California's Low-Threat LUFT Site Closure Policy: Looking Forward
California's regulatory agencies have historically been at the forefront of national efforts to address environmental concerns. In 2012, California's agency for addressing leaking underground fuel tanks (LUFTs) adopted a policy that identifies low‐threat conditions warranting closure of an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Remediation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2015-03, Vol.25 (2), p.9-33 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 33 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | Remediation (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Hadley, Paul W. Arulanantham, Ravi Gandhi, Deepa |
description | California's regulatory agencies have historically been at the forefront of national efforts to address environmental concerns. In 2012, California's agency for addressing leaking underground fuel tanks (LUFTs) adopted a policy that identifies low‐threat conditions warranting closure of an LUFT case. That development clearly fulfills the role of risk management in the risk assessment–risk management paradigm inherent in environmental remediation. It also encourages identification of additional categories of sites and other circumstances that are “low threat” to develop similar guidance on closure to apply to those sites. ©2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rem.21421 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677970447</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1677970447</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3611-40577d4cdeb0b3e7632075c9913f4351fbf55b8973ca8e070f503c5e0c1751f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0EFPwjAYBuDFaCKiB__BEg_qYfB1bdfNG1kADRONgh6bUjotDIotBPn3FlEPJiamhzbp837J9wbBKYIGAoibVs0aMSIx2gtqiMYQJSlG-_4NFEU0oelhcOTcBAD5g2tBKxeVLo2da3HuwsKso8GrVWIZFsPOIHzUSxXmlXErq8J7U2m5ufLITPX8JewYuxZ2fBwclKJy6uTrrgfDTnuQX0fFXfcmbxWRxAlCEQHK2JjIsRrBCCuW4BgYlVmGcEkwReWopHSUZgxLkSpgUFLAkiqQiPlfhOvBxW7uwpq3lXJLPtNOqqoSc2VWjqOEsYwBIewfNEljGqeEenr2i07Mys79IltFYpoRmnl1uVPSGuesKvnC6pmwG46Ab3vnvnf-2bu3zZ1d60pt_ob8oX37nYh2Ce2W6v0nIeyUJwwzyp_7Xd7r4QEUT33exR_cv490</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1664259459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>California's Low-Threat LUFT Site Closure Policy: Looking Forward</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Hadley, Paul W. ; Arulanantham, Ravi ; Gandhi, Deepa</creator><creatorcontrib>Hadley, Paul W. ; Arulanantham, Ravi ; Gandhi, Deepa</creatorcontrib><description>California's regulatory agencies have historically been at the forefront of national efforts to address environmental concerns. In 2012, California's agency for addressing leaking underground fuel tanks (LUFTs) adopted a policy that identifies low‐threat conditions warranting closure of an LUFT case. That development clearly fulfills the role of risk management in the risk assessment–risk management paradigm inherent in environmental remediation. It also encourages identification of additional categories of sites and other circumstances that are “low threat” to develop similar guidance on closure to apply to those sites. ©2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-5658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6831</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rem.21421</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Categories ; Closures ; Ecological risk assessment ; Policies ; Regulatory agencies ; Remediation ; Risk assessment ; Risk management</subject><ispartof>Remediation (New York, N.Y.), 2015-03, Vol.25 (2), p.9-33</ispartof><rights>2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., a Wiley Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3611-40577d4cdeb0b3e7632075c9913f4351fbf55b8973ca8e070f503c5e0c1751f13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frem.21421$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frem.21421$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hadley, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arulanantham, Ravi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Deepa</creatorcontrib><title>California's Low-Threat LUFT Site Closure Policy: Looking Forward</title><title>Remediation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Remediation</addtitle><description>California's regulatory agencies have historically been at the forefront of national efforts to address environmental concerns. In 2012, California's agency for addressing leaking underground fuel tanks (LUFTs) adopted a policy that identifies low‐threat conditions warranting closure of an LUFT case. That development clearly fulfills the role of risk management in the risk assessment–risk management paradigm inherent in environmental remediation. It also encourages identification of additional categories of sites and other circumstances that are “low threat” to develop similar guidance on closure to apply to those sites. ©2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Categories</subject><subject>Closures</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Remediation</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><issn>1051-5658</issn><issn>1520-6831</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0EFPwjAYBuDFaCKiB__BEg_qYfB1bdfNG1kADRONgh6bUjotDIotBPn3FlEPJiamhzbp837J9wbBKYIGAoibVs0aMSIx2gtqiMYQJSlG-_4NFEU0oelhcOTcBAD5g2tBKxeVLo2da3HuwsKso8GrVWIZFsPOIHzUSxXmlXErq8J7U2m5ufLITPX8JewYuxZ2fBwclKJy6uTrrgfDTnuQX0fFXfcmbxWRxAlCEQHK2JjIsRrBCCuW4BgYlVmGcEkwReWopHSUZgxLkSpgUFLAkiqQiPlfhOvBxW7uwpq3lXJLPtNOqqoSc2VWjqOEsYwBIewfNEljGqeEenr2i07Mys79IltFYpoRmnl1uVPSGuesKvnC6pmwG46Ab3vnvnf-2bu3zZ1d60pt_ob8oX37nYh2Ce2W6v0nIeyUJwwzyp_7Xd7r4QEUT33exR_cv490</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Hadley, Paul W.</creator><creator>Arulanantham, Ravi</creator><creator>Gandhi, Deepa</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>California's Low-Threat LUFT Site Closure Policy: Looking Forward</title><author>Hadley, Paul W. ; Arulanantham, Ravi ; Gandhi, Deepa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3611-40577d4cdeb0b3e7632075c9913f4351fbf55b8973ca8e070f503c5e0c1751f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Categories</topic><topic>Closures</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Remediation</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hadley, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arulanantham, Ravi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Deepa</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Remediation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hadley, Paul W.</au><au>Arulanantham, Ravi</au><au>Gandhi, Deepa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>California's Low-Threat LUFT Site Closure Policy: Looking Forward</atitle><jtitle>Remediation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Remediation</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>9-33</pages><issn>1051-5658</issn><eissn>1520-6831</eissn><abstract>California's regulatory agencies have historically been at the forefront of national efforts to address environmental concerns. In 2012, California's agency for addressing leaking underground fuel tanks (LUFTs) adopted a policy that identifies low‐threat conditions warranting closure of an LUFT case. That development clearly fulfills the role of risk management in the risk assessment–risk management paradigm inherent in environmental remediation. It also encourages identification of additional categories of sites and other circumstances that are “low threat” to develop similar guidance on closure to apply to those sites. ©2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/rem.21421</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1051-5658 |
ispartof | Remediation (New York, N.Y.), 2015-03, Vol.25 (2), p.9-33 |
issn | 1051-5658 1520-6831 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677970447 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Categories Closures Ecological risk assessment Policies Regulatory agencies Remediation Risk assessment Risk management |
title | California's Low-Threat LUFT Site Closure Policy: Looking Forward |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A28%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=California's%20Low-Threat%20LUFT%20Site%20Closure%20Policy:%20Looking%20Forward&rft.jtitle=Remediation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Hadley,%20Paul%20W.&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=9-33&rft.issn=1051-5658&rft.eissn=1520-6831&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rem.21421&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1677970447%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1664259459&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |