Generation of Domestic Solid Waste in Rural Areas: Case Study of Remote Communities in the Brazilian Amazon
The Brazilian rural population is estimated to be around 30 million people and many rural areas do not have universal access to basic infrastructure services, including those related to solid waste. There are very few scientific studies on rural domestic solid waste and more investigative work is ne...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human Ecology 2014-08, Vol.42 (4), p.617-623 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 623 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 617 |
container_title | Human Ecology |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Bernardes, Carolina Günther, Wanda Maria Risso |
description | The Brazilian rural population is estimated to be around 30 million people and many rural areas do not have universal access to basic infrastructure services, including those related to solid waste. There are very few scientific studies on rural domestic solid waste and more investigative work is needed to provide information for appropriate solid waste management policies. This paper aims to characterize rural domestic solid waste in terms of quantity and quality. Amazonian rural communities were chosen for our case study. The issue of domestic solid waste was characterized both by means of interviews, at household level, and by a study of industrialized products traded in the communities located along the banks of the Juruá River, in the Brazilian Amazon. Quantitative results have shown that generation of solid waste in these rural communities reaches 0.5 kg/person/day. Organic matter represents 90 % of domestic solid waste generation and is mainly reused to feed animals and/or is composted using a method called paú. Inorganic solid waste (10 %) is either reused, burned or inadequately dumped in open sites. Based on these data, the annual production of solid waste is 437 tons per year in these communities. Since infrastructure services are virtually non-existent in this rural context, even this amount of solid waste may have a serious environmental impact, with negative effects on the population's health, particularly in terms of hazardous waste. Even though solid waste management solutions for rural populations might not always be based on economic efficiency, decision makers responsible for development and planning should present solutions that are socially, technologically, environmentally and economically suitable for this context. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10745-014-9679-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680152207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A706546618</galeid><jstor_id>24013865</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A706546618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-1564435f6e406ff0f06bcb7d2b83af475fde5320a1f8bebad31bcbebccab2fbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEEkvhB_SAZIkLl5Rx_JVwW7ZQkCohtaAeLccZFy-JXezk0P31eBWEEIdWPoxkP8-MR29VnVI4owDqXaaguKiB8rqTqqsPT6oNFaqpu46Kp9UGGECtWtY9r17kvAcASpXaVD8vMGAys4-BREfO44R59pZcx9EP5MbkGYkP5GpJZiTbhCa_JzuTkVzPy3B_VK5wigXaxWlagp895qMw_0DyIZmDH70JZDuZQwwvq2fOjBlf_akn1fdPH7_tPteXXy--7LaXtRVczTUVknMmnEQO0jlwIHvbq6HpW2YcV8INKFgDhrq2x94MjJZ37K01feN6y06qt2vfuxR_LWUfPflscRxNwLhkTWULVDQNqMdRIYGCaKAr6Jv_0H1cUiiLFEoAbzkVrFBnK3VrRtQ-uDgnY8sZcPI2BnS-3G8VSMGlpG0R6CrYFHNO6PRd8pNJ95qCPkar12h1iVYfo9WH4jSrkwsbbjH985UHpNertM9zTH-nNBwoa6VgvwEVc7B_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1550484153</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Generation of Domestic Solid Waste in Rural Areas: Case Study of Remote Communities in the Brazilian Amazon</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Bernardes, Carolina ; Günther, Wanda Maria Risso</creator><creatorcontrib>Bernardes, Carolina ; Günther, Wanda Maria Risso</creatorcontrib><description>The Brazilian rural population is estimated to be around 30 million people and many rural areas do not have universal access to basic infrastructure services, including those related to solid waste. There are very few scientific studies on rural domestic solid waste and more investigative work is needed to provide information for appropriate solid waste management policies. This paper aims to characterize rural domestic solid waste in terms of quantity and quality. Amazonian rural communities were chosen for our case study. The issue of domestic solid waste was characterized both by means of interviews, at household level, and by a study of industrialized products traded in the communities located along the banks of the Juruá River, in the Brazilian Amazon. Quantitative results have shown that generation of solid waste in these rural communities reaches 0.5 kg/person/day. Organic matter represents 90 % of domestic solid waste generation and is mainly reused to feed animals and/or is composted using a method called paú. Inorganic solid waste (10 %) is either reused, burned or inadequately dumped in open sites. Based on these data, the annual production of solid waste is 437 tons per year in these communities. Since infrastructure services are virtually non-existent in this rural context, even this amount of solid waste may have a serious environmental impact, with negative effects on the population's health, particularly in terms of hazardous waste. Even though solid waste management solutions for rural