Modelling the Relationship Between Bird Population Variables and Hedgerow, and Other Field Margin Attributes. II. Abundance of Individual Species and of Groups of Similar Species

1. An earlier paper related bird species richness to hedgerows and other field boundary attributes including adjacent land use. The study was over several years (winter and summer) at two sites, Huntingdon and Swavesey, in East Anglia UK. 2. The present paper deals with similar relationships, but th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of applied ecology 1995, Vol.32 (2), p.362-371
Hauptverfasser: Parish, T., Lakhani, K. H., Sparks, T. H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 371
container_issue 2
container_start_page 362
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 32
creator Parish, T.
Lakhani, K. H.
Sparks, T. H.
description 1. An earlier paper related bird species richness to hedgerows and other field boundary attributes including adjacent land use. The study was over several years (winter and summer) at two sites, Huntingdon and Swavesey, in East Anglia UK. 2. The present paper deals with similar relationships, but the bird variables used are the abundance of individual species, of groups of species (all finches, all raptors, etc.) and of all birds, as well as Simpson's index of diversity. This required extensive modelling - 105 models for Huntingdon and 174 for Swavesey. 3. The results of all 279 models are presented in a condensed form, highlighting the importance of given field boundary attributes to particular species or groups of species. 4. Like bird species richness in the earlier paper, the abundance of many species was strongly influenced by the land use, and by the main vegetation variables (tree height and number, hedgerow length, height and width). Land use was important to a larger majority of species, the exceptions being carrion crow, pheasant, reed bunting and wren. 5. Verge width appeared important for small insectivores (blue tit) and was particularly important for seed eating birds, e.g. most finches and buntings, red-legged partridge in summer, and carrion crow and skylark in winter. 6. Ditch dimensions were associated with the abundance of some seed eaters (linnet, reed bunting and goldfinch) and insectivores (blackbird, great tit, skylark, song thrush and wren). Kestrel and the groups raptors, corvids, waders and aquatics were associated with large ditches. 7. Though the general management prescriptions to benefit the majority of farmland birds were found to be similar to those in the earlier paper, the detailed species specific modelling made it possible to examine the habitat requirements of particular species. 8. Ecological evaluation of the results from the two studies are presented in a form considered to be of value for practical management. Bird species and groups of birds are categorised with respect to their likely requirements of particular attributes of the field boundaries.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/2405102
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16787050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2405102</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2405102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-a65027b7c2deca58a7c21b763ad0a4e9923c9f704cc331af0cb0f412e31b2fde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EEkuLeAVLILiQrf8k8ea4rWi7UqsiClyjiT3ZepW1U9uh4rV4QrzstgeknmZG8-nTaH6EvONsLiRTJ6JkFWfiBZlxWVeFqOvyJZkxJnixaBh_Td7EuGGMNZWUM_Ln2hscBuvWNN0h_YYDJOtdvLMjPcX0gOjoqQ2GfvXjtN_RnxAsdANGCs7QSzRrDP7h87_pJlsCPbc4GHoNYW0dXaYUbDcljHO6Ws3pspucAaeR-p6unLG_rJlgoLcjanuQ5s1F8NMYd92t3doBwiNwTF71MER8e6hH5Mf5l-9nl8XVzcXqbHlVaLEoUwF1xYTqlBYGNVQLyB3vVC3BMCixaYTUTa9YqbWUHHqmO9aXXKDknegNyiPyce8dg7-fMKZ2a6POzwKHfootr9VCsYpl8P1_4MZPweXbWi45r4UStcrUpz2lg48xYN-OwW4h_G45a3fJtYfkMvnh4IOoYehDfpaNT7jMwe3Ce8I2MfnwrO0vkhCjtw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311627267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modelling the Relationship Between Bird Population Variables and Hedgerow, and Other Field Margin Attributes. II. Abundance of Individual Species and of Groups of Similar Species</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Parish, T. ; Lakhani, K. H. ; Sparks, T. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Parish, T. ; Lakhani, K. H. ; Sparks, T. H.</creatorcontrib><description>1. An earlier paper related bird species richness to hedgerows and other field boundary attributes including adjacent land use. The study was over several years (winter and summer) at two sites, Huntingdon and Swavesey, in East Anglia UK. 2. The present paper deals with similar relationships, but the bird variables used are the abundance of individual species, of groups of species (all finches, all raptors, etc.) and of all birds, as well as Simpson's index of diversity. This required extensive modelling - 105 models for Huntingdon and 174 for Swavesey. 3. The results of all 279 models are presented in a condensed form, highlighting the importance of given field boundary attributes to particular species or groups of species. 4. Like bird species richness in the earlier paper, the abundance of many species was strongly influenced by the land use, and by the main vegetation variables (tree height and number, hedgerow length, height and width). Land use was important to a larger majority of species, the exceptions being carrion crow, pheasant, reed bunting and wren. 5. Verge width appeared important for small insectivores (blue tit) and was particularly important for seed eating birds, e.g. most finches and buntings, red-legged partridge in summer, and carrion crow and skylark in winter. 6. Ditch dimensions were associated with the abundance of some seed eaters (linnet, reed bunting and goldfinch) and insectivores (blackbird, great tit, skylark, song thrush and wren). Kestrel and the groups raptors, corvids, waders and aquatics were associated with large ditches. 7. Though the general management prescriptions to benefit the majority of farmland birds were found to be similar to those in the earlier paper, the detailed species specific modelling made it possible to examine the habitat requirements of particular species. 8. Ecological evaluation of the results from the two studies are presented in a form considered to be of value for practical management. Bird species and groups of birds are categorised with respect to their likely requirements of particular attributes of the field boundaries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2405102</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPEAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; Birds of prey ; Carrion ; Crows ; Finches ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hedgerows ; Land use ; Species ; Summer ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Winter</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 1995, Vol.32 (2), p.362-371</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1995 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-a65027b7c2deca58a7c21b763ad0a4e9923c9f704cc331af0cb0f412e31b2fde3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2405102$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2405102$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4009,27848,27902,27903,27904,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3533953$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parish, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakhani, K. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparks, T. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Modelling the Relationship Between Bird Population Variables and Hedgerow, and Other Field Margin Attributes. II. Abundance of Individual Species and of Groups of Similar Species</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. An earlier paper related bird species richness to hedgerows and other field boundary attributes including adjacent land use. The study was over several years (winter and summer) at two sites, Huntingdon and Swavesey, in East Anglia UK. 2. The present paper deals with similar relationships, but the bird variables used are the abundance of individual species, of groups of species (all finches, all raptors, etc.) and of all birds, as well as Simpson's index of diversity. This required extensive modelling - 105 models for Huntingdon and 174 for Swavesey. 3. The results of all 279 models are presented in a condensed form, highlighting the importance of given field boundary attributes to particular species or groups of species. 4. Like bird species richness in the earlier paper, the abundance of many species was strongly influenced by the land use, and by the main vegetation variables (tree height and number, hedgerow length, height and width). Land use was important to a larger majority of species, the exceptions being carrion crow, pheasant, reed bunting and wren. 5. Verge width appeared important for small insectivores (blue tit) and was particularly important for seed eating birds, e.g. most finches and buntings, red-legged partridge in summer, and carrion crow and skylark in winter. 6. Ditch dimensions were associated with the abundance of some seed eaters (linnet, reed bunting and goldfinch) and insectivores (blackbird, great tit, skylark, song thrush and wren). Kestrel and the groups raptors, corvids, waders and aquatics were associated with large ditches. 7. Though the general management prescriptions to benefit the majority of farmland birds were found to be similar to those in the earlier paper, the detailed species specific modelling made it possible to examine the habitat requirements of particular species. 8. Ecological evaluation of the results from the two studies are presented in a form considered to be of value for practical management. Bird species and groups of birds are categorised with respect to their likely requirements of particular attributes of the field boundaries.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds of prey</subject><subject>Carrion</subject><subject>Crows</subject><subject>Finches</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hedgerows</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EEkuLeAVLILiQrf8k8ea4rWi7UqsiClyjiT3ZepW1U9uh4rV4QrzstgeknmZG8-nTaH6EvONsLiRTJ6JkFWfiBZlxWVeFqOvyJZkxJnixaBh_Td7EuGGMNZWUM_Ln2hscBuvWNN0h_YYDJOtdvLMjPcX0gOjoqQ2GfvXjtN_RnxAsdANGCs7QSzRrDP7h87_pJlsCPbc4GHoNYW0dXaYUbDcljHO6Ws3pspucAaeR-p6unLG_rJlgoLcjanuQ5s1F8NMYd92t3doBwiNwTF71MER8e6hH5Mf5l-9nl8XVzcXqbHlVaLEoUwF1xYTqlBYGNVQLyB3vVC3BMCixaYTUTa9YqbWUHHqmO9aXXKDknegNyiPyce8dg7-fMKZ2a6POzwKHfootr9VCsYpl8P1_4MZPweXbWi45r4UStcrUpz2lg48xYN-OwW4h_G45a3fJtYfkMvnh4IOoYehDfpaNT7jMwe3Ce8I2MfnwrO0vkhCjtw</recordid><startdate>1995</startdate><enddate>1995</enddate><creator>Parish, T.</creator><creator>Lakhani, K. H.</creator><creator>Sparks, T. H.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Scientific Publications</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1995</creationdate><title>Modelling the Relationship Between Bird Population Variables and Hedgerow, and Other Field Margin Attributes. II. Abundance of Individual Species and of Groups of Similar Species</title><author>Parish, T. ; Lakhani, K. H. ; Sparks, T. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-a65027b7c2deca58a7c21b763ad0a4e9923c9f704cc331af0cb0f412e31b2fde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds of prey</topic><topic>Carrion</topic><topic>Crows</topic><topic>Finches</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hedgerows</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parish, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakhani, K. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparks, T. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parish, T.</au><au>Lakhani, K. H.</au><au>Sparks, T. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modelling the Relationship Between Bird Population Variables and Hedgerow, and Other Field Margin Attributes. II. Abundance of Individual Species and of Groups of Similar Species</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>1995</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>362</spage><epage>371</epage><pages>362-371</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><coden>JAPEAI</coden><abstract>1. An earlier paper related bird species richness to hedgerows and other field boundary attributes including adjacent land use. The study was over several years (winter and summer) at two sites, Huntingdon and Swavesey, in East Anglia UK. 2. The present paper deals with similar relationships, but the bird variables used are the abundance of individual species, of groups of species (all finches, all raptors, etc.) and of all birds, as well as Simpson's index of diversity. This required extensive modelling - 105 models for Huntingdon and 174 for Swavesey. 3. The results of all 279 models are presented in a condensed form, highlighting the importance of given field boundary attributes to particular species or groups of species. 4. Like bird species richness in the earlier paper, the abundance of many species was strongly influenced by the land use, and by the main vegetation variables (tree height and number, hedgerow length, height and width). Land use was important to a larger majority of species, the exceptions being carrion crow, pheasant, reed bunting and wren. 5. Verge width appeared important for small insectivores (blue tit) and was particularly important for seed eating birds, e.g. most finches and buntings, red-legged partridge in summer, and carrion crow and skylark in winter. 6. Ditch dimensions were associated with the abundance of some seed eaters (linnet, reed bunting and goldfinch) and insectivores (blackbird, great tit, skylark, song thrush and wren). Kestrel and the groups raptors, corvids, waders and aquatics were associated with large ditches. 7. Though the general management prescriptions to benefit the majority of farmland birds were found to be similar to those in the earlier paper, the detailed species specific modelling made it possible to examine the habitat requirements of particular species. 8. Ecological evaluation of the results from the two studies are presented in a form considered to be of value for practical management. Bird species and groups of birds are categorised with respect to their likely requirements of particular attributes of the field boundaries.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.2307/2405102</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 1995, Vol.32 (2), p.362-371
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16787050
source Periodicals Index Online; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Birds
Birds of prey
Carrion
Crows
Finches
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hedgerows
Land use
Species
Summer
Synecology
Terrestrial ecosystems
Winter
title Modelling the Relationship Between Bird Population Variables and Hedgerow, and Other Field Margin Attributes. II. Abundance of Individual Species and of Groups of Similar Species
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T02%3A20%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modelling%20the%20Relationship%20Between%20Bird%20Population%20Variables%20and%20Hedgerow,%20and%20Other%20Field%20Margin%20Attributes.%20II.%20Abundance%20of%20Individual%20Species%20and%20of%20Groups%20of%20Similar%20Species&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Parish,%20T.&rft.date=1995&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=362&rft.epage=371&rft.pages=362-371&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft.coden=JAPEAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2405102&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2405102%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311627267&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2405102&rfr_iscdi=true