Contour deletion as a method for identifying the weights of features underlying object recognition
A prerequisite for comparative work on object recognition is a method for identifying the features actually extracted from the form. The method introduced here with pigeons is discrimination training between two simple line drawings, followed by a generalization test in which contour is deleted from...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology Comparative and physiological psychology, 1993-02, Vol.46 (1), p.43-61 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 61 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 43 |
container_title | The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Rilling, Mark Marse, Tom De Claire, Luke La |
description | A prerequisite for comparative work on object recognition is a method for identifying the features actually extracted from the form. The method introduced here with pigeons is discrimination training between two simple line drawings, followed by a generalization test in which contour is deleted from the reinforced drawing. In Condition 1, the line drawings were a square (S+) versus a triangle (S-); for Condition 2, the line drawings were planar projections of a cube (S+) versus a truncated pyramid (S-). The generalization decrement between responses to S+ and responses to test stimuli provides a quantitative index of the weight assigned to each feature. Contour deletion at either vertices or midsegments produced a decrement in the rate of responding, showing that each contour was represented as a feature. The generalization decrement to forms containing vertices with midsegments deleted was larger than the generalization decrement to forms containing midsegments with vertices deleted. Therefore, it appears that midsegments are weighted more strongly as features than vertices. Contour deletion provides a direct method for identifying the visual features underlying object recognition and lays a foundation for the development of comparative theories of object recognition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14640749308401094 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sage_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16787872</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_14640749308401094</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1297867768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i335t-44c56619d8d216ce4ace1f02b2a2de52b50c66855ca7a346b864b96f2c5057843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLJDEUhcPgwLTO_IDZBRR3pUkqrwI30vgCwc3MukilbnWnqU7aJEXT_960rSCKuYtA-M65ueci9JeSC0o0uaRccqJ4UxPNCSUN_4Fm-7eK1oweoRlhilW8acQvdJzSipQjVD1D3Tz4HKaIexghu-CxSdjgNeRl6PEQInY9-OyGnfMLnJeAt-AWy5xwGPAAJk8REp58D3F8RUK3AptxBBsW3u0df6OfgxkT_Hm7T9D_25t_8_vq8enuYX79WLm6Frni3AopadPrnlFpgRsLdCCsY4b1IFgniJVSC2GNMjWXnZa8a-TArCijaF6foPOD7yaG5wlSbtcuWRhH4yFMqaVS6VKsgKefwFVJwJe_tZQ1SkulpC7U2RtlkjXjEI23LrWb6NYm7louhFavZhcHLJkFfDAi7X4v7Ze9FMHVQeB8iXdttiGOfZvNbgzxvUn9vfwF52KSPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297867768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contour deletion as a method for identifying the weights of features underlying object recognition</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Rilling, Mark ; Marse, Tom De ; Claire, Luke La</creator><creatorcontrib>Rilling, Mark ; Marse, Tom De ; Claire, Luke La</creatorcontrib><description>A prerequisite for comparative work on object recognition is a method for identifying the features actually extracted from the form. The method introduced here with pigeons is discrimination training between two simple line drawings, followed by a generalization test in which contour is deleted from the reinforced drawing. In Condition 1, the line drawings were a square (S+) versus a triangle (S-); for Condition 2, the line drawings were planar projections of a cube (S+) versus a truncated pyramid (S-). The generalization decrement between responses to S+ and responses to test stimuli provides a quantitative index of the weight assigned to each feature. Contour deletion at either vertices or midsegments produced a decrement in the rate of responding, showing that each contour was represented as a feature. The generalization decrement to forms containing vertices with midsegments deleted was larger than the generalization decrement to forms containing midsegments with vertices deleted. Therefore, it appears that midsegments are weighted more strongly as features than vertices. Contour deletion provides a direct method for identifying the visual features underlying object recognition and lays a foundation for the development of comparative theories of object recognition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-1321</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14640749308401094</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QJEBDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Learning. Memory ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><ispartof>The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology, 1993-02, Vol.46 (1), p.43-61</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Experimental Psychology Society 1993</rights><rights>1993 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14640749308401094$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14640749308401094$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27848,27903,27904,59623,60412</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4558772$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rilling, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marse, Tom De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claire, Luke La</creatorcontrib><title>Contour deletion as a method for identifying the weights of features underlying object recognition</title><title>The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology</title><description>A prerequisite for comparative work on object recognition is a method for identifying the features actually extracted from the form. The method introduced here with pigeons is discrimination training between two simple line drawings, followed by a generalization test in which contour is deleted from the reinforced drawing. In Condition 1, the line drawings were a square (S+) versus a triangle (S-); for Condition 2, the line drawings were planar projections of a cube (S+) versus a truncated pyramid (S-). The generalization decrement between responses to S+ and responses to test stimuli provides a quantitative index of the weight assigned to each feature. Contour deletion at either vertices or midsegments produced a decrement in the rate of responding, showing that each contour was represented as a feature. The generalization decrement to forms containing vertices with midsegments deleted was larger than the generalization decrement to forms containing midsegments with vertices deleted. Therefore, it appears that midsegments are weighted more strongly as features than vertices. Contour deletion provides a direct method for identifying the visual features underlying object recognition and lays a foundation for the development of comparative theories of object recognition.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><issn>0272-4995</issn><issn>1464-1321</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLJDEUhcPgwLTO_IDZBRR3pUkqrwI30vgCwc3MukilbnWnqU7aJEXT_960rSCKuYtA-M65ueci9JeSC0o0uaRccqJ4UxPNCSUN_4Fm-7eK1oweoRlhilW8acQvdJzSipQjVD1D3Tz4HKaIexghu-CxSdjgNeRl6PEQInY9-OyGnfMLnJeAt-AWy5xwGPAAJk8REp58D3F8RUK3AptxBBsW3u0df6OfgxkT_Hm7T9D_25t_8_vq8enuYX79WLm6Frni3AopadPrnlFpgRsLdCCsY4b1IFgniJVSC2GNMjWXnZa8a-TArCijaF6foPOD7yaG5wlSbtcuWRhH4yFMqaVS6VKsgKefwFVJwJe_tZQ1SkulpC7U2RtlkjXjEI23LrWb6NYm7louhFavZhcHLJkFfDAi7X4v7Ze9FMHVQeB8iXdttiGOfZvNbgzxvUn9vfwF52KSPg</recordid><startdate>19930201</startdate><enddate>19930201</enddate><creator>Rilling, Mark</creator><creator>Marse, Tom De</creator><creator>Claire, Luke La</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Academic Press for the Experimental Psychology Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930201</creationdate><title>Contour deletion as a method for identifying the weights of features underlying object recognition</title><author>Rilling, Mark ; Marse, Tom De ; Claire, Luke La</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i335t-44c56619d8d216ce4ace1f02b2a2de52b50c66855ca7a346b864b96f2c5057843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rilling, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marse, Tom De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claire, Luke La</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rilling, Mark</au><au>Marse, Tom De</au><au>Claire, Luke La</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contour deletion as a method for identifying the weights of features underlying object recognition</atitle><jtitle>The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology</jtitle><date>1993-02-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>43-61</pages><issn>0272-4995</issn><eissn>1464-1321</eissn><coden>QJEBDT</coden><abstract>A prerequisite for comparative work on object recognition is a method for identifying the features actually extracted from the form. The method introduced here with pigeons is discrimination training between two simple line drawings, followed by a generalization test in which contour is deleted from the reinforced drawing. In Condition 1, the line drawings were a square (S+) versus a triangle (S-); for Condition 2, the line drawings were planar projections of a cube (S+) versus a truncated pyramid (S-). The generalization decrement between responses to S+ and responses to test stimuli provides a quantitative index of the weight assigned to each feature. Contour deletion at either vertices or midsegments produced a decrement in the rate of responding, showing that each contour was represented as a feature. The generalization decrement to forms containing vertices with midsegments deleted was larger than the generalization decrement to forms containing midsegments with vertices deleted. Therefore, it appears that midsegments are weighted more strongly as features than vertices. Contour deletion provides a direct method for identifying the visual features underlying object recognition and lays a foundation for the development of comparative theories of object recognition.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/14640749308401094</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-4995 |
ispartof | The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology, 1993-02, Vol.46 (1), p.43-61 |
issn | 0272-4995 1464-1321 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16787872 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Learning. Memory Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology |
title | Contour deletion as a method for identifying the weights of features underlying object recognition |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T00%3A41%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sage_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contour%20deletion%20as%20a%20method%20for%20identifying%20the%20weights%20of%20features%20underlying%20object%20recognition&rft.jtitle=The%20Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20B,%20Comparative%20and%20physiological%20psychology&rft.au=Rilling,%20Mark&rft.date=1993-02-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=43-61&rft.issn=0272-4995&rft.eissn=1464-1321&rft.coden=QJEBDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14640749308401094&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sage_%3E1297867768%3C/proquest_sage_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297867768&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1080_14640749308401094&rfr_iscdi=true |