Within-stand nest site selection by spotted owls in the eastern Washington Cascades

We describe 83 nest sites (0.2-ha areas) of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) in mixed conifer forests on the eastern slope of the Cascade Mountains, Washington. Approximately 74% of the nest sites were in forests in intermediate stages of succession, and 27% were in old-growth fore...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 1995-04, Vol.59 (2), p.301-310
Hauptverfasser: Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.), Irwin, L.L, McCutchen, E.L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 310
container_issue 2
container_start_page 301
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 59
creator Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.)
Irwin, L.L
McCutchen, E.L
description We describe 83 nest sites (0.2-ha areas) of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) in mixed conifer forests on the eastern slope of the Cascade Mountains, Washington. Approximately 74% of the nest sites were in forests in intermediate stages of succession, and 27% were in old-growth forests (median = 122 yr, range 54-700 yr). Most sites were naturally regenerated after fire, but 23% of the nest sites had been partially harvested ≥40 years ago. We tested the hypothesis that habitat structure does not influence nest site selection within forested stands, because such knowledge would aid conservation strategies that may include silvicultural prescriptions for creating future habitat. We compared habitat characteristics at 62 nest sites with those at 62 random sites within the same forest stands. Compared with random sites, spotted owl nest sites had canopies of dominant and/or codominant and intermediate trees that were farther aboveground (P = 0.02 and 0.07, respectively), more 35-60-cm-dbh (diam at breast height) Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees (P = 0.03), greater basal area of Douglas-fir trees (P = 0.02), more 61-84-cm-dbh ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) trees (P = 0.03), greater live tree basal area (P = 0.09), greater basal area of Class IV snags (broken snags with no branches and little bark; P < 0.001), less basal area of a group of relatively uncommon conifer species (P = 0.02), fewer 10-34-cm-dbh uncommon conifer species (P = 0.08), and less basal area of Class I and II snags (intact or nearly intact snags with branches and most bark remaining; P = 0.08 and 0.095, respectively). Volume of coarse woody debris (P > 0.13 in all decay classes) and percent canopy closure (P = 0.45) did not differ between nest and random sites. Data support the hypothesis that nest sites are selected as part of an antipredator strategy.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3808943
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16787999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3808943</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3808943</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-a991ff3f554a0f0c1747b497b93de7371bab9a158ea8231da7bbd199a5f50bbb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtLAzEQBvAgCtYH3j0FET2t5rFpNkcpvkDwoFJvy2Q30S3bpGZSxP_eLS0KHjzN5Tcf3wwhR5xdCMn0paxYZUq5RUbcSF2IiuttMmJMiEKV_HWX7CHOGJOcV-MReZp2-b0LBWYILQ0OM8UuO4qud03uYqD2i-Ii5uxaGj97pF2g-d1RB5hdCnQKOOy_5UFOABtoHR6QHQ89usPN3CcvN9fPk7vi4fH2fnL1UDRSVbkAY7j30itVAvOs4brUtjTaGtk6LTW3YA1wVTmohOQtaGtbbgwor5i1Vu6Ts3XuIsWP5VC9nnfYuL6H4OISaz7WlTbGDPDkD5zFZQpDt1rIUgitNRvQ-Ro1KSIm5-tF6uaQvmrO6tVn681nB3m6iVsd3PsEoenwh0vFmRHil80wx_RP2vGaeYg1vKUh6eXJKCUNM_Ib9zOKtA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234227770</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Within-stand nest site selection by spotted owls in the eastern Washington Cascades</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.) ; Irwin, L.L ; McCutchen, E.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.) ; Irwin, L.L ; McCutchen, E.L</creatorcontrib><description>We describe 83 nest sites (0.2-ha areas) of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) in mixed conifer forests on the eastern slope of the Cascade Mountains, Washington. Approximately 74% of the nest sites were in forests in intermediate stages of succession, and 27% were in old-growth forests (median = 122 yr, range 54-700 yr). Most sites were naturally regenerated after fire, but 23% of the nest sites had been partially harvested ≥40 years ago. We tested the hypothesis that habitat structure does not influence nest site selection within forested stands, because such knowledge would aid conservation strategies that may include silvicultural prescriptions for creating future habitat. We