Cannabis policy reforms in the Americas: A comparative analysis of Colorado, Washington, and Uruguay

Abstract Legal reforms in the Americas are influencing the public debate on cannabis policy. Uruguay and the two US states of Colorado and Washington have taken steps to regulate and legitimize the production, distribution, and use of cannabis and its derivatives. Earlier experiences with medical ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The International journal of drug policy 2014-07, Vol.25 (4), p.727-735
1. Verfasser: Pardo, Bryce
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 735
container_issue 4
container_start_page 727
container_title The International journal of drug policy
container_volume 25
creator Pardo, Bryce
description Abstract Legal reforms in the Americas are influencing the public debate on cannabis policy. Uruguay and the two US states of Colorado and Washington have taken steps to regulate and legitimize the production, distribution, and use of cannabis and its derivatives. Earlier experiences with medical cannabis in the United States and limited access and production models in Europe have been insightful. However, these reforms are going further still, venturing into a new area of cannabis policy. A lack of empirical evidence regarding the effects of such reforms poses a challenge for policymakers. These examples will inform the design and implementation of any future cannabis policies. Therefore, a clear understanding of the details of each jurisdiction is necessary in developing future legal changes. Literature comparing the models of Uruguay, Colorado, and Washington is thin. This paper is based on an exhaustive examination of the laws, regulations, and discussions with regulators and functionaries of each jurisdiction. The research and analysis herein will provide policymakers with a greater understanding of the laws and regulations relevant to legal cannabis in these three jurisdictions, as well as draw to their attention some potential impacts and challenges of cannabis reform that require additional consideration to ensure public safety and health.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.05.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680144538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S095539591400139X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1634461399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-473d3dd63b2c33aae919e409bf374fe5d93febe3da09b2420b233934002ea7363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk9v1DAQxSMEokvhGyBkiQuHbrAzdhJzQFqt-CdV4gAV3CzHnrRekji1k0r59jhsAamXPVka_eZ55r3JspeM5oyy8u0ht2G-Hn1eUMZzKnLK6KNsw-oKtrwS9eNsQ6UQW5BCnmXPYjxQSjnj7Gl2VnBZUahhk9m9HgbduEhG3zmzkICtD30kbiDTDZJdj8EZHd-RHTG-H3XQk7tDogfdLTG1-ZbsfeeDtv6C_NDxxg3Xkx8uEmHJVZpw1svz7Emru4gv7t_z7Orjh-_7z9vLr5--7HeXWyNqNqWpwYK1JTSFAdAaJZPIqWxaqHiLwkposUGwOtUKXtCmAJDAKS1QV1DCefbmqDsGfztjnFTvosGu0wP6OSpW1skrLtLmp1HgvGQg5WlUiBWVBU_o6wfowc8hWfWHEpA06SrIj5QJPsZkuBqD63VYFKNqzVYd1DFbtWarqFAp29T26l58bnq0_5r-hpmA90cAk8d3DoOKxuFg0LqAZlLWu1M_PBQwnRtS_N0vXDD-30XFQlH1bb2v9bxYiiBZ9RN-A4VNyiE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1555334409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cannabis policy reforms in the Americas: A comparative analysis of Colorado, Washington, and Uruguay</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Pardo, Bryce</creator><creatorcontrib>Pardo, Bryce</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Legal reforms in the Americas are influencing the public debate on cannabis policy. Uruguay and the two US states of Colorado and Washington have taken steps to regulate and legitimize the production, distribution, and use of cannabis and its derivatives. Earlier experiences with medical cannabis in the United States and limited access and production models in Europe have been insightful. However, these reforms are going further still, venturing into a new area of cannabis policy. A lack of empirical evidence regarding the effects of such reforms poses a challenge for policymakers. These examples will inform the design and implementation of any future cannabis policies. Therefore, a clear understanding of the details of each jurisdiction is necessary in developing future legal changes. Literature comparing the models of Uruguay, Colorado, and Washington is thin. This paper is based on an exhaustive examination of the laws, regulations, and discussions with regulators and functionaries of each jurisdiction. The research and analysis herein will provide policymakers with a greater understanding of the laws and regulations relevant to legal cannabis in these three jurisdictions, as well as draw to their attention some potential impacts and challenges of cannabis reform that require additional consideration to ensure public safety and health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-3959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.05.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24970383</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Access to cannabis ; Cannabis ; Colorado ; Comparative analysis ; Drug and Narcotic Control - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Drug policy ; Drug prevention ; Drugs ; Europe ; Government policy ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; International drug control ; Jurisdiction ; Law ; Legislation, Drug ; Marijuana ; Medical Education ; Policy ; Production ; Public health ; Public policy ; Public Policy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Public safety ; Reform ; Regulation ; U.S.A ; United States ; Uruguay ; Washington</subject><ispartof>The International journal of drug policy, 2014-07, Vol.25 (4), p.727-735</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-473d3dd63b2c33aae919e409bf374fe5d93febe3da09b2420b233934002ea7363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-473d3dd63b2c33aae919e409bf374fe5d93febe3da09b2420b233934002ea7363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.05.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27865,27866,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24970383$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pardo, Bryce</creatorcontrib><title>Cannabis policy reforms in the Americas: A comparative analysis of Colorado, Washington, and Uruguay</title><title>The International journal of drug policy</title><addtitle>Int J Drug Policy</addtitle><description>Abstract Legal reforms in the Americas are influencing the public debate on cannabis policy. Uruguay and the two US states of Colorado and Washington have taken steps to regulate and legitimize the production, distribution, and use of cannabis and its derivatives. Earlier experiences with medical cannabis in the United States and limited access and production models in Europe have been insightful. However, these reforms are going further still, venturing into a new area of cannabis policy. A lack of empirical evidence regarding the effects of such reforms poses a challenge for policymakers. These examples will inform the design and implementation of any future cannabis policies. Therefore, a clear understanding of the details of each jurisdiction is necessary in developing future legal changes. Literature comparing the models of Uruguay, Colorado, and Washington is thin. This paper is based on an exhaustive examination of the laws, regulations, and discussions with regulators and functionaries of each jurisdiction. The research and analysis herein will provide policymakers with a greater understanding of the laws and regulations relevant to legal cannabis in these three jurisdictions, as well as draw to their attention some potential impacts and challenges of cannabis reform that require additional consideration to ensure public safety and health.