The Implosion of the Federal Budget Process: Triggers, Commissions, Cliffs, Sequesters, Debt Ceilings, and Shutdown
Budgeting in the federal government recently imploded. The competing parties played repeated games of chicken in which they set short‐term budget deadlines and established automatic procedures in hopes of outmaneuvering their opponents. They went to the brink of defaulting on the government's d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public budgeting & finance 2014-12, Vol.34 (4), p.1-23 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 23 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Public budgeting & finance |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Meyers, Roy T. |
description | Budgeting in the federal government recently imploded. The competing parties played repeated games of chicken in which they set short‐term budget deadlines and established automatic procedures in hopes of outmaneuvering their opponents. They went to the brink of defaulting on the government's debt, and then shut down the government. This article recounts the history of this implosion and discusses what might have caused it. Budgeting's decline was certainly driven by partisan conflict. Yet budgeting's decline was also due to a dumbing down of aspirations for the process. Ironically, budget hawks contributed substantially to this when they endorsed “action‐forcing mechanisms” that they hoped would constitute “credible commitments” to adopt sustainable budgetary policies. Even if their aspirations were partially realized, their logic was flawed and the collateral damage was substantial.
“Obama, Congress Must Reach Deal On Budget By March 1, And Then April 1, And Then April 20, And Then April 28, And Then May 1, And Then Twice A Week For Next Four Years”–Headline in The Onion, February 27, 2013
“So we're going to hit the debt ceiling then go off the fiscal cliff. I assume an anvil lands on us after that.”–@pourmecoffee, December 26, 2012 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/pbaf.12049 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680146784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1667937567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-1009c02a66b29c74a1c08e0fa3063568461aa8b76728d7971bda045148e5e92e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EEkvphU9giQtCpB0n_hNza7fdtlCVii5wtJxksnXJxoudqO23x9kFDhwQcxmN9Xuj53mEvGJwwFIdbirbHrAcuH5CZkxwyEQp4CmZQa5ExhjAc_IixjsA4FKJGYnLW6QX603no_M99S0d0sMCGwy2o8djs8KBXgdfY4zv6TK41QpDfEfnfr12cdJMQ-faNvUb_DFiHLbACVYDnaPrXL9Ko-0benM7Do2_71-SZ63tIu7_6nvky-J0OT_PLj-dXcyPLrOaS62zZFbXkFspq1zXiltWQ4nQ2gJkIWTJJbO2rJRUedkorVjVWOCC8RIF6hyLPfJmt3cT_NaYSZZr7Drbox-jYbIEls5Q8v9ApdKFElIl9PVf6J0fQ58-YphKVlQu2ES93VF18DEGbM0muLUNj4aBmaIyU1RmG1WC2Q6-dx0-_oM018dHi9-abKdx6eAPfzQ2fDfJpBLm29WZ0R8-fhUnuTafi58xfKKc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1772872517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Implosion of the Federal Budget Process: Triggers, Commissions, Cliffs, Sequesters, Debt Ceilings, and Shutdown</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Meyers, Roy T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meyers, Roy T.</creatorcontrib><description>Budgeting in the federal government recently imploded. The competing parties played repeated games of chicken in which they set short‐term budget deadlines and established automatic procedures in hopes of outmaneuvering their opponents. They went to the brink of defaulting on the government's debt, and then shut down the government. This article recounts the history of this implosion and discusses what might have caused it. Budgeting's decline was certainly driven by partisan conflict. Yet budgeting's decline was also due to a dumbing down of aspirations for the process. Ironically, budget hawks contributed substantially to this when they endorsed “action‐forcing mechanisms” that they hoped would constitute “credible commitments” to adopt sustainable budgetary policies. Even if their aspirations were partially realized, their logic was flawed and the collateral damage was substantial.
“Obama, Congress Must Reach Deal On Budget By March 1, And Then April 1, And Then April 20, And Then April 28, And Then May 1, And Then Twice A Week For Next Four Years”–Headline in The Onion, February 27, 2013
“So we're going to hit the debt ceiling then go off the fiscal cliff. I assume an anvil lands on us after that.”–@pourmecoffee, December 26, 2012</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-1100</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pbaf.12049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Budget, Government ; Budgeting ; Budgets ; Conflict ; Debt ; Federal budget ; Federal Government ; Game theory ; Games ; Government shutdowns ; History ; Land ; Legislatures ; Partisanship ; Public Debt ; Shutdowns</subject><ispartof>Public budgeting & finance, 2014-12, Vol.34 (4), p.1-23</ispartof><rights>2014 Public Financial Publications, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-1009c02a66b29c74a1c08e0fa3063568461aa8b76728d7971bda045148e5e92e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-1009c02a66b29c74a1c08e0fa3063568461aa8b76728d7971bda045148e5e92e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpbaf.12049$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpbaf.12049$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27865,27866,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meyers, Roy T.</creatorcontrib><title>The Implosion of the Federal Budget Process: Triggers, Commissions, Cliffs, Sequesters, Debt Ceilings, and Shutdown</title><title>Public budgeting & finance</title><addtitle>Public Budgeting & Finance</addtitle><description>Budgeting in the federal government recently imploded. The competing parties played repeated games of chicken in which they set short‐term budget deadlines and established automatic procedures in hopes of outmaneuvering their opponents. They went to the brink of defaulting on the government's debt, and then shut down the government. This article recounts the history of this implosion and discusses what might have caused it. Budgeting's decline was certainly driven by partisan conflict. Yet budgeting's decline was also due to a dumbing down of aspirations for the process. Ironically, budget hawks contributed substantially to this when they endorsed “action‐forcing mechanisms” that they hoped would constitute “credible commitments” to adopt sustainable budgetary policies. Even if their aspirations were partially realized, their logic was flawed and the collateral damage was substantial.
“Obama, Congress Must Reach Deal On Budget By March 1, And Then April 1, And Then April 20, And Then April 28, And Then May 1, And Then Twice A Week For Next Four Years”–Headline in The Onion, February 27, 2013
“So we're going to hit the debt ceiling then go off the fiscal cliff. I assume an anvil lands on us after that.”–@pourmecoffee, December 26, 2012</description><subject>Budget, Government</subject><subject>Budgeting</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Debt</subject><subject>Federal budget</subject><subject>Federal Government</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Government shutdowns</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Public Debt</subject><subject>Shutdowns</subject><issn>0275-1100</issn><issn>1540-5850</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EEkvphU9giQtCpB0n_hNza7fdtlCVii5wtJxksnXJxoudqO23x9kFDhwQcxmN9Xuj53mEvGJwwFIdbirbHrAcuH5CZkxwyEQp4CmZQa5ExhjAc_IixjsA4FKJGYnLW6QX603no_M99S0d0sMCGwy2o8djs8KBXgdfY4zv6TK41QpDfEfnfr12cdJMQ-faNvUb_DFiHLbACVYDnaPrXL9Ko-0benM7Do2_71-SZ63tIu7_6nvky-J0OT_PLj-dXcyPLrOaS62zZFbXkFspq1zXiltWQ4nQ2gJkIWTJJbO2rJRUedkorVjVWOCC8RIF6hyLPfJmt3cT_NaYSZZr7Drbox-jYbIEls5Q8v9ApdKFElIl9PVf6J0fQ58-YphKVlQu2ES93VF18DEGbM0muLUNj4aBmaIyU1RmG1WC2Q6-dx0-_oM018dHi9-abKdx6eAPfzQ2fDfJpBLm29WZ0R8-fhUnuTafi58xfKKc</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Meyers, Roy T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>The Implosion of the Federal Budget Process: Triggers, Commissions, Cliffs, Sequesters, Debt Ceilings, and Shutdown</title><author>Meyers, Roy T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-1009c02a66b29c74a1c08e0fa3063568461aa8b76728d7971bda045148e5e92e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Budget, Government</topic><topic>Budgeting</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Debt</topic><topic>Federal budget</topic><topic>Federal Government</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Government shutdowns</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Public Debt</topic><topic>Shutdowns</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meyers, Roy T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Public budgeting & finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meyers, Roy T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Implosion of the Federal Budget Process: Triggers, Commissions, Cliffs, Sequesters, Debt Ceilings, and Shutdown</atitle><jtitle>Public budgeting & finance</jtitle><addtitle>Public Budgeting & Finance</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>1-23</pages><issn>0275-1100</issn><eissn>1540-5850</eissn><abstract>Budgeting in the federal government recently imploded. The competing parties played repeated games of chicken in which they set short‐term budget deadlines and established automatic procedures in hopes of outmaneuvering their opponents. They went to the brink of defaulting on the government's debt, and then shut down the government. This article recounts the history of this implosion and discusses what might have caused it. Budgeting's decline was certainly driven by partisan conflict. Yet budgeting's decline was also due to a dumbing down of aspirations for the process. Ironically, budget hawks contributed substantially to this when they endorsed “action‐forcing mechanisms” that they hoped would constitute “credible commitments” to adopt sustainable budgetary policies. Even if their aspirations were partially realized, their logic was flawed and the collateral damage was substantial.
“Obama, Congress Must Reach Deal On Budget By March 1, And Then April 1, And Then April 20, And Then April 28, And Then May 1, And Then Twice A Week For Next Four Years”–Headline in The Onion, February 27, 2013
“So we're going to hit the debt ceiling then go off the fiscal cliff. I assume an anvil lands on us after that.”–@pourmecoffee, December 26, 2012</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/pbaf.12049</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0275-1100 |
ispartof | Public budgeting & finance, 2014-12, Vol.34 (4), p.1-23 |
issn | 0275-1100 1540-5850 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680146784 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
subjects | Budget, Government Budgeting Budgets Conflict Debt Federal budget Federal Government Game theory Games Government shutdowns History Land Legislatures Partisanship Public Debt Shutdowns |
title | The Implosion of the Federal Budget Process: Triggers, Commissions, Cliffs, Sequesters, Debt Ceilings, and Shutdown |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T03%3A22%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Implosion%20of%20the%20Federal%20Budget%20Process:%20Triggers,%20Commissions,%20Cliffs,%20Sequesters,%20Debt%20Ceilings,%20and%20Shutdown&rft.jtitle=Public%20budgeting%20&%20finance&rft.au=Meyers,%20Roy%20T.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=1-23&rft.issn=0275-1100&rft.eissn=1540-5850&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pbaf.12049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1667937567%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1772872517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |