The Implosion of the Federal Budget Process: Triggers, Commissions, Cliffs, Sequesters, Debt Ceilings, and Shutdown

Budgeting in the federal government recently imploded. The competing parties played repeated games of chicken in which they set short‐term budget deadlines and established automatic procedures in hopes of outmaneuvering their opponents. They went to the brink of defaulting on the government's d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public budgeting & finance 2014-12, Vol.34 (4), p.1-23
1. Verfasser: Meyers, Roy T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 23
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1
container_title Public budgeting & finance
container_volume 34
creator Meyers, Roy T.
description Budgeting in the federal government recently imploded. The competing parties played repeated games of chicken in which they set short‐term budget deadlines and established automatic procedures in hopes of outmaneuvering their opponents. They went to the brink of defaulting on the government's debt, and then shut down the government. This article recounts the history of this implosion and discusses what might have caused it. Budgeting's decline was certainly driven by partisan conflict. Yet budgeting's decline was also due to a dumbing down of aspirations for the process. Ironically, budget hawks contributed substantially to this when they endorsed “action‐forcing mechanisms” that they hoped would constitute “credible commitments” to adopt sustainable budgetary policies. Even if their aspirations were partially realized, their logic was flawed and the collateral damage was substantial. “Obama, Congress Must Reach Deal On Budget By March 1, And Then April 1, And Then April 20, And Then April 28, And Then May 1, And Then Twice A Week For Next Four Years”–Headline in The Onion, February 27, 2013 “So we're going to hit the debt ceiling then go off the fiscal cliff. I assume an anvil lands on us after that.”–@pourmecoffee, December 26, 2012
doi_str_mv 10.1111/pbaf.12049
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680146784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1667937567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-1009c02a66b29c74a1c08e0fa3063568461aa8b76728d7971bda045148e5e92e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EEkvphU9giQtCpB0n_hNza7fdtlCVii5wtJxksnXJxoudqO23x9kFDhwQcxmN9Xuj53mEvGJwwFIdbirbHrAcuH5CZkxwyEQp4CmZQa5ExhjAc_IixjsA4FKJGYnLW6QX603no_M99S0d0sMCGwy2o8djs8KBXgdfY4zv6TK41QpDfEfnfr12cdJMQ-faNvUb_DFiHLbACVYDnaPrXL9Ko-0benM7Do2_71-SZ63tIu7_6nvky-J0OT_PLj-dXcyPLrOaS62zZFbXkFspq1zXiltWQ4nQ2gJkIWTJJbO2rJRUedkorVjVWOCC8RIF6hyLPfJmt3cT_NaYSZZr7Drbox-jYbIEls5Q8v9ApdKFElIl9PVf6J0fQ58-YphKVlQu2ES93VF18DEGbM0muLUNj4aBmaIyU1RmG1WC2Q6-dx0-_oM018dHi9-abKdx6eAPfzQ2fDfJpBLm29WZ0R8-fhUnuTafi58xfKKc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1772872517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Implosion of the Federal Budget Process: Triggers, Commissions, Cliffs, Sequesters, Debt Ceilings, and Shutdown</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Meyers, Roy T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meyers, Roy T.</creatorcontrib><description>Budgeting in the federal government recently imploded. The competing parties played repeated games of chicken in which they set short‐term budget deadlines and established automatic procedures in hopes of outmaneuvering their opponents. They went to the brink of defaulting on the government's debt, and then shut down the government. This article recounts the history of this implosion and discusses what might have caused it. Budgeting's decline was certainly driven by partisan conflict. Yet budgeting's decline was also due to a dumbing down of aspirations for the process. Ironically, budget hawks contributed substantially to this when they endorsed “action‐forcing mechanisms” that they hoped would constitute “credible commitments” to adopt sustainable budgetary policies. Even if their aspirations were partially realized, their logic was flawed and the collateral damage was substantial. “Obama, Congress Must Reach Deal On Budget By March 1, And Then April 1, And Then April 20, And Then April 28, And Then May 1, And Then Twice A Week For Next Four Years”–Headline in The Onion, February 27, 2013 “So we're going to hit the debt ceiling then go off the fiscal cliff. I assume an anvil lands on us after that.”–@pourmecoffee, December 26, 2012</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-1100</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pbaf.12049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Budget, Government ; Budgeting ; Budgets ; Conflict ; Debt ; Federal budget ; Federal Government ; Game theory ; Games ; Government shutdowns ; History ; Land ; Legislatures ; Partisanship ; Public Debt ; Shutdowns</subject><ispartof>Public budgeting &amp; finance, 2014-12, Vol.34 (4), p.1-23</ispartof><rights>2014 Public Financial Publications, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-1009c02a66b29c74a1c08e0fa3063568461aa8b76728d7971bda045148e5e92e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-1009c02a66b29c74a1c08e0fa3063568461aa8b76728d7971bda045148e5e92e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpbaf.12049$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpbaf.12049$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27865,27866,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meyers, Roy T.