A comparison of three test methods for determining the thermal performance of parabolic trough solar collectors

•Three outdoor test methods for parabolic trough solar collectors were compared.•Four typical tests were conducted at transient working conditions for the regression.•The regressed parameters of mathematical models in the test methods were analyzed.•The comparative analysis on thermal performance pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Solar energy 2014-01, Vol.99, p.11-27
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Li, Wang, Zhifeng, Li, Xin, Yuan, Guofeng, Sun, Feihu, Lei, Dongqiang, Li, Shidong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue
container_start_page 11
container_title Solar energy
container_volume 99
creator Xu, Li
Wang, Zhifeng
Li, Xin
Yuan, Guofeng
Sun, Feihu
Lei, Dongqiang
Li, Shidong
description •Three outdoor test methods for parabolic trough solar collectors were compared.•Four typical tests were conducted at transient working conditions for the regression.•The regressed parameters of mathematical models in the test methods were analyzed.•The comparative analysis on thermal performance predictions was carried out. Based on the theoretical background and experimental results, a study on the extensive comparison of three outdoor test methods for determining the thermal performance of parabolic trough solar collectors is presented. These test methods are the steady-state method in the ASHRAE 93 standard, the quasi-dynamic method in the EN 12975-2 standard and a new dynamic method developed by Xu et al. They are discussed in detail and are explained in view of the on-site parabolic trough solar collectors in the real service. In addition, the experimental data acquired from four typical test cases at the transient working conditions is applied to obtain the parameters of three mathematical models in the test methods and predict the collector outlet temperature, and collector output power. Furthermore, the comparative analysis on the projections of the essential thermal performance indicators shows the advantages and disadvantages of these three test models according to both the practical operation and weather conditions, which proves that the dynamic model may be the potential core of a quick, reliable on-site thermal performance test method at some future time.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.solener.2013.10.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1678000940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0038092X13004210</els_id><sourcerecordid>1678000940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-9dbc5b9d178733513491fd585b78ee2af77323529806ed57bee9e579b7bc7e0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMoOI7-BCEggpceK8mk032SZVk_YMGLgreQTqp3MqQ7Y9Ij-O-tZgYPXtZDEag89dbHy9hrATsBon1_3NWccMaykyAU5XYA_RO2EXsjGiG1eco2AKproJc_nrMXtR4BhBGd2bB8w32eTq7EmmeeR74cCiJfsC58wuWQQ-VjLjzggmWKc5wfCME1yuQSP2Gh78nNHtdqEnJDTtHzpeTzw4HTZK5Qi5TQL7nUl-zZ6FLFV9d3y75_vPt2-7m5__rpy-3NfeM1mKXpw-D10AdhOqOUFmrfizHoTg-mQ5RuNEZJpWXfQYtBmwGxR236wQzeIAS1Ze8uuqeSf55pGzvF6jElN2M-Vyta0wGdaQ-Po3oPUgkN_4NKUAY0tIS--Qc95nOZaWdLvmjZqjW2TF8oX3KtBUd7KnFy5bcVYFdz7dFezbWruWuapqa6t1d1V71LYyEDYv1bLDshFM1L3IcLh3TrX5FUqo9IZoVYyBAbcnyk0x_AC70I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1475263526</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of three test methods for determining the thermal performance of parabolic trough solar collectors</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Xu, Li ; Wang, Zhifeng ; Li, Xin ; Yuan, Guofeng ; Sun, Feihu ; Lei, Dongqiang ; Li, Shidong</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Li ; Wang, Zhifeng ; Li, Xin ; Yuan, Guofeng ; Sun, Feihu ; Lei, Dongqiang ; Li, Shidong</creatorcontrib><description>•Three outdoor test methods for parabolic trough solar collectors were compared.•Four typical tests were conducted at transient working conditions for the regression.•The regressed parameters of mathematical models in the test methods were analyzed.•The comparative analysis on thermal performance predictions was carried out. Based on the theoretical background and experimental results, a study on the extensive comparison of three outdoor test methods for determining the thermal performance of parabolic trough solar collectors is presented. These test methods are the steady-state method in the ASHRAE 93 standard, the quasi-dynamic method in the EN 12975-2 standard and a new dynamic method developed by Xu et al. They are discussed in detail and are explained in view of the on-site parabolic trough solar collectors in the real service. In addition, the experimental data acquired from four typical test cases at the transient working conditions is applied to obtain the parameters of three mathematical models in the test methods and predict the collector outlet temperature, and collector output power. Furthermore, the comparative analysis on the projections of the essential thermal performance indicators shows the advantages and disadvantages of these three test models according