Within-stand nest site selection by spotted owls in the eastern Washington Cascades
We describe 83 nest sites (0.2-ha areas) of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) in mixed conifer forests on the eastern slope of the Cascade Mountains, Washington. Approximately 74% of the nest sites were in forests in intermediate stages of succession, and 27% were in old-growth fore...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of wildlife management 1995-04, Vol.59 (2), p.301-310 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 310 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 301 |
container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.) Irwin, L.L McCutchen, E.L |
description | We describe 83 nest sites (0.2-ha areas) of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) in mixed conifer forests on the eastern slope of the Cascade Mountains, Washington. Approximately 74% of the nest sites were in forests in intermediate stages of succession, and 27% were in old-growth forests (median = 122 yr, range 54-700 yr). Most sites were naturally regenerated after fire, but 23% of the nest sites had been partially harvested ≥40 years ago. We tested the hypothesis that habitat structure does not influence nest site selection within forested stands, because such knowledge would aid conservation strategies that may include silvicultural prescriptions for creating future habitat. We compared habitat characteristics at 62 nest sites with those at 62 random sites within the same forest stands. Compared with random sites, spotted owl nest sites had canopies of dominant and/or codominant and intermediate trees that were farther aboveground (P = 0.02 and 0.07, respectively), more 35-60-cm-dbh (diam at breast height) Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees (P = 0.03), greater basal area of Douglas-fir trees (P = 0.02), more 61-84-cm-dbh ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) trees (P = 0.03), greater live tree basal area (P = 0.09), greater basal area of Class IV snags (broken snags with no branches and little bark; P < 0.001), less basal area of a group of relatively uncommon conifer species (P = 0.02), fewer 10-34-cm-dbh uncommon conifer species (P = 0.08), and less basal area of Class I and II snags (intact or nearly intact snags with branches and most bark remaining; P = 0.08 and 0.095, respectively). Volume of coarse woody debris (P > 0.13 in all decay classes) and percent canopy closure (P = 0.45) did not differ between nest and random sites. Data support the hypothesis that nest sites are selected as part of an antipredator strategy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3808943 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16787999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3808943</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3808943</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-a991ff3f554a0f0c1747b497b93de7371bab9a158ea8231da7bbd199a5f50bbb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtLAzEQBvAgCtYH3j0FET2t5rFpNkcpvkDwoFJvy2Q30S3bpGZSxP_eLS0KHjzN5Tcf3wwhR5xdCMn0paxYZUq5RUbcSF2IiuttMmJMiEKV_HWX7CHOGJOcV-MReZp2-b0LBWYILQ0OM8UuO4qud03uYqD2i-Ii5uxaGj97pF2g-d1RB5hdCnQKOOy_5UFOABtoHR6QHQ89usPN3CcvN9fPk7vi4fH2fnL1UDRSVbkAY7j30itVAvOs4brUtjTaGtk6LTW3YA1wVTmohOQtaGtbbgwor5i1Vu6Ts3XuIsWP5VC9nnfYuL6H4OISaz7WlTbGDPDkD5zFZQpDt1rIUgitNRvQ-Ro1KSIm5-tF6uaQvmrO6tVn681nB3m6iVsd3PsEoenwh0vFmRHil80wx_RP2vGaeYg1vKUh6eXJKCUNM_Ib9zOKtA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234227770</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Within-stand nest site selection by spotted owls in the eastern Washington Cascades</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.) ; Irwin, L.L ; McCutchen, E.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.) ; Irwin, L.L ; McCutchen, E.L</creatorcontrib><description>We describe 83 nest sites (0.2-ha areas) of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) in mixed conifer forests on the eastern slope of the Cascade Mountains, Washington. Approximately 74% of the nest sites were in forests in intermediate stages of succession, and 27% were in old-growth forests (median = 122 yr, range 54-700 yr). Most sites were naturally regenerated after fire, but 23% of the nest sites had been partially harvested ≥40 years ago. We tested the hypothesis that habitat structure does not influence nest site selection within forested stands, because such knowledge would aid conservation strategies that may include silvicultural prescriptions for creating future habitat. We compared habitat characteristics at 62 nest sites with those at 62 random sites within the same forest stands. Compared with random sites, spotted owl nest sites had canopies of dominant and/or codominant and intermediate trees that were farther aboveground (P = 0.02 and 0.07, respectively), more 35-60-cm-dbh (diam at breast height) Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees (P = 0.03), greater basal area of Douglas-fir trees (P = 0.02), more 61-84-cm-dbh ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) trees (P = 0.03), greater live tree basal area (P = 0.09), greater basal area of Class IV snags (broken snags with no branches and little bark; P < 0.001), less basal area of a group of relatively uncommon conifer species (P = 0.02), fewer 10-34-cm-dbh uncommon conifer species (P = 0.08), and less basal area of Class I and II snags (intact or nearly intact snags with branches and most bark remaining; P = 0.08 and 0.095, respectively). Volume of coarse woody debris (P > 0.13 in all decay classes) and percent canopy closure (P = 0.45) did not differ between nest and random sites. Data support the hypothesis that nest sites are selected as part of an antipredator strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3808943</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>AMENAGEMENT FORESTIER ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal nesting ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Autoecology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; BOSQUE MIXTO ; BOSQUES ; Branches ; Coniferous forests ; DEPREDACION ; ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION ; ENDANGERED SPECIES ; ESPECE EN DANGER ; ESPECIES EN PELIGRO DE EXTINCION ; EXTINCION DE INCENDIOS ; EXTINCTION DES INCENDIES ; FAUNE ET FLORE SAUVAGES ; FIRE SUPPRESSION ; Forest canopy ; Forest habitats ; FOREST MANAGEMENT ; Forest stands ; FORESTS ; FORET ; FORET MELANGEE ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; GESTION ; HABITAT ; HABITAT SELECTION ; HABITATS ; MANAGEMENT ; MIXED FORESTS ; Mountains ; NESTING ; Nesting sites ; NIDIFICACION ; NIDIFICATION ; OLD GROWTH FORESTS ; ORDENACION FORESTAL ; Owls ; PLANT SUCCESSION ; PREDATION ; Site selection ; STRIGIFORMES ; STRIX OCCIDENTALIS ; Strix occidentalis caurina ; SUCCESSION ECOLOGIQUE ; SUCESION ECOLOGICA ; Vertebrata ; VIDA SILVESTRE ; WASHINGTON ; WILDLIFE ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 1995-04, Vol.59 (2), p.301-310</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1995 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Wildlife Society Apr 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-a991ff3f554a0f0c1747b497b93de7371bab9a158ea8231da7bbd199a5f50bbb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3808943$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3808943$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3510922$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irwin, L.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCutchen, E.L</creatorcontrib><title>Within-stand nest site selection by spotted owls in the eastern Washington Cascades</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>We describe 83 nest sites (0.2-ha areas) of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) in mixed conifer forests on the eastern slope of the Cascade Mountains, Washington. Approximately 74% of the nest sites were in forests in intermediate stages of succession, and 27% were in old-growth forests (median = 122 yr, range 54-700 yr). Most sites were naturally regenerated after fire, but 23% of the nest sites had been partially harvested ≥40 years ago. We tested the hypothesis that habitat structure does not influence nest site selection within forested stands, because such knowledge would aid conservation strategies that may include silvicultural prescriptions for creating future habitat. We compared habitat characteristics at 62 nest sites with those at 62 random sites within the same forest stands. Compared with random sites, spotted owl nest sites had canopies of dominant and/or codominant and intermediate trees that were farther aboveground (P = 0.02 and 0.07, respectively), more 35-60-cm-dbh (diam at breast height) Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees (P = 0.03), greater basal area of Douglas-fir trees (P = 0.02), more 61-84-cm-dbh ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) trees (P = 0.03), greater live tree basal area (P = 0.09), greater basal area of Class IV snags (broken snags with no branches and little bark; P < 0.001), less basal area of a group of relatively uncommon conifer species (P = 0.02), fewer 10-34-cm-dbh uncommon conifer species (P = 0.08), and less basal area of Class I and II snags (intact or nearly intact snags with branches and most bark remaining; P = 0.08 and 0.095, respectively). Volume of coarse woody debris (P > 0.13 in all decay classes) and percent canopy closure (P = 0.45) did not differ between nest and random sites. Data support the hypothesis that nest sites are selected as part of an antipredator strategy.