</creatorcontrib><title>The Implosion of the Federal Budget Process: Triggers, Commissions, Cliffs, Sequesters, Debt Ceilings, and Shutdown</title><title>Public budgeting &amp; finance</title><addtitle>Public Budgeting &amp; Finance</addtitle><description>Budgeting in the federal government recently imploded. The competing parties played repeated games of chicken in which they set short‐term budget deadlines and established automatic procedures in hopes of outmaneuvering their opponents. They went to the brink of defaulting on the government's debt, and then shut down the government. This article recounts the history of this implosion and discusses what might have caused it. Budgeting's decline was certainly driven by partisan conflict. Yet budgeting's decline was also due to a dumbing down of aspirations for the process. Ironically, budget hawks contributed substantially to this when they endorsed “action‐forcing mechanisms” that they hoped would constitute “credible commitments” to adopt sustainable budgetary policies. Even if their aspirations were partially realized, their logic was flawed and the collateral damage was substantial. “Obama, Congress Must Reach Deal On Budget By March 1, And Then April 1, And Then April 20, And Then April 28, And Then May 1, And Then Twice A Week For Next Four Years”–Headline in The Onion, February 27, 2013 “So we're going to hit the debt ceiling then go off the fiscal cliff. I assume an anvil lands on us after that.”–@pourmecoffee, December 26, 2012</description><subject>Budget, Government</subject><subject>Budgeting</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Debt</subject><subject>Federal budget</subject><subject>Federal Government</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Government shutdowns</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Public Debt</subject><subject>Shutdowns</subject><issn>0275-1100</issn><issn>1540-5850</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EEkvphU9giQtCpB0n_hNza7fdtlCVii5wtJxksnXJxoudqO23x9kFDhwQcxmN9Xuj53mEvGJwwFIdbirbHrAcuH5CZkxwyEQp4CmZQa5ExhjAc_IixjsA4FKJGYnLW6QX603no_M99S0d0sMCGwy2o8djs8KBXgdfY4zv6TK41QpDfEfnfr12cdJMQ-faNvUb_DFiHLbACVYDnaPrXL9Ko-0benM7Do2_71-SZ63tIu7_6nvky-J0OT_PLj-dXcyPLrOaS62zZFbXkFspq1zXiltWQ4nQ2gJkIWTJJbO2rJRUedkorVjVWOCC8RIF6hyLPfJmt3cT_NaYSZZr7Drbox-jYbIEls5Q8v9ApdKFElIl9PVf6J0fQ58-YphKVlQu2ES93VF18DEGbM0muLUNj4aBmaIyU1RmG1WC2Q6-dx0-_oM018dHi9-abKdx6eAPfzQ2fDfJpBLm29WZ0R8-fhUnuTafi58xfKKc</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Meyers, Roy T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>The Implosion of the Federal Budget Process: Triggers, Commissions, Cliffs, Sequesters, Debt Ceilings, and Shutdown</title><author>Meyers, Roy T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-1009c02a66b29c74a1c08e0fa3063568461aa8b76728d7971bda045148e5e92e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Budget, Government</topic><topic>Budgeting</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Debt</topic><topic>Federal budget</topic><topic>Federal Government</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Government shutdowns</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Public Debt</topic><topic>Shutdowns</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meyers, Roy T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Public budgeting &amp; finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meyers, Roy T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Implosion of the Federal Budget Process: Triggers, Commissions, Cliffs, Sequesters, Debt Ceilings, and Shutdown</atitle><jtitle>Public budgeting &amp; finance</jtitle><addtitle>Public Budgeting &amp; Finance</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>1-23</pages><issn>0275-1100</issn><eissn>1540-5850</eissn><abstract>Budgeting in the federal government recently imploded. The competing parties played repeated games of chicken in which they set short‐term budget deadlines and established automatic procedures in hopes of outmaneuvering their opponents. They went to the brink of defaulting on the government's debt, and then shut down the government. This article recounts the history of this implosion and discusses what might have caused it. Budgeting's decline was certainly driven by partisan conflict. Yet budgeting's decline was also due to a dumbing down of aspirations for the process. Ironically, budget hawks contributed substantially to this when they endorsed “action‐forcing mechanisms” that they hoped would constitute “credible commitments” to adopt sustainable budgetary policies. Even if their aspirations were partially realized, their logic was flawed and the collateral damage was substantial. “Obama, Congress Must Reach Deal On Budget By March 1, And Then April 1, And Then April 20, And Then April 28, And Then May 1, And Then Twice A Week For Next Four Years”–Headline in The Onion, February 27, 2013 “So we're going to hit the debt ceiling then go off the fiscal cliff. I assume an anvil lands on us after that.”–@pourmecoffee, December 26, 2012</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/pbaf.12049</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0275-1100
ispartof Public budgeting & finance, 2014-12, Vol.34 (4), p.1-23
issn 0275-1100
1540-5850
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680146784
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete
subjects Budget, Government
Budgeting
Budgets
Conflict
Debt
Federal budget
Federal Government
Game theory
Games
Government shutdowns
History
Land
Legislatures
Partisanship
Public Debt
Shutdowns
title The Implosion of the Federal Budget Process: Triggers, Commissions, Cliffs, Sequesters, Debt Ceilings, and Shutdown
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T03%3A22%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Implosion%20of%20the%20Federal%20Budget%20Process:%20Triggers,%20Commissions,%20Cliffs,%20Sequesters,%20Debt%20Ceilings,%20and%20Shutdown&rft.jtitle=Public%20budgeting%20&%20finance&rft.au=Meyers,%20Roy%20T.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=1-23&rft.issn=0275-1100&rft.eissn=1540-5850&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pbaf.12049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1667937567%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1772872517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true