populations might not always be based on economic efficiency, decision makers responsible for development and planning should present solutions that are socially, technologically, environmentally and economically suitable for this context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-7839</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10745-014-9679-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HMECAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer</publisher><subject>Amazon ; Anthropology ; Banking ; Brazil ; Case studies ; Communities ; Context ; Economic Development ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Management ; Geography ; Hazardous wastes ; Household wastes ; Industrial efficiency ; Information management ; Infrastructure ; Inorganic wastes ; Management ; Organic matter ; Organic waste ; Population estimates ; Population studies ; Recycling ; RESEARCH REPORTS ; River banks ; Rural Areas ; Rural Communities ; Rural environments ; Rural Population ; Rural populations ; Social Sciences ; Sociology ; Solid waste management ; Solid wastes ; Sparsely populated areas ; Waste disposal ; Waste management</subject><ispartof>Human Ecology, 2014-08, Vol.42 (4), p.617-623</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-1564435f6e406ff0f06bcb7d2b83af475fde5320a1f8bebad31bcbebccab2fbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-1564435f6e406ff0f06bcb7d2b83af475fde5320a1f8bebad31bcbebccab2fbc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24013865$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24013865$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,27327,27907,27908,33757,33758,41471,42540,51302,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bernardes, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Günther, Wanda Maria Risso</creatorcontrib><title>Generation of Domestic Solid Waste in Rural Areas: Case Study of Remote Communities in the Brazilian Amazon</title><title>Human Ecology</title><addtitle>Hum Ecol</addtitle><description>The Brazilian rural population is estimated to be around 30 million people and many rural areas do not have universal access to basic infrastructure services, including those related to solid waste. There are very few scientific studies on rural domestic solid waste and more investigative work is needed to provide information for appropriate solid waste management policies. This paper aims to characterize rural domestic solid waste in terms of quantity and quality. Amazonian rural communities were chosen for our case study. The issue of domestic solid waste was characterized both by means of interviews, at household level, and by a study of industrialized products traded in the communities located along the banks of the Juruá River, in the Brazilian Amazon. Quantitative results have shown that generation of solid waste in these rural communities reaches 0.5 kg/person/day. Organic matter represents 90 % of domestic solid waste generation and is mainly reused to feed animals and/or is composted using a method called paú. Inorganic solid waste (10 %) is either reused, burned or inadequately dumped in open sites. Based on these data, the annual production of solid waste is 437 tons per year in these communities. Since infrastructure services are virtually non-existent in this rural context, even this amount of solid waste may have a serious environmental impact, with negative effects on the population's health, particularly in terms of hazardous waste. Even though solid waste management solutions for rural populations might not always be based on economic efficiency, decision makers responsible for development and planning should present solutions that are socially, technologically, environmentally and economically suitable for this context.</description><subject>Amazon</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Banking</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Hazardous wastes</subject><subject>Household wastes</subject><subject>Industrial efficiency</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Inorganic wastes</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic waste</subject><subject>Population estimates</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>RESEARCH REPORTS</subject><subject>River banks</subject><subject>Rural Areas</subject><subject>Rural Communities</subject><subject>Rural environments</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Rural populations</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Solid waste management</subject><subject>Solid wastes</subject><subject>Sparsely populated areas</subject><subject>Waste disposal</subject><subject>Waste management</subject><issn>0300-7839</issn><issn>1572-9915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEEkvhB_SAZIkLl5Rx_JVwW7ZQkCohtaAeLccZFy-JXezk0P31eBWEEIdWPoxkP8-MR29VnVI4owDqXaaguKiB8rqTqqsPT6oNFaqpu46Kp9UGGECtWtY9r17kvAcASpXaVD8vMGAys4-BREfO44R59pZcx9EP5MbkGYkP5GpJZiTbhCa_JzuTkVzPy3B_VK5wigXaxWlagp895qMw_0DyIZmDH70JZDuZQwwvq2fOjBlf_akn1fdPH7_tPteXXy--7LaXtRVczTUVknMmnEQO0jlwIHvbq6HpW2YcV8INKFgDhrq2x94MjJZ37K01feN6y06qt2vfuxR_LWUfPflscRxNwLhkTWULVDQNqMdRIYGCaKAr6Jv_0H1cUiiLFEoAbzkVrFBnK3VrRtQ-uDgnY8sZcPI2BnS-3G8VSMGlpG0R6CrYFHNO6PRd8pNJ95qCPkar12h1iVYfo9WH4jSrkwsbbjH985UHpNertM9zTH-nNBwoa6VgvwEVc7B_</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Bernardes, Carolina</creator><creator>Günther, Wanda Maria Risso</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Generation