</description><subject>Access to cannabis</subject><subject>Cannabis</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Drug and Narcotic Control - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Drug policy</subject><subject>Drug prevention</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Government policy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>International drug control</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Legislation, Drug</subject><subject>Marijuana</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Public Policy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Public safety</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Uruguay</subject><subject>Washington</subject><issn>0955-3959</issn><issn>1873-4758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk9v1DAQxSMEokvhGyBkiQuHbrAzdhJzQFqt-CdV4gAV3CzHnrRekji1k0r59jhsAamXPVka_eZ55r3JspeM5oyy8u0ht2G-Hn1eUMZzKnLK6KNsw-oKtrwS9eNsQ6UQW5BCnmXPYjxQSjnj7Gl2VnBZUahhk9m9HgbduEhG3zmzkICtD30kbiDTDZJdj8EZHd-RHTG-H3XQk7tDogfdLTG1-ZbsfeeDtv6C_NDxxg3Xkx8uEmHJVZpw1svz7Emru4gv7t_z7Orjh-_7z9vLr5--7HeXWyNqNqWpwYK1JTSFAdAaJZPIqWxaqHiLwkposUGwOtUKXtCmAJDAKS1QV1DCefbmqDsGfztjnFTvosGu0wP6OSpW1skrLtLmp1HgvGQg5WlUiBWVBU_o6wfowc8hWfWHEpA06SrIj5QJPsZkuBqD63VYFKNqzVYd1DFbtWarqFAp29T26l58bnq0_5r-hpmA90cAk8d3DoOKxuFg0LqAZlLWu1M_PBQwnRtS_N0vXDD-30XFQlH1bb2v9bxYiiBZ9RN-A4VNyiE</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Pardo, Bryce</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Cannabis policy reforms in the Americas: A comparative analysis of Colorado, Washington, and Uruguay</title><author>Pardo, Bryce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-473d3dd63b2c33aae919e409bf374fe5d93febe3da09b2420b233934002ea7363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Access to cannabis</topic><topic>Cannabis</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Drug and Narcotic Control - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Drug policy</topic><topic>Drug prevention</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Government policy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>International drug control</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Legislation, Drug</topic><topic>Marijuana</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Public Policy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Public safety</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Uruguay</topic><topic>Washington</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pardo, Bryce</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The International journal of drug policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pardo, Bryce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cannabis policy reforms in the Americas: A comparative analysis of Colorado, Washington, and Uruguay</atitle><jtitle>The International journal of drug policy</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Drug Policy</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>727</spage><epage>735</epage><pages>727-735</pages><issn>0955-3959</issn><eissn>1873-4758</eissn><abstract>Abstract Legal reforms in the Americas are influencing the public debate on cannabis policy. Uruguay and the two US states of Colorado and Washington have taken steps to regulate and legitimize the production, distribution, and use of cannabis and its derivatives. Earlier experiences with medical cannabis in the United States and limited access and production models in Europe have been insightful. However, these reforms are going further still, venturing into a new area of cannabis policy. A lack of empirical evidence regarding the effects of such reforms poses a challenge for policymakers. These examples will inform the design and implementation of any future cannabis policies. Therefore, a clear understanding of the details of each jurisdiction is necessary in developing future legal changes. Literature comparing the models of Uruguay, Colorado, and Washington is thin. This paper is based on an exhaustive examination of the laws, regulations, and discussions with regulators and functionaries of each jurisdiction. The research and analysis herein will provide policymakers with a greater understanding of the laws and regulations relevant to legal cannabis in these three jurisdictions, as well as draw to their attention some potential impacts and challenges of cannabis reform that require additional consideration to ensure public safety and health.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24970383</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.05.010</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0955-3959
ispartof The International journal of drug policy, 2014-07, Vol.25 (4), p.727-735
issn 0955-3959
1873-4758
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680144538
source MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Access to cannabis
Cannabis
Colorado
Comparative analysis
Drug and Narcotic Control - legislation & jurisprudence
Drug policy
Drug prevention
Drugs
Europe
Government policy
Humans
Internal Medicine
International drug control
Jurisdiction
Law
Legislation, Drug
Marijuana
Medical Education
Policy
Production
Public health
Public policy
Public Policy - legislation & jurisprudence
Public safety
Reform
Regulation
U.S.A
United States
Uruguay
Washington
title Cannabis policy reforms in the Americas: A comparative analysis of Colorado, Washington, and Uruguay
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A01%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cannabis%20policy%20reforms%20in%20the%20Americas:%20A%20comparative%20analysis%20of%20Colorado,%20Washington,%20and%20Uruguay&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20journal%20of%20drug%20policy&rft.au=Pardo,%20Bryce&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=727&rft.epage=735&rft.pages=727-735&rft.issn=0955-3959&rft.eissn=1873-4758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.05.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1634461399%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1555334409&rft_id=info:pmid/24970383&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S095539591400139X&rfr_iscdi=true