Radiobiological Intercomparison of the 160 MeV and 230 MeV Proton Therapy Beams at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory and at Massachusetts General Hospital

The purpose of this study was to determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) along the axis of two range-modulated proton beams (160 and 230 MeV). Both the depth and the dose dependence of RBE were investigated. Chinese hamster V79-WNRE cells, suspended in medium containing gelatin and coo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiation research 2015-02, Vol.183 (2), p.174-187
Hauptverfasser: Wouters, Bradly G., Skarsgard, Lloyd D., Gerweck, Leo E., Carabe-Fernandez, Alejandro, Wong, Michelle, Durand, Ralph E., Nielson, Deanna, Bussiere, Marc R., Wagner, Miles, Biggs, Peter, Paganetti, Harald, Suit, Herman D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 187
container_issue 2
container_start_page 174
container_title Radiation research
container_volume 183
creator Wouters, Bradly G.
Skarsgard, Lloyd D.
Gerweck, Leo E.
Carabe-Fernandez, Alejandro
Wong, Michelle
Durand, Ralph E.
Nielson, Deanna
Bussiere, Marc R.
Wagner, Miles
Biggs, Peter
Paganetti, Harald
Suit, Herman D.
description The purpose of this study was to determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) along the axis of two range-modulated proton beams (160 and 230 MeV). Both the depth and the dose dependence of RBE were investigated. Chinese hamster V79-WNRE cells, suspended in medium containing gelatin and cooled to 2°C, were used to obtain complete survival curves at multiple positions throughout the entrance and 10 cm spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). Simultaneous measurements of the survival response to 60Co gamma rays served as the reference data for the proton RBE determinations. For both beams the RBE increased significantly with depth in the 10 cm SOBP, particularly in the distal half of the SOBP, then rose even more sharply at the distal edge, the most distal position measured. At a 4 Gy dose of gamma radiation (S = 0.34) the average RBE values for the entrance, proximal half, distal half and distal edge were 1.07 ± 0.01, 1.10 ± 0.01, 1.17 ± 0.01 and 1.21 ± 0.01, respectively, and essentially the same for both beams. At a 2 Gy dose of gamma radiation (S = 0.71) the average RBE values rose to 1.13 ± 0.03, 1.15 ± 0.02, 1.26 ± 0.02 and 1.30 ± 0.02, respectively, for the same four regions of the SOBP. The difference between the 4 Gy and 2 Gy RBE values reflects the dose dependence of RBE as measured in these V79-WNRE cells, which have a low α/β value, as do other widely used cell lines that also show dose-dependent RBE values. Late-responding tissues are also characterized by low α/β values, so it is possible that these cell lines may be predictive for the response of such tissues (e.g., spinal cord, optic nerve, kidney, liver, lung). However, in the very small number of studies of late-responding tissues performed to date there appears to be no evidence of an increased RBE for protons at low doses. Similarly, RBE measurements using early responding in vivo systems (mostly mouse jejunum, an early-responding tissue which has a large α/β ∼10 Gy) have generally shown little or no detectable dose dependence. It is useful to compare the RBE values reported here to the commonly used generic clinical RBE of 1.1, which assumes no dependence on depth or on dose. Our proximal RBEs obviously avoid the depth-related increase in RBE and for doses of 4 Gy or more, the low-dose increase in RBE is also minimized, as shown in this article. Thus the proximal RBE at a 4 Gy dose of 1.10 ± 0.01, quoted above, represents an interesting point of congruence with the clinical RBE for conditi
doi_str_mv 10.1667/RR13795.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677965344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24545473</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24545473</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-ad9ec612ee3f607a03b12bb7e6e62383e7db8bf1344f166d9dd910df86e965563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UGL1DAUB_AgijuuHvwASsCDeuiaNE3SHHXQnYVZlGH1Wl6bV6dD29QkFeaj-G3NbkcFDyI5NOn75V_6HiFPObvgSuk3ux0X2sgLfo-suBFlJgtW3CcrxoTItCz1GXkUwoGlM1fmITnLZXqpC74iP3ZgO1d3rndfuwZ6ejVG9I0bJvBdcCN1LY17pFwxeo1fKIyW5mLZf_IuJnGzRw_Tkb5DGAKFeOc34L-Dt3R9bHoXfWJbqJ2H6PzxLiS5awgBmv0cMMZAL3FMOT3duDB1EfrH5EELfcAnp-c5-fzh_c16k20_Xl6t326zWjIVM7AGG8VzRNEqpoGJmud1rVGhykUpUNu6rFsuiqJNzbLGWsOZbUuFRkmpxDl5teRO3n2bMcRq6EKDfQ8jujlUXGmdZLr_H1RqkbNc36a--Ise3OzH9CNJKcYLU-YmqdeLarwLwWNbTb4bwB8rzm6drk6jrXiyz0-Jcz2g_S1_zTKBZws4hNTlP_VCpqVFqr9c6mnabsR_fOonKiyznw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1660149829</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiobiological Intercomparison of the 160 MeV and 230 MeV Proton Therapy Beams at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory and at Massachusetts General Hospital</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Wouters, Bradly G. ; Skarsgard, Lloyd D. ; Gerweck, Leo E. ; Carabe-Fernandez, Alejandro ; Wong, Michelle ; Durand, Ralph E. ; Nielson, Deanna ; Bussiere, Marc R. ; Wagner, Miles ; Biggs, Peter ; Paganetti, Harald ; Suit, Herman D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wouters, Bradly G. ; Skarsgard, Lloyd D. ; Gerweck, Leo E. ; Carabe-Fernandez, Alejandro ; Wong, Michelle ; Durand, Ralph E. ; Nielson, Deanna ; Bussiere, Marc R. ; Wagner, Miles ; Biggs, Peter ; Paganetti, Harald ; Suit, Herman D.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) along the axis of two range-modulated proton beams (160 and 230 MeV). Both the depth and the dose dependence of RBE were investigated. Chinese hamster V79-WNRE cells, suspended in medium containing gelatin and cooled to 2°C, were used to obtain complete survival curves at multiple positions throughout the entrance and 10 cm spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). Simultaneous measurements of the survival response to 60Co gamma rays served as the reference data for the proton RBE determinations. For both beams the RBE increased significantly with depth in the 10 cm SOBP, particularly in the distal half of the SOBP, then rose even more sharply at the distal edge, the most distal position measured. At a 4 Gy dose of gamma radiation (S = 0.34) the average RBE values for the entrance, proximal half, distal half and distal edge were 1.07 ± 0.01, 1.10 ± 0.01, 1.17 ± 0.01 and 1.21 ± 0.01, respectively, and essentially the same for both beams. At a 2 Gy dose of gamma radiation (S = 0.71) the average RBE values rose to 1.13 ± 0.03, 1.15 ± 0.02, 1.26 ± 0.02 and 1.30 ± 0.02, respectively, for the same four regions of the SOBP. The difference between the 4 Gy and 2 Gy RBE values reflects the dose dependence of RBE as measured in these V79-WNRE cells, which have a low α/β value, as do other widely used cell lines that also show dose-dependent RBE values. Late-responding tissues are also characterized by low α/β values, so it is possible that these cell lines may be predictive for the response of such tissues (e.g., spinal cord, optic nerve, kidney, liver, lung). However, in the very small number of studies of late-responding tissues performed to date there appears to be no evidence of an increased RBE for protons at low doses. Similarly, RBE measurements using early responding in vivo systems (mostly mouse jejunum, an early-responding tissue which has a large α/β ∼10 Gy) have generally shown little or no detectable dose dependence. It is useful to compare the RBE values reported here to the commonly used generic clinical RBE of 1.1, which assumes no dependence on depth or on dose. Our proximal RBEs obviously avoid the depth-related increase in RBE and for doses of 4 Gy or more, the low-dose increase in RBE is also minimized, as shown in this article. Thus the proximal RBE at a 4 Gy dose of 1.10 ± 0.01, quoted above, represents an interesting point of congruence with the clinical RBE for conditions where it could reasonably be expected in the measurements reported here. The depth dependence of RBE reported here is consistent with the majority of measurements, both in vitro and in vivo, by other investigators. The dose dependence of RBE, on the other hand, is tissue specific but has not yet been demonstrated for protons by RBE values in late-responding normal tissue systems. This indicates a need for additional RBE determination as function of dose, especially in late-responding tissues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-7587</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5404</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1667/RR13795.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25587741</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Radiation Research Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Apoptosis - radiation effects ; Beams (radiation) ; Cell Line ; Cell Survival - radiation effects ; Cricetinae ; Cricetulus ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Entrances ; Gamma rays ; Hamsters ; Hospitals ; Laboratories ; Lung - cytology ; Lung - physiology ; Lung - radiation effects ; Position measurement ; Proton beams ; Protons - therapeutic use ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy, High-Energy - methods ; REGULAR ARTICLES ; Space life sciences ; Survival</subject><ispartof>Radiation research, 2015-02, Vol.183 (2), p.174-187</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 Radiation Research Society</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Feb 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-ad9ec612ee3f607a03b12bb7e6e62383e7db8bf1344f166d9dd910df86e965563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-ad9ec612ee3f607a03b12bb7e6e62383e7db8bf1344f166d9dd910df86e965563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24545473$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24545473$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25587741$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wouters, Bradly G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skarsgard, Lloyd D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerweck, Leo E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carabe-Fernandez, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durand, Ralph E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielson, Deanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bussiere, Marc R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Miles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biggs, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paganetti, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suit, Herman D.</creatorcontrib><title>Radiobiological Intercomparison of the 160 MeV and 230 MeV Proton Therapy Beams at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory and at Massachusetts General Hospital</title><title>Radiation research</title><addtitle>Radiat Res</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) along the axis of two range-modulated proton beams (160 and 230 MeV). Both the depth and the dose dependence of RBE were investigated. Chinese hamster V79-WNRE cells, suspended in medium containing gelatin and cooled to 2°C, were used to obtain complete survival curves at multiple positions throughout the entrance and 10 cm spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). Simultaneous measurements of the survival response to 60Co gamma rays served as the reference data for the proton RBE determinations. For both beams the RBE increased significantly with depth in the 10 cm SOBP, particularly in the distal half of the SOBP, then rose even more sharply at the distal edge, the most distal position measured. At a 4 Gy dose of gamma radiation (S = 0.34) the average RBE values for the entrance, proximal half, distal half and distal edge were 1.07 ± 0.01, 1.10 ± 0.01, 1.17 ± 0.01 and 1.21 ± 0.01, respectively, and essentially the same for both beams. At a 2 Gy dose of gamma radiation (S = 0.71) the average RBE values rose to 1.13 ± 0.03, 1.15 ± 0.02, 1.26 ± 0.02 and 1.30 ± 0.02, respectively, for the same four regions of the SOBP. The difference between the 4 Gy and 2 Gy RBE values reflects the dose dependence of RBE as measured in these V79-WNRE cells, which have a low α/β value, as do other widely used cell lines that also show dose-dependent RBE values. Late-responding tissues are also characterized by low α/β values, so it is possible that these cell lines may be predictive for the response of such tissues (e.g., spinal cord, optic nerve, kidney, liver, lung). However, in the very small number of studies of late-responding tissues performed to date there appears to be no evidence of an increased RBE for protons at low doses. Similarly, RBE measurements using early responding in vivo systems (mostly mouse jejunum, an early-responding tissue which has a large α/β ∼10 Gy) have generally shown little or no detectable dose dependence. It is useful to compare the RBE values reported here to the commonly used generic clinical RBE of 1.1, which assumes no dependence on depth or on dose. Our proximal RBEs obviously avoid the depth-related increase in RBE and for doses of 4 Gy or more, the low-dose increase in RBE is also minimized, as shown in this article. Thus the proximal RBE at a 4 Gy dose of 1.10 ± 0.01, quoted above, represents an interesting point of congruence with the clinical RBE for conditions where it could reasonably be expected in the measurements reported here. The depth dependence of RBE reported here is consistent with the majority of measurements, both in vitro and in vivo, by other investigators. The dose dependence of RBE, on the other hand, is tissue specific but has not yet been demonstrated for protons by RBE values in late-responding normal tissue systems. This indicates a need for additional RBE determination as function of dose, especially in late-responding tissues.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apoptosis - radiation effects</subject><subject>Beams (radiation)</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cell Survival - radiation effects</subject><subject>Cricetinae</subject><subject>Cricetulus</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Entrances</subject><subject>Gamma rays</subject><subject>Hamsters</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lung - cytology</subject><subject>Lung - physiology</subject><subject>Lung - radiation effects</subject><subject>Position measurement</subject><subject>Proton beams</subject><subject>Protons - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, High-Energy - methods</subject><subject>REGULAR ARTICLES</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>0033-7587</issn><issn>1938-5404</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0UGL1DAUB_AgijuuHvwASsCDeuiaNE3SHHXQnYVZlGH1Wl6bV6dD29QkFeaj-G3NbkcFDyI5NOn75V_6HiFPObvgSuk3ux0X2sgLfo-suBFlJgtW3CcrxoTItCz1GXkUwoGlM1fmITnLZXqpC74iP3ZgO1d3rndfuwZ6ejVG9I0bJvBdcCN1LY17pFwxeo1fKIyW5mLZf_IuJnGzRw_Tkb5DGAKFeOc34L-Dt3R9bHoXfWJbqJ2H6PzxLiS5awgBmv0cMMZAL3FMOT3duDB1EfrH5EELfcAnp-c5-fzh_c16k20_Xl6t326zWjIVM7AGG8VzRNEqpoGJmud1rVGhykUpUNu6rFsuiqJNzbLGWsOZbUuFRkmpxDl5teRO3n2bMcRq6EKDfQ8jujlUXGmdZLr_H1RqkbNc36a--Ise3OzH9CNJKcYLU-YmqdeLarwLwWNbTb4bwB8rzm6drk6jrXiyz0-Jcz2g_S1_zTKBZws4hNTlP_VCpqVFqr9c6mnabsR_fOonKiyznw</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Wouters, Bradly G.</creator><creator>Skarsgard, Lloyd D.</creator><creator>Gerweck, Leo E.</creator><creator>Carabe-Fernandez, Alejandro</creator><creator>Wong, Michelle</creator><creator>Durand, Ralph E.</creator><creator>Nielson, Deanna</creator><creator>Bussiere, Marc R.</creator><creator>Wagner, Miles</creator><creator>Biggs, Peter</creator><creator>Paganetti, Harald</creator><creator>Suit, Herman D.</creator><general>The Radiation Research Society</general><general>Radiation Research Society</general><general>Allen Press Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Radiobiological Intercomparison of the 160 MeV and 230 MeV Proton Therapy Beams at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory and at Massachusetts General Hospital</title><author>Wouters, Bradly G. ; Skarsgard, Lloyd D. ; Gerweck, Leo E. ; Carabe-Fernandez, Alejandro ; Wong, Michelle ; Durand, Ralph E. ; Nielson, Deanna ; Bussiere, Marc R. ; Wagner, Miles ; Biggs, Peter ; Paganetti, Harald ; Suit, Herman D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-ad9ec612ee3f607a03b12bb7e6e62383e7db8bf1344f166d9dd910df86e965563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apoptosis - radiation effects</topic><topic>Beams (radiation)</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cell Survival - radiation effects</topic><topic>Cricetinae</topic><topic>Cricetulus</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Entrances</topic><topic>Gamma rays</topic><topic>Hamsters</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lung - cytology</topic><topic>Lung - physiology</topic><topic>Lung - radiation effects</topic><topic>Position measurement</topic><topic>Proton beams</topic><topic>Protons - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, High-Energy - methods</topic><topic>REGULAR ARTICLES</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wouters, Bradly G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skarsgard, Lloyd D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerweck, Leo E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carabe-Fernandez, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durand, Ralph E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielson, Deanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bussiere, Marc R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Miles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biggs, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paganetti, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suit, Herman D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wouters, Bradly G.</au><au>Skarsgard, Lloyd D.</au><au>Gerweck, Leo E.</au><au>Carabe-Fernandez, Alejandro</au><au>Wong, Michelle</au><au>Durand, Ralph E.</au><au>Nielson, Deanna</au><au>Bussiere, Marc R.</au><au>Wagner, Miles</au><au>Biggs, Peter</au><au>Paganetti, Harald</au><au>Suit, Herman D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiobiological Intercomparison of the 160 MeV and 230 MeV Proton Therapy Beams at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory and at Massachusetts General Hospital</atitle><jtitle>Radiation research</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Res</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>183</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>174</spage><epage>187</epage><pages>174-187</pages><issn>0033-7587</issn><eissn>1938-5404</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) along the axis of two range-modulated proton beams (160 and 230 MeV). Both the depth and the dose dependence of RBE were investigated. Chinese hamster V79-WNRE cells, suspended in medium containing gelatin and cooled to 2°C, were used to obtain complete survival curves at multiple positions throughout the entrance and 10 cm spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). Simultaneous measurements of the survival response to 60Co gamma rays served as the reference data for the proton RBE determinations. For both beams the RBE increased significantly with depth in the 10 cm SOBP, particularly in the distal half of the SOBP, then rose even more sharply at the distal edge, the most distal position measured. At a 4 Gy dose of gamma radiation (S = 0.34) the average RBE values for the entrance, proximal half, distal half and distal edge were 1.07 ± 0.01, 1.10 ± 0.01, 1.17 ± 0.01 and 1.21 ± 0.01, respectively, and essentially the same for both beams. At a 2 Gy dose of gamma radiation (S = 0.71) the average RBE values rose to 1.13 ± 0.03, 1.15 ± 0.02, 1.26 ± 0.02 and 1.30 ± 0.02, respectively, for the same four regions of the SOBP. The difference between the 4 Gy and 2 Gy RBE values reflects the dose dependence of RBE as measured in these V79-WNRE cells, which have a low α/β value, as do other widely used cell lines that also show dose-dependent RBE values. Late-responding tissues are also characterized by low α/β values, so it is possible that these cell lines may be predictive for the response of such tissues (e.g., spinal cord, optic nerve, kidney, liver, lung). However, in the very small number of studies of late-responding tissues performed to date there appears to be no evidence of an increased RBE for protons at low doses. Similarly, RBE measurements using early responding in vivo systems (mostly mouse jejunum, an early-responding tissue which has a large α/β ∼10 Gy) have generally shown little or no detectable dose dependence. It is useful to compare the RBE values reported here to the commonly used generic clinical RBE of 1.1, which assumes no dependence on depth or on dose. Our proximal RBEs obviously avoid the depth-related increase in RBE and for doses of 4 Gy or more, the low-dose increase in RBE is also minimized, as shown in this article. Thus the proximal RBE at a 4 Gy dose of 1.10 ± 0.01, quoted above, represents an interesting point of congruence with the clinical RBE for conditions where it could reasonably be expected in the measurements reported here. The depth dependence of RBE reported here is consistent with the majority of measurements, both in vitro and in vivo, by other investigators. The dose dependence of RBE, on the other hand, is tissue specific but has not yet been demonstrated for protons by RBE values in late-responding normal tissue systems. This indicates a need for additional RBE determination as function of dose, especially in late-responding tissues.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Radiation Research Society</pub><pmid>25587741</pmid><doi>10.1667/RR13795.1</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-7587
ispartof Radiation research, 2015-02, Vol.183 (2), p.174-187
issn 0033-7587
1938-5404
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677965344
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE
subjects Animals
Apoptosis - radiation effects
Beams (radiation)
Cell Line
Cell Survival - radiation effects
Cricetinae
Cricetulus
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Entrances
Gamma rays
Hamsters
Hospitals
Laboratories
Lung - cytology
Lung - physiology
Lung - radiation effects
Position measurement
Proton beams
Protons - therapeutic use
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy, High-Energy - methods
REGULAR ARTICLES
Space life sciences
Survival
title Radiobiological Intercomparison of the 160 MeV and 230 MeV Proton Therapy Beams at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory and at Massachusetts General Hospital
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T13%3A27%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiobiological%20Intercomparison%20of%20the%20160%20MeV%20and%20230%20MeV%20Proton%20Therapy%20Beams%20at%20the%20Harvard%20Cyclotron%20Laboratory%20and%20at%20Massachusetts%20General%20Hospital&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20research&rft.au=Wouters,%20Bradly%20G.&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=183&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=174&rft.epage=187&rft.pages=174-187&rft.issn=0033-7587&rft.eissn=1938-5404&rft_id=info:doi/10.1667/RR13795.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24545473%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1660149829&rft_id=info:pmid/25587741&rft_jstor_id=24545473&rfr_iscdi=true