Cannabis policy reforms in the Americas: A comparative analysis of Colorado, Washington, and Uruguay
Abstract Legal reforms in the Americas are influencing the public debate on cannabis policy. Uruguay and the two US states of Colorado and Washington have taken steps to regulate and legitimize the production, distribution, and use of cannabis and its derivatives. Earlier experiences with medical ca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The International journal of drug policy 2014-07, Vol.25 (4), p.727-735 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 735 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 727 |
container_title | The International journal of drug policy |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Pardo, Bryce |
description | Abstract Legal reforms in the Americas are influencing the public debate on cannabis policy. Uruguay and the two US states of Colorado and Washington have taken steps to regulate and legitimize the production, distribution, and use of cannabis and its derivatives. Earlier experiences with medical cannabis in the United States and limited access and production models in Europe have been insightful. However, these reforms are going further still, venturing into a new area of cannabis policy. A lack of empirical evidence regarding the effects of such reforms poses a challenge for policymakers. These examples will inform the design and implementation of any future cannabis policies. Therefore, a clear understanding of the details of each jurisdiction is necessary in developing future legal changes. Literature comparing the models of Uruguay, Colorado, and Washington is thin. This paper is based on an exhaustive examination of the laws, regulations, and discussions with regulators and functionaries of each jurisdiction. The research and analysis herein will provide policymakers with a greater understanding of the laws and regulations relevant to legal cannabis in these three jurisdictions, as well as draw to their attention some potential impacts and challenges of cannabis reform that require additional consideration to ensure public safety and health. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.05.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680144538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S095539591400139X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1634461399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-473d3dd63b2c33aae919e409bf374fe5d93febe3da09b2420b233934002ea7363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk9v1DAQxSMEokvhGyBkiQuHbrAzdhJzQFqt-CdV4gAV3CzHnrRekji1k0r59jhsAamXPVka_eZ55r3JspeM5oyy8u0ht2G-Hn1eUMZzKnLK6KNsw-oKtrwS9eNsQ6UQW5BCnmXPYjxQSjnj7Gl2VnBZUahhk9m9HgbduEhG3zmzkICtD30kbiDTDZJdj8EZHd-RHTG-H3XQk7tDogfdLTG1-ZbsfeeDtv6C_NDxxg3Xkx8uEmHJVZpw1svz7Emru4gv7t_z7Orjh-_7z9vLr5--7HeXWyNqNqWpwYK1JTSFAdAaJZPIqWxaqHiLwkposUGwOtUKXtCmAJDAKS1QV1DCefbmqDsGfztjnFTvosGu0wP6OSpW1skrLtLmp1HgvGQg5WlUiBWVBU_o6wfowc8hWfWHEpA06SrIj5QJPsZkuBqD63VYFKNqzVYd1DFbtWarqFAp29T26l58bnq0_5r-hpmA90cAk8d3DoOKxuFg0LqAZlLWu1M_PBQwnRtS_N0vXDD-30XFQlH1bb2v9bxYiiBZ9RN-A4VNyiE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1555334409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cannabis policy reforms in the Americas: A comparative analysis of Colorado, Washington, and Uruguay</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Pardo, Bryce</creator><creatorcontrib>Pardo, Bryce</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Legal reforms in the Americas are influencing the public debate on cannabis policy. Uruguay and the two US states of Colorado and Washington have taken steps to regulate and legitimize the production, distribution, and use of cannabis and its derivatives. Earlier experiences with medical cannabis in the United States and limited access and production models in Europe have been insightful. However, these reforms are going further still, venturing into a new area of cannabis policy. A lack of empirical evidence regarding the effects of such reforms poses a challenge for policymakers. These examples will inform the design and implementation of any future cannabis policies. Therefore, a clear understanding of the details of each jurisdiction is necessary in developing future legal changes. Literature comparing the models of Uruguay, Colorado, and Washington is thin. This paper is based on an exhaustive examination of the laws, regulations, and discussions with regulators and functionaries of each jurisdiction. The research and analysis herein will provide policymakers with a greater understanding of the laws and regulations relevant to legal cannabis in these three jurisdictions, as well as draw to their attention some potential impacts and challenges of cannabis reform that require additional consideration to ensure public safety and health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-3959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.05.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24970383</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Access to cannabis ; Cannabis ; Colorado ; Comparative analysis ; Drug and Narcotic Control - legislation & jurisprudence ; Drug policy ; Drug prevention ; Drugs ; Europe ; Government policy ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; International drug control ; Jurisdiction ; Law ; Legislation, Drug ; Marijuana ; Medical Education ; Policy ; Production ; Public health ; Public policy ; Public Policy - legislation & jurisprudence ; Public safety ; Reform ; Regulation ; U.S.A ; United States ; Uruguay ; Washington</subject><ispartof>The International journal of drug policy, 2014-07, Vol.25 (4), p.727-735</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-473d3dd63b2c33aae919e409bf374fe5d93febe3da09b2420b233934002ea7363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-473d3dd63b2c33aae919e409bf374fe5d93febe3da09b2420b233934002ea7363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.05.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27865,27866,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24970383$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pardo, Bryce</creatorcontrib><title>Cannabis policy reforms in the Americas: A comparative analysis of Colorado, Washington, and Uruguay</title><title>The International journal of drug policy</title><addtitle>Int J Drug Policy</addtitle><description>Abstract Legal reforms in the Americas are influencing the public debate on cannabis policy. Uruguay and the two US states of Colorado and Washington have taken steps to regulate and legitimize the production, distribution, and use of cannabis and its derivatives. Earlier experiences with medical cannabis in the United States and limited access and production models in Europe have been insightful. However, these reforms are going further still, venturing into a new area of cannabis policy. A lack of empirical evidence regarding the effects of such reforms poses a challenge for policymakers. These examples will inform the design and implementation of any future cannabis policies. Therefore, a clear understanding of the details of each jurisdiction is necessary in developing future legal changes. Literature comparing the models of Uruguay, Colorado, and Washington is thin. This paper is based on an exhaustive examination of the laws, regulations, and discussions with regulators and functionaries of each jurisdiction. The research and analysis herein will provide policymakers with a greater understanding of the laws and regulations relevant to legal cannabis in these three jurisdictions, as well as draw to their attention some potential impacts and challenges of cannabis reform that require additional consideration to ensure public safety and health.