</description><subject>AMENAGEMENT FORESTIER</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BOSQUE MIXTO</subject><subject>BOSQUES</subject><subject>Branches</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>DEPREDACION</subject><subject>ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION</subject><subject>ENDANGERED SPECIES</subject><subject>ESPECE EN DANGER</subject><subject>ESPECIES EN PELIGRO DE EXTINCION</subject><subject>EXTINCION DE INCENDIOS</subject><subject>EXTINCTION DES INCENDIES</subject><subject>FAUNE ET FLORE SAUVAGES</subject><subject>FIRE SUPPRESSION</subject><subject>Forest canopy</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>FOREST MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>Forest stands</subject><subject>FORESTS</subject><subject>FORET</subject><subject>FORET MELANGEE</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>GESTION</subject><subject>HABITAT</subject><subject>HABITAT SELECTION</subject><subject>HABITATS</subject><subject>MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>MIXED FORESTS</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>NESTING</subject><subject>Nesting sites</subject><subject>NIDIFICACION</subject><subject>NIDIFICATION</subject><subject>OLD GROWTH FORESTS</subject><subject>ORDENACION FORESTAL</subject><subject>Owls</subject><subject>PLANT SUCCESSION</subject><subject>PREDATION</subject><subject>Site selection</subject><subject>STRIGIFORMES</subject><subject>STRIX OCCIDENTALIS</subject><subject>Strix occidentalis caurina</subject><subject>SUCCESSION ECOLOGIQUE</subject><subject>SUCESION ECOLOGICA</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>VIDA SILVESTRE</subject><subject>WASHINGTON</subject><subject>WILDLIFE</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MtLAzEQBvAgCtYH3j0FET2t5rFpNkcpvkDwoFJvy2Q30S3bpGZSxP_eLS0KHjzN5Tcf3wwhR5xdCMn0paxYZUq5RUbcSF2IiuttMmJMiEKV_HWX7CHOGJOcV-MReZp2-b0LBWYILQ0OM8UuO4qud03uYqD2i-Ii5uxaGj97pF2g-d1RB5hdCnQKOOy_5UFOABtoHR6QHQ89usPN3CcvN9fPk7vi4fH2fnL1UDRSVbkAY7j30itVAvOs4brUtjTaGtk6LTW3YA1wVTmohOQtaGtbbgwor5i1Vu6Ts3XuIsWP5VC9nnfYuL6H4OISaz7WlTbGDPDkD5zFZQpDt1rIUgitNRvQ-Ro1KSIm5-tF6uaQvmrO6tVn681nB3m6iVsd3PsEoenwh0vFmRHil80wx_RP2vGaeYg1vKUh6eXJKCUNM_Ib9zOKtA</recordid><startdate>19950401</startdate><enddate>19950401</enddate><creator>Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.)</creator><creator>Irwin, L.L</creator><creator>McCutchen, E.L</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950401</creationdate><title>Within-stand nest site selection by spotted owls in the eastern Washington Cascades</title><author>Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.) ; Irwin, L.L ; McCutchen, E.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-a991ff3f554a0f0c1747b497b93de7371bab9a158ea8231da7bbd199a5f50bbb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>AMENAGEMENT FORESTIER</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BOSQUE MIXTO</topic><topic>BOSQUES</topic><topic>Branches</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>DEPREDACION</topic><topic>ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION</topic><topic>ENDANGERED SPECIES</topic><topic>ESPECE EN DANGER</topic><topic>ESPECIES EN PELIGRO DE EXTINCION</topic><topic>EXTINCION DE INCENDIOS</topic><topic>EXTINCTION DES INCENDIES</topic><topic>FAUNE ET FLORE SAUVAGES</topic><topic>FIRE SUPPRESSION</topic><topic>Forest canopy</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>FOREST MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>Forest stands</topic><topic>FORESTS</topic><topic>FORET</topic><topic>FORET MELANGEE</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>GESTION</topic><topic>HABITAT</topic><topic>HABITAT SELECTION</topic><topic>HABITATS</topic><topic>MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>MIXED FORESTS</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>NESTING</topic><topic>Nesting sites</topic><topic>NIDIFICACION</topic><topic>NIDIFICATION</topic><topic>OLD GROWTH FORESTS</topic><topic>ORDENACION FORESTAL</topic><topic>Owls</topic><topic>PLANT SUCCESSION</topic><topic>PREDATION</topic><topic>Site selection</topic><topic>STRIGIFORMES</topic><topic>STRIX OCCIDENTALIS</topic><topic>Strix occidentalis caurina</topic><topic>SUCCESSION ECOLOGIQUE</topic><topic>SUCESION ECOLOGICA</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>VIDA SILVESTRE</topic><topic>WASHINGTON</topic><topic>WILDLIFE</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irwin, L.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCutchen, E.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buchanan, J.B. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.)</au><au>Irwin, L.L</au><au>McCutchen, E.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Within-stand nest site selection by spotted owls in the eastern Washington Cascades</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>1995-04-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>310</epage><pages>301-310</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>We describe 83 nest sites (0.2-ha areas) of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) in mixed conifer forests on the eastern slope of the Cascade Mountains, Washington. Approximately 74% of the nest sites were in forests in intermediate stages of succession, and 27% were in old-growth forests (median = 122 yr, range 54-700 yr). Most sites were naturally regenerated after fire, but 23% of the nest sites had been partially harvested ≥40 years ago. We tested the hypothesis that habitat structure does not influence nest site selection within forested stands, because such knowledge would aid conservation strategies that may include silvicultural prescriptions for creating future habitat. We compared habitat characteristics at 62 nest sites with those at 62 random sites within the same forest stands. Compared with random sites, spotted owl nest sites had canopies of dominant and/or codominant and intermediate trees that were farther aboveground (P = 0.02 and 0.07, respectively), more 35-60-cm-dbh (diam at breast height) Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees (P = 0.03), greater basal area of Douglas-fir trees (P = 0.02), more 61-84-cm-dbh ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) trees (P = 0.03), greater live tree basal area (P = 0.09), greater basal area of Class IV snags (broken snags with no branches and little bark; P < 0.001), less basal area of a group of relatively uncommon conifer species (P = 0.02), fewer 10-34-cm-dbh uncommon conifer species (P = 0.08), and less basal area of Class I and II snags (intact or nearly intact snags with branches and most bark remaining; P = 0.08 and 0.095, respectively). Volume of coarse woody debris (P > 0.13 in all decay classes) and percent canopy closure (P = 0.45) did not differ between nest and random sites. Data support the hypothesis that nest sites are selected as part of an antipredator strategy.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2307/3808943</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 1995-04, Vol.59 (2), p.301-310 |
issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16787999 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | AMENAGEMENT FORESTIER Animal and plant ecology Animal nesting Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Autoecology Aves Biological and medical sciences BOSQUE MIXTO BOSQUES Branches Coniferous forests DEPREDACION ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION ENDANGERED SPECIES ESPECE EN DANGER ESPECIES EN PELIGRO DE EXTINCION EXTINCION DE INCENDIOS EXTINCTION DES INCENDIES FAUNE ET FLORE SAUVAGES FIRE SUPPRESSION Forest canopy Forest habitats FOREST MANAGEMENT Forest stands FORESTS FORET FORET MELANGEE Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology GESTION HABITAT HABITAT SELECTION HABITATS MANAGEMENT MIXED FORESTS Mountains NESTING Nesting sites NIDIFICACION NIDIFICATION OLD GROWTH FORESTS ORDENACION FORESTAL Owls PLANT SUCCESSION PREDATION Site selection STRIGIFORMES STRIX OCCIDENTALIS Strix occidentalis caurina SUCCESSION ECOLOGIQUE SUCESION ECOLOGICA Vertebrata VIDA SILVESTRE WASHINGTON WILDLIFE Wildlife management |
title | Within-stand nest site selection by spotted owls in the eastern Washington Cascades |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A02%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Within-stand%20nest%20site%20selection%20by%20spotted%20owls%20in%20the%20eastern%20Washington%20Cascades&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Buchanan,%20J.B.%20(Washington%20Department%20of%20Fish%20and%20Wildlife,%20Olympia,%20WA.)&rft.date=1995-04-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=310&rft.pages=301-310&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3808943&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3808943%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234227770&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3808943&rfr_iscdi=true |