Body wave extraction and tomography at Long Beach, California, with ambient-noise interferometry
We retrieve P diving waves by applying seismic interferometry to ambient‐noise records observed at Long Beach, California, and invert travel times of these waves to estimate 3‐D P wave velocity structure. The ambient noise is recorded by a 2‐D dense and large network, which has about 2500 receivers...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2015-02, Vol.120 (2), p.1159-1173 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1173 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1159 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth |
container_volume | 120 |
creator | Nakata, Nori Chang, Jason P. Lawrence, Jesse F. Boué, Pierre |
description | We retrieve P diving waves by applying seismic interferometry to ambient‐noise records observed at Long Beach, California, and invert travel times of these waves to estimate 3‐D P wave velocity structure. The ambient noise is recorded by a 2‐D dense and large network, which has about 2500 receivers with 100 m spacing. Compared to surface wave extraction, body wave extraction is a much greater challenge because ambient noise is typically dominated by surface wave energy. For each individual receiver pair, the cross‐correlation function obtained from ambient‐noise data does not show clear body waves. Although we can reconstruct body waves when we stack correlation functions over all receiver pairs, we need to extract body waves at each receiver pair separately for imaging spatial heterogeneity of subsurface structure. Therefore, we employ two filters after correlation to seek body waves between individual receiver pairs. The first filter is a selection filter based on the similarity between each correlation function and the stacked function. After selecting traces containing stronger body waves, we retain about two million correlation functions (35% of all correlation functions) and successfully preserve most of body wave energy in the retained traces. The second filter is a noise suppression filter to enhance coherent energy (body waves here) and suppress incoherent noise in each trace. After applying these filters, we can reconstruct clear body waves from each virtual source. As an application of using extracted body waves, we estimate 3‐D P wave velocities from these waves with travel time tomography. This study is the first body wave tomography result obtained from only ambient noise recorded at the ground surface. The velocity structure estimated from body waves has higher resolution than estimated from surface waves.
Key Points
We extract body waves from ambient noise recorded by a dense network
Two signal‐processing filters are applied to retrieve clear body waves
We use the extracted body waves to estimate 3‐D P wave velocities |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2015JB011870 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677975986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1911135984</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4714-2d817d1b9d02800daff2422444e55f55d765a8218c0e15195f050ff6002eaccf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhiPUSiDg1gew1EsPm-Jx4tg5siu6Ld22EqLq0TXJmDUk9tb2dsnb12gRQhw6lxmNvn_mnymKd0A_AqXsjFHgl3MKIAU9KI4YNG3ZVrx581xDdVicxnhHc8jcgvqo-D33_UR2-i8SfEhBd8l6R7TrSfKjvw16s56ITmTl3S2Zo-7WM7LQgzU-OKtnZGfTmujxxqJLpfM2IrEuYTAY_IgpTCfFW6OHiKdP-bj4-enievG5XP1Yflmcr0pdC6hL1ksQPdy0PWWS0l4bw2rG6rpGzg3nvWi4lgxkRxE4tNxQTo1p8uXZVGeq4-LDfu4m-D9bjEmNNnY4DNqh30YFjRCt4K1sMvr-FXrnt8FldwpaAKgyVWdqtqe64GMMaNQm2FGHSQFVjx9XLz-e8WqP7-yA039Zdbm8mnOg8Lik3KtsTPjwrNLhXjWiElz9-r5U8ppdyVX1VX2r_gG4fY9c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1911135984</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Body wave extraction and tomography at Long Beach, California, with ambient-noise interferometry</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><creator>Nakata, Nori ; Chang, Jason P. ; Lawrence, Jesse F. ; Boué, Pierre</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakata, Nori ; Chang, Jason P. ; Lawrence, Jesse F. ; Boué, Pierre</creatorcontrib><description>We retrieve P diving waves by applying seismic interferometry to ambient‐noise records observed at Long Beach, California, and invert travel times of these waves to estimate 3‐D P wave velocity structure. The ambient noise is recorded by a 2‐D dense and large network, which has about 2500 receivers with 100 m spacing. Compared to surface wave extraction, body wave extraction is a much greater challenge because ambient noise is typically dominated by surface wave energy. For each individual receiver pair, the cross‐correlation function obtained from ambient‐noise data does not show clear body waves. Although we can reconstruct body waves when we stack correlation functions over all receiver pairs, we need to extract body waves at each receiver pair separately for imaging spatial heterogeneity of subsurface structure. Therefore, we employ two filters after correlation to seek body waves between individual receiver pairs. The first filter is a selection filter based on the similarity between each correlation function and the stacked function. After selecting traces containing stronger body waves, we retain about two million correlation functions (35% of all correlation functions) and successfully preserve most of body wave energy in the retained traces. The second filter is a noise suppression filter to enhance coherent energy (body waves here) and suppress incoherent noise in each trace. After applying these filters, we can reconstruct clear body waves from each virtual source. As an application of using extracted body waves, we estimate 3‐D P wave velocities from these waves with travel time tomography. This study is the first body wave tomography result obtained from only ambient noise recorded at the ground surface. The velocity structure estimated from body waves has higher resolution than estimated from surface waves.