</description><subject>Access to cannabis</subject><subject>Cannabis</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Drug and Narcotic Control - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Drug policy</subject><subject>Drug prevention</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Government policy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>International drug control</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Legislation, Drug</subject><subject>Marijuana</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Public Policy - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Public safety</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Uruguay</subject><subject>Washington</subject><issn>0955-3959</issn><issn>1873-4758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk9v1DAQxSMEokvhGyBkiQuHbrAzdhJzQFqt-CdV4gAV3CzHnrRekji1k0r59jhsAamXPVka_eZ55r3JspeM5oyy8u0ht2G-Hn1eUMZzKnLK6KNsw-oKtrwS9eNsQ6UQW5BCnmXPYjxQSjnj7Gl2VnBZUahhk9m9HgbduEhG3zmzkICtD30kbiDTDZJdj8EZHd-RHTG-H3XQk7tDogfdLTG1-ZbsfeeDtv6C_NDxxg3Xkx8uEmHJVZpw1svz7Emru4gv7t_z7Orjh-_7z9vLr5--7HeXWyNqNqWpwYK1JTSFAdAaJZPIqWxaqHiLwkposUGwOtUKXtCmAJDAKS1QV1DCefbmqDsGfztjnFTvosGu0wP6OSpW1skrLtLmp1HgvGQg5WlUiBWVBU_o6wfowc8hWfWHEpA06SrIj5QJPsZkuBqD63VYFKNqzVYd1DFbtWarqFAp29T26l58bnq0_5r-hpmA90cAk8d3DoOKxuFg0LqAZlLWu1M_PBQwnRtS_N0vXDD-30XFQlH1bb2v9bxYiiBZ9RN-A4VNyiE</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Pardo, Bryce</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Cannabis policy reforms in the Americas: A comparative analysis of Colorado, Washington, and Uruguay</title><author>Pardo, Bryce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-473d3dd63b2c33aae919e409bf374fe5d93febe3da09b2420b233934002ea7363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Access to cannabis</topic><topic>Cannabis</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Drug and Narcotic Control - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Drug policy</topic><topic>Drug prevention</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Government policy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>International drug control</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Legislation, Drug</topic><topic>Marijuana</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Public Policy - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Public safety</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Uruguay</topic><topic>Washington</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pardo, Bryce</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The International journal of drug policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pardo, Bryce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cannabis policy reforms in the Americas: A comparative analysis of Colorado, Washington, and Uruguay</atitle><jtitle>The International journal of drug policy</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Drug Policy</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>727</spage><epage>735</epage><pages>727-735</pages><issn>0955-3959</issn><eissn>1873-4758</eissn><abstract>Abstract Legal reforms in the Americas are influencing the public debate on cannabis policy. Uruguay and the two US states of Colorado and Washington have taken steps to regulate and legitimize the production, distribution, and use of cannabis and its derivatives. Earlier experiences with medical cannabis in the United States and limited access and production models in Europe have been insightful. However, these reforms are going further still, venturing into a new area of cannabis policy. A lack of empirical evidence regarding the effects of such reforms poses a challenge for policymakers. These examples will inform the design and implementation of any future cannabis policies. Therefore, a clear understanding of the details of each jurisdiction is necessary in developing future legal changes. Literature comparing the models of Uruguay, Colorado, and Washington is thin. This paper is based on an exhaustive examination of the laws, regulations, and discussions with regulators and functionaries of each jurisdiction. The research and analysis herein will provide policymakers with a greater understanding of the laws and regulations relevant to legal cannabis in these three jurisdictions, as well as draw to their attention some potential impacts and challenges of cannabis reform that require additional consideration to ensure public safety and health.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24970383</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.05.010</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0955-3959 |
ispartof | The International journal of drug policy, 2014-07, Vol.25 (4), p.727-735 |
issn | 0955-3959 1873-4758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680144538 |
source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Access to cannabis Cannabis Colorado Comparative analysis Drug and Narcotic Control - legislation & jurisprudence Drug policy Drug prevention Drugs Europe Government policy Humans Internal Medicine International drug control Jurisdiction Law Legislation, Drug Marijuana Medical Education Policy Production Public health Public policy Public Policy - legislation & jurisprudence Public safety Reform Regulation U.S.A United States Uruguay Washington |
title | Cannabis policy reforms in the Americas: A comparative analysis of Colorado, Washington, and Uruguay |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A01%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cannabis%20policy%20reforms%20in%20the%20Americas:%20A%20comparative%20analysis%20of%20Colorado,%20Washington,%20and%20Uruguay&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20journal%20of%20drug%20policy&rft.au=Pardo,%20Bryce&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=727&rft.epage=735&rft.pages=727-735&rft.issn=0955-3959&rft.eissn=1873-4758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.05.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1634461399%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1555334409&rft_id=info:pmid/24970383&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S095539591400139X&rfr_iscdi=true |