to both the practical operation and weather conditions, which proves that the dynamic model may be the potential core of a quick, reliable on-site thermal performance test method at some future time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-092X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-1257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2013.10.009</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SRENA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accumulators ; Applied sciences ; ASHRAE 93 ; Collectors ; Comparative analysis ; Dynamic test ; Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering ; EN 12975-2 ; Energy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Mathematical models ; Natural energy ; Outdoor ; Outlets ; Parabolic trough solar collector ; Performance evaluation ; Photovoltaic cells ; Solar collectors ; Solar energy ; Solar power generation ; Solar thermal conversion ; Test methods ; Testing. Reliability. Quality control ; Thermal energy</subject><ispartof>Solar energy, 2014-01, Vol.99, p.11-27</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Jan 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-9dbc5b9d178733513491fd585b78ee2af77323529806ed57bee9e579b7bc7e0d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-9dbc5b9d178733513491fd585b78ee2af77323529806ed57bee9e579b7bc7e0d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.10.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28113003$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Guofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Feihu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Dongqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shidong</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of three test methods for determining the thermal performance of parabolic trough solar collectors</title><title>Solar energy</title><description>•Three outdoor test methods for parabolic trough solar collectors were compared.•Four typical tests were conducted at transient working conditions for the regression.•The regressed parameters of mathematical models in the test methods were analyzed.•The comparative analysis on thermal performance predictions was carried out. Based on the theoretical background and experimental results, a study on the extensive comparison of three outdoor test methods for determining the thermal performance of parabolic trough solar collectors is presented. These test methods are the steady-state method in the ASHRAE 93 standard, the quasi-dynamic method in the EN 12975-2 standard and a new dynamic method developed by Xu et al. They are discussed in detail and are explained in view of the on-site parabolic trough solar collectors in the real service. In addition, the experimental data acquired from four typical test cases at the transient working conditions is applied to obtain the parameters of three mathematical models in the test methods and predict the collector outlet temperature, and collector output power. Furthermore, the comparative analysis on the projections of the essential thermal performance indicators shows the advantages and disadvantages of these three test models according to both the practical operation and weather conditions, which proves that the dynamic model may be the potential core of a quick, reliable on-site thermal performance test method at some future time.</description><subject>Accumulators</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>ASHRAE 93</subject><subject>Collectors</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Dynamic test</subject><subject>Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering</subject><subject>EN 12975-2</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Natural energy</subject><subject>Outdoor</subject><subject>Outlets</subject><subject>Parabolic trough solar collector</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Photovoltaic cells</subject><subject>Solar collectors</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar power generation</subject><subject>Solar thermal conversion</subject><subject>Test methods</subject><subject>Testing. Reliability. Quality control</subject><subject>Thermal energy</subject><issn>0038-092X</issn><issn>1471-1257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMoOI7-BCEggpceK8mk032SZVk_YMGLgreQTqp3MqQ7Y9Ij-O-tZgYPXtZDEag89dbHy9hrATsBon1_3NWccMaykyAU5XYA_RO2EXsjGiG1eco2AKproJc_nrMXtR4BhBGd2bB8w32eTq7EmmeeR74cCiJfsC58wuWQQ-VjLjzggmWKc5wfCME1yuQSP2Gh78nNHtdqEnJDTtHzpeTzw4HTZK5Qi5TQL7nUl-zZ6FLFV9d3y75_vPt2-7m5__rpy-3NfeM1mKXpw-D10AdhOqOUFmrfizHoTg-mQ5RuNEZJpWXfQYtBmwGxR236wQzeIAS1Ze8uuqeSf55pGzvF6jElN2M-Vyta0wGdaQ-Po3oPUgkN_4NKUAY0tIS--Qc95nOZaWdLvmjZqjW2TF8oX3KtBUd7KnFy5bcVYFdz7dFezbWruWuapqa6t1d1V71LYyEDYv1bLDshFM1L3IcLh3TrX5FUqo9IZoVYyBAbcnyk0x_AC70I</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Xu, Li</creator><creator>Wang, Zhifeng</creator><creator>Li, Xin</creator><creator>Yuan, Guofeng</creator><creator>Sun, Feihu</creator><creator>Lei, Dongqiang</creator><creator>Li, Shidong</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>A comparison of three test methods for determining the thermal performance of parabolic trough solar collectors</title><author>Xu, Li ; Wang, Zhifeng ; Li, Xin ; Yuan, Guofeng ; Sun, Feihu ; Lei, Dongqiang ; Li, Shidong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-9dbc5b9d178733513491fd585b78ee2af77323529806ed57bee9e579b7bc7e0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Accumulators</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>ASHRAE 93</topic><topic>Collectors</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Dynamic test</topic><topic>Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering</topic><topic>EN 12975-2</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Natural energy</topic><topic>Outdoor</topic><topic>Outlets</topic><topic>Parabolic trough solar collector</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Photovoltaic cells</topic><topic>Solar collectors</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar power generation</topic><topic>Solar thermal conversion</topic><topic>Test methods</topic><topic>Testing. Reliability. Quality control</topic><topic>Thermal energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Guofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Feihu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Dongqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shidong</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Li</au><au>Wang, Zhifeng</au><au>Li, Xin</au><au>Yuan, Guofeng</au><au>Sun, Feihu</au><au>Lei, Dongqiang</au><au>Li, Shidong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of three test methods for determining the thermal performance of parabolic trough solar collectors</atitle><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>99</volume><spage>11</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>11-27</pages><issn>0038-092X</issn><eissn>1471-1257</eissn><coden>SRENA4</coden><abstract>•Three outdoor test methods for parabolic trough solar collectors were compared.•Four typical tests were conducted at transient working conditions for the regression.•The regressed parameters of mathematical models in the test methods were analyzed.•The comparative analysis on thermal performance predictions was carried out. Based on the theoretical background and experimental results, a study on the extensive comparison of three outdoor test methods for determining the thermal performance of parabolic trough solar collectors is presented. These test methods are the steady-state method in the ASHRAE 93 standard, the quasi-dynamic method in the EN 12975-2 standard and a new dynamic method developed by Xu et al. They are discussed in detail and are explained in view of the on-site parabolic trough solar collectors in the real service. In addition, the experimental data acquired from four typical test cases at the transient working conditions is applied to obtain the parameters of three mathematical models in the test methods and predict the collector outlet temperature, and collector output power. Furthermore, the comparative analysis on the projections of the essential thermal performance indicators shows the advantages and disadvantages of these three test models according to both the practical operation and weather conditions, which proves that the dynamic model may be the potential core of a quick, reliable on-site thermal performance test method at some future time.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.solener.2013.10.009</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-092X
ispartof Solar energy, 2014-01, Vol.99, p.11-27
issn 0038-092X
1471-1257
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1678000940
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Accumulators
Applied sciences
ASHRAE 93
Collectors
Comparative analysis
Dynamic test
Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering
EN 12975-2
Energy
Exact sciences and technology
Mathematical models
Natural energy
Outdoor
Outlets
Parabolic trough solar collector
Performance evaluation
Photovoltaic cells
Solar collectors
Solar energy
Solar power generation
Solar thermal conversion
Test methods
Testing. Reliability. Quality control
Thermal energy
title A comparison of three test methods for determining the thermal performance of parabolic trough solar collectors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A56%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20three%20test%20methods%20for%20determining%20the%20thermal%20performance%20of%20parabolic%20trough%20solar%20collectors&rft.jtitle=Solar%20energy&rft.au=Xu,%20Li&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=99&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=11-27&rft.issn=0038-092X&rft.eissn=1471-1257&rft.coden=SRENA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.solener.2013.10.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1678000940%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1475263526&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0038092X13004210&rfr_iscdi=true