of Domestic Solid Waste in Rural Areas: Case Study of Remote Communities in the Brazilian Amazon</title><author>Bernardes, Carolina ; Günther, Wanda Maria Risso</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-1564435f6e406ff0f06bcb7d2b83af475fde5320a1f8bebad31bcbebccab2fbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Amazon</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Banking</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Hazardous wastes</topic><topic>Household wastes</topic><topic>Industrial efficiency</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Inorganic wastes</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic waste</topic><topic>Population estimates</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>RESEARCH REPORTS</topic><topic>River banks</topic><topic>Rural Areas</topic><topic>Rural Communities</topic><topic>Rural environments</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Rural populations</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Solid waste management</topic><topic>Solid wastes</topic><topic>Sparsely populated areas</topic><topic>Waste disposal</topic><topic>Waste management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernardes, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Günther, Wanda Maria Risso</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Human Ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernardes, Carolina</au><au>Günther, Wanda Maria Risso</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Generation of Domestic Solid Waste in Rural Areas: Case Study of Remote Communities in the Brazilian Amazon</atitle><jtitle>Human Ecology</jtitle><stitle>Hum Ecol</stitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>617</spage><epage>623</epage><pages>617-623</pages><issn>0300-7839</issn><eissn>1572-9915</eissn><coden>HMECAJ</coden><abstract>The Brazilian rural population is estimated to be around 30 million people and many rural areas do not have universal access to basic infrastructure services, including those related to solid waste. There are very few scientific studies on rural domestic solid waste and more investigative work is needed to provide information for appropriate solid waste management policies. This paper aims to characterize rural domestic solid waste in terms of quantity and quality. Amazonian rural communities were chosen for our case study. The issue of domestic solid waste was characterized both by means of interviews, at household level, and by a study of industrialized products traded in the communities located along the banks of the Juruá River, in the Brazilian Amazon. Quantitative results have shown that generation of solid waste in these rural communities reaches 0.5 kg/person/day. Organic matter represents 90 % of domestic solid waste generation and is mainly reused to feed animals and/or is composted using a method called paú. Inorganic solid waste (10 %) is either reused, burned or inadequately dumped in open sites. Based on these data, the annual production of solid waste is 437 tons per year in these communities. Since infrastructure services are virtually non-existent in this rural context, even this amount of solid waste may have a serious environmental impact, with negative effects on the population's health, particularly in terms of hazardous waste. Even though solid waste management solutions for rural populations might not always be based on economic efficiency, decision makers responsible for development and planning should present solutions that are socially, technologically, environmentally and economically suitable for this context.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10745-014-9679-z</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-7839 |
ispartof | Human Ecology, 2014-08, Vol.42 (4), p.617-623 |
issn | 0300-7839 1572-9915 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680152207 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Amazon Anthropology Banking Brazil Case studies Communities Context Economic Development Environmental impact Environmental Management Geography Hazardous wastes Household wastes Industrial efficiency Information management Infrastructure Inorganic wastes Management Organic matter Organic waste Population estimates Population studies Recycling RESEARCH REPORTS River banks Rural Areas Rural Communities Rural environments Rural Population Rural populations Social Sciences Sociology Solid waste management Solid wastes Sparsely populated areas Waste disposal Waste management |
title | Generation of Domestic Solid Waste in Rural Areas: Case Study of Remote Communities in the Brazilian Amazon |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T22%3A51%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Generation%20of%20Domestic%20Solid%20Waste%20in%20Rural%20Areas:%20Case%20Study%20of%20Remote%20Communities%20in%20the%20Brazilian%20Amazon&rft.jtitle=Human%20Ecology&rft.au=Bernardes,%20Carolina&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=617&rft.epage=623&rft.pages=617-623&rft.issn=0300-7839&rft.eissn=1572-9915&rft.coden=HMECAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10745-014-9679-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA706546618%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1550484153&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A706546618&rft_jstor_id=24013865&rfr_iscdi=true |