Key Points
We extract body waves from ambient noise recorded by a dense network
Two signal‐processing filters are applied to retrieve clear body waves
We use the extracted body waves to estimate 3‐D P wave velocities</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2015JB011870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ambient noise ; Beaches ; body wave ; Body waves ; Correlation ; Correlation analysis ; Cross correlation ; Data processing ; Diving ; Elastic waves ; Electromagnetic wave filters ; Energy ; Estimates ; Extraction ; Filters ; Geophysics ; Heterogeneity ; Imaging ; Imaging techniques ; Information processing ; Interferometry ; Long Beach ; Noise ; Noise prediction ; Noise reduction ; P wave ; P waves ; Patchiness ; Receivers ; Records ; seismic interferometry ; Seismic velocities ; Seismic wave velocities ; Signal processing ; Similarity ; Spatial heterogeneity ; Surface water waves ; Surface waves ; Three dimensional ; Three dimensional bodies ; Tomography ; Travel ; Travel time ; Velocity ; Wave energy ; Wave power ; Wave velocity</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2015-02, Vol.120 (2), p.1159-1173</ispartof><rights>2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Feb 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4714-2d817d1b9d02800daff2422444e55f55d765a8218c0e15195f050ff6002eaccf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4714-2d817d1b9d02800daff2422444e55f55d765a8218c0e15195f050ff6002eaccf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2015JB011870$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2015JB011870$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakata, Nori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Jason P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Jesse F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boué, Pierre</creatorcontrib><title>Body wave extraction and tomography at Long Beach, California, with ambient-noise interferometry</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</addtitle><description>We retrieve P diving waves by applying seismic interferometry to ambient‐noise records observed at Long Beach, California, and invert travel times of these waves to estimate 3‐D P wave velocity structure. The ambient noise is recorded by a 2‐D dense and large network, which has about 2500 receivers with 100 m spacing. Compared to surface wave extraction, body wave extraction is a much greater challenge because ambient noise is typically dominated by surface wave energy. For each individual receiver pair, the cross‐correlation function obtained from ambient‐noise data does not show clear body waves. Although we can reconstruct body waves when we stack correlation functions over all receiver pairs, we need to extract body waves at each receiver pair separately for imaging spatial heterogeneity of subsurface structure. Therefore, we employ two filters after correlation to seek body waves between individual receiver pairs. The first filter is a selection filter based on the similarity between each correlation function and the stacked function. After selecting traces containing stronger body waves, we retain about two million correlation functions (35% of all correlation functions) and successfully preserve most of body wave energy in the retained traces. The second filter is a noise suppression filter to enhance coherent energy (body waves here) and suppress incoherent noise in each trace. After applying these filters, we can reconstruct clear body waves from each virtual source. As an application of using extracted body waves, we estimate 3‐D P wave velocities from these waves with travel time tomography. This study is the first body wave tomography result obtained from only ambient noise recorded at the ground surface. The velocity structure estimated from body waves has higher resolution than estimated from surface waves.
Key Points
We extract body waves from ambient noise recorded by a dense network
Two signal‐processing filters are applied to retrieve clear body waves
We use the extracted body waves to estimate 3‐D P wave velocities</description><subject>Ambient noise</subject><subject>Beaches</subject><subject>body wave</subject><subject>Body waves</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Cross correlation</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Diving</subject><subject>Elastic waves</subject><subject>Electromagnetic wave filters</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Filters</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Imaging techniques</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Interferometry</subject><subject>Long Beach</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Noise prediction</subject><subject>Noise reduction</subject><subject>P wave</subject><subject>P waves</subject><subject>Patchiness</subject><subject>Receivers</subject><subject>Records</subject><subject>seismic interferometry</subject><subject>Seismic velocities</subject><subject>Seismic wave velocities</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>Similarity</subject><subject>Spatial heterogeneity</subject><subject>Surface water waves</subject><subject>Surface waves</subject><subject>Three dimensional</subject><subject>Three dimensional bodies</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Travel time</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Wave energy</subject><subject>Wave power</subject><subject>Wave velocity</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhiPUSiDg1gew1EsPm-Jx4tg5siu6Ld22EqLq0TXJmDUk9tb2dsnb12gRQhw6lxmNvn_mnymKd0A_AqXsjFHgl3MKIAU9KI4YNG3ZVrx581xDdVicxnhHc8jcgvqo-D33_UR2-i8SfEhBd8l6R7TrSfKjvw16s56ITmTl3S2Zo-7WM7LQgzU-OKtnZGfTmujxxqJLpfM2IrEuYTAY_IgpTCfFW6OHiKdP-bj4-enievG5XP1Yflmcr0pdC6hL1ksQPdy0PWWS0l4bw2rG6rpGzg3nvWi4lgxkRxE4tNxQTo1p8uXZVGeq4-LDfu4m-D9bjEmNNnY4DNqh30YFjRCt4K1sMvr-FXrnt8FldwpaAKgyVWdqtqe64GMMaNQm2FGHSQFVjx9XLz-e8WqP7-yA039Zdbm8mnOg8Lik3KtsTPjwrNLhXjWiElz9-r5U8ppdyVX1VX2r_gG4fY9c</recordid><startdate>201502</startdate><enddate>201502</enddate><creator>Nakata, Nori</creator><creator>Chang, Jason P.</creator><creator>Lawrence, Jesse F.</creator><creator>Boué, Pierre</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201502</creationdate><title>Body wave extraction and tomography at Long Beach, California, with ambient-noise interferometry</title><author>Nakata, Nori ; Chang, Jason P. ; Lawrence, Jesse F. ; Boué, Pierre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4714-2d817d1b9d02800daff2422444e55f55d765a8218c0e15195f050ff6002eaccf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Ambient noise</topic><topic>Beaches</topic><topic>body wave</topic><topic>Body waves</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Cross correlation</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Diving</topic><topic>Elastic waves</topic><topic>Electromagnetic wave filters</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Filters</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Imaging techniques</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Interferometry</topic><topic>Long Beach</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Noise prediction</topic><topic>Noise reduction</topic><topic>P wave</topic><topic>P waves</topic><topic>Patchiness</topic><topic>Receivers</topic><topic>Records</topic><topic>seismic interferometry</topic><topic>Seismic velocities</topic><topic>Seismic wave velocities</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>Similarity</topic><topic>Spatial heterogeneity</topic><topic>Surface water waves</topic><topic>Surface waves</topic><topic>Three dimensional</topic><topic>Three dimensional bodies</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Travel time</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Wave energy</topic><topic>Wave power</topic><topic>Wave velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakata, Nori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Jason P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Jesse F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boué, Pierre</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakata, Nori</au><au>Chang, Jason P.</au><au>Lawrence, Jesse F.</au><au>Boué, Pierre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Body wave extraction and tomography at Long Beach, California, with ambient-noise interferometry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</addtitle><date>2015-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1159</spage><epage>1173</epage><pages>1159-1173</pages><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>We retrieve P diving waves by applying seismic interferometry to ambient‐noise records observed at Long Beach, California, and invert travel times of these waves to estimate 3‐D P wave velocity structure. The ambient noise is recorded by a 2‐D dense and large network, which has about 2500 receivers with 100 m spacing. Compared to surface wave extraction, body wave extraction is a much greater challenge because ambient noise is typically dominated by surface wave energy. For each individual receiver pair, the cross‐correlation function obtained from ambient‐noise data does not show clear body waves. Although we can reconstruct body waves when we stack correlation functions over all receiver pairs, we need to extract body waves at each receiver pair separately for imaging spatial heterogeneity of subsurface structure. Therefore, we employ two filters after correlation to seek body waves between individual receiver pairs. The first filter is a selection filter based on the similarity between each correlation function and the stacked function. After selecting traces containing stronger body waves, we retain about two million correlation functions (35% of all correlation functions) and successfully preserve most of body wave energy in the retained traces. The second filter is a noise suppression filter to enhance coherent energy (body waves here) and suppress incoherent noise in each trace. After applying these filters, we can reconstruct clear body waves from each virtual source. As an application of using extracted body waves, we estimate 3‐D P wave velocities from these waves with travel time tomography. This study is the first body wave tomography result obtained from only ambient noise recorded at the ground surface. The velocity structure estimated from body waves has higher resolution than estimated from surface waves.
Key Points
We extract body waves from ambient noise recorded by a dense network
Two signal‐processing filters are applied to retrieve clear body waves
We use the extracted body waves to estimate 3‐D P wave velocities</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2015JB011870</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9313 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2015-02, Vol.120 (2), p.1159-1173 |
issn | 2169-9313 2169-9356 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677975986 |
source | Wiley Journals; Wiley Online Library Free Content |
subjects | Ambient noise Beaches body wave Body waves Correlation Correlation analysis Cross correlation Data processing Diving Elastic waves Electromagnetic wave filters Energy Estimates Extraction Filters Geophysics Heterogeneity Imaging Imaging techniques Information processing Interferometry Long Beach Noise Noise prediction Noise reduction P wave P waves Patchiness Receivers Records seismic interferometry Seismic velocities Seismic wave velocities Signal processing Similarity Spatial heterogeneity Surface water waves Surface waves Three dimensional Three dimensional bodies Tomography Travel Travel time Velocity Wave energy Wave power Wave velocity |
title | Body wave extraction and tomography at Long Beach, California, with ambient-noise interferometry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T11%3A22%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Body%20wave%20extraction%20and%20tomography%20at%20Long%20Beach,%20California,%20with%20ambient-noise%20interferometry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Nakata,%20Nori&rft.date=2015-02&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1159&rft.epage=1173&rft.pages=1159-1173&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2015JB011870&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1911135984%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1911135984&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |