James M. Buchanan’s contractarianism and modern liberalism
This paper contrasts Buchanan’s contractarian–constitutional liberalism with Hayek’s evolutionary liberalism and Rothbards free-market liberalism as representative branches of the classical liberal tradition. While Hayek and Rothbard focus on individual liberty as private autonomy, Buchanan posits t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Constitutional political economy 2014-03, Vol.25 (1), p.18-38 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 38 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 18 |
container_title | Constitutional political economy |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Vanberg, Viktor J. |
description | This paper contrasts Buchanan’s contractarian–constitutional liberalism with Hayek’s evolutionary liberalism and Rothbards free-market liberalism as representative branches of the classical liberal tradition. While Hayek and Rothbard focus on individual liberty as private autonomy, Buchanan posits that individual sovereignty should be recognized as the fundamental normative premise of liberalism. He insists that a consistent application of this premise requires liberals to respect individuals as sovereigns not only in their capacity as private law subjects but also at the constitutional level of choice where, as sovereign citizens, they choose, jointly with their fellow citizens, the rules under which they wish to live. It is argued that by supplementing the notion of individual liberty as private autonomy with the concept of individual sovereignty in constitutional matters Buchanan lays the theoretical foundation for complementing the well-developed liberal theory of the market with a consistent liberal theory of democracy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10602-014-9152-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680148549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3244477721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-68d5aa6922242fc27f56579487977ccaf42c6a7b1034f5c0d8932564fc9442d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwAGyRWFhcrv9jiQUqflXEArPlOg6kSpxipwMbr8Hr8SS4CgNCYrpXV985uucgdExgRgDUWSIggWIgHGsiKOY7aEKEolhrKXfzDpxhDpLuo4OUVgCgFWMTdH5vO5-Kh1lxuXGvNtjw9fGZCteHIVo32NjY0KSusKEqur7yMRRts_TRtvl6iPZq2yZ_9DOn6Pn66ml-ixePN3fziwV2nLABy7IS1kpNKeW0dlTVQgqleam0Us7ZmlMnrVoSYLwWDqpSMyokr53mnFbApuh09F3H_m3j02C6Jjnftjb4fpMMkWUOXgquM3ryB131mxjyd4YIkIoAUSJTZKRc7FOKvjbr2HQ2vhsCZtunGfs02dZs-zQ8a-ioSZkNLz7-cv5X9A0Im3ZO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1506710175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>James M. Buchanan’s contractarianism and modern liberalism</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Vanberg, Viktor J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vanberg, Viktor J.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper contrasts Buchanan’s contractarian–constitutional liberalism with Hayek’s evolutionary liberalism and Rothbards free-market liberalism as representative branches of the classical liberal tradition. While Hayek and Rothbard focus on individual liberty as private autonomy, Buchanan posits that individual sovereignty should be recognized as the fundamental normative premise of liberalism. He insists that a consistent application of this premise requires liberals to respect individuals as sovereigns not only in their capacity as private law subjects but also at the constitutional level of choice where, as sovereign citizens, they choose, jointly with their fellow citizens, the rules under which they wish to live. It is argued that by supplementing the notion of individual liberty as private autonomy with the concept of individual sovereignty in constitutional matters Buchanan lays the theoretical foundation for complementing the well-developed liberal theory of the market with a consistent liberal theory of democracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1043-4062</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9966</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10602-014-9152-4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPECFO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Autonomy ; Buchanan, James M ; Citizens ; Constitutional Law ; Democracy ; Economic theory ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economists ; Freedom ; Hayek, Friedrich August von ; Law ; Liberalism ; Libertarianism ; Original Paper ; Political economy ; Political Science ; Political Science and International Relations ; Political Science and International Studies ; Rule of Law ; Social order ; Sovereignty ; Studies ; Traditions</subject><ispartof>Constitutional political economy, 2014-03, Vol.25 (1), p.18-38</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-68d5aa6922242fc27f56579487977ccaf42c6a7b1034f5c0d8932564fc9442d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-68d5aa6922242fc27f56579487977ccaf42c6a7b1034f5c0d8932564fc9442d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10602-014-9152-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10602-014-9152-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vanberg, Viktor J.</creatorcontrib><title>James M. Buchanan’s contractarianism and modern liberalism</title><title>Constitutional political economy</title><addtitle>Const Polit Econ</addtitle><description>This paper contrasts Buchanan’s contractarian–constitutional liberalism with Hayek’s evolutionary liberalism and Rothbards free-market liberalism as representative branches of the classical liberal tradition. While Hayek and Rothbard focus on individual liberty as private autonomy, Buchanan posits that individual sovereignty should be recognized as the fundamental normative premise of liberalism. He insists that a consistent application of this premise requires liberals to respect individuals as sovereigns not only in their capacity as private law subjects but also at the constitutional level of choice where, as sovereign citizens, they choose, jointly with their fellow citizens, the rules under which they wish to live. It is argued that by supplementing the notion of individual liberty as private autonomy with the concept of individual sovereignty in constitutional matters Buchanan lays the theoretical foundation for complementing the well-developed liberal theory of the market with a consistent liberal theory of democracy.</description><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Buchanan, James M</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Constitutional Law</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economists</subject><subject>Freedom</subject><subject>Hayek, Friedrich August von</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Libertarianism</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Political Science and International Relations</subject><subject>Political Science and International Studies</subject><subject>Rule of Law</subject><subject>Social order</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><issn>1043-4062</issn><issn>1572-9966</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwAGyRWFhcrv9jiQUqflXEArPlOg6kSpxipwMbr8Hr8SS4CgNCYrpXV985uucgdExgRgDUWSIggWIgHGsiKOY7aEKEolhrKXfzDpxhDpLuo4OUVgCgFWMTdH5vO5-Kh1lxuXGvNtjw9fGZCteHIVo32NjY0KSusKEqur7yMRRts_TRtvl6iPZq2yZ_9DOn6Pn66ml-ixePN3fziwV2nLABy7IS1kpNKeW0dlTVQgqleam0Us7ZmlMnrVoSYLwWDqpSMyokr53mnFbApuh09F3H_m3j02C6Jjnftjb4fpMMkWUOXgquM3ryB131mxjyd4YIkIoAUSJTZKRc7FOKvjbr2HQ2vhsCZtunGfs02dZs-zQ8a-ioSZkNLz7-cv5X9A0Im3ZO</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Vanberg, Viktor J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>James M. Buchanan’s contractarianism and modern liberalism</title><author>Vanberg, Viktor J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-68d5aa6922242fc27f56579487977ccaf42c6a7b1034f5c0d8932564fc9442d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Buchanan, James M</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Constitutional Law</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economists</topic><topic>Freedom</topic><topic>Hayek, Friedrich August von</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Libertarianism</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Political Science and International Relations</topic><topic>Political Science and International Studies</topic><topic>Rule of Law</topic><topic>Social order</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vanberg, Viktor J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Constitutional political economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vanberg, Viktor J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>James M. Buchanan’s contractarianism and modern liberalism</atitle><jtitle>Constitutional political economy</jtitle><stitle>Const Polit Econ</stitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>18-38</pages><issn>1043-4062</issn><eissn>1572-9966</eissn><coden>CPECFO</coden><abstract>This paper contrasts Buchanan’s contractarian–constitutional liberalism with Hayek’s evolutionary liberalism and Rothbards free-market liberalism as representative branches of the classical liberal tradition. While Hayek and Rothbard focus on individual liberty as private autonomy, Buchanan posits that individual sovereignty should be recognized as the fundamental normative premise of liberalism. He insists that a consistent application of this premise requires liberals to respect individuals as sovereigns not only in their capacity as private law subjects but also at the constitutional level of choice where, as sovereign citizens, they choose, jointly with their fellow citizens, the rules under which they wish to live. It is argued that by supplementing the notion of individual liberty as private autonomy with the concept of individual sovereignty in constitutional matters Buchanan lays the theoretical foundation for complementing the well-developed liberal theory of the market with a consistent liberal theory of democracy.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10602-014-9152-4</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1043-4062 |
ispartof | Constitutional political economy, 2014-03, Vol.25 (1), p.18-38 |
issn | 1043-4062 1572-9966 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680148549 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Autonomy Buchanan, James M Citizens Constitutional Law Democracy Economic theory Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods Economists Freedom Hayek, Friedrich August von Law Liberalism Libertarianism Original Paper Political economy Political Science Political Science and International Relations Political Science and International Studies Rule of Law Social order Sovereignty Studies Traditions |
title | James M. Buchanan’s contractarianism and modern liberalism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T19%3A01%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=James%20M.%20Buchanan%E2%80%99s%20contractarianism%20and%20modern%20liberalism&rft.jtitle=Constitutional%20political%20economy&rft.au=Vanberg,%20Viktor%20J.&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=18-38&rft.issn=1043-4062&rft.eissn=1572-9966&rft.coden=CPECFO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10602-014-9152-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3244477721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1506710175&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |