Dynamic response of traditional and buttressed reinforced concrete minarets

•A strengthening technique for RC minarets under height of 45m was proposed.•This strengthening technique can be applied to all RC minarets.•This strengthening technique can be adapted to all RC minarets.•Technique can be adapted without interrupting architectural and historical details. The destruc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Engineering failure analysis 2015-03, Vol.49, p.31-48
Hauptverfasser: Tuerkeli, Erdem, Livaolu, Ramazan, Doanguen, Adem
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 48
container_issue
container_start_page 31
container_title Engineering failure analysis
container_volume 49
creator Tuerkeli, Erdem
Livaolu, Ramazan
Doanguen, Adem
description •A strengthening technique for RC minarets under height of 45m was proposed.•This strengthening technique can be applied to all RC minarets.•This strengthening technique can be adapted to all RC minarets.•Technique can be adapted without interrupting architectural and historical details. The destructive 17 August 1999 Mw 7.4 Kocaeli and 12 November 1999 Mw 7.2 Düzce Earthquake caused significant damage on reinforced concrete (RC) minarets and many of them severely damaged or collapsed causing the loss of lives. Damages or collapses of these RC minarets after the miserable actions of nature compel us to revise our knowledge about the dynamic response. The experiences from the catastrophic strong ground motions also dictate to the practitioners that alternative structural load carrying systems should be used and/or the seismic resistance of widely used systems should be improved. In this study, the dynamic behaviors of traditional and proposed buttressed RC minarets were compared with each other. Findings of this study show that using buttressed structural load carrying systems in the earthquake prone regions is beneficial and these supporting system behaved well when compared to traditional RC systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.12.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677998984</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1350630714003653</els_id><sourcerecordid>1677998984</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-d55cd39148c30cd5fe8bf2df9ce6ad05f00d7cec7da706b377482b049ae339c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwDuHGJWEdJ3F8ROVXVOICZ8ux18hVYhc7Rerb46ocOHLakXZmpPkIuaZQUaDd7aZC_2mVG5VXY1UDbSpaVwD1CVnQnrOSio6eZs1aKDsG_JxcpLQBAF4LuiCv93uvJqeLiGkbfMIi2GKOyrjZhVxZKG-KYTfP-Z_QZJvzNkSdpQ5eR5yxmJxXWaRLcmbVmPDq9y7Jx-PD--q5XL89vazu1qVmbTOXpm21YYI2vWagTWuxH2xtrNDYKQOtBTBco-ZGcegGxnnT1wM0QiFjQnO2JDfH3m0MXztMs5xc0jhmBhh2SdKOcyF60TfZKo5WHUNKEa3cRjepuJcU5AGg3Mg_AOUBoKS1zABzdnXMYt7y7TDKpB36PN1F1LM0wf2j5QfTPYFS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1677998984</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic response of traditional and buttressed reinforced concrete minarets</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Tuerkeli, Erdem ; Livaolu, Ramazan ; Doanguen, Adem</creator><creatorcontrib>Tuerkeli, Erdem ; Livaolu, Ramazan ; Doanguen, Adem</creatorcontrib><description>•A strengthening technique for RC minarets under height of 45m was proposed.•This strengthening technique can be applied to all RC minarets.•This strengthening technique can be adapted to all RC minarets.•Technique can be adapted without interrupting architectural and historical details. The destructive 17 August 1999 Mw 7.4 Kocaeli and 12 November 1999 Mw 7.2 Düzce Earthquake caused significant damage on reinforced concrete (RC) minarets and many of them severely damaged or collapsed causing the loss of lives. Damages or collapses of these RC minarets after the miserable actions of nature compel us to revise our knowledge about the dynamic response. The experiences from the catastrophic strong ground motions also dictate to the practitioners that alternative structural load carrying systems should be used and/or the seismic resistance of widely used systems should be improved. In this study, the dynamic behaviors of traditional and proposed buttressed RC minarets were compared with each other. Findings of this study show that using buttressed structural load carrying systems in the earthquake prone regions is beneficial and these supporting system behaved well when compared to traditional RC systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-6307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.12.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Buttressed supporting system ; Buttresses ; Damage ; Dynamic response ; Dynamic tests ; Dynamical systems ; Dynamics ; Earthquake response ; Glass transition temperature ; RC minaret ; Reinforced concrete ; Seismic phenomena ; Traditional RC minarets</subject><ispartof>Engineering failure analysis, 2015-03, Vol.49, p.31-48</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-d55cd39148c30cd5fe8bf2df9ce6ad05f00d7cec7da706b377482b049ae339c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-d55cd39148c30cd5fe8bf2df9ce6ad05f00d7cec7da706b377482b049ae339c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.12.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tuerkeli, Erdem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livaolu, Ramazan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doanguen, Adem</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic response of traditional and buttressed reinforced concrete minarets</title><title>Engineering failure analysis</title><description>•A strengthening technique for RC minarets under height of 45m was proposed.•This strengthening technique can be applied to all RC minarets.•This strengthening technique can be adapted to all RC minarets.•Technique can be adapted without interrupting architectural and historical details. The destructive 17 August 1999 Mw 7.4 Kocaeli and 12 November 1999 Mw 7.2 Düzce Earthquake caused significant damage on reinforced concrete (RC) minarets and many of them severely damaged or collapsed causing the loss of lives. Damages or collapses of these RC minarets after the miserable actions of nature compel us to revise our knowledge about the dynamic response. The experiences from the catastrophic strong ground motions also dictate to the practitioners that alternative structural load carrying systems should be used and/or the seismic resistance of widely used systems should be improved. In this study, the dynamic behaviors of traditional and proposed buttressed RC minarets were compared with each other. Findings of this study show that using buttressed structural load carrying systems in the earthquake prone regions is beneficial and these supporting system behaved well when compared to traditional RC systems.</description><subject>Buttressed supporting system</subject><subject>Buttresses</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Dynamic response</subject><subject>Dynamic tests</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Earthquake response</subject><subject>Glass transition temperature</subject><subject>RC minaret</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Seismic phenomena</subject><subject>Traditional RC minarets</subject><issn>1350-6307</issn><issn>1873-1961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwDuHGJWEdJ3F8ROVXVOICZ8ux18hVYhc7Rerb46ocOHLakXZmpPkIuaZQUaDd7aZC_2mVG5VXY1UDbSpaVwD1CVnQnrOSio6eZs1aKDsG_JxcpLQBAF4LuiCv93uvJqeLiGkbfMIi2GKOyrjZhVxZKG-KYTfP-Z_QZJvzNkSdpQ5eR5yxmJxXWaRLcmbVmPDq9y7Jx-PD--q5XL89vazu1qVmbTOXpm21YYI2vWagTWuxH2xtrNDYKQOtBTBco-ZGcegGxnnT1wM0QiFjQnO2JDfH3m0MXztMs5xc0jhmBhh2SdKOcyF60TfZKo5WHUNKEa3cRjepuJcU5AGg3Mg_AOUBoKS1zABzdnXMYt7y7TDKpB36PN1F1LM0wf2j5QfTPYFS</recordid><startdate>201503</startdate><enddate>201503</enddate><creator>Tuerkeli, Erdem</creator><creator>Livaolu, Ramazan</creator><creator>Doanguen, Adem</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201503</creationdate><title>Dynamic response of traditional and buttressed reinforced concrete minarets</title><author>Tuerkeli, Erdem ; Livaolu, Ramazan ; Doanguen, Adem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-d55cd39148c30cd5fe8bf2df9ce6ad05f00d7cec7da706b377482b049ae339c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Buttressed supporting system</topic><topic>Buttresses</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Dynamic response</topic><topic>Dynamic tests</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Earthquake response</topic><topic>Glass transition temperature</topic><topic>RC minaret</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Seismic phenomena</topic><topic>Traditional RC minarets</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tuerkeli, Erdem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livaolu, Ramazan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doanguen, Adem</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering failure analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tuerkeli, Erdem</au><au>Livaolu, Ramazan</au><au>Doanguen, Adem</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic response of traditional and buttressed reinforced concrete minarets</atitle><jtitle>Engineering failure analysis</jtitle><date>2015-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>49</volume><spage>31</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>31-48</pages><issn>1350-6307</issn><eissn>1873-1961</eissn><abstract>•A strengthening technique for RC minarets under height of 45m was proposed.•This strengthening technique can be applied to all RC minarets.•This strengthening technique can be adapted to all RC minarets.•Technique can be adapted without interrupting architectural and historical details. The destructive 17 August 1999 Mw 7.4 Kocaeli and 12 November 1999 Mw 7.2 Düzce Earthquake caused significant damage on reinforced concrete (RC) minarets and many of them severely damaged or collapsed causing the loss of lives. Damages or collapses of these RC minarets after the miserable actions of nature compel us to revise our knowledge about the dynamic response. The experiences from the catastrophic strong ground motions also dictate to the practitioners that alternative structural load carrying systems should be used and/or the seismic resistance of widely used systems should be improved. In this study, the dynamic behaviors of traditional and proposed buttressed RC minarets were compared with each other. Findings of this study show that using buttressed structural load carrying systems in the earthquake prone regions is beneficial and these supporting system behaved well when compared to traditional RC systems.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.12.002</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1350-6307
ispartof Engineering failure analysis, 2015-03, Vol.49, p.31-48
issn 1350-6307
1873-1961
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677998984
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Buttressed supporting system
Buttresses
Damage
Dynamic response
Dynamic tests
Dynamical systems
Dynamics
Earthquake response
Glass transition temperature
RC minaret
Reinforced concrete
Seismic phenomena
Traditional RC minarets
title Dynamic response of traditional and buttressed reinforced concrete minarets
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T23%3A58%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20response%20of%20traditional%20and%20buttressed%20reinforced%20concrete%20minarets&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20failure%20analysis&rft.au=Tuerkeli,%20Erdem&rft.date=2015-03&rft.volume=49&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=31-48&rft.issn=1350-6307&rft.eissn=1873-1961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.12.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1677998984%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1677998984&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1350630714003653&rfr_iscdi=true