6aKsCU1NwpSyapomlyN2tMtdhO5hSbG38zZWNJs5T90yWlQGUAsQ8j_Q9INQRqiEfn2H3nfL4NMgGypXqLXARI13VBW6GAM1dhHauQtri2A3euxGht3IsFs96cWXl9zl7znVb_yrjwQUO-CxndH6X3n2_NvdLvgZDCeXdg</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Piccoli, GB</creator><creator>Clari, R</creator><creator>Vigotti, FN</creator><creator>Leone, F</creator><creator>Attini, R</creator><creator>Cabiddu, G</creator><creator>Mauro, G</creator><creator>Castelluccia, N</creator><creator>Colombi, N</creator><creator>Capizzi, I</creator><creator>Pani, A</creator><creator>Todros, T</creator><creator>Avagnina, P</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy: danger or panacea? A systematic narrative review</title><author>Piccoli, GB ; Clari, R ; Vigotti, FN ; Leone, F ; Attini, R ; Cabiddu, G ; Mauro, G ; Castelluccia, N ; Colombi, N ; Capizzi, I ; Pani, A ; Todros, T ; Avagnina, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5150-33311d314246290160787087318e834859f375fdfeda66759de18de2893cfff43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Birthweight</topic><topic>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</topic><topic>Diet, Vegetarian - adverse effects</topic><topic>Diet, Vegetarian - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>maternal–fetal outcomes</topic><topic>Nutrition Policy</topic><topic>Nutritional Requirements</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>vegan diet</topic><topic>vegetarian diet</topic><topic>Vegetarianism</topic><topic>Vitamins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piccoli, GB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clari, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigotti, FN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leone, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attini, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabiddu, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauro, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelluccia, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombi, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capizzi, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pani, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todros, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avagnina, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piccoli, GB</au><au>Clari, R</au><au>Vigotti, FN</au><au>Leone, F</au><au>Attini, R</au><au>Cabiddu, G</au><au>Mauro, G</au><au>Castelluccia, N</au><au>Colombi, N</au><au>Capizzi, I</au><au>Pani, A</au><au>Todros, T</au><au>Avagnina, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy: danger or panacea? A systematic narrative review</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>623</spage><epage>633</epage><pages>623-633</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><coden>BIOGFQ</coden><abstract>Background Although vegan–vegetarian diets are increasingly popular, no recent systematic reviews on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy exist. Objectives To review the literature on vegan–vegetarian diets and pregnancy outcomes. Search strategy PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to September 2013 for pregnancy and vegan or vegetarian Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free‐text terms. Selection criteria Vegan or vegetarian diets in healthy pregnant women. We excluded case reports and papers analysing vegan–vegetarian diets in poverty and malnutrition. Searching, paper selection, and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Data collection and analysis The high heterogeneity of the studies led to a narrative review. Main results We obtained 262 full texts from 2329 references; 22 selected papers reporting maternal–fetal outcomes (13) and dietary deficiencies (nine) met the inclusion criteria. None of the studies reported an increase in severe adverse outcomes or in major malformations, except one report of increased hypospadias in infants of vegetarian mothers. Five studies reported vegetarian mothers had lower birthweight babies, yet two studies reported higher birthweights. The duration of pregnancy was available in six studies and was similar between vegan–vegetarians and omnivores. The nine heterogeneous studies on microelements and vitamins suggest vegan–vegetarian women may be at risk of vitamin B12 and iron deficiencies. Author's conclusions The evidence on vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy is heterogeneous and scant. The lack of randomised studies prevents us from distinguishing the effects of diet from confounding factors. Within these limits, vegan–vegetarian diets may be considered safe in pregnancy, provided that attention is paid to vitamin and trace element requirements.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>25600902</pmid><doi>10.1111/1471-0528.13280</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-0328
ispartof BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2015-04, Vol.122 (5), p.623-633
issn 1470-0328
1471-0528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680172023
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Birthweight
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Diet, Vegetarian - adverse effects
Diet, Vegetarian - statistics & numerical data
Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage
Feeding Behavior
Female
Humans
Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
maternal–fetal outcomes
Nutrition Policy
Nutritional Requirements
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Risk Factors
Systematic review
vegan diet
vegetarian diet
Vegetarianism
Vitamins - administration & dosage
title Vegan–vegetarian diets in pregnancy: danger or panacea? A systematic narrative review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A16%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vegan%E2%80%93vegetarian%20diets%20in%20pregnancy:%20danger%20or%20panacea?%20A%20systematic%20narrative%20review&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Piccoli,%20GB&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=623&rft.epage=633&rft.pages=623-633&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft.coden=BIOGFQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1471-0528.13280&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3629323451%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1664617721&rft_id=info:pmid/25600902&rfr_iscdi=true