compared habitat characteristics at 62 nest sites with those at 62 random sites within the same forest stands. Compared with random sites, spotted owl nest sites had canopies of dominant and/or codominant and intermediate trees that were farther aboveground (P = 0.02 and 0.07, respectively), more 35-60-cm-dbh (diam at breast height) Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees (P = 0.03), greater basal area of Douglas-fir trees (P = 0.02), more 61-84-cm-dbh ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) trees (P = 0.03), greater live tree basal area (P = 0.09), greater basal area of Class IV snags (broken snags with no branches and little bark; P &lt; 0.001), less basal area of a group of relatively uncommon conifer species (P = 0.02), fewer 10-34-cm-dbh uncommon conifer species (P = 0.08), and less basal area of Class I and II snags (intact or nearly intact snags with branches and most bark remaining; P = 0.08 and 0.095, respectively). Volume of coarse woody debris (P &gt; 0.13 in all decay classes) and percent canopy closure (P = 0.45) did not differ between nest and random sites. Data support the hypothesis that nest sites are selected as part of an antipredator strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3808943</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>AMENAGEMENT FORESTIER ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal nesting ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Autoecology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; BOSQUE MIXTO ; BOSQUES ; Branches ; Coniferous forests ; DEPREDACION ; ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION ; ENDANGERED SPECIES ; ESPECE EN DANGER ; ESPECIES EN PELIGRO DE EXTINCION ; EXTINCION DE INCENDIOS ; EXTINCTION DES INCENDIES ; FAUNE ET FLORE SAUVAGES ; FIRE SUPPRESSION ; Forest canopy ; Forest habitats ; FOREST MANAGEMENT ; Forest stands ; FORESTS ; FORET ; FORET MELANGEE ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; GESTION ; HABITAT ; HABITAT SELECTION ; HABITATS ; MANAGEMENT ; MIXED FORESTS ; Mountains ; NESTING ; Nesting sites ; NIDIFICACION ; NIDIFICATION ; OLD GROWTH FORESTS ; ORDENACION FORESTAL ; Owls ; PLANT SUCCESSION ; PREDATION ; Site selection ; STRIGIFORMES ; STRIX OCCIDENTALIS ; Strix occidentalis caurina ; SUCCESSION ECOLOGIQUE ; SUCESION ECOLOGICA ; Vertebrata ; VIDA SILVESTRE ; WASHINGTON ; WILDLIFE ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 1995-04, Vol.59 (2), p.301-310</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1995 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Wildlife Society Apr 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-a991ff3f554a0f0c1747b497b93de7371bab9a158ea8231da7bbd199a5f50bbb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3808943$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3808943$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3510922$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irwin, L.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCutchen, E.L</creatorcontrib><title>Within-stand nest site selection by spotted owls in the eastern Washington Cascades</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>We describe 83 nest sites (0.2-ha areas) of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) in mixed conifer forests on the eastern slope of the Cascade Mountains, Washington. Approximately 74% of the nest sites were in forests in intermediate stages of succession, and 27% were in old-growth forests (median = 122 yr, range 54-700 yr). Most sites were naturally regenerated after fire, but 23% of the nest sites had been partially harvested ≥40 years ago. We tested the hypothesis that habitat structure does not influence nest site selection within forested stands, because such knowledge would aid conservation strategies that may include silvicultural prescriptions for creating future habitat. We compared habitat characteristics at 62 nest sites with those at 62 random sites within the same forest stands. Compared with random sites, spotted owl nest sites had canopies of dominant and/or codominant and intermediate trees that were farther aboveground (P = 0.02 and 0.07, respectively), more 35-60-cm-dbh (diam at breast height) Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees (P = 0.03), greater basal area of Douglas-fir trees (P = 0.02), more 61-84-cm-dbh ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) trees (P = 0.03), greater live tree basal area (P = 0.09), greater basal area of Class IV snags (broken snags with no branches and little bark; P &lt; 0.001), less basal area of a group of relatively uncommon conifer species (P = 0.02), fewer 10-34-cm-dbh uncommon conifer species (P = 0.08), and less basal area of Class I and II snags (intact or nearly intact snags with branches and most bark remaining; P = 0.08 and 0.095, respectively). Volume of coarse woody debris (P &gt; 0.13 in all decay classes) and percent canopy closure (P = 0.45) did not differ between nest and random sites. Data support the hypothesis that nest sites are selected as part of an antipredator strategy.</description><subject>AMENAGEMENT FORESTIER</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BOSQUE MIXTO</subject><subject>BOSQUES</subject><subject>Branches</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>DEPREDACION</subject><subject>ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION</subject><subject>ENDANGERED SPECIES</subject><subject>ESPECE EN DANGER</subject><subject>ESPECIES EN PELIGRO DE EXTINCION</subject><subject>EXTINCION DE INCENDIOS</subject><subject>EXTINCTION DES INCENDIES</subject><subject>FAUNE ET FLORE SAUVAGES</subject><subject>FIRE SUPPRESSION</subject><subject>Forest canopy</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>FOREST MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>Forest stands</subject><subject>FORESTS</subject><subject>FORET</subject><subject>FORET MELANGEE</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>GESTION</subject><subject>HABITAT</subject><subject>HABITAT SELECTION</subject><subject>HABITATS</subject><subject>MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>MIXED FORESTS</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>NESTING</subject><subject>Nesting sites</subject><subject>NIDIFICACION</subject><subject>NIDIFICATION</subject><subject>OLD GROWTH FORESTS</subject><subject>ORDENACION FORESTAL</subject><subject>Owls</subject><subject>PLANT SUCCESSION</subject><subject>PREDATION</subject><subject>Site selection</subject><subject>STRIGIFORMES</subject><subject>STRIX OCCIDENTALIS</subject><subject>Strix occidentalis caurina</subject><subject>SUCCESSION ECOLOGIQUE</subject><subject>SUCESION ECOLOGICA</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>VIDA SILVESTRE</subject><subject>WASHINGTON</subject><subject>WILDLIFE</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MtLAzEQBvAgCtYH3j0FET2t5rFpNkcpvkDwoFJvy2Q30S3bpGZSxP_eLS0KHjzN5Tcf3wwhR5xdCMn0paxYZUq5RUbcSF2IiuttMmJMiEKV_HWX7CHOGJOcV-MReZp2-b0LBWYILQ0OM8UuO4qud03uYqD2i-Ii5uxaGj97pF2g-d1RB5hdCnQKOOy_5UFOABtoHR6QHQ89usPN3CcvN9fPk7vi4fH2fnL1UDRSVbkAY7j30itVAvOs4brUtjTaGtk6LTW3YA1wVTmohOQtaGtbbgwor5i1Vu6Ts3XuIsWP5VC9nnfYuL6H4OISaz7WlTbGDPDkD5zFZQpDt1rIUgitNRvQ-Ro1KSIm5-tF6uaQvmrO6tVn681nB3m6iVsd3PsEoenwh0vFmRHil80wx_RP2vGaeYg1vKUh6eXJKCUNM_Ib9zOKtA</recordid><startdate>19950401</startdate><enddate>19950401</enddate><creator>Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.)</creator><creator>Irwin, L.L</creator><creator>McCutchen, E.L</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950401</creationdate><title>Within-stand nest site selection by spotted owls in the eastern Washington Cascades</title><author>Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.) ; Irwin, L.L ; McCutchen, E.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-a991ff3f554a0f0c1747b497b93de7371bab9a158ea8231da7bbd199a5f50bbb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>AMENAGEMENT FORESTIER</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BOSQUE MIXTO</topic><topic>BOSQUES</topic><topic>Branches</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>DEPREDACION</topic><topic>ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION</topic><topic>ENDANGERED SPECIES</topic><topic>ESPECE EN DANGER</topic><topic>ESPECIES EN PELIGRO DE EXTINCION</topic><topic>EXTINCION DE INCENDIOS</topic><topic>EXTINCTION DES INCENDIES</topic><topic>FAUNE ET FLORE SAUVAGES</topic><topic>FIRE SUPPRESSION</topic><topic>Forest canopy</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>FOREST MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>Forest stands</topic><topic>FORESTS</topic><topic>FORET</topic><topic>FORET MELANGEE</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>GESTION</topic><topic>HABITAT</topic><topic>HABITAT SELECTION</topic><topic>HABITATS</topic><topic>MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>MIXED FORESTS</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>NESTING</topic><topic>Nesting sites</topic><topic>NIDIFICACION</topic><topic>NIDIFICATION</topic><topic>OLD GROWTH FORESTS</topic><topic>ORDENACION FORESTAL</topic><topic>Owls</topic><topic>PLANT SUCCESSION</topic><topic>PREDATION</topic><topic>Site selection</topic><topic>STRIGIFORMES</topic><topic>STRIX OCCIDENTALIS</topic><topic>Strix occidentalis caurina</topic><topic>SUCCESSION ECOLOGIQUE</topic><topic>SUCESION ECOLOGICA</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>VIDA SILVESTRE</topic><topic>WASHINGTON</topic><topic>WILDLIFE</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irwin, L.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCutchen, E.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.)</au><au>Irwin, L.L</au><au>McCutchen, E.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Within-stand nest site selection by spotted owls in the eastern Washington Cascades</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>1995-04-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>310</epage><pages>301-310</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>We describe 83 nest sites (0.2-ha areas) of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) in mixed conifer forests on the eastern slope of the Cascade Mountains, Washington. Approximately 74% of the nest sites were in forests in intermediate stages of succession, and 27% were in old-growth forests (median = 122 yr, range 54-700 yr). Most sites were naturally regenerated after fire, but 23% of the nest sites had been partially harvested ≥40 years ago. We tested the hypothesis that habitat structure does not influence nest site selection within forested stands, because such knowledge would aid conservation strategies that may include silvicultural prescriptions for creating future habitat. We compared habitat characteristics at 62 nest sites with those at 62 random sites within the same forest stands. Compared with random sites, spotted owl nest sites had canopies of dominant and/or codominant and intermediate trees that were farther aboveground (P = 0.02 and 0.07, respectively), more 35-60-cm-dbh (diam at breast height) Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees (P = 0.03), greater basal area of Douglas-fir trees (P = 0.02), more 61-84-cm-dbh ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) trees (P = 0.03), greater live tree basal area (P = 0.09), greater basal area of Class IV snags (broken snags with no branches and little bark; P &lt; 0.001), less basal area of a group of relatively uncommon conifer species (P = 0.02), fewer 10-34-cm-dbh uncommon conifer species (P = 0.08), and less basal area of Class I and II snags (intact or nearly intact snags with branches and most bark remaining; P = 0.08 and 0.095, respectively). Volume of coarse woody debris (P &gt; 0.13 in all decay classes) and percent canopy closure (P = 0.45) did not differ between nest and random sites. Data support the hypothesis that nest sites are selected as part of an antipredator strategy.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2307/3808943</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 1995-04, Vol.59 (2), p.301-310
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16787999
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects AMENAGEMENT FORESTIER
Animal and plant ecology
Animal nesting
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Autoecology
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
BOSQUE MIXTO
BOSQUES
Branches
Coniferous forests
DEPREDACION
ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION
ENDANGERED SPECIES
ESPECE EN DANGER
ESPECIES EN PELIGRO DE EXTINCION
EXTINCION DE INCENDIOS
EXTINCTION DES INCENDIES
FAUNE ET FLORE SAUVAGES
FIRE SUPPRESSION
Forest canopy
Forest habitats
FOREST MANAGEMENT
Forest stands
FORESTS
FORET
FORET MELANGEE
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
GESTION
HABITAT
HABITAT SELECTION
HABITATS
MANAGEMENT
MIXED FORESTS
Mountains
NESTING
Nesting sites
NIDIFICACION
NIDIFICATION
OLD GROWTH FORESTS
ORDENACION FORESTAL
Owls
PLANT SUCCESSION
PREDATION
Site selection
STRIGIFORMES
STRIX OCCIDENTALIS
Strix occidentalis caurina
SUCCESSION ECOLOGIQUE
SUCESION ECOLOGICA
Vertebrata
VIDA SILVESTRE
WASHINGTON
WILDLIFE
Wildlife management
title Within-stand nest site selection by spotted owls in the eastern Washington Cascades
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A02%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Within-stand%20nest%20site%20selection%20by%20spotted%20owls%20in%20the%20eastern%20Washington%20Cascades&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Buchanan,%20J.B.%20(Washington%20Department%20of%20Fish%20and%20Wildlife,%20Olympia,%20WA.)&rft.date=1995-04-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=310&rft.pages=301-310&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3808943&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3808943%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234227770&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3808943&rfr_iscdi=true