Neurodata and Neuroprivacy: Data Protection Outdated?

There are a number of novel technologies and a broad range of research aimed at the collection and use of data drawn directly from the human brain. Given that this data-neurodata-is data collected from individuals, one area of law which will be of relevance is data protection. The thesis of this pap...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surveillance & society 2014-01, Vol.12 (1), p.55-72
Hauptverfasser: Hallinan, Dara, Friedewald, Michael, Schutz, Philip, de Hert, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 72
container_issue 1
container_start_page 55
container_title Surveillance & society
container_volume 12
creator Hallinan, Dara
Friedewald, Michael
Schutz, Philip
de Hert, Paul
description There are a number of novel technologies and a broad range of research aimed at the collection and use of data drawn directly from the human brain. Given that this data-neurodata-is data collected from individuals, one area of law which will be of relevance is data protection. The thesis of this paper is that neurodata is a unique form of data and that this will raise questions for the application of data protection law. Issues may arise on two levels. On a legal technical level, it is uncertain whether the definitions and mechanisms used in the data protection framework can be easily applied to neurodata. On a more fundamental level, there may be interests in neurodata, particularly those related to the protection of the mind, the framework was not designed to represent and may be insufficiently equipped, or constructed, to deal with. . Adapted from the source document.
doi_str_mv 10.24908/ss.v12i1.4500
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680146466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3306954021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-db5ee4f6ea94422efd86b66ceb8ec5120e1fc248672e940d8f997df1e7c29c143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLAzEUhYMoWKtb1wNu3MyYpHm6EalPKNaFrkOa3MCUdlKTmUL_vTPVhbjq6j74ONx7DkKXBFeUaaxucq62hNakYhzjIzQiTMpSMiWP__Sn6CznJcZcUkpGiL9Bl6K3rS1s44v9tEn11rrdbfEwrN9TbMG1dWyKedf2JPi7c3QS7CrDxW8do8-nx4_pSzmbP79O72elY1i0pV9wABYEWM0YpRC8EgshHCwUOE4oBhIcZUpICpphr4LW0gcC0lHtCJuM0fWP7ibFrw5ya9Z1drBa2QZilw0RChMmmBAHoEJqPiGHqHIuqBrO6tGrf-gydqnpf-4pyuXg4iBY_VAuxZwTBNNbuLZpZwg2-2xMzmafjRmymXwDARSAdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1525757224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neurodata and Neuroprivacy: Data Protection Outdated?</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Hallinan, Dara ; Friedewald, Michael ; Schutz, Philip ; de Hert, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Hallinan, Dara ; Friedewald, Michael ; Schutz, Philip ; de Hert, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>There are a number of novel technologies and a broad range of research aimed at the collection and use of data drawn directly from the human brain. Given that this data-neurodata-is data collected from individuals, one area of law which will be of relevance is data protection. The thesis of this paper is that neurodata is a unique form of data and that this will raise questions for the application of data protection law. Issues may arise on two levels. On a legal technical level, it is uncertain whether the definitions and mechanisms used in the data protection framework can be easily applied to neurodata. On a more fundamental level, there may be interests in neurodata, particularly those related to the protection of the mind, the framework was not designed to represent and may be insufficiently equipped, or constructed, to deal with. . Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-7487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-7487</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24908/ss.v12i1.4500</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kingston: Surveillance Studies Network</publisher><subject>Brain ; Data integrity ; Data protection ; Information society ; Innovation ; Law ; Legal norms ; Legislation ; Protection ; Reporting requirements ; Technological change ; Technology ; Technology policy</subject><ispartof>Surveillance &amp; society, 2014-01, Vol.12 (1), p.55-72</ispartof><rights>Copyright Surveillance Studies Network 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-db5ee4f6ea94422efd86b66ceb8ec5120e1fc248672e940d8f997df1e7c29c143</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27335,27856,27915,27916,33765,33766</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hallinan, Dara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedewald, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schutz, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Hert, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Neurodata and Neuroprivacy: Data Protection Outdated?</title><title>Surveillance &amp; society</title><description>There are a number of novel technologies and a broad range of research aimed at the collection and use of data drawn directly from the human brain. Given that this data-neurodata-is data collected from individuals, one area of law which will be of relevance is data protection. The thesis of this paper is that neurodata is a unique form of data and that this will raise questions for the application of data protection law. Issues may arise on two levels. On a legal technical level, it is uncertain whether the definitions and mechanisms used in the data protection framework can be easily applied to neurodata. On a more fundamental level, there may be interests in neurodata, particularly those related to the protection of the mind, the framework was not designed to represent and may be insufficiently equipped, or constructed, to deal with. . Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Data integrity</subject><subject>Data protection</subject><subject>Information society</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Legal norms</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Reporting requirements</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology policy</subject><issn>1477-7487</issn><issn>1477-7487</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLAzEUhYMoWKtb1wNu3MyYpHm6EalPKNaFrkOa3MCUdlKTmUL_vTPVhbjq6j74ONx7DkKXBFeUaaxucq62hNakYhzjIzQiTMpSMiWP__Sn6CznJcZcUkpGiL9Bl6K3rS1s44v9tEn11rrdbfEwrN9TbMG1dWyKedf2JPi7c3QS7CrDxW8do8-nx4_pSzmbP79O72elY1i0pV9wABYEWM0YpRC8EgshHCwUOE4oBhIcZUpICpphr4LW0gcC0lHtCJuM0fWP7ibFrw5ya9Z1drBa2QZilw0RChMmmBAHoEJqPiGHqHIuqBrO6tGrf-gydqnpf-4pyuXg4iBY_VAuxZwTBNNbuLZpZwg2-2xMzmafjRmymXwDARSAdA</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Hallinan, Dara</creator><creator>Friedewald, Michael</creator><creator>Schutz, Philip</creator><creator>de Hert, Paul</creator><general>Surveillance Studies Network</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Neurodata and Neuroprivacy: Data Protection Outdated?</title><author>Hallinan, Dara ; Friedewald, Michael ; Schutz, Philip ; de Hert, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-db5ee4f6ea94422efd86b66ceb8ec5120e1fc248672e940d8f997df1e7c29c143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Data integrity</topic><topic>Data protection</topic><topic>Information society</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Legal norms</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Reporting requirements</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hallinan, Dara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedewald, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schutz, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Hert, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>UK &amp; Ireland Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Surveillance &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hallinan, Dara</au><au>Friedewald, Michael</au><au>Schutz, Philip</au><au>de Hert, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neurodata and Neuroprivacy: Data Protection Outdated?</atitle><jtitle>Surveillance &amp; society</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>55-72</pages><issn>1477-7487</issn><eissn>1477-7487</eissn><abstract>There are a number of novel technologies and a broad range of research aimed at the collection and use of data drawn directly from the human brain. Given that this data-neurodata-is data collected from individuals, one area of law which will be of relevance is data protection. The thesis of this paper is that neurodata is a unique form of data and that this will raise questions for the application of data protection law. Issues may arise on two levels. On a legal technical level, it is uncertain whether the definitions and mechanisms used in the data protection framework can be easily applied to neurodata. On a more fundamental level, there may be interests in neurodata, particularly those related to the protection of the mind, the framework was not designed to represent and may be insufficiently equipped, or constructed, to deal with. . Adapted from the source document.</abstract><cop>Kingston</cop><pub>Surveillance Studies Network</pub><doi>10.24908/ss.v12i1.4500</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-7487
ispartof Surveillance & society, 2014-01, Vol.12 (1), p.55-72
issn 1477-7487
1477-7487
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680146466
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Brain
Data integrity
Data protection
Information society
Innovation
Law
Legal norms
Legislation
Protection
Reporting requirements
Technological change
Technology
Technology policy
title Neurodata and Neuroprivacy: Data Protection Outdated?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T20%3A23%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neurodata%20and%20Neuroprivacy:%20Data%20Protection%20Outdated?&rft.jtitle=Surveillance%20&%20society&rft.au=Hallinan,%20Dara&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=55-72&rft.issn=1477-7487&rft.eissn=1477-7487&rft_id=info:doi/10.24908/ss.v12i1.4500&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3306954021